by Michael Bresciani, New American Prophet, ©2023

(Aug. 23, 2023) — Without doubt, someone on Fox will, during the first debate, bring up the fact that Ramaswamy took scholarship money from the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowship to attend Yale Law School. Also the $90K used to attend Yale was granted in the same year Vivek made $2.2 million according to his tax returns. While Fox now is showing favoritism for Vivek, it was Fox that first reported this fact.
3 Serious Reasons Not to Choose Vivek
First Reason
Some Evangelical Christians are leaning toward Vivek’s candidacy, which for many Christians only lends credence to the fact that Christianity is plunging into apostasy.
Vivek is a practicing Hindu.
Ramaswamy has the right to choose any religion he prefers, but that takes away nothing from the severe warning given by Christ.
“Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (Jn 14:6)
Vivek wants the Christians to overlook the polytheism of Hinduism which is breaking the very first and most important commandment of the Ten Commandments. He cites the “commonalities” of Hinduism and Christianity.
The worship of other gods is idolatry, first because there are no other Gods and second because we have been commanded not to worship any other deity.
“See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me” (Dt 32:39a)
We cannot raise a defence on the day of judgment, based on similarities.
The truth is, that nothing in any world religion compares to the sacrifice made on the cross to cover the sins of men.
If Vivek cannot see that difference, he would surely not see the right way to lead our nation.
Second Reason
Ramaswamy has publicly stated that he thinks all foreign aid should be suspended for Israel by 2028, which is the year the $3.8 billion annual aid package to Israel ends.
The decision to end aid to Israel runs contrary to every doctrine of Scripture. Christians are called to aid and support Israel throughout all time. Even though they are still in unbelief and are rejecting the gospel to this day, the day of their national conversion is near. Our support will help to bring that about.
Far more important is the fact that the U.S. is running out of reasons for God to withhold his protection for America. We are taking a headlong plunge into perversity under the guise of diversity. We have supplanted the full knowledge of our iniquities with an unknown quantity now commonly referred to as equity.
We are virtually and literally offering up our children to the demons that now engineer the new trans movement, and after all this, do we think it’s time to have a moratorium on aid for Israel?
There is a fixed meaning to the verse below, that even a child could not miss.
“And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.” (Ge 12:2-3)
Third Reason
Vivek Ramaswamy has never held a public office and is a young man who is without political background. He has never faced the enemies and resistance like Trump or DeSantis or many of the other GOP candidates that are on the campaign trail today.
He is floating somewhere between the 30-year-old limit for a Pharisee to start a public ministry, and the sixty year old requirement to become a judge at the gates of the city in ancient Israel.
In modern terms – he is an upstart.
Yes, some of his exuberance and strong stands against wokeism are truly inspiring, but that does not answer the big question.
Could he lead, inspire, and ultimately defend our nation in these troubled days?
In the light of the aforementioned the only answer can be – no!
Michael Bresciani
Photo: India Today
To read more articles by Michael Bresciani click here.

From Joseph DeMaio:
——————————-
Regarding Vivek Ramaswamy’s “eligibility issue,” there is another website where a series of interesting exchanges took place recently. If one is a “VIP” subscriber at “Townhall.com,” one can review the sometimes terse exchanges between one “Tinsldr2” and one “anon-ziev.” The former commenter supports the “common law” theory that Ramaswamy is constitutionally eligible simply because he was born here regardless of his parents’ non-U.S. citizenship. The other commenter advocates for a “de Vattel” definition of “natural born citizen,” requiring birth here to two U.S. citizen parents.
The exchanges are revealing and underscore how deep the divide remains between the two “eligibility” camps.
Why is Vivek Ramaswamy being Constitutionally ineligible not listed as a reason to NOT vote for him?
http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/Vivek-Ramaswamy-Not-a-Natural-Born-Citizen-of-USA-2023-07-01.pdf
Add the below reason for not chusing (sic) V’vek to win, place, or show in the 2024 general election and place it in any order in reference to this article’s other three reasons in order to satisfy each reader’s technical, legal, or political agenda:
Both V’vek and Nikki Haley were born with dual national loyalties – India [parents (blood)] and U.S.A. [native (soil)]; therefore, both are not natural born Citizens. Their parents were not subject to the COMPLETE “jurisdiction thereof” while in the U.S.A. even if they were here legally as non-U.S. citizens (my opinion). The Founding Framers of the U.S. Constitution ruled out dual loyalties when they added/included the natural born Citizen provision into Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
Birth alone on U.S. soil does not make one a natural born Citizen, obfuscated by many as “citizen at birth”. Besides, the only mention of “natural born Citizen” in any current legal documents is in Article II and certainly not found in the 14th Amendment. Both parents must be U.S. citizens at the time of an individual’s birth on U.S. soil (50 States or Washington, D.C.) in order to be a natural born Citizen. Additionally, many people wrongly interpret the 14th Amendment’s automatic citizenship clause, but that is another topic that still needs to be resolved (also my opinion).
Obama, Harris, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and McCain were all unqualified Article II candidates and are nothing more than STATUTORY (by law) U.S. citizens. A natural born Citizen is a citizen by the law of nature – the natural act of being born in the country to two citizen parents of that country.
V’vek needs to ‘fess up’ and disclose the status of his parents citizenship (Indian or U.S.A.) at the time of his birth on U.S.A. soil with documented proof before continuing his hoodwinking exercise.
“Judge by what they do, not upon what they say.”
The truth of the matter is, if Swamy was a Patriot, he wouldn’t be running against Trump, he’d be campaigning for Trump.
End of story.
Professor ‘Trash the masks’ Zorkophsky
I love your reply, I rather wish I could have included it in the article.
High praise indeed; thank you.
Professor ‘Trash the masks’ Zorkophsky