Second Update: The Post & Email Speaks with Douglas Vogt, Typesetting Expert, About His Letters to Congress Regarding Birth Certificate Forgery

WHAT EXCUSE CAN ANYONE MAKE FOR OBAMA NOW?

by Sharon Rondeau

This "document" lacks the certifying wording present on other birth and marriage certificates issued by the Hawaii Department of Health. Why?

(Jul. 22, 2011) — Mr. Douglas Vogt, owner of Vector Associates and Archive Index Systems, has sent letters to officials in Hawaii and will be sending them to all members of Congress with his report on why he believes the image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate is a forgery.

The Post & Email previously interviewed Mr. Vogt on June 2, 2011, during which he stated, “I have a unique background for analyzing this document. I owned a typesetting company for 11 years so I know type and form design very well. I currently own Archive Index Systems since 1993, which sells all types of document scanners worldwide and also developed document imaging software…”

We asked Mr. Vogt how many mailings he had completed, and his interview follows below:

MRS. RONDEAU:  How many letters have you sent to members of Congress with your report as of now?

MR. VOGT:  I haven’t finished the cover letter to Congress.  I mailed off about 70 of them, but that was 3-4 weeks ago, and that was to several committees.  Then I started to write all of them down.  I still have to create that mailing list.  I have about 89 names, and I have more to do to finish off all the Republicans in the House and the Senate.  They’ll get it first before their Democrat colleagues.

I’ve been busy with notifying the U.S. Attorney in Hawaii.  You saw the letter to the governor and the attorney general of Hawaii.  It looks as if it worked with them, because Loretta Fuddy, the Health Department Director, split!  She supposedly “left the island.”

MRS. RONDEAU:  Have you been able to find out any more specifics on that?

MR. VOGT:  Yes, I mailed the thing on July 11th; it was accepted on the 14th, and on the 15th they said that the deputy attorney in the office who was handling the subpoena had left and won’t be back until this week sometime and that Fuddy had left the island.  It doesn’t matter whether the director is there or not; it’s a public office, and people come and go all the time.  The government office remains open; it’s just the next person in charge or even an employee who serves the public, and that’s it; you’re done.  Actually, it’s the State of Hawaii which gets served and has to produce it.

The letter to the AG and governor formally notified them that it’s a forgery.  I sent them both copies of the report:  the 28-pager and also the latest affidavit on the news conference.

The news conference analysis was very important, and I think the reason that it shook up the attorney general and governor was that I had correctly identified plausible deniability in that news conference on the 27th of April.  It was clear-cut.  I’m surprised no one had spotted this.  The lawyers hadn’t; other people at least didn’t say anything; but Bauer and Pfeiffer – Bauer is the former White House attorney and Pfeiffer is communications director – basically set up plausible deniability, and when Obama gave the speech an hour later, he never even mentioned the Certificate of Live Birth that was released an hour before.  He only mentioned the Certification of Live Birth of 2008.  That’s a classic case of plausible deniability where they say, “Well, I never saw it; I never heard it; I didn’t order it…”  They did it.  It’s not going to work here.  It didn’t work during the Nixon administration, and it’s not going to work here, because the only one who benefits by that fraud is him.  It has nothing to do with money; it has to do with a certificate.  That’s what we’re dealing with.

I think it shook them up.  I think it shook up the attorney general in Hawaii and the governor such that they looked at the evidence and said, “He’s right.”  That’s plausible deniability; there’s no question.  They knew they were presenting a fraud.  “We’re in trouble.”

When you read the letter, you’ll see it.  I said, “This is most likely going to be the end of the Democrat Party.”  The letter is two pages.  The point is that I think this letter scared them, especially when they saw plausible deniability, and I think they realized I’m right.  When I defined “plausible deniability” on the affidavit, they said that middle management either is inaccessible or impossible to interrogate because they’ve beat the scene or they’re dead.  It’s one or the other; that’s what happens with criminal organizations to protect the leadership.

[Editor’s Note:  Vogt issued an original affidavit on May 10, 2011, an expanded 22-page report on May 22, 2011, and a longer report dated June 13, 2011 consisting of 28 pages.  A July 4 affidavit containing graphics analyses by Vogt states that “false statements” were made on April 27, 2011, the day on which the image in question was presented to the public as a copy of Obama’s original birth record.]

If you remember the Watergate matter, G. Gordon Liddy was volunteered to be assassinated on a Washington, DC street corner if it would save the president.  Send Liddy an email; he’ll tell you.  I’m going to be contacting the U.S. attorney here in Seattle with all the evidence against Robert Bauer to have him prosecuted, because he obviously perpetrated the fraud; he’s a principal.  I did the same thing with the U.S. attorney in Hawaii to investigate Fuddy and the Hawaii attorney general.  They’ve all been put on notice that “This fraud has happened; these people are most likely involved, and it’s your job to investigate.”

MRS. RONDEAU:  The Post & Email had conducted two Hawaii Petition Campaign mailings, after which we thought we might turn our focus elsewhere.  Then Obama released what he said was his birth certificate on April 27 which many have stated is a forgery.  As a result, perhaps people such as Fuddy; the attorney general and deputy attorney general, Jill Nagamine; Alvin Onaka, the registrar; the U.S. attorney, as you’ve mentioned, and the FBI  in Hawaii need to hear from as many people as possible.

MR. VOGT:  I’ve notified the U.S. attorney there, Florence Nakakuni; she received hers the same day as the others.  She’s in the same building as the FBI.

What I want to do is something I learned from my friend, who did something similar with a totally different subject:  We have a crook in the White House.  We have people who are covering up for him.  If the FBI doesn’t do anything, I will resort to telling them about not only the plausible deniability, but also the section in the statute about misprision of felony.  I tell them very plainly that I’m obligated to tell people, and I’ve said, “If you do nothing, I’m going to the next group on the list, which is federal judges.”  I’m going to tell them that I’ve notified the FBI director and the agent in charge of Hawaii, and they’ve refused to do anything about it; it’s obviously a forgery.  I think they’re not acting for political reasons.  I’m going to ask the federal judges if Mueller can become an accessory after the fact.  If you read that law, Section 3, it says that if you hinder the investigation or the prosecution of a guilty party, that is an accessory after the fact.  I’m going to ask all the federal judges, including the Supreme Court justices  – all the judges who deal with criminal cases, not bankruptcy or probate matters – just those who deal with criminal cases.  That’s hundreds of judges.  If I don’t get a response, the next group is all the U.S. attorneys.

MRS. RONDEAU:  U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president, but perhaps we don’t have a president right now.

MR. VOGT:  We do, but he’s a liar.  He lied his way to the top; he’s a phony.  The FBI has to deal with U.S. attorneys and federal judges all the time on a daily basis.  So what do you think is going to happen with Mueller and other FBI agents, once they know this stuff, that every U.S. attorney and every federal judge has gotten black-and-white proof that this thing is a forgery?  Everybody they work with from whom they need cooperation is going to know the secret.  It’s no longer going to be a secret.  They may not mention it publicly, but they all talk among themselves.  This would be the biggest topic among them.  Eventually they’re going to break, and they’re going to break the story to other media.  The best thing that could happen for your readers and you is to contact foreign media as well as the smaller- and medium-sized domestic media, both radio and print media, because they aren’t so much under the control of the White House, or maybe not even ideologically attuned to them.  That’s perhaps the best way of doing it.  I put up on the secure Birther Summit website blog a suggestion format for a news release.

The only way to force Mueller and the FBI to do something is my plan, which is contacting the federal judges and then the U.S. attorneys, then all of Congress.  You tell each and every one, “I’ve told the FBI; they refuse to do anything; can you please contact them, because the next one on the list is going to be all of these people.”  They can’t do anything to me.  I have an absolutely clean record, and they know I’m right.  I’m going to try calling Mueller and the FBI agent in Hawaii.  I think they’ll take my call because I’m the one who wrote the letter and affidavit.  A couple of people have called Hawaii and Washington, DC, but they didn’t speak with the people to whom I have written.  I’m going to see if I can get anything out of them.  If I get a chance to talk to them, I’ll say, “Listen, if you don’t do it, the next one on the list under the law is all the judges.”  Every single federal judge is going to get a copy of it.  Then every single U.S. attorney is going to get it, and they’re all going to know that the FBI didn’t do anything about it.  It’ll put the pressure on them.

With Paul Irey‘s material, my report has a total of ten items.  I’ve offered people who are complaining a $1,000-$2,000 challenge that they couldn’t prove all nine of my items wrong, and no one has taken me up on it.  They won’t.  It’s just overwhelming.

Anyone who says that the image released by Obama is a forgery has to produce an affidavit that a lawyer can use in court.  Some have not come out publicly, so that’s just “noise” that the FBI can legally ignore.  They have to be formally told that a crime has been committed.  They have to make an affidavit, write a letter to the FBI or their congressman, and do the same thing I’m doing.  It’s basically putting your name and your reputation on the line.  I was evidently the first one to do it.

Editor’s Note:  In an email, Mr. Vogt supplied the following information:

My cover letter will remind them that this scandal is the worst in American history and it is going to hit the domestic as well as foreign media this year. The American voters will want to know why the Republicans did not ask for Congressional hearing or at least ask the FBI to do an investigation.  Contact information for Congress, domestic and foreign media is as follows:

Here are links to the names and addresses of all the Congressmen and Senators for you to contact:

http://www.house.gov/representatives/

Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

All elected officials both federal and state:

http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index.cfm/siteid/resourcecenter/action/Legislators.Main

All the election officials in the USA :
http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index.cfm/siteid/resourcecenter/action/VoterInformation.Main

All the US News Media:

These are the links you can use that will tell you all the newspapers in the USA :
http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index.cfm/siteid/resourcecenter/action/Media.Main

For Foreign and Domestic media including TV, Radio, Newspapers all over the world:
http://www.mondotimes.com/

Mailing off news releases to the foreign media might get faster results because they are not under the influence of the Obama administration. If you contact the media while I am notifying the Congress and the US Attorneys and Judges, we might get some action. I will put up a suggested News Release format you should use to notify the news media. Go onto the Birthers Secure Forum: http://birthers.tpath.org/login.aspx

MRS. RONDEAU:  What can readers do if they’d like to help defray the costs of postage?

MR. VOGT:  It’s really simple.  The address for Vector is:

12819 S.E. 38th St.
Suite 115
Bellevue, WA 98006

and the phone number is 425-643-1131.  Three people called me up the other day and gave me their credit card number, and I actually got to talk to them.  I enjoy talking to members of the public.  It’s the best thing so that somebody doesn’t feel as if they’re just a number.  I also have a chance to tell them to contact the foreign and domestic media.  That may be the best way to break the story:  drown them, and say, “This is it.  It is a fraud.  Here are the legal reasons why.”

————————-

Editor’s Note:  Mr. Vogt had requested that we send him the reports on the CRS memos written by Joseph DeMaio indicating that Jack Maskell had misled members of Congress regarding Obama’s eligibility by representing that simply being born on U.S. soil is enough to be considered a “natural born Citizen.”  We also sent Vogt our article written about an essay by Attorney Sarah P. Herlihy regarding her advocacy of eliminating the natural born Citizen clause from the U.S. Constitution in which she also hypothesized that a Muslim might become president some day.

After we sent the articles, Vogt reponsded,  “Thank you Sharon. Now I can finish my letter to the Congressmen.”

Update, July 22, 2011, 7:15 p.m. EDT:  The Post & Email has heard from a resident of Hawaii who reported the following of Director of Health Loretta J. Fuddy:  “Ms. Loretta Fuddy is here on Island.  At a meeting today and booked all next week.”

If true, then government officials have blatantly lied to members of the public who have inquired as to whether or not Ms. Fuddy intends to respond to the subpoena issued from the U.S. District Court in Honolulu to make available for inspection the original birth record of Barack Hussein Obama.

Now why would government officials in Hawaii lie about such a thing?  Can they be brought up on charges for doing so?  They are being paid with taxpayer dollars.

On Tuesday, July 19, 2011, The Post & Email contacted the Hawaii Attorney General’s office, specifically asking for Assistant Attorney General Jill T. Nagamine’s office.  We spoke with an “Adele,” who transferred us to a “Jan.”   We told Jan that as a member of the media, our readers are asking if Ms. Nagamine intends to respond to the subpoena issued to the Hawaii Department of Health by the U.S. District Court requesting that Obama’s original birth certificate be made available for inspection.  We added that we had just published an interview of someone whose company coworkers in Kenya stated that they were told by Kenyan officials before the 2008 presidential election that Obama’s birth record resides in that country.  We left an email address and a phone number but received no response.

Update, July 23, 2011:  The Hawaii Department of Health’s website states that “…Barack Obama posted a certified copy of his original Certificate of Live Birth.”  If what was posted on April 27, 2011 was a “certified copy of his original,” why will Loretta Fuddy not release that “original” contained in the files at the Health Department?  Why have the department’s employees resorted to lying to continue hiding it?