IS TRUMP COMPROMISING OVER PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY?

by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015

(Jul. 16, 2015) — Everyone, including Trump now, seems to think the ‘Birther/Eligibility’ Question is off the table. When asked by a reporter directly Trump referred to it an ‘old subject‘ after NBC’s Katy Turr asked why people should believe his numbers on illegal immigration when he ‘led’ the birther movement and sent investigators out to Hawaii to investigate whether Obama was was born there, [Read more at http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/07/nbc-news-trump-resurrects-birther-issue.html#Ktebl90di3mIvrcj.99.] but we are reminded everyday it is a very important part of the Constitution of the United States and often the Main Stream Media highlights it reminding us they understand it quite well.

[See video here]

On the heels of that interview, it is reported this morning in The Washington Post U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and Mr. Trump, also a Presidential Candidate contender, may be making an informal compromise on the Constitution’s demand for a natural born Citizen based  on Cruz’s defense for Trump’s stand on ‘illegal immigration’. Cruz fails the standard of natural born Citizen just as Obama both having ‘foreign’ fathers. Cruz’s father is noted as a Cuban while Obama’s is listed as Kenyan.

The only citizenship status definition for naturalization purposes most notably missing in Congress’s definition  found in the “Aliens and Nationals Title 8 Act” is ‘born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. This is presumably because it has never been doubted that ‘Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’ was indeed a respect for man’s recognition of ‘nature’s definition’ being indisputable.

Those apposed to the clear definition have seized on the fact that ‘natural born Citizen’ was not defined in the Constitution, leaving out the fact that neither was ‘Citizen’, the standard for U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives along with ‘pirating’ also found in the Constitution.  According to the Aliens and Nationals Title 8 §1401 Code there are no less than ten (10) different circumstances of Citizenship considered that the Constitution failed to identify or outline understood in a-h.

‘Being Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’ is the requirement that you will not find in the Title 8 Actions of naturalization , and thus was reserved for the Vice President and President as a requirement. U.S. Senator Ted Cruz’s naturalization is described by Congress in(d):

[a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;] , [i]f of course Cruz’s mother did not also become a Canadian Citizen at the same time as her husband did immigrating from Cuba.

If Cruz’s mother and father were registered current Canadian Citizens at the time of  Cruz birth in Canada his ‘American Citizenship’ is as questionable in documentation as Arnold Schwarzenegger  born to foreign parents in Austria. The interesting claim Sen. Cruz makes is that regardless of his mother’s devotion to her husband’s citizenship in Canada, and whether she acclimated to Canada as he did with his citizenship from Cuba, is that regardless of that perhaps being a fact she was “born” in the U.S. and maintained the native citizenship regardless of any foreign paperwork regarding official status. This claim would not bode well for Sen. John McCain who was born in the foreign country of Panama  as I maintained in my action barring him from the Office of the President due to an unfaltering statement of nature that Panama would always be where it began for him instead of the United States. He will always be a Panama son, and certainly one of their more famous.

Reference and Respect for both of one’s parents and place has been forgotten to cheat in the race for President of the United States. At this point in the race, Mr. Trump ought to be suing Mr. Cruz in Federal Court for being in the race illegally and collecting campaign contributions for an Office he is not qualified for.

While the Main Stream Media will not let Mr. Trump forget he led the Birther Movement, although not a single case in Court bears Mr. Trump’s name and it has been I who has borne the standard on a bipartisan level, the highlights of Mr. Cruz’s ‘citizenship status’ in The Washington Post relays the message that Mr. Trump is not true to that standard that he placed upon Mr. Obama in objecting to his eligibility in Office.

Read the rest here.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. If Trump accepts Cruz as his running mate, Trump will not be “compromising” on eligibility law. Trump will be flagrantly BREAKING THE LAW by committing FRAUD.

  2. Cruz and Rubio are NOT Article 2 legal for POTUS and their ignorance of 3 requests from The Post Email with no response is proof that they are willing to risk violating the Constitution to get higher up in entitlement. It also show how disconnected the “Republican” party is and division is its forte.
    ——————-
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: The Post & Email has not yet submitted any FOIA requests for documentation on Sen. Marco Rubio, but we have been unable to obtain anything on Sen. Cruz other than a purported Selective Service registration record from that agency.

  3. As it is in the Neo United States of America, those in high office have adopted the habit of picking and choosing which laws they want to abide by as per their own convenience. Trump will flip flop whenever it suits his needs just as the others who ignore the laws to which they find inconvenient or an obstacle in their path to reaching their goals. The Neo America is a lawless county unless of course, you are a commoner.