Birth Certificate Analyst: Forgery Done with “Trusted Individuals,” Part 1

Print This Article


by Sharon Rondeau

Mr. Douglas Vogt, who has 11 years in the typesetting industry and has sold and installed imaging systems for city and county governments, has researched federal and state laws meticulously and determined that those who created and perpetuated the fraudulent birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama will be sentenced to lengthy prisons terms or even death for their roles in the crime

(Mar. 23, 2013) — On March 22, The Post & Email spoke with Douglas Vogt, owner of Vector Associates and an analyst who determined shortly after the releases of Obama’s purported long-from birth certificate in April 2011 that it was a forgery.

Vogt sent a detailed analysis and criminal complaint to the FBI in June 2011.  In an affidavit sent in July, Vogt stated that Obama claimed “plausible deniability” on the morning of April 27, 2011 when he spoke about the release of his birth certificate, as he referred to a “Certification” document rather than the “Certificate” which was actually made public that day.  “Nowhere does he mention anything about this new Certificate presented earlier that morning, or posting the new Certificate on the Web or even acknowledging he requested it or its existence,” Vogt wrote.

Other experts almost immediately declared the “long-form” a forgery.  On September 24, 2009, The Colorado Independent reported that “Experts have repeated time and again that the documents presented to the country and campaign officials are real and legitimate documents and that a “long-form certificate” does not exist. **” then stating its reliance on reporting done by “Politifact, the Pulitzer Prize-winning factcheck site run by the St Petersburg Times.”

Prior to the 2008 election, speculation and reports had surfaced which claimed that Obama was born in the country of Kenya and was therefore a dual citizen.  Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president be a “natural born Citizen” which some scholars have defined as “born in the country to parents who are citizens” with the purpose of assuring sole allegiance to the United States.

The Congressional Research Office (CRS) claims that simply a birth on U.S. soil makes one a “natural born Citizen” and therefore eligible for the presidency.

Obama’s “Fight the Smears” website, now defunct, stated that he had been born a dual citizen of Great Britain and the United States since Kenya was at that time a British protectorate.  The website displayed the “short-form” birth certificate which first appeared at The Daily Kos, followed by the Tampa Bay Times, Politifact and other outlets.

In a recent interview with Mark Gillar, host of the Tea Party Power Hour, Vogt stated that there were numerous “principals” who participated in producing and disseminating the “Certificate” posted by the White House almost two years ago.  Vogt predicted that lengthy prison terms can be expected once the principals’ roles in the crime become clear.

The Post & Email had published an interview with Vogt on June 2, 2011 regarding his May 22 report filed with the FBI, which included what Vogt believed were the applicable statutes violated by the creation and perpetration of the forgery as authentic.

Vogt told The Post & Email that he plans to release updated information on his webpage entitled “Obama Fraudulent Certificate of Live Birth” in the near future.   He and typesetting expert Paul Irey also plan to release a book in June detailing all of the findings which they claim unmask the forgery.

“The age of the father alone proves that the thing is a forgery,” Vogt said, “because it’s wrong.”  On the Certificate, the age of Barack Hussein Obama is stated to be “25,” which meant that he would have been born in 1936.  Wikipedia states that Obama Sr. was born on June 18, 1936, but documents released by the State Department show that Obama Sr. reported his birth date of October 18, 1934.

The Post & Email asked Vogt who he believed Obama’s parents were, and he responded that he believes Frank Marshall Davis, a communist writer who moved to Hawaii from Chicago during the 1940s, is “most likely” the father.  “During the election, he gave it away,” Vogt said.  “He wound up saying that his father taught him the love of jazz.  Barack Obama Sr. from Kenya wasn’t that one.  It’s well-known that Frank Marshall Davis had an appreciation of jazz in Chicago and constantly mentioned it all the time in his writings.  It’s been stated that the grandfather took him to Marshall’s house two or three times a week.  So Stanley Dunham knew who the real father was.”

We asked Vogt, “You said you know who the forgers are.  Was it done in the state of Hawaii?” to which he answered, “Yes, it was done with trusted individuals.  It’s just like the mob; when they want something done, they’ll go to a relative or close friend who has been with the family a long time.   These Marxists have done the same thing.”

Vogt said that anyone producing a “false document of identification” knowing that it would be submitted to a federal authority has violated Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, “Fraud and False Statements.”

Reading from 18 USC, Chapter 2, “Principals,” Vogt explained the various roles that might have been played by people collecting information to assemble the forgery, including “assisting the offender.”  Vogt contends that, whether paid or not, anyone who assisted could receive 15 years to life in prison.  Section 3 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code states:

Sec. 3. Accessory after the fact

Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.

“Their actions and phone communications can all be retrieved,” Vogt said, to prove culpability in the scheme to produce a forgery with the intent to deceive the public.

Vogt believes that Obama was installed in the White House as a result of a “communist conspiracy” which began with the 1960s protest movements such as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and The Weather Underground, which was led by Bill Ayers. He told us:

These people have written books on what they wanted to do.  They are trying to overthrow the government from within, and he [Obama] is doing a wonderful job.  Cloward & Piven said to overspend the place.  You get people who want more and you bankrupt the place, and after the bankruptcy you have a revolution.  These stupid fools think they’re going to be on top of the heap and become the new royalty.  This really defines the crime they have committed.  If this part I’m about to read to you didn’t exist and if they hadn’t done what they did with the birth certificate, they could easily say, “No, we haven’t done that.  If you did the research, people knew that Obama was a Marxist or socialist; they knew what they were buying when they voted for him.”

However, Vogt said, “This is the difference” and read the following:

18 USC §3591

Sentence of Death

(a) A defendant who has been found guilty of—

(1) an offense described in section 794 or section 2381; or
(2) any other offense for which a sentence of death is provided, if the defendant, as determined beyond a reasonable doubt at the hearing under section 3593

(A) intentionally killed the victim;
(B) intentionally inflicted serious bodily injury that resulted in the death of the victim;
(C) intentionally participated in an act, contemplating that the life of a person would be taken or intending that lethal force would be used in connection with a person, other than one of the participants in the offense, and the victim died as a direct result of the act; or
(D) intentionally and specifically engaged in an act of violence, knowing that the act created a grave risk of death to a person, other than one of the participants in the offense, such that participation in the act constituted a reckless disregard for human life and the victim died as a direct result of the act,
shall be sentenced to death if, after consideration of the factors set forth in section 3592 in the course of a hearing held pursuant to section 3593, it is determined that imposition of a sentence of death is justified, except that no person may be sentenced to death who was less than 18 years of age at the time of the offense.
Vogt said that 18 USC, Section 3592 also applies, which reads:
(2) Grave risk to national security.— In the commission of the offense the defendant knowingly created a grave risk of substantial danger to the national security.
“The President of the United States appoints the Secretary of Defense, Attorney General, Secretary of State, head of CIA, maybe the FBI, Treasury Secretary.  There’s nothing worse than this.  This one section in the code makes it a clear-cut case that the principals have committed high treason,” Vogt said.
He said that paragraph 3 also applies:
(3) Grave risk of death.— In the commission of the offense the defendant knowingly created a grave risk of death to another person.

“We know of at least 12 people who died in this commission, four for sure directly related to his homosexuality:  anybody who was involved with him or had direct knowledge of it,” Vogt told us.

Vogt believes that Stanley Armour Dunham, Obama’s alleged grandfather, was a CIA agent.  “The author of the video ‘Dreams from my real Father’ got it right.  They weren’t supposed to spy domestically, but he did because they didn’t trust the FBI,” Vogt said.  “They had Stanley Dunham there in Seattle in the ’50s to make sure that Russian spies up here weren’t going to steal the plans for the B-52 bomber.  Frank Marshall Davis left Chicago in 1948 and arrived in Hawaii.  It was getting hot for him because of the Smith Act, and they were having hearings and arresting communist agents.” Vogt explained.

The following is Vogt’s reconstruction of events as he understands them with the information he has gathered:

Why was he sent to Hawaii?  If you look at a timeline of what was going on in the Far East with Russia, they had taken over what is now North Korea, and Mao had taken over China.  They were planning on a war to take over the rest of Korea and Vietnam felt the communists at the same time.  They knew Hawaii was a staging area for the U.S. military, a jump-off point for supplying the Far East.  What Davis did there was to create an insurrection.  He got into the union newspaper and he wound up fomenting a strike in Hawaii that lasted 180 days and shut down the harbors.  That’s a national security issue.  He did the same thing in 1962 during the Vietnam War, but the federal government ended that.  So what he was there for was to try to cause a revolt or separation of Hawaii from the U.S. before it became a state.  That was his real goal.

Frank Marshall Davis was a member of several organizations identified as “un-American” and “subversive” by U.S. Attorney General Tom Clark in the 1940s and 1950s

[Editor's Note: Davis was a member of communist organizations while in Chicago, including a writers' guild to which Vernon Jarrett, White House senior adviser Valerie Jarret's father-in-law, belonged.

After moving to Hawaii, Davis became acquainted with members of the International Longshore & Warehouse Union (ILWU), which sought "social gains" from employers after 1949. One source reports that the ILWU "controlled the Honolulu Record," the newspaper for which Davis worked, and that "Rules for Radicals" author Saul Alinsky was an author of the ILWU's Book Club.

Davis was tracked by the FBI because of his known associations with communist organizations.  Trevor Loudon of the New Zeal blog reports:

"Senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett’s late father-in-law and Chicago Sun-Times columnist Vernon Jarrett, was a key member of the South Chicago communist left of the late 1940s.

After graduating from Knoxville College in Tennessee, Jarrett moved to Chicago in 1946 to work as a journalist. On his first day on the job at the radical Chicago Defender, he was sent to cover a race riot.

The Defender was heavily influenced by the Communist Party USA and included on its roster well known Chicago Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis.

Jarrett and Davis worked on the Defender around the same time. They certainly knew each other through the Communist Party and its fronts."]

Vogt continued:

Stanley Dunham was supposedly a furniture salesman and ended up getting transferred to Hawaii.  He went there, and there was a program in Africa run by the CIA which would bring Africans to the United States to go to college here – the Kennedy Airlifts.  It began in the ’50s.  I remember them, as I’m 65.  Barack Hussein Obama was a Marxist and a Muslim, and you see him after he got off the plane and Stanley Dunham, the furniture salesman, standing next to him.  Stanley Dunham was there to “manage” him, but he was also really there to make friends with Frank Marshall Davis, which he did.

If you’re a CIA agent undercover, you’re not telling your daughter or even your wife who you really are.  You don’t take that chance.  So they never told the daughter, who was angry about leaving Seattle for Hawaii, and she had an affair with Davis.  Jerome Corsi visited Davis’s former home with the jazz records on the floor…

The Post & Email asked Vogt if there were further proof that Davis is Obama’s father, to which he responded:

I figured it out.  Stanley was CIA.  He couldn’t afford to have the agency find out that his daughter became pregnant by his target, so he shipped her off to Kenya after school was over.  He sent her to Kenya so there wouldn’t be a legal record that she gave birth.  So that’s the reason why she left the country and gave birth in Kenya.

On July 15, when Obama was going to be 50, he said that he was going to turn 50 “next week.”  Nobody forgets when his birthday is.  He slipped up.  He constantly slips up; he can’t keep his lies straight in his head.  There are too many lies.

We know he wasn’t born August 4; that was when Virginia Sunahara was born.  I was involved in the lawsuit that her brother Duncan filed.

The Post & Email helped to send a researcher to Hawaii in July 2010 who stated that in her estimation, the circumstances of Virginia Sunahara’s very short life and the passage of so many years with the unlikelihood of a relative requesting her long-form birth certificate rendered her birth certificate number one that could have been reassigned to Obama.

When we asked Vogt if he believed that Virginia’s number was given to Obama, he said, “That’s true.”

Of Duncan Sunahara’s attempts to obtain a certified copy of his sister’s long-form birth certificate, Vogt said:

Duncan has a legal right to get a copy of his sister’s birth certificate by state and federal statutes.  The lawyer from the attorney general’s office said, “Judge, you know, this is all about the Obama case.”  But there was nothing in our suit that said that at all.  The Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) broke the law; they can’t redefine what a form is.  They said, “The certificate of live birth is now this; that’s like saying that from now on, a tomato is going to be a mushroom. You’re not allowed to do that, you can’t change the name. Both federal and state law, when they say a “Certificate of Live Birth,” they mean the long form; nothing else.  In fact, I found in the federal statutes that a short form isn’t good enough to get a passport.  They say it has to be regular Certificate of Live Birth; the whole thing; not a computer-generated abstract.

To answer the question regarding the sequence of the numbers, they didn’t give us just one bad number; we know about four or more, and they were all 25 days off.  Isn’t that interesting?

The birth certificate number was the main thing.  In order to figure out a great secret, you have to find the point in time that some event happened, both naturally or by another group of people, that caused another group of people to react to it.  Once you find that starting point, then everything after that falls into place.  When they issued the short form, they said the date of acceptance by the registrar was the 8th of August rather than the 11th or the 12th, and the person who sunk him for sure was Mrs. Nordyke.  When she showed her two daughters’ microfilm copies, number 637 and 638, Obama’s is 641, Obama’s should have been 144-190 numbers lower than theirs.  There was an average of 46.9 births per day in Hawaii at that time.  Within two weeks after they issued the short-form, on June 12, 2008, magically, a computer-generated short-form showed up on the internet of a “Patricia DeCosta,” and the stupid story they gave was that she walked into the newspaper and showed it off.  One problem:  she died in 1963, 40 years before then, and her number was 199 days off.  The numbers were for the first or second week in December.  It’s impossible.  The Social Security Administration even says what to look for for a forged birth certificate.  They say if you have a birth certificate in the beginning of the year and you have a high number, it’s a forgery.  If it’s a person born at the end of the year and there’s a low number, it’s a forgery.

I actually went to the trouble of reading all 50 states’ laws and administrative code on birth certificates, plus the District of Columbia and the federal statutes and regulations of the CDC’s Department of Vital Statistics.  I’ve read them all.  It comes down to three definitions.  It will be in the book.  It’s what “file,” “filing,” and “registration” mean, and it’s all done at the same time.  When it comes in, they check for no cross-outs, the signatures of the mother and hospital administrator are signed in black indelible ink.  In Hawaii, they have seven days from the date of birth to report it to the registrar.  In this case, the state registrar is the only one which does registrations; there are no local offices in the county of Honolulu.  That’s where everybody who’s involved in this thing was born.  They check it off, and if everything is correct, they date-stamp it with a rubber stamp, they sign it, and they number it, and that is the action of filing.  In those days, they would collect  what they had for that day; they would scan it in the microfilm machines, which looked something like a scanner nowadays; and then they would put them in the loose-leaf books.  That was the act of legally filing.

The birth certificates also are not the property of the people.  By law, for every state, they’re the property of the state.  The registrar is merely the custodian.  The registrar controls who can see it, who can’t see it, according to the regulations of the state.  The point is if you have it, you can’t copyright your birth certificate.  It’s a public document after 100 years, which makes it a public document.  If people gave it to someone, they’ve given up any pretense of privacy.  It’s a government document; the state owns it.  I want people out there to understand that.

Why do you think they assigned Virginia Sunahara’s birth certificate number to Obama?  What is it that he is hiding?

He was not born in the United States.  He is not a U.S. citizen.  He doesn’t come under the treason part, because technically he has not sworn allegiance to the United States.  If he’s not a citizen, he can’t be charges with treason.  He can be charged with spying as a foreigner and could therefore just be arrested.

He has an Indonesian passport and entered school as a foreign student, which means you aren’t a U.S. citizen.

Have you seen proof of that?

Only the fact that it’s been reported that he went to school at Columbia and Occidental as a foreign student.

Atty. Taitz tried to obtain his records from Occidental, and in court, one Occidental lawyer said to the other that “Courts don’t like to rule on things that don’t exist.”

Paul Irey and I went to Hawaii with Orly last year.  After seeing what she was going through, I read the Hawaiian law and the federal statute and thought, “This is a criminal case from Day One.”  The only way it could be a civil case is to show damages.  Anyone who could possibly have a right to do it is Duncan Sunahara.  All of these court cases keep getting thrown out because you have to show damages in an equity court.

When it comes to police departments and the FBI, they have no problems getting a copy of the records.

[Editor's Note:  The conclusion of our interview with Mr. Vogt will be published within the next few days.]

© 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: National