Spread the love

AT THE SECOND REPUBLICAN DEBATE & THE NARROW TENT OF THE DNC?

by Cody Robert Judy, Presidential Candidate, ©2015

(Sep. 17, 2015) — Circulating criticisms of Fox News cutting off the first Republican debate they hosted Aug. 6th, 2015 from live-streaming Internet Users is the same criticism the DNC Chairman Debbie Wassermann Schultz is facing not allowing Candidates to debate under the very harsh penalty of not being invited to the six regularly-scheduled debates if they should engage in any non-sanctioned debates.

CNN has taken a higher road for the second Republican debate, opting to air it livestreamed on CNNgo 2.0. But let’s be really clear about it: Hillary Clinton has her hands all over this as her poll numbers dive from 71% in July to 41% among Democratic Party voting women, while the rest of the Democratic Party is being force-fed the speculative presumption their preemptive nominee may be indicted on criminal charges for breaches of national security and perhaps even illegal foreign aid in her campaign if the server hasn’t been wiped.

But Hillary may not be the only one with their hands in this cookie jar for Democrats, as Schultz volunteered, reaching back in referencing the 26 debates in the Democratic Party of 2008 when a ‘relatively unknown’ candidate named Barack Obama was being introduced to the public and more debates were seen as necessary. Yeah, right!

Going from 26 to 6 is a what most people would call extremely radical, as well it should be seen as just that.

In fact, asked about the possibilities of Republicans drowning out the Democratic chances with their debates being broadcast nationwide, Debbie snipped, [“Good. Because you know what?” she asked rhetorically. “I am actually thrilled at the voters across America being able to see the 16 Republican candidates in the food fight that they will engage in tonight.”

“What would she call the 26 debates Hillary and Obama were allowed to engage in without penalties attached in 2008? In parlance, it’s not a food fight but a proper introduction to a choice. She also stated the Democratic Party had 5 Candidates (they have 19 declared), would be certainly able to participate in 6 debates, while ‘Main Streaming America’ by the millions tune in to the Republican Debates? If you were running a business this would be akin to hara-kiri or suicide planning. It just isn’t smart unless you want to lose?”

America has not yet even been given the opportunity to hear me at a debate on these issues all because of choices by some party elites. It’s very sad and disrespectfully of the equality they pretend.”

“On the other hand, maybe Democrats don’t want me in debates because they don’t like the way I’m standing up for the Constitution and my Civil Rights? Huh? I thought we had confidence in our Justice system and the Second Conference scheduled September 28 is simply part of the process of Justice? What if they were to find Barack Obama was not a natural born Citizen?”If I win, would the Democratic Party be seen as discouraging Civil Rights that all Americans should have afforded to them in equal opportunity? What would the Democratic Party be doing then? Would six debates do it? These are the questions that will be asked and what will be their answers. Will Debbie be maintaining her job then? This is why acting against Candidates and in favor of Candidates in the Democratic Debate Forum is really dangerous territory for the Party and the overall prospects of health to the party,” Cody said.

“The Democratic Party is not featuring a single Candidate who has not been elected before and the Republican Party has three based on what … their high income level? Trump is worth $10 Billion, Carly $80 Million, Carson $5 Million; what is the message there? Is the Office of the President up for sale?”  Glenn Beck was insinuating today his concern of Trump’s populist movement with a lack of concern for the Constitution. The same theme was repeated on Rush Limbaugh’s show today as a caller came on advocating for Sen. Paul and the Constitution. Where would the Republican Candidates be if my case was heard and I won the court advocating a ‘natural born Citizen’ indeed was ‘born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents‘ in a higher calling in qualifications then a Representative or Senator in the Constitution? Rubio’s out.. Cruz is out.. Jindal’s out. Has Hillary been able to do that? And I do not have an invitation to the Democratic party debates yet? Hummm?”My point really is that regardless of Party the Constitutional principles are here to stay and neither party can really afford to stray far from its principles as its the Supreme Law that forms the bond in our Union.”

GOOD BUSINESS ADVICE IS ALSO AT TIMES GOOD POLITICAL ADVICE

The same advice given by CNN’s Chief Product Officer Alex Wellen might be good advice for the Democratic Party’s National Chairman – he said:

“Given the massive public interest and value of this even (speaking of the CNN Debate tonight) and the launch of CNNgo 2.0 across all platforms, the timing was ripe to roll out this live TV preview to all of our audiences,”, he continued, “the goal is to reintroduce tens of millions of CNN consumers — including our pay TV subscribers – to a service that now has 100 hours of on-demand TV programming, deep personalization and a revolutionary real-time live TV experience’.”

From the article, “When a YouTube channel from Sky News, part of the same parent company as Fox News, was found to be live streaming the debate for free (speaking about the first R Debate) Fox shut it down mid-debate”.

Susan Crawford, one of the most prominent critics of the cable business, wrote in a blog post after the Fox debate that “There are all kinds of public values at stake here, and we shouldn’t glide past them.  There is no speech more central to civic life than a political debate. And yet we have allowed access to that speech by way of the common medium of our era – high speed internet access – to be controlled by a cabal of private actors.”

Couldn’t the exact same thing be said of Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s decision to limit and redefine for the public the interest in the Democratic Party candidates by those she consulted that had nothing to do with the general public’s interest and everything to do with being force-fed the communistic curriculum we have as a choice now in America on the Democratic side of the aisle as far as candidates hiding us, hiding me, from America?

Check back here for my thoughts on the 2nd Republican Debate!

Americans, get smart, get educated, and then stand up and support that which has given you so much, as a well that never fails. It does remind me that this time was foretold: Amos 8:11

“Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD”

God Bless You!

Read the rest here.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.