Let's have a Mock Trial, and put Obama in the Docket!


by John Charlton

In the Docket, Obama's claims will melt away under forensic scrutiny
In the Docket, Obama's claims will melt away under forensic scrutiny

(Oct 30, 2009) — It’s a national imperative — the security and tranquility of the nation demand it; all want to know the truth behind it; and its a doable; a lot lest costly than organizing the 9-12 D.C. Tea-party; plus we citizens have the inalienable right to do it:  put Barack Hussein Obama on trial, and make an informative documentary about it.

This is the suggestion of a CWer — a veteran commentatrix at Citizen Wells Blog — a life-long Democrat who goes by the name of Michelle.  She explains her idea thus:

Dear John,

Since the government is too gutless to have this trial. We can have a Mock Trial, that is filmed and goes viral.

Someone can play the JUDGE will call him SOLOMON; bring in all the evidence, (allow Obama a) defense (and have a) prosecution. We will call it a historical documentary.

No one will get hurt, the people will finally get the message.

All evidence can be brought in. ACORN, SEIU, all the sabotaging of web-sites, threats, intimidation’s, VOTER FRAUD etc. media blackout.

Kind of like those indie movies that people love.

All the stuff you couldn’t introduce in a government trial. Jury composed of 12 NBC AMERICANS with documented birth certificates.

This Mock Trial would be equivalent to Obama’s mock COLB, as opposed to legal, documented birth certificate and all supporting documentation.

John please feel free to add any ideas, suggestions that will hopefully move the cause of our Constitution forward. There is so much material on the web already, I think most of the film could be “assembled” and just fill in the remainder.

Another feature could be something from all of the lawyers (who have sued Obama, challenging his eligibility) so that the American people can see that there are attorneys who cared about the Constitution and did their level best to ensure our Liberty and the uphill battle that ensued.

The Post & Email formally endorses the proposal and asks that the readers contact each and every patriot group and suggest that a committee for its production be formed.

I personally would love to see Attorneys Philip Berg, Leo Donofrio, Orly Taitz, and Mario Apuzzo argue before the bench.

We will need to find a patriot who has experience as a judge. I personally know of a professional video studio where it can be taped for free and put in DVD format.

If you run a patriot organization and would like to be on this committee, email me!

I don’t want to run the show, as it were; but I will help coordinate: that’s the least I can do for my country.

24 Responses to "Let's have a Mock Trial, and put Obama in the Docket!"

  1. Spencer Dixon   Saturday, February 1, 2020 at 4:19 PM

    Under the laws in force at the time of his birth, if Obama wasn’t born in the United States, he wouldn’t be a U.S. citizen.

  2. Sharon Rondeau   Friday, January 31, 2020 at 8:09 PM

    Couldn’t he be a U.S. citizen born abroad, if not a “natural born Citizen?”

  3. Rikker   Friday, January 31, 2020 at 8:08 PM

    “Can I be the executioner? I believe treason is a hanging offense.” ~DDB

    One can only commit treason against the nation where one has citizenship. If you claim Obama wasn’t born in America, it’s not possible to charge him with treason.

  4. Alexander Gofen   Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 10:11 PM

    1) Indeed, Reverend Manning did such trial already in 2010
    http://www.atlah.org/category/the-columbia-obama-trial/ yet it was completely ignored by near everybody.

    2) What more do we need to be filmed and made if we have already 3 (three!) filmed press conferences by Sheriff Arpaio: two in 2012 and the recent one on on December 15, 2016 already during the president-elect!

    3) Gee, just at the recent “Conservative” conference in Phoenix Sheriff Arpaio mentioned again about the counterfeit BC of Obama!

    4) I have gathered an extensive and systematized materials at http://www.judeochristianamerica.org/ during several years. The problem is not that we have not enough systematized hard evidence. The problem is in the indifference of the sheeple to the fact of a parallel reality of this fallen nation.

    Even in the dystopia like the “1984” and in a very real former USSR the government was always concerned to have all the data sources and history records “consistent”. Controversies in official records were considered very damaging for the state. Yet in this degenerate nation controversies flying into face bother nobody and are perceived as a new “norm” – a new condition of human misery…

  5. betz   Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 12:22 AM

    Reverand Manning already held a trial 2008.

  6. Robert Laity   Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 4:05 AM

    Constitutionally We the People have the right to hold public officials accountable under the 5th Amendment “Presentment” provision. Obama has been tried several times by this method by “The American Grand Jury”. I served on two of these non-judicially empanelled juries. The Presentments were formally served on Obama and the US Attorney General. Obama was placed under citizen’s arrest by me in 2012. See: “There is NO ‘President’ Obama”: http://www.thepostemail.com/09/17/2010/there-is-no-president-obama/

  7. DDB   Friday, December 4, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    Can I be the executioner? I believe treason is a hanging offense.

  8. Lauren   Saturday, October 31, 2009 at 8:27 AM

    I agree with Noway2no

    “It will not be a “mock” trial and we must not call it that. It will be a trial by the “citizen judiciary”. Keep it real, no theatrics. It will be the real thing.”

    If you just do a mock trial and try to add humor you lose the whole impact…. If it is not the real thing then don’t do it.

    Mr. Charlton replies: By “mock” I never intended humor…such as there is in mockery; I intended a trial in which we don’t claim constitutional authority, because that is not necessary, the facts will speak for themselves. We could even invite a lawyer from Mayer Brown in Chicago to defend him; if one of them has the courage.

  9. scathcart   Saturday, October 31, 2009 at 8:08 AM


    Sandy Cathcart

    — On Fri, 10/30/09, bettina@vivianofeldman.com wrote:

    From: bettina@vivianofeldman.com

    I agree it’s a great idea. I would do it.

    Bettina Sofia Viviano

    Viviano Feldman Entertainment
    8484 Wilshire Blvd.
    Suite 220
    Beverly Hills, Ca. 90211
    (323) 370-6266 (phone)
    (323) 944-0912 (fax)

    Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July. Democrats believe every day is April 15th. — Ronald Reagan

  10. NewEnglandPatriot   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 7:18 PM

    I’ve read the comments here and most at http://www.oilforimmigration.org. This idea seems to be a combination of the citizens’ grand juries done in the states, the American Grand Jury done nationally, and the grand juries authorized by the Seventh Amendment.

    WorldNetDaily has already made a documentary about the eligibility question, but I don’t believe it is presented as a trial of sorts.

    I caught the end of the “Let’s Talk Liberty” show with Terry Dodd and Red Beckman last night, and I heard Terry Dodd say that the Continental Congress that is coming up in November might act as a trial court for Obama. Orly Taitz has already been elected a delegate from the state of California, and I believe she will be there.

    Since this group is already scheduled to meet and they’ve already thought of it, I’m going to drop them an email to find out how seriously they’re considering the idea. There will be 150 people there, and they already have state-of-the-art video and audio equipment on reserve. In fact, they intend to broadcast the proceedings daily so that anyone with an internet connection can see what’s going on. Their stated purpose is to discuss our “rogue” government and how to regain control over it, but there is no greater issue relating to that than of Obama the Usurper.

  11. Greg   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM

    This is an excellent so long as we assert that it is an educational as well as a vehicle to send a message out tothe public. We don’t hinder the real legal issues and lawsuits against Obama and his associates. t must be genuine and as accurate as possible so we maintain our ultimate objectives get Obama and his associates and appropriatyely punished We also need to affect local, state and federal election elect people who are genuinily representative to the public.

  12. tony   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 4:56 PM

    Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

    He is real Judge and a FOX News regular.

    FOX Producers:
    1- Ron Mitchell
    2-Rob Monaco RobMonaco@FOXNews.com

    Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

  13. bacsi   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 3:42 PM

    Great idea – maybe you might like to involve the folk over at American Grand Jury [americangrandjury.org] since they have been holding citizen grand juries on this very issue and issuing findings for quite some time now.

    I really like the suggestion to invite Orly Taitz, Leo Donofrio, and Mario Apuzzo to make arguments; however, let’s leave mr. berg and his questionable ethics out of this.

  14. thistle   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 3:19 PM

    How about a real judge playing the part of the judge? Judge Napolitano! He’s used to being in front of a camera because he fills in for Glenn Beck now and again. It’s a thought.

  15. Noway2no   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM

    It will not be a “mock” trial and we must not call it that. It will be a trial by the “citizen judiciary”. Keep it real, no theatrics. It will be the real thing.

    Who empowers the government, we do. If we don’t want to lose that forever we must assert the power we have.

    We are the judicial branch if we want to be and the structure that currently exists does so at our behest. If they will not do their job we can change it dissolve it or do the job ourselves.

    We are citizens not subjects!

  16. baOH   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 2:52 PM

    Great idea! More people need to be informed (educated) about Zerobama. Everyone loves movies. Add a little humor along with the facts–although it will be difficult considering the subject matter–and this will contrast how serious the situation is.

  17. ms. helga   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 2:14 PM

    If you have it in Washington, D.C. will you call the town USURPERVILLE?


  18. ihveit   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 1:53 PM

    i think if this trial would take hold “pastor manning” would be a good one to bring foreward both as a witness or as a judge or jury member.

  19. Harry H   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 1:21 PM

    As an educational tool, and a way to let off steam, this mock trial idea sounds promising. The DVD might even become an important historical document. I’ll buy one if you make it.

  20. Pixel Patriot   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM

    can I be the jailer?

  21. 7thswan   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 12:07 PM

    At least it will be more “for real” that the Justice we have now.

  22. zachjonesishome   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 12:07 PM

    Could this be done in Washington, D. C. when Obama gives the State of the Union Address and combine it with a million person Tea Party?

  23. Truth   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM

    Just a thought:

    The church in Albany, Georgia that produced Facing the Giants and FireProof, at a fraction of the costs Hollywood produces moves, would love to see the approach they would take with a mock trial. The members of the church are the actors in these movies. Their movies build personal strength and give power to never give up, never back down and never lose faith.. . . . . . .

  24. cq   Friday, October 30, 2009 at 10:49 AM

    can I be a juror?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.