HAS OBAMA TRAMPLED ALL AMERICANS’ CIVIL RIGHTS?
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015, blogging at CodyJudy
(May 13, 2015) — Throughout the relatively young history here in the United States of America we have seen many different Civil Rights movements. The nefarious brutality that occurred in this country at Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama, happened the year I was born in 1965. The same year color television arrived on the major networks regular programming, Malcolm X was killed, and the first American troops arrived in the Vietnam War, LBJ signed the Voting Rights Act and an immigration bill that abolished quotas based on national origin, Mary Poppins took home 5 Oscars and Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.) was born.
The United States of America had fought many civil rights battles up to that point, including the Mormon Extermination Executive Order 44 of 1838; the Civil War was fought in 1861-1865; in 1868 the 14th Amendment was signed, and in 1870 the 15th Amendment was signed granting the right to vote to those regardless of race, color, or prior servitude. Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on the bus in 1955, leading to buses desegregated on Dec. 21, 1956. In 1960 President Kennedy issued Executive Order 10925, prohibiting discrimination in federal government hiring on the basis of race, religion or national origin and establishing The President’s Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity. January 23, 1964 the poll tax was abolished by the 24th Amendment making it difficult for blacks to vote. In 1969 President Nixon signed the Philadelphia Order” which presented “goals and timetables” for reaching equal employment opportunity in construction trades. In MARCH 22, 1988 Overriding President Ronald Reagan’s veto, Congress passed the Civil Rights Restoration Act, which expanded the reach of nondiscrimination laws within private institutions receiving federal funds and in 1992 Affirmative Action upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s policy, ruling race could be one of factors colleges consider when selecting students because it furthered “a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body.”
What happened in 2008? America elected, with the help of the Mainstream Media, the first ineligible person to the Office of the President who they called “Black,”even though Obama was noticed half-white and half-black on a long-form birth certificate that was riddled with forgery and fabrication depicting his father as “African” rather than the term “Negro” that was used in 1961. Malik Obama, who is Obama’s half-brother, stated recently in an interview with Joel Gilbert that Obama may not be his half-brother or a true son of his Kenyan father in an interview and even offered to take a DNA test and stating Obama is not an honest man.
Standing laws demand, and Obama’s lawyers confirm, a Presidential Candidate is really the only person who can show harm or damages fulfilling what is called Standing, but nowhere in the litigation history noticed under the Wiki term Barack Obama Presidential Eligibility Litigation is Judy v. Obama mentioned, although it has two United States Supreme Court Cases now, and is referenced in the Georgia Litigation and New Hampshire Litigation only under the attorney’s name who represented briefly the matter.
In fact, in Wiki the Georgia Case cites “Carl Swenson and another Georgian” as well as Taitz representing “A Georgian.” Why has Wikipedia deliberately left out that there was a Presidential Candidate represented in New Hampshire and Georgia as myself, Cody Robert Judy? This shows you Wikipedia is involved in a big cover-up and that involves the public who contributes to it who either won’t really investigate or deliberately is withholding evidence from being understood.
In the 2014 released movie SELMA, also last week released on Redbox, it is very accurately depicted that though the Civil Rights Act was signed in 1964, Blacks were blocked from voting by other means. Oprah Winfrey, playing the part in the movie of Annie Lee Cooper, is shown filling out the voter registration form, then being further harassed. She’s asked to recite the preamble of the United States Constitution; when she does that successfully, she is asked how many counties there are. When she does that successfully, she’s asked to name the judges in each county which she cannot do, and this substantiates the “DENIAL” on her voter registration form.
The brainstorming meeting depicted with Martin Luther King Jr. and his group of Civil Rights leaders states the hardship of Blacks by first having to have a registered voter vouch for them, so they then could fill out a registration form, pay the poll tax, so they then can be forced to declare their address where retaliation can then be concentrated by white officials, who own the Justice Departments because you have to be a registered voter to qualify to be on a jury. This shows the deliberate manipulation of laws in order to lawfully do what was wrong. This is in fact happening today, only in favor of Barack Hussein Obama, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio.
Martin Luther King Jr, declared that they would demonstrate, and march, and disrupt the peace until justice is specific enough to afford the rights of individuals to be protected by the law and the purpose of the laws were fulfilled. The dereliction and obfuscation of my rights as a Presidential Candidate are exactly what we are seeing today turned on and having blacks turn on me and my rights based on something that happened before I was even born. Many blacks today we are seeing in looting riots and burning Ferguson, Missouri and Baltimore, Maryland are in fact doing the same thing the whites were accused of doing in 1964. What this proves is that knuckleheads exist in every race to do the same kind of damages against the law that then require a constant vigilance necessary in every generation to stand up for the law.
Does equality include making white people suffer the same damages that happened upon black people until such nefarious acts add up to require legislation to prohibit such? Since when does the prohibition of discrimination upon “color” not include the color of “white”? The same evil actions that discriminated against blacks can also be used to discriminate against whites, and if we as Americans have come anywhere we have to recognize this or we provoke a racial divide that is really un-American.
You know I sued Sen. John McCain first on his ineligibility because he was not ‘Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’ and it was only later that I included Mr. Obama. I think one of the things white people are not used to is having to march and stand up for their Civil Rights which are in jeopardy now from a black president who is ineligible, unqualified, and unfit for the Office of the President by the standards of the Constitution and who was elected but only upon the fraud and fabrication of his identity which constituted a lie. Martin Luther King Jr said and it was depicted in the movie Selma:
“We all bear a responsibility. When will we be free soon, and very soon because no lie can live forever.” That includes Barack Hussein Obama’s lie and fraud committed upon every voter in the United States of America that directly damaged my campaign for President in 2008, 2012, and now is still doing damages by taking necessary monies away from the Campaign and forcing us to act in the civil courts of law to invoke Justice and make known the lie that has been wickedly formed against We The People.
When do black or white people’s actions constitute a violation of our Civil Rights? When those actions undermine the laws established by We The People under our United States Constitution. Without the Untied States Constitution, where are black people today? Why, then, does any black person today not respect the Constitution’s demand for a natural born Citizen in the Office of the President (born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) unless they have themselves become the Masters of the whip and a movement of civil rights violations?
Have we not spent millions of dollars, even trillions of dollars on wars under Barack Hussein Obama financing the Arab Spring, financing the states of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Yemen, Ukraine, but do not have the moral courage to defend Civil Rights in our own Country?
What gives you the right to kick and beat a man who is unconscious, lying limp on the floor unless you are evil? What gives you the right to deny evidence to a man that would afford his release from prison while the denial of that evidence substantiates your own dilapidated civil rights frame of mind and protects what you call the integrity of your church? When do we march for Civil Rights in a manner that is productive to the integrity of the laws that are already on the books? How important is it that the U.S. Supreme Court hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 that brings to the Court the legal investigations that prove Obama’s identification is a fraud, declare that he is not a ‘natural born Citizen‘ qualified for the Office of the President, by a Candidate for President who has been run over and trashed because of his disregard for the Constitution of the United States?
You know, people wonder why I haven’t been elected while I’ve run for office in six elections? Its because I have run in all of my election races, for Congress for the Senate and for President in an overwhelming majority that did not respect or honor the Civil Rights of our Untied States Constitution. Indeed they said they did, but their actions were much the same as those actions we would compare to the perpetrators of Civil Rights you’d find opposed to equality.
Obama is opposed to equality; his desire all stems from a root of superiority. If it wasn’t so, he would have never run for President and had to doctor his identity to commit fraud upon America. Obama has done more for devastating and undoing black America’s gains of the last century then any single person. Obama is not all blacks in America. He is one single person who doesn’t think he has done any damage in the wake of his own disabling Civil Rights machinations. Indeed, he thinks that without any United States Constitutional Amendment expressly declaring a change in the requirements for the Office of the President, that suddenly despite the failed attempts to change such in the Legislature eight times since 2003, it changed and those requirements of Citizen for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators suddenly meshed with the Office of the President’s qualifications of a “natural born Citizen.”
Read the rest here.