If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Sharon Rondeau, h/t Jeff Harrison

Mark Steyn, 2014, Wikimedia Commons, CC by 2.0

(Sep. 8, 2020) — Approximately 16 minutes in to the first hour of the Rush Limbaugh Show on Tuesday, guest host Mark Steyn opined that “everything now in America” is viewed through “a racial prism” as significant geopolitical issues such as the rise of China are overlooked.

The segment followed the first break in the first hour.  Invoking the work of Victor Davis Hanson, Steyn said he differed from Hanson, who reportedly expressed his belief that “race would eventually become irrelevant” in the U.S. as societal morés changed.

As an example, he recalled meeting a young woman at Hillsdale College who he described as “striking” and “beautiful” who said she was of Slovenian and Filipino descent.  “You only get that in America; that would not be possible without the United–.  Where else would a Slovene meet someone from the Philippines?”

“Now that black lives matter, people define themselves as black in circumstances where they ought to actually be thinking of themselves, as Victor said, in post-racial terms,” Steyn said.  “It’s always frightening to me at election season, because it’s become a tradition now in America for Joe Biden to run with a British subject.  He ran with — last time ran with Barack Obama, who’s a Kenyan — who’s a son of a Kenyan subject of Her Majesty; born in colonial Kenya, a British subject; and now he’s running with the child of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, Kamala Harris, and so that’s simply this season’s British subject.  So it’s almost like the Revolution never happened. It’s like the early presidents, who also were children of British subjects, and African-Americans just get totally cut out of this thing.”

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Email to White House and DOJ today:


    TO: John Durham, DOJ
    TO: Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch

    It is BAD to commit crimes, it is WORSE to cover-up those crimes, yet, the WORST crime of all is REFUSING TO PROSECUTE THOSE CRIMES!
    EXHIBIT A: https://conservapedia.com/Obamagate_timeline_2009-2014

    STREET looters tear down Founding Father statues, ELITE looters tear down Founding Father statutes.
    EXHIBIT A: “natural born Citizen” (nbC) statute of 1787 Constitution torn down by The Pelosi-Biden-Soros’ Soetoros on 08-28-08 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXFwqUi3zR0&feature=youtu.be
    EXHIBIT B: https://www.thepostemail.com/2020/09/08/mark-steyn-obama-kenyan-son-of-a-kenyan/

    PROSECUTE nbC-FRAUD 2020: Obama II+Biden II+Kamala, Too!

    ATTORNEY-CRIMINALS continue RELYING on RE-LYING 08-28-08- TODAY to tear-down nbC-1787:

    >a national syndication of judges rule that natural born US-citizens cannot challenge nbC-FRAUD in any court in the land because those nbC’s et al do not have “standing” https://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/birther%20case%20list.pdf

    >anchor baby citizen today= nbC-1787

    >citizenship of parents of nbC-child doesn’t matter for Kamala, but it does matter for Canada Cruz

    >the Founding Fathers did not define nbC, so it can mean anything you want


    >98% non-grandfathered presidents were born in sole US-jurisdiction to US-jurisdiction-citizen parents per Law of Nations https://www.scribd.com/doc/48856102/All-U-S-Presidents-Eligibility-Grandfather-Clause-Natural-Born-Citizen-Clause-or-Seated-by-Fraud

    >LAW of NATURE RULES nbC = any human born in sole US-jurisdiction to sole US-citizen parents, as originally intended in 1787 (the supreme nbC law of the land today unless amended), offers the simplest, uncontestable national security insurance that such nbC humans will be life-sensitized with sufficient US-sights-sounds-smells-tastes-touches so as to INGRAIN THE BRAIN with MINIMAL FOREIGN-BIAS


  2. The Queen of England is also the Queen of Jamaica. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_Jamaica

    Kamala Harris is a Citizen of Jamaica at Birth and as such she “owes homage” and allegiance because of her Jamaican citizenship at birth to the Queen of Jamaica, the Queen of England. Again see and read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_Jamaica … and … https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/08/14/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-jamaican-citizen-at-birth/ Gaining possible U.S. citizenship at birth does not dissolve or remove her Jamaican citizenship at birth. She was born a dual-Citizen with divided allegiance at birth. Such a person born with foreign influence and allegiance per the founders and framers was not to be allowed to become Commander in Chief of our military, via the front door or the back door as VP.

  3. Mark Steyn probably was alluding to the British connection for Kamala Harris since she was a Citizen of Jamaica at Birth and that Jamaica was once a British Colony and more importantly is still to this day a part of the British Commonwealth and pays homage to the Queen of England, as does Kenya: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_the_Commonwealth_of_Nations

    Kamala Harris a Jamaican Citizen at Birth: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/08/14/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-jamaican-citizen-at-birth/

    1. “natural born Citizens” of the USA do not and are not required by our government as part of said citizenship status to pay homage to the Queen of England. We totally ditched the King (and thus subsequent Queens) of England in 1776. Not so for people born with citizenship of a British Commonwealth member nation who still pays homage to the Queen of England.

      Kamala Harris a Jamaican (and British Commonwealth member) Citizen at Birth: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/08/14/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-jamaican-citizen-at-birth/

  4. Some candidates for President have had questionable heritage problems regarding their natural-born Citizenship status. Two have become President. The first was Chester A. Arthur and the second Barack H. Obama.

    In 1880, while running for Vice-President with President James A. Garfield, Arthur P. Hinman made a charge that Chester Arthur was ineligible to be Vice-President because in was born in Ireland or Canada. The charge was discredited but Hinman went on to write a book called, “How a British Subject Became President of the United States” Arthur was not a natural-born citizen, but not for the reason claimed by Hinman. He was ineligible because his father was a British Subject at the time of his birth. Arthur, a lawyer, repeatedly gave false and misleading statements to the Brooklyn Eagle newspaper concerning his father’s heritage, immigration status and age. Later, Arthur burned most of his family documents. He even lied about his own age. He claimed to have been born in 1830, the date recorded on his gravestone. His attempts to conceal his father’s history suggest he was aware of his ineligibility, per Article 2, Section 1 and the Law of Nations, to be President or Vice-President.

    President Obama’s status is controversial and has focused on his birthplace. His literary biography published from 1991 to 2007 and various newspaper articles about him state he was born in Kenya. His birthplace, while an issue, is not the only reason many disqualify him. Obama’s parents were allegedly married (no marriage documents have been found) in Hawaii. His father, Barack Obama Sr., a British Kenyan, and bigamist, was never a U.S. citizen and was in the country on a temporary student visa. His mother was a natural born Citizen from Kansas. Per his own website, Obama admits he was born with dual citizenship, British, via his father, and American, via his mother. Since both parents must be U.S. citizen to be natural-born, Obama may or may not be a U.S. citizen at birth, but he is not a natural-born Citizen within the meaning of the Constitution.

    Another challenge to Obama comes from people who point to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1952, which has been in effect since December 24, 1952:

    Barack Obama was allegedly born on August 4, 1961 in Hawaii. The law, established by Congress, for babies born between December 23, 1952, and November 13, 1986, including Obama, were if parents were married and one parent was a U.S. citizen (his mother) and the other parent a foreigner (his father), the citizen parent must have lived in the U.S. for 10 years prior to the birth, with five of those years after age 14. Where the birth occurred did not matter. Since Ann Dunham was age 18 (instead of 19) at the time of birth, she did not meet the (five year) requirement and could not confer U.S. citizenship on her son. (This position is technical, but that apparently was the law.)

    Children born outside of marriage to a U.S. citizen mother were citizens if the mother lived in the U.S. for one year prior to the birth. Children born out of wedlock to a U.S. citizen father acquired citizenship only legitimated before turning 21 years of age.

    Then there is the matter of Indonesia. School records from that country show Obama as Indonesian. If President Obama (aka Barry Soetoro) was an Indonesian citizen, did he renounce that citizenship and reapply to the U.S to be naturalized? He allegedly traveled as an Indonesian citizen and attended Occidental College and Columbia College as a foreign student. This could be cleared up if Obama would produce his passport records from 1980-1990. Thus far he has not.

    Obama (aka Sotetoro) may be a citizen of four countries. Britain, Kenya, America, and Indonesia. In which, if any, of these countries is he Citizen, let alone a natural-born citizen? His mother was American. His father was a British Kenyan. His adopted father was Indonesian.

    1. Stanley Dunham and Barack Obama,Sr. were NEVER legally married. Senior was still married to his Kenyan wife Kezia Obama when he claimed to have “Married” Stanley Dunham. Senior was a bigamist. If the narrative is to be believed that BHO,Sr. and Dunham were his actual parents, BHO,Jr. was their illegitimate son,born out of wedlock.

  5. My thanks to Mark Steyn for stating the obvious…….as others have said, don’t expect to be invited back to Rush’s show…unless, the circumstances of Rush’s health have changed the “blackout” on the subject of Obama’s eligibility and identity fraud which has always been present.

    Things are heating up again for John Brennan, who IMO is likely the lead in providing Obama with documents when Barry was forced to show them….albeit, lousy forgeries…

  6. Email sent to White House and DOJ today:


    EXHIBIT A: https://www.teaparty.org/this-investigation-is-a-sham-judicial-watch-president-slams-john-durham-for-going-easy-on-the-deep-state-453384/

    EXHIBIT B: https://www.teaparty.org/america-hating-democrat-ilhan-omar-praises-violent-uprisings-in-minneapolis-and-kenosha-to-fundamentally-change-america-video-453222/ >>>

    “Barry O was the problem and still IS the problem Mr. Community Organizer still causing chaos in this Country funding BLM and Antifa with his Organizing for America non profit foundation along with Soros and all his non profit hate groups. Start there with running these two out of our Country and seizing their assets for acts of terrorism.”

    People on Main Street USA KNOW that FAKE presIDent Barry Soetoro-Obama II never was, never is and never will be America’s 44th Constitutional presIDent.

    Naturally, Tom Fitton knows this.

    Naturally, John Durham knows this.

    Yet, Tom Fitton refuses recent invitations to go on Mike Volin’s Blog Talk Radio Show, from the comforts of Tom’s home or office, to tell Mike what he knows that Mike and thousands (millions?) of other “bigoted birthers” (including me) don’t know. Why this avoidance dance, Tom?

    Tom Fitton has Judicial Watch earnestly unearthing FOIA dirt on The SYMP-TOMS, while meticulously avoiding The PROBLEM that causes those vexing symp-toms, being, The PELOSI-SOROS’ SOETOROS (Barry and Michelle) nbC-FRAUD! Why?

    And now it appears from Tom’s own appraisal herein, that John Durham is going to PUNT ON PUNISHMENT of the Obamagate COUPSTERS. Why, after so much trumped-up EXPECTATIONS that indictments are coming?

    Tom refuses to publicly discuss/disclose his natural awareness of the “natural born Citizen” (nbC)-FRAUD of Obama II and Kamala, too, and John Durham of Groton, CT, so far, refuses to meet some 30 miles away with Sharon Rondeau of Canterbury, CT to LEARN of her 11 years of discoveries of said nbC-FRAUD! https://www.thepostemail

    “Because Nature Rules!”

  7. Didn’t India become an independent republic in 1950?

    Didn’t Jamaica become an independent republic in 1962?

    What would happen to natural born citizens of the US, if tomorrow Great Britain made everyone with any British subject ancestor a British subject? Would those NBCs become ineligible?

    1. Omission of information is part of the far-left’s deceptive tactics.

      The USA is not a British Commonwealth nation. We don’t still pays homage to the Queen of England like the countries (and citizens of said countries are required to do) of Kenya and Jamaica do. That is what I think Mark Steyn was relating to. And the fact that both Barack Obama and Kamala Harris were born with dual-Citizenship with divided allegiance at birth. And those British Commonwealth country’s citizenship’s held by Obama and likewise for Harris requires paying homage to the Queen of England as a Citizen of a British Commonwealth nation.

      Kamala Harris a Jamaican Citizen at Birth: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/08/14/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-jamaican-citizen-at-birth/

      CDR Kerchner (Ret) — http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org

        1. I don’t normally feed trolls but you really need to learn more about Jamaica’s form of government and its relationship to the Queen of England. Your constant omission of information and facts and telling half-truths on this site is an attempt at gas-lighting and disinformation. But then that is why you are here, isn’t it. That is what you are tasked to do. The Jamaican government certainly does “pay homage” or to say it as a synonym, “bows down” to the Queen. Of course Obama bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia and the Emperor of Japan, as I recall. But then Obama considered himself to be a citizen of the world, and of course he was not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. And neither Kamala Harris a “natural born Citizen. She was born a Citizen of Jamaica: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/08/14/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-jamaican-citizen-at-birth/ And do see this about Jamaica’s form of government and its relationship to England and the Queen: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_Jamaica

        2. Jamaica is a member of the British Commonwealth of Nations and retained the British Monarch as it’s head of State. Prime Ministers conduct the affairs of Commonwealth member nations. Canada is a Commonwealth nation with a Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, The Head of State is Queen Elizabeth. Her representative in Canada is Governor-General Julie Payette. Jamaica operates under the same system. Kamala Harris was born a British Subject under the British Nationality Act. She is NOT a natural Born Citizen of the U.S. BOTH her parents were British subjects since both India and Jamaica are member nations in the British Commonwealth of Nations.

    2. Jamaica is not a republic. They want to transition to becoming one. But as of now they are not. The Queen of England is also the Queen of Jamaica. Mark Steyn is very knowledgeable about this since he was formerly a British Subject and paid homage to Queen Elizabeth. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_Jamaica We the people and the United States severed all political connections to England and their kings and queens in 1776. That is a significant difference between the USA’s past connections to England and Jamaica’s current connections. which you should be aware of. And if you weren’t then you should be now.

      Kamala Harris is a Citizen of Jamaica at Birth: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/07/23/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-not-eligible-to-be-president-and-cinc-or-vp/

    3. In fact, the British Nationality Act allows persons BORN IN HAWAII to claim British Citizenship. Who do we know that says he was born in Hawaii? Hmm? Born in Hawaii to a British Father. Can you say Barack Obama?

  8. P.S. As I recall, some time ago a caller called into the Rush Show asking about
    Obama being a fraud. At this call – in Rush “snapped” at the caller… When Rush
    comes back to his radio show, will he remark on Steyn’s recent remark?

    1. There’s a massive cover-up and it is a bi-partisan cover-up. It is only through the continued efforts of constitutionalists like Sharon,you,Cmdr.Kerchner,and the rest of us here on the P & E. that Obama’s treasonous scam will eventually be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

  9. I have asked a certain question several times in the past. Chester Arthur was born with British citizenship as was Barack Obama. Now as Mr. Steyn mentions we have Harris.

    The question I asked in the past?

    Is the United Kingdom attempting to reinsert itself into OUR sovereign nation’s affairs? I am CERTAIN that the founders would NOT countenance persons born under the sovereignty of Britain being in OUR Presidency or Vice-Presidency.

    Since all those persons that were “Citizen[s] of the United States at the time of the adaption of the Constitution” are NOW dead, unless of course one can prove otherwise (That they were alive then), “NO person…” at the present time “except a Natural Born Citizen” of the U.S. is eligible to be President or VP.

  10. It actually matters only about 33 1/3% where Obama, and for that matter Kamala Harris, was born. As it is, he could have been born in Lincoln”s bed in the White House. The FACT that Obama”s father was NEVER a citizen of the U.S.A. was enough to Constitutionally DISQUALIFY Obama from legally holding the office of POTUS. Since NEITHER of Harris’s parents were citizens of the U.S.A. at the time she was born in the U.S.A. she is 66 2/3% Constitutionally DISQUALIFIED to hold the office of VPOTUS, since qualifications for both ARE the SAME. Neither of these two, Obama and Harris, are “natural born citizens” which is a requirement for the office of POTUS. A “natural born citizen” as it was known to be at the time of the Constitutional Congress when the Constitution was being hashed out is… “one who is born in the country (33 1/3%) to a Mother who is a citizen (33 1/3%) and a Father who is a citizen (331/3%) at the time of birth”. 100% is Constitutionally REQUIRED to be POTUS and VPOTUS. This definition of “natural born citizen” can be found in the book “Law of Nations” by Emerich de Vattel 1758. A book that was well read by those who founded OUR GREAT COUNTRY. Look it up.
    Jim Judge

  11. Mark Steyn: I always enjoy listening to you. However, from what I’ve heard about Rush Limbaugh (i.e. that any guest host who talks about “Obama” being a Kenyan or foreigner would never guest host again on the radio show), THIS MAY HAVE BEEN YOUR LAST TIME SUBBING IN FOR LIMBAUGH! Or, have I misconstrued what you said, or meant? Oh well, the cover up of “Obama’s” constitutional ineligibility seems to be off limits everywhere to everyone, especially in Washington DC to anyone in our federal government (the “open secret”). Take a bow Chief Justice John Roberts. You are, except possibly for John Brennan, the most guilty of all of the co-conspirators! Personally, I am convinced of one thing, Chief Justice Roberts, and it is that YOU were singularly responsible for the CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS which began in January 2009 when you swore in “Obama” to office and which is still ongoing in our country today over a decade later.

  12. India has been an independent country since 1950. Jamaica has been an independent country since 1962.

    Harris was born in the United States in 1964.