Will mRNA Enter the Food Supply?

by Sharon Rondeau

(Apr. 8, 2023) — On Friday Attorney Thomas Renz was a guest on “War Room” discussing side effects of mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” and the recently-emerging concern of mRNA entering the food supply.

An early discoverer of mRNA potential therapy, Dr. Robert W. Malone, MD, has described the modality as “gene therapy” and not a traditional “vaccine,” a claim pounced upon by the mainstream media.

At the 5:00 mark, War Room cohost and Executive Editor Natalie Winters brought Renz into the conversation, at which time he described himself as a “pro-vax guy” who objected to mandated “lockdowns.”

At the beginning of the pandemic, Renz said, he was working on a Master’s degree in “Health Science” which enabled him to determine, he said, that “everything they had said was a lie,” referring to public health authorities and the coronavirus.

A “leaked FDA investigation” prior to the availability of the mRNA shots purportedly to prevent COVID-19 in December 2020, he said, demonstrated that the FDA expected serious side effects from the injections yet pushed them on the public without disclosing the risks.

Renz said he “dug” into the issue and came to disbelieve all information coming from then-NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and government agencies in general.

Just after the 8:00 mark, Winter asked Renz about documents he obtained from the National Institutes of Health “from the early 2000s” containing a “five-step plan to embed what is mRNA technology…as gene therapy into the food supply.”

Renz agreed mRNA is a “gene therapy” and that “Moderna has admitted it in their SEC filings, and so has Pfizer.” “There’s never been a question; the manufacturers have admitted it,” he said.

Among a number of lawsuits stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic, Renz is supporting House Bill 1169 in Missouri, which if passed would mandate disclosure of the presence of a “gene therapy product” in food, cosmetics or other consumables.

On the bill, Renz said, “We got a tip…it looks like we’re going to get some negotiating done on this now…it essentially requires that you disclose if any product has a gene therapy quality; it requires that you talk about how those gene therapy aspects could be transmitted to other people; and it requires full informed consent before someone gives you a medical intervention or gene therapy.”

“We’re getting massive opposition to informed consent,” Renz then told Winter incredulously.

“It turns out that Big Pharma, through the egg lobbyists, were opposing this massively, and the reason that they’re doing it…I’ve actually found documents going back to the mid-’90s where they’re talked about integrating vaccines into foods.”

“We got word from the pork and cattle lobbyists…that they were planning on using mRNA gene therapies, like, in the immediate future.”

He then said he discovered Merck produces a “product called ‘Sequivity‘” which “harnesses mRNA particle technology to create customized prescription vaccines in swine.”

“Combat current and future swine diseases with SEQUIVITY from Merck Animal Health,” the Merck website reads. “A revolutionary swine vaccine platform, SEQUIVITY harnesses RNA particle technology to create customized prescription vaccines against strains of influenza A virus in swine, porcine circovirus (PCV), rotavirus and beyond. It’s supported by a sophisticated dashboard filled with comprehensive data and insights, all to help you stay on top.”

Also on Friday, epidemiologist, cardiologist and internist Dr. Peter A. McCullough reported a published scientific paper detailing a study performed in China in which mRNA was given to mice through milk and found to have produced an immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19.

During his interview with Winters, Renz referred to McCullough’s post, which begins, “The nation’s food supply can be manipulated by public health agencies to influence population outcomes. A great is example is fortification of cereal grains with folic acid — the synthetic form of folate — which successfully reduced the incidence of neural tube defects (e.g. spina bifida). Now an oral route of administration is being considered specifically for COVID-19 vaccination using mRNA in cow’s milk.”

“From a scientific perspective,” McCullough expounded, “these experimental steps taken by the Chinese were a stunning success. However, given the damage mRNA vaccines have generated in terms of injuries, disabilities, and deaths, these data raise considerable ethical issues. The COVID States project has shown that 25% of Americans were successful in remaining unvaccinated. This group would have strong objections to mRNA in the food supply, particularly if it was done surreptitiously or with minimal labelling/warnings. Children could be targeted with easily administered oral vaccine dosing or potentially get mRNA through milk at school lunches and other unsupervised meals.”

He then went further, writing, “For those who have taken one of the COVID-19 vaccines, having milk vaccines as an EUA offering would allow even more loading of the body with synthetic mRNA which has been proven resistant to ribonucleases and may reside permanently in the human body.”

In 2006, Dr. Andrew Weil reported on the subject of “hormones” in animals raised for human consumption:

…the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) does not permit the use of hormones in raising hogs or chickens, turkeys and other fowl. That is why the USDA does not allow the use of the term “no hormones added” on labels of pork or poultry products unless it is followed by a statement explaining that “Federal regulations prohibit the use of hormones.”

Hormones are still used as growth promoters in cattle and sheep. It’s estimated that two-thirds of the cattle raised in the U.S. are given hormones (usually testosterone or estrogens) to boost growth. Producers of beef and lamb may use the term “no hormones administered” on labels after satisfying the USDA that hormones were not used in raising the animals. If you eat beef or lamb, I urge you to look for such products.

Last week, while repeating some of the same information, Weil reported:

…Currently cattle and sheep are the only animals allowed to have growth hormones added. The USDA does not permit the use of hormones in hogs; chickens, turkeys and other fowl; or in venison.

…It is even better to source meat from local sources that raise the animals using natural, organic methods – for example, seek out 100% grass-fed beef. It’s less likely hormones are used in small, local farms that are committed to quality. It is always a win if you can meet with the farmer and discuss raising practices. If they are currently using hormones, your interest may get them thinking otherwise.

On April 2, Renz interviewed with “Daily Clout” founder and author Dr. Naomi Wolf, who he told, “[Bill] Gates, the WHO [World Health Organization], a ton of these universities: they’re all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They’re gonna modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines.”

On March 22, McCullough celebrated that “a healthy minority” of Americans have refused to take the COVID “vaccines” at a rate he said is much higher than that which the CDC has reported. “These findings give new hope to the unvaccinated that they are not alone in holding strong against the adverse safety profile of the COVID-19 vaccines and standing up for the preservation of good health and right to decide what is injected into their bodies,” McCullough wrote.

The conclusion of Renz’s interview with Winters depicts clips of Gates, Fauci and others predicting “the next pandemic” with confidence.