BOTH IN COMMON LAW AND IN NATURAL LAW
by John Charlton
For those who are the true sons of the American Revolution no conclusion in law could be more obvious, clear, and simple.
In common law the English Sovereign claimed a right to question the holders of offices which he had the right to bestow, and if upon finding they did not have proper title, removed them from office. This he did because it was his royal right. This action was called quo warranto, from the Late Latin phrase meaning, “By what warrant or right do you hold office?”
According to the Preamble of the Constitution of the United States, it is We the People who promulgate the Constitution. Hence that government receives its authority and office of power from us.
We the People, to form a more perfect union . . .
Therefore the common law right to issue a quo warranto action is now transferred to We the People.
It is our inalienable right, just as much as it was the inalienable right of the English Monarch; because just as natural law grants to the author of government and office the right to question officers for proof to their holding thereof, so We the People have always, everywhere, in every court, forum, or jurisdiction, for whatever reason, the right to demand and receive proof that an elected or appointed office which exercises authority in the name of the Constitution which WE THE PEOPLE PROMULGATED, show definitive and authenticated proof that he, as the holder of the office, received it lawfully, entered upon it according to due process, and was eligible for it in the moment of time in which he did.
If one uses one’s common sense, Such a Claim also is most reasonable
No one is harmed by presenting evidence.
If proof exists it can be divulged without harm.
What harm is there in showing proof of U.S. Citizenship, residency, or age?
Against Zero harm you would have to be insane to demand that the people spend a year litigating in court.
Against Zero harm you would have to be insane to demand that the people travel thousands of miles, pay tens of thousands of dollars to file papers, initiate action, wait months, fall on their knees and beg.
Against Zero harm?
If one can prove that one’s holding of an office under the Constiution is just, one does not hesitate to prove it.
To refuse to prove it for a year, is already proof that it is unjustly held!
Hence, I say, “Out with the usurper!”
Quo warranto is the inalienable right of We the People!
As such the use of this right CANNOT LAWFULLY BE RESTRICTED by any statute, any theory of standing, any claim of jurisdiction, or any proof of harm or injury.
If even one 8 year old child, U.S. Citizen, has a doubt, that is sufficient grounds to move a Quo Warranto action.
The logic could not be simpler, if you accept the sovereignty of the people.
Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.