Spread the love

THE U.S. MILITARY COMMITS TREASON

The JAG Corps was founded by Gen. George Washington on July 29, 1775 and is the oldest "law firm" in the U.S.

Dear Editor:  The following letter was sent this evening in response to the ruling of Col. Denise R. Lind in the case of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who seeks to know whether or not Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief:

September 2, 2010

Adm. Michael Mullen
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
9999 Joint Staff Pentagon
Washington, DC  20318-9999

An open letter to Admiral Mullen:

Admiral Mullen, this is not the outcome expected from a military organization led by a champion of apolitical neutrality, a champion who has frequently stated his love of country, the Constitution and his obligation to the people of the United States of America.

In my opinion, Admiral, in the court of public opinion, the Army has been tried in this matter by its own hand and found guilty.  Guilty of political bias!  Guilty of misprision of felony! And guilty of conduct unbecoming members of the U.S. military.

I see no clear-cut demonstration of the political neutrality to which you frequently refer, but what I do see is the failure of a military system to live up to the oath sworn to protect the Constitution and to honor those who have fallen serving their country in defense of the principles of the Constitution, which has been dishonored right here and now in front of us all.  I also see the blatant failure of the senior military command to live up to its stated commitments and obligation to the people of these United States.

But by far, aside from the greatest injustice and disappointment over this clearly politically-motivated decision, I see a deeply-rooted conflicted paradox.

We go to great extremes to provide Col. Lakin, this undisputed, highly-decorated military warrior, with the finest weapons of destruction so that he may protect himself on the field of battle. But on the field of American justice we deprive him of the basic tools with which to protect his honor.

At this moment I am deeply ashamed of your conduct, Admiral Mullen.  I feel as though you have dishonored the corps, let down all of those who serve under your command, and misled me as well as the rest of the people of this country.

Please read this.

From an item previously posted:

Admiral Mullen, will you honor your oath and, along with Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, take the necessary steps to ensure that any and all orders from your “Commander-in-Chief” are, in fact, lawful orders from a Constitutionally-qualified and eligible person for that position, and, if not, also take the necessary steps to remove him from the chain of command? I and a desperately-awaiting nation are awaiting your response to this burning question:  Can any orders, Executive or Commands,  from an illegitimate Commander-in-Chief, be considered “Lawful Orders”?

There is more….

Even more…

Since it is apparent that the Army has no ability to effectively deal with such a political issue and the national security is at stake, it would seem urgent and essential that this matter be moved to a neutral, unbiased jurisdiction composed of disinterested public citizens, citizens convened as a citizens’ grand jury as guaranteed under the provisions of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, and a grand jury totally free of any influence or direction from a judicial system which has also proven itself incapable of administering constitutional ethical justice.

As I see the circumstances, only under these conditions can justice be served.  Anything less will constitute a violation of human and civil rights.

Arnie

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

68 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sk1951
Saturday, September 4, 2010 10:14 PM

“PROOF” of voter fraud. Why is this not making it to court? Make sure you read exibit 6 and 7
http://americangrandjury.org/public/

AuntieMadder
Reply to  sk1951
Sunday, September 5, 2010 3:46 AM

It started in the primaries.

This documentary is about the disenfranchising of American citizens by the Democratic Party and the Obama Campaign…Democrats have sent in their stories from all parts of America…We believe this infamous campaign of “change” from Chicago encouraged and created an army to steal caucus packets, falsify documents, change results, allow unregistered people to vote, scare and intimidate Hillary supporters, stalk them, threaten them, lock them out of their polling places, silence their voices and stop their right to vote…
http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/index.htm

Terence Brennan
Saturday, September 4, 2010 6:01 PM

If Obama were a natural born citizen, and if he were a man of honor, he would stand by LTC Lakin’s defense and voluntarily prove his eligibility to be Commander in Chief. He would pardon Lakin. He would apologize to the nation, and to this soldier for putting him in this terrible position.

Instead Obama daily proves himself to be a coward and self-serving fake.

This so-called “Commander in Chief” would rather send his honorable soldier to prison for doubting him.

sk1951
Reply to  Terence Brennan
Saturday, September 4, 2010 10:15 PM

Honor? He uses the courts to sue states that are trying to protect themselves from invation.

AuntieMadder
Reply to  Terence Brennan
Sunday, September 5, 2010 3:28 AM

“If Obama were… a man of honor…” You’re too funny, Terence Brennan. And if frogs had wings…

NeilBJ
Saturday, September 4, 2010 12:53 PM

What makes me very uneasy, and I am not one who likes to advocate conspiracy theories, is the fact that without fail, everyone in a position to consider Obama’s Constitutional eligibility has found a way to avoid the issue.

What is even more troublesome are the inane and childish reasons that judges have used to dismiss the legal challenges.

His eligibility has been twittered on the Internet.

It would be an embarrasement to Obama to have his records revealed.

The voters have determined he is eligible by their vote.

I am counting on the last best hope for resolving this issue, and that is the citizens in every state challenging his placement on the ballot in the 2012 elections.

Chance
Reply to  NeilBJ
Saturday, September 4, 2010 1:48 PM

Yes. And we must also keep Hilliary Clinton off the ballots. She is also a Marxist and proudly carried her communist card way back in the 80’s.

Bob1943
Reply to  NeilBJ
Saturday, September 4, 2010 2:21 PM

Yep, something so obvious as Obama’s eligibility problems, several them actually, are spoken not at all by the lame stream media, including Fox, and talked about not at all by virtually all, if not all, of Congress.
It’s as if they all know the only way to protect Obama from the hazard that would end his fake presidency is to speak of it not all…..too pretend it doesn’t exist.

The Constitution, the rule of law, transparency, common sense and personal integrity all are tossed aside to protect the usurper president.

Do they all believe that they are doing the right thing?

Is it fear, or is it that they agree with the Obama regime, and are willing to do anything to keep the dismantling of America and the ignoring of her Constitution in progress?

Waiting over 2 more years to maybe vote out someone who has no Constitutional right to be president seems like a bad option. We must keep up the pressure. We have the truth on our side….do not give up.

sk1951
Reply to  NeilBJ
Saturday, September 4, 2010 10:17 PM

Found a way? It is called usurpation by the courts. It is illegal what they are doing. Their claim is that NO ONE has standing. What a load of….

HighlanderJuan
Reply to  NeilBJ
Sunday, September 5, 2010 6:12 AM

@NeilBJ – there are strong and believable indications of widespread election fraud at both the national level and at the precinct level.

Too many votes were cast:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23495809/Jon-Christian-Ryter-Forgot-the-Past-Here-apos-s-the-Future

Fraud at the precinct level:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34325799/Fred-Dardick-Two-Articles

So, you see, the people may not have truly elected Obama in 2008 by their votes.

Regarding eligibility, as long as Obama’s father was a British subject, he will never qualify as a natural born citizen, and therefore will never be eligible to be POTUS, regardless of the people’s votes.

A pen
Saturday, September 4, 2010 8:47 AM

The Supreme Court;

“The characteristics of a “totalitarian dictatorship,” as set forth in subsections (2) and (3) are the existence of a single, dictatorial political party substantially identified with the government of the country in which it exists, the suppression of all opposition to the party in power, the subordination of the rights of the individual to the state, and the denial of fundamental rights and liberties characteristic of a representative form of government.”

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=367&invol=1

enoughalready
Saturday, September 4, 2010 7:29 AM

This is disgusting. “Equal” justice for all…what a load of crap. You can’t get “justice” because one party might get ’embarrassed’. The fact that she would say that this was a congressional issue…Congress is elected by WE THE PEOPLE…we all have standing!!! Every judge who has thrown these cases out needs to be thrown out. This man is being denied due process and the right to defend himself. The Army should be defending him. What happened to their code of “leaving no man behind?”–they’ve abandoned Lakin. Obama is a usurper.

thistle
Friday, September 3, 2010 11:10 PM

Arnie….another great letter and another ‘Thank You!’ from my household. I (almost) had hope for Adm. Mullen when he came out last week and said that this national deficit was one of the worst things for our national security (my thoughts were, “has he finally awakened???”) but other than that, we have heard next to nothing from him or the others. It’s so hard to know where our Joint Chiefs of Staff really stand. Are they 100% behind Obama or are they keeping their thoughts hidden and just following orders? The silence on LTC Lakin kinda tells its own story I guess. I’m still in shock & extremely saddened over the ruling of Judge Lind. Thanks for another great letter Mr. Rosner.

Friday, September 3, 2010 11:01 PM

McCain will never get involved, he was not eligible to be POTUS either. He was born in a hospital in Panama, not on a military base in the Canal Zone. Google michiganlawreview.org/assets/fi/107/mccain.pdf

One option may to be to sue Obama and the publisher of Obama’s two books, “Dreams From My Father” and “Audacity of Hope” for fraud. Just Google James Frye, “A Million Little Pieces,”
to find out what happens to big fat liars that sell books.

Another avenue may be to figure out a way to sue Factcheck and Snopes for misleading the public, although I am not sure what laws would apply. Consumer fraud, influencing the outcome of an election, false advertisement…who knows.

Further options may be to use the HI UIPA. I believe that the “vexatious requester” law is discriminatory, harassing and unconstitutional. There must be some HI statutes that applies.

I do not think the cases currently in the Court system or the USMJ will be fruitful. We need a solid plan “B.” God bless everyone that is fighting hard and I pray for Ltc. Lakin, but I believe HE needs a better defense. Check out the latest article on the BirtherReport.com to see some recommendations.

Al Tallant
Reply to  JeanWTPUSA
Saturday, September 4, 2010 11:24 AM

I agree with your idea of suing the book publishers-this would be another avenue that has not been tried. I aslso agree that Obama seemss to- so far- have the upper hand in lying to everyone.
However, to correct one point, while I am not a big fan, of McCain’s, he did produce an authentic birth certificate at the same time Obama refused to do so. McCain is legitimate since both of his parents are U.S. citizens-UNLIKE OBAMA!

NeilBJ
Reply to  JeanWTPUSA
Saturday, September 4, 2010 12:39 PM

I read this far in the McCain ariticle and quit.

“Those born in the United States are uncontroversially natural born citizens.”

That is exactly the controversy, whether mere birth on U.S. soil, independent of the status of the parents, makes one a natural born citizen.

Yaser Hamdi, born on U.S. soil to Saudi parents and who later joined the Taliban, would technically be eligible for President (assuming he would also be able to meet the age and residency requirments). I don’t think this is what the Founding Fathers had in mind.

sk1951
Reply to  JeanWTPUSA
Saturday, September 4, 2010 10:18 PM

He was validated.

Bob1943
Friday, September 3, 2010 9:54 PM

This guy has Glenn Beck pegged just right. Give this a look and listen, you’ll like it:

http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=9648

sk1951
Reply to  Bob1943
Saturday, September 4, 2010 10:19 PM

He is funny but ya…I like it.

James
Friday, September 3, 2010 9:30 PM

Does anyone have Denise R. Lind contact information: Email, phone, and mailing?

MRR
Friday, September 3, 2010 9:29 PM

Bob is right. McCain is hiding and he is part of the fraud in the first place. Also I hope that nobody forgets who is responsible for the fact that he was re-elected to the Senate. Palin.

Joe The Blogger
Friday, September 3, 2010 5:55 PM

Who appointed Col. Denise R. Lind to cover-up for Obama?

If you follow this back, up the chain of command, you will eventually get back to The Usurper-in-Chief. All of the links in this corrupt chain must be exposed.

Kathy
Friday, September 3, 2010 5:25 PM

Someone needs to get a hold of McCain (a so-called hero) and pin him against the wall. He is disgraceful if he does not force Congress to investigate Obama’s eligibility. What kind of a soldier is he if he lets Lakin go down for standing up for our Constitution, military men and all of us? He is no hero, he is a disgrace if he allows this to stand. He was forced to show his BC; no one has a better opportunity to get the discovery necessary than John McCain.

Bob1943
Reply to  Kathy
Friday, September 3, 2010 6:17 PM

Your idea is good, but, I think the chances of Obama just fessing up are greater than the chances of getting McCain to do anything on this.

Bob
Reply to  Kathy
Friday, September 3, 2010 7:41 PM

RIGHT ON Kathy !!! McCain is gutless and hiding – what a disgrace is right. I tries this before, see Bob says: Thursday, August 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM

Nobody in Government is listening, and are all co-conspirators. It will take another civil war to get us back on track.

Al Tallant
Reply to  Kathy
Saturday, September 4, 2010 11:30 AM

Unfortunately, McCain belongs to the Bilederberg Group, so he is one of many-like Clinton;s, Geitner, Soros, and many others who are behind the push for “ONE WOLRD GOVERNMENT”

Don Butcher (CSM)(USA Ret)
Friday, September 3, 2010 4:51 PM

This government is the most cowardly, spineless, irresponsible bunch of
people ever assembled. They know nothing, see nothing, or suspect anything thats taking place around them. The only ones who know anything is Obama and his cohorts. Everyone seems to be under a spell (brain-washed) and wait to do what they are told. I hope and pray that some one will come to their senses and realize the seriousness this country is in. I con-
gratulate Arnie on his great articles informing lots of us on this situation
facing our nation.

Chance
Friday, September 3, 2010 1:28 PM

I was so mad I fired off a hasty letter to Mullen for allowing this. The others will get theirs:

September 3, 2010
Adm. Michael Mullen
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
9999 Joint Staff Pentagon
Washington, DC 20318-9999
Dear Admiral Mullen:
Well congratulations. You have single handedly destroyed our Constitution by not allowing discovery for LT. Col. Lakin. Not only that, by your actions, you have confirmed that Obama is a fraud. This is no ordinary trial and the circumstances are not ordinary. We have never before had a fraud in the White House. You know it and we know it. It HAS reached critical mass.
The fact that Obama’s father was Kenyan and has dual citizenships disqualifies Obama from being Commander in Chief. And – if his father turns out to be an American, Obama is still a fraud. His Selective Service card is a fraud and his social security numbers, (all 39 of them) prove it. Can you say racketeering? Right now he is using a social security number different from the number he used as senator.
We also know Pelosi committed fraud and treason by certifying twice that Obama was eligible for POTUS. He will never be OUR president. Never!
You should have long ago taken Obama from the White House in handcuffs. He is not an American and he shows that every day. Too bad if he is embarrassed. He knew what he was doing was wrong and so did you. You are all guilty of misprision and treason!
I keep hearing there will be rioting in the streets if he is removed. I don’t hear about the rioting if he is not removed! If there is blood, it will be on YOUR hands.
Please honor your country and do the right thing by removing Obama and his cohorts.
I certainly hope you will reconsider this disgraceful act of not allowing discovery for LT. Col. Lakin (and other military) and the citizens of this country. Indeed, you will suffer the consequences of the wrath of the people by not doing so. You have treated Gitmo prisioners better than our own military. Disgraceful!
As far as we are concerned, Lt. Col. Lakin is the only one doing his duty by not following Unlawful orders.
Sincerely,

jetstream
Friday, September 3, 2010 1:25 PM

I think it’s now clear that the military KNOWS Obama is ineligible and they are actively participating in the usurpation. The judge has made a “determination of fact” that Obama is ineligible when she states that the evidence would be “embarrassing” and impeachment should be handled by Congress.

All branches of the government are acting in concert to override the Constitution! Another example is the Arizona case which was filed by Holder in federal district court rather than the Supreme Court under an unconstitutional approval of concurrent jurisdiction endorsed by Congress for many years. This Article III case can ONLY be heard by the Supreme Court according to the Constitution. Read more here.

I think HighlanderJuan is right. It’s now up to the States to demand federal compliance with the Constitution. Otherwise, the final word on the future of this country will be heard from We the People.

Ben Dover
Friday, September 3, 2010 1:09 PM

Lind should be impeached from the bench. Since she’s not a civilian, hopefully someday her gutless dereliction in this matter will lead to HER court-martial. Then Leavenworth.

Lakin, on the other hand, will be remembered by history as the true patriot that he is.

This is not just about a birth certificate. It is about the most severe crime in the history of the Presidency. BHO admits that his father was a joint Kenyan/British subject; by definition, this means that Barry CAN NOT be a “natural born citizen” as defined by law (the child of two native-born parents) in order to be POTUS. Additionally, he “gave up” any U.S. citizenship (which he may not have had anyway) when he was adopted by Soetoro and officially (as recorded) recieved Indonesian citizenship. Obunghole is a joint Kenyan/British/Indonesian citizen. This is FACT. He holds his office illegally, and is more than apparent that he’s seeking to do as much damage as possibly to our national stability–in EVERY area–because he knows his time is running out.
Let us not forget that his right-wing, white-supremacist, black-hating, tea-partying, conspiracy-nut Birther GRANDMOTHER, a KENYAN of AFRICAN DESCENT, stated PUBLICLY THAT HE WAS BORN IN KENYA. Crazy old racist bat, right? Says she was “in the room when he was born,” and she’s “so proud to see a Kenyan as President of the United States.” Yep, RECORDED. She SAID IT.

Just a LIAR, right? Proud of her grandson? No, of course not. She just wants to join the birther/tea-party right-wing-extremist racist crowd, right?

Time for all the DOLTS out there to WAKE THE HELL UP. IMPEACH THE BASTARD.

Harry H
Friday, September 3, 2010 12:28 PM

Judge Denise Lind apparently thinks she took an oath to protect the alleged president from embarrassment! How does such midget mentality make it onto a judge’s bench? And how can she propound such imbecilic nonsense with a straight face? Not embarrass a lying, usurping, foreign imposter posing as Commander-in-Chief? Why does the Wizard of Ozbamia deserve such an obviously contrived pass, because he is half-black, maybe? Black Privilege, maybe?

jtx
Friday, September 3, 2010 11:13 AM

Another fine letter, Arnie – TYVM and keep up the good work.

Col. Lind’s “decision” in the Sep. 2 “hearing” is pathetic at best. Firstly, it was not a hearing at all in the normal courtroom sense since the “good Col.” obviously already had her decicision printed and ready before the 1100 kangaroo court (and that’s clearly what it has shown itself to be) convened.

At 1100 the court listened to presentations from both sides – but not for too long – and Col. Lind then “took a long lunch break to finalize her decision and findings”.

WHAT?!?!?!?!!! A “long lunch break to finalize her decision (meaning it was already ready) whieh decision took 40 minuted to read. Who is trying to bamboozle who here since a “40 minutes of reading” could not possibly be prepared with cites and authorities, etc. during a “long lunch break”. What BS!!

LTC Lakin is clearly being railroaded and is receiving no “hearing” or “court consideration” at all. Why do these pissants work so assiduously to protect a man who has never shown himself to be eligible to hold the office he now occupies???

Does not the idea of misprison of felony apply to members of the military?? Did they learn nothing from the Nuremberg Trials???

meeko
Friday, September 3, 2010 10:55 AM

EMBARRASSMENT

“Embarrass” is derived from the French, where embarrasser means to “block” or “obstruct.” Thus, the first meaning in the OED, going back to 1683 is “to encumber, hamper, impede (movements, actions, persons moving or acting). “The Character of Ambassador, which would delay or embarrass me with Preparations of Equipage.” Or, from 1734, “Hannibal..ran to the assistance of his troops, who were thus embarrassed.” One might also say, in 19th century form, that the contours of the country would embarrass the enemy to a considerable degree. This doesn’t mean that it would make them feel ashamed of themselves; it suggests, rather that it would set up a road block, an impediment, a hindrance, a difficulty.

12thGenerationAMERICAN
Friday, September 3, 2010 10:54 AM

“What would happen if a sovereign state governor or legislature declared that, since the Democrat Party and president elect had not shown Obama to be lawfully eligible for the office, and that fraud had been committed against the people of the state, that the state would require a new election of POTUS, and that the Democratic Party would NOT be allowed to offer a candidate in the election in that state because of the election fraud perpetrated by the party on the state?………….What would happen if one or more states recognized and restored their own individual state sovereignty, developed the necessary set of brass cajones, and actually confronted the unlawful actions being performed by the federal government?”

If you could find ONE brass cojone, much les a set, in the entire 50 states governments, I would be pleasantly surprised. Once they get elected, they seem to be automatically neutered?!?!?

2discern
Reply to  12thGenerationAMERICAN
Friday, September 3, 2010 6:26 PM

At this point my guess would be Arizona. The logical choice. Even though the stress caused a senior moment on camera, no worries she (Gov. Brewer) has the guts to do what is right and tell barry soetero stay away from my state with your power grabs.

Friday, September 3, 2010 9:29 AM

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=198465 I guess the Judge in this trial telling the Col to “find” a new defense has abrogated his oath to uphold the Constitution. An officer has swears an oath to the Constitution “not the president” Contrast with the enlisted personnel who take an uphold to do both. This judge must be removed. He had demonstrated his failure to protect the Constitution.

Reply to  Jim Campbell
Friday, September 3, 2010 6:29 PM

Jim, I think the enlisted person is obligated to obey only “lawful” orders – s/he does not take an oath to obey the president.

Yes, the officer’s oath is expressly to The Constitution alone – and the officer swears or affirms to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC. “Domestic enemies” could include the president. The current president is an enemy of the Constitution. Can anyone contradict this? DO IT, IF YOU CAN!

If the JAG judge indeed ruled as reported herein, she disgraced herself, and violated her Oath of Office. Coward. Oath breaker. Her Oath is to defend the Constitution from its domestic (and foreign) enemies, not to protect the president from “embarrassment”. That judge has an INDEPENDENT DUTY TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION FROM PRETENDED PRESIDENTS who seek to destroy it and our Country. She may not properly shove that duty over to Congress. Otherwise, what is the purpose of her Oath? Is her Oath to defend the Constitution herself or is it to say, “Let Congress do it”?

RacerJim
Friday, September 3, 2010 9:24 AM

First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—
because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me—
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

History ignored is history repeated!

Chance
Friday, September 3, 2010 9:18 AM

By Lind’s and Mullen actions, they have proved to the world that Obama is a usurper! I just wrote and told them so! I am sending it returned receipt and restricted! and sending to all Chiefs of Staff and media.

Tom the veteran
Friday, September 3, 2010 9:12 AM

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”
John F. Kennedy

Impeachtheboob
Friday, September 3, 2010 9:06 AM

I give you the words of my father…a Korean war vet.

Every year or so I dust off this quote and remind myself that what we see going on around us was recognized and commented on eloquently over the years.

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”
— French economist, statesman and author Frederic Bastiast (1801-1850)