Spread the love

WHO IS THREATENING BENGHAZI WITNESSES?

by Sharon Rondeau

John O. Brennan worked for the CIA for 25 years, then became a foreign policy and national security adviser to Obama. He was confirmed as CIA chief in early March 2013.

(Aug. 1, 2013) — Jake Tapper of CNN has reported in an exclusive that “dozens” of CIA agents were present while the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya came under attack last September 11, but they have been intimidated into silence by frequent polygraph exams and threats of termination if they should speak to the press or Congress.

Rep. Frank Wolf, who called for the formation of a House select committee to probe the terrorist attack which killed four Americans, has described the new revelations as “a form of a cover-up.”  Wolf said that he had been approached by some at the CIA who “wanted to be subpoenaed” but that “suddenly, there was silence.”

The Obama regime has previously claimed that it would practice “transparency” with the American people, but the details of the attack are unclear nearly one year afterward.

Some believe that the attack masked an attempt at a kidnapping of Amb. Christopher Stevens, who was to be held in exchange for Omar Abdel-Rahman, also known as the Blind Sheikh, who former Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi had desired freed from the Butner Federal Correctional Institution for his role in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

The head of the CIA is now John Brennan, whose confirmation was contentiously debated and later filibustered for 13 hours by Sen. Rand Paul.  Brennan replaced Gen. David Petraeus, who allegedly resigned over an extramarital affair just after the November 2012 election.

Some suspect that the Benghazi compound was being used as a transfer point for weapons from the United States to the Syrian rebels, who have been fighting a two-year war to depose Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.

Last fall, Middle Eastern analyst Denise Simon contended that weapons from the U.S. were most likely being transferred from Libya to Qatar and Turkey for eventual dispensing to the Syrian rebels.

Contradictory accounts have been given by members of the military chains of command who might have played a part in responding to the attack on the outpost on September 11.  A State Department employee, Gregory Hicks, who was acting charge d’affaires following Stevens’ death, testified under oath that a “stand-down” order was given to Lt. Col. Steve Gibson such that contingency plans to mount a rescue and recovery were suspended.  Gibson later testified that he was never given that order.  His superior, Col. George Bristol, testified on Wednesday that “Gibson’s orders changed over time, as conditions on the ground evolved.”

Brennan is believed to be a practicing Muslim who converted to Islam while working for the CIA in Saudi Arabia.

The only military response to the Benghazi attack was a drone which collected video from the scene that was transmitted to Washington, DC in real time.

During congressional testimony in January, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked rhetorically, “What difference does it make?” when questioned about the cause of the Americans’ deaths amidst insufficient security.

Clinton reportedly is the Democrats’ “top choice” for their presidential candidate for 2016.


Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
gigclick
Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:21 PM

We really don’t know how many Muslim Operatives that Obama and the DNC have installed in the high levels of DC. We keep getting bits and pieces of truth over time. There was a FOX interview with a Benghazi Spec. Op. COL. who said he and his 16 Spec. Op. team were given orders to leave the compound about 1.5 weeks before it all came down. Hillary was in big on this one; I would think she was riding in a Spec. Op. Helo that crashed when she “bumped her head” trying to play 007 roles on the gun deals. It all went bad and they sacrificed the people at the compound to cover up the other ills that were happening. The ultimate for the DNC is to protect Hillary for the next POTUS run at all costs, literally. I knew when the Clintons got involved with this Obama faux POTUS fraud that it would be trouble. Clinton is finishing out his last term through Hillary; he has coached her all the way! What we see now would be 10 times greater if the DNC could voter-fraud Hillary into POTUS.

2discern
Thursday, August 1, 2013 10:44 PM

Look real hard at the picture folks, this guy is over the putative president. Barry Soetero takes his orders from him who in turn takes his mandates from the global cabal going back to Bush 41 (CIA also)