If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Sher Zieve, ©2012

Is Obama planning to detain people he deems to be "terrorists?"

(Jan. 2, 2012) — Today’s column will be short and to the point.  It has finally arrived, folks.  I’d hoped I was wrong about it but, tragically and chillingly, I was not.  Obama has just announced–in his own words–that he can detain (imprison) anyone he wants with the new unconstitutional NDAA bill passed by Congress and signed by the now self-proclaimed Dictator-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama.  Note:  As usual, the Marxist-media doesn’t care and is, instead, jubilant that Dear Leader Obama has finally done away with that pesky Constitution.

In a statement published 31 December on his White House site, Mr. Obama states:  “Today I have signed into law H.R. 1540, the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.”  He goes on to state:  “I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists.”  Note:  Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) advised in the below YouTube video that the White House and Barack Obama DEMANDED the removal of any and all protections for US citizens and legal residents.  So, the collaborative Congress gave him the dictatorial powers he has wanted since he usurped the Office of POTUS.

The now formal Dictator of the USA Obama also disingenuously stated:    “Section 1021 affirms the executive branch’s authority to detain persons covered by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note). This section breaks no new ground [yes, it does] and is unnecessary. The authority it describes was included in the 2001 AUMF, as recognized by the Supreme Court and confirmed through lower court decisions since then.”

“Two critical limitations in section 1021 confirm that it solely codifies established authorities. First, under section 1021(d), the bill does not “limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force.” Second, under section 1021(e), the bill may not be construed to affect any “existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.”  Note:  But, it does.

“My Administration strongly supported the inclusion of these limitations in order to make clear beyond doubt that the legislation does nothing more than confirm authorities that the Federal courts have recognized as lawful under the 2001 AUMF.”  Note:  No, it did not.  In fact, per Democrat Senator Carl Levin, just the opposite occurred–as Obama demanded protections for US citizens and legal residents be removed before he would sign the bill!   Obama continues with:  “Moreover, I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens.”  Translation:  “I may choose to be a beneficent dictator, if I wish to do so.”

“Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values [they are not ’traditions and values’ they are US law] as a Nation. My Administration will interpret section 1021 in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law.”  Note:  This is another abject ObamaLie.  The new revised NDAA bill, which Obama demanded, effectively renders the US Constitution’s Bill of Rights–and the US Constitution, itself–null and void.

We have now reached the end of the road as a free country.  As never before, only two choices now remain We-the-People:   “If we refuse to rise up and fight, we’ll be forced to lie down and die.”

“And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable”–Isaiah 3:5

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. “we, the people are sovereign, not we, the states….

    “Why are the states so silent?” Federal Funding?”

    In order to be successful, in what ever it is we intend to do, we have to start from a base of reality. Citizens are not, in fact, sovereign, in spite of the Constitution saying otherwise. The “patriot” act destroyed all semblance of the 1st Amendment. The SCOTUS “decision” on exigent circumstances repealed the 4th Amendment. These are hard facts and reality. It is what it is.

    States’ rights, state “sovereignty”, and the 10th Amendment were abolished in 1861. The fedgov has controlled the activity of states by tightening the purse strings with an unrelenting ferocity ever since. America has been split into ten fedgov FEMA regions such that the states have lost relevance in governance. Realize this reality and go from there.

    The answer is not on the keyboards. Keyboards are just more inanimate pieces of Chini junk. The more you pound them the less time you will have to get in the weasels’ faces. Now is the time during the political campaigns to challenge and embarrass the pols while they are on the stump . Ask them the tough questions and demand a Constitutional answer and commitment. And if they don’t, find someone who will.

    Start studying now for your next time on jury duty. Read the FIJA literature. Get seated and challenge the law, as well as the testimony, it is your responsibility as a citizen and allowed by the Constitution. You will do ten days for contempt but you’ll make the point. Others we read about on this website are certainly doing more than ten.

    Remember what Samuel Adams said, if you lay back, “. . .wear your chains lightly”.

  2. its not worth the paper it is written on, the ink that signed it is worthless…

    not only that, but the constitution is the ruling authority and overrides this so called law…

    were did america go, i was seeking to find justice…but instead 535 men in congress delivered anarchy

  3. It will become increasingly dangerous for the people the more the federal government usurps state sovereignty and violates more and more citizen rights. The states are the only entities that are able to stop this dictatorship.

    Why are the states so silent?