THE POWER OF FREE SPEECH AND PRAYER
by Neil Turner, ©2012
(Oct. 3, 2012) — Just in time for Pulpit Freedom Sunday on October 7, 2012, a part of the Pulpit Initiative, designed to allow pastors to speak freely from their pulpits without fear of censorship or control by the IRS, a group of patriotic teenagers, not yet old enough to vote, speak out on the necessity to vote with their Constitutionally guaranteed rights in mind.
Voices Without A Vote
www.TinyURL.com/VoicesWithoutAVote
The teenagers who speak in this video belong to www.im2moro.org. These young people realize that if they don’t stand up and speak out for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness today, they will be living in a very different America tomorrow.
Produced in the summer of 2012 in San Diego County by local college students, and local high-schoolers…..can you believe it….in California!!, this 3¾-minute, professional-quality video is perfect to share across the nation with family, friends and everyone in between!!
And if these kids can take the time to motivate us to do the right thing this November, then perhaps we can all take steps to motivate our spiritual leaders to step up to the plate on Pulpit Freedom Sunday this October 7th. Here is what I sent to my pastor:
Neil B. Turner
30 September, 2012
Pastor Mark Foreman, North Coast Calvary Chapel
1330 Poinsettia Lane, Carlsbad, CA. 92011
Dear Pastor Mark;
In 2008, I approached you about using the church facilities for a meeting with Pastor Chuck Baldwin, presidential candidate for the Constitution Party. I have long assumed that the reason for your denial of this was your concern over the potential IRS tax ramifications and NCCC’s status as a 501(c)3 Corporation. This next Sunday October 7, 2012, will provide a chance for pastors all across the nation to address that issue.
Since then, I have become heavily involved in what I consider to be the providential benefits of our God-ordained Constitution, and the natural rights it was meant to guarantee us.
Although you may not be as aware as I of the total corruption of that ‘guarantee’ within our Government and our Judiciary, I am sure you are aware that we have an ineligible and unlawful person occupying the Office of President and Commander in Chief – an act that is repugnant to the Constitution. According to the famous Marbury vs. Madison decision in 1803, it was determined that “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” And in Norton vs. Shelby County, the Supreme Court decided, “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”
When the preponderance of evidence indicates that Mr. Obama/Soetoro was born anywhere but Hawaii, and the documents that he uses to justify his occupancy of that Office are all proven forgeries (entered into a court of law): forged Certificate of Live Birth, forged Selective Service Registration, stolen Social Security number, and failure to pass eVerify based on those forged and stolen documents – we can only conclude that we have at this point lost the protections and guarantees of that God-ordained document.
Mark, I feel that if we are to regain the benefits of that document and secure the blessings of God on our land, it will take the combined efforts of our pastors and spiritual leaders to help lead the way. And that is why I and millions of others have joined together in 40 days of prayer for the US of A from September 28 – November 6, 2012:
Dear Heavenly Father,
You have given us the promise “If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.”
So, we pray to you. We turn from evil and look to you, our God. Please:
Unite us
Strengthen us
Appoint and anoint our next president
In the name of Christ we pray.
Amen
Next Sunday, October 7, 2012, is Pulpit Freedom Sunday, a part of the Pulpit Initiative, designed to allow pastors to speak freely from their pulpits without fear of censorship or control by the IRS.
As usual, I will be looking forward to your message on Pulpit Freedom Sunday. And I feel blessed to know that you go to my church.
Sincerely,
Neil B. Turner
Go here for your two-per-page handout downloadable ‘40 Day Prayer Card’: www.TinyURL.com/PrayerFor40Days
http://upwords-static-cache.s3.amazonaws.com/election/files/40-days-of-prayer.pdf
In Liberty and In Truth.
Neil B. Turner
Citizens for the Constitution
Attention everyone:
The ‘Bill of Rights’ should only have been known by this title until the Ten Amendments were ratified.
I can only hope that someday most of the people will never refer to the first Ten Amendments as ‘The Bill of Rights’ and that goes for all of our appointed and elected officials of the U.S. including all 50 Union states’ appointed and elected officials too.
These amendments were only known as ‘The Bill of Rights’ before they were ratified as amendments because they were in a form of a ‘Bill’ before Congress and they were a list of unalienable Rights instructing our appointed and elected officials on what they could or could not do.
This is well documented via the first paragraph of the Preamble to the first ten amendments posted here http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html:
“THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.”
In the first paragraph of the Preamble when they talk about “… in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers”, there should be no confusion that this is being addressed to all of our appointed and elected officials just like the organic Federal Constitution is declaratory and restrictive clauses mandating what all of our appointed and elected officials can and cannot do. That is what declaratory and restrictive clauses mean!
The Ten Amendments once ratified were further declaratory and restrictive clauses mandating what all of our appointed and elected officials can do which would be known as being Constitutional. Once they were ratified they were no longer a ‘Bill’ but ratified amendments. They were Ten Amendments listing Rights that all of our appointed and elected officials were to make sure that they did not infringe upon any Lawful Union State Citizen.
Also within the letter from Neil B. Turner to Pastor Mark, Neil states – “and the natural rights it was meant to guarantee us”. The Federal Organic Constitution has no guarantees.
The Constitution is the People’s document by the use of declaratory and restrictive clauses mandating what all of our appointed and elected officials can and cannot do. It is the responsibility of the Grantors as explained within this URS – http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/Pattison_Baldwin_1837.html by HENRY BALDWIN, One of the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Our Rights do not come from the Constitution or from the Federal Government either. We are collectively the sovereigns. You will only find an explanation that you should use Common Law to preserve your rights – in the last paragraph posted here – http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/TO_THE_ALUMNI_OF_THE_LAW_DEPARTMENT_OF_COLUMBIAN%20_COLLEGE.pdf which states:
“When the United Colonies met in Congress, in 1774, they claimed the common law of England as a branch of those “indubitable rights and liberties to which the respective colonies are entitled.” And the common law, like a silent providence is still the preserver of our liberties.”
If you believe this is not true please document where and when Common Law was done a way with!
All Rights Reserved,
/S/ Steven Pattison
As one who can legally vote, please allow me to be the first to nominate “Voices Without a Vote” for the Academy Award for “Best Subject Possible”.
Thank you,
OPOVV
Thomas,
I totally agree and if I was able to get enough of the collective owners of our government, I would explain to everyone the fact that only the owners should vote. The owners are the ones providing for the common defence, promoting the general Welfare, and securing the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.
Everyone on any form of government entitlements should not be allowed to vote and it should be so obvious to everyone for the reason why they should not be allowed to vote.
Right now if it was up to me, I would have to allow anyone that is paying Federal Income Taxes to vote in the Federal Elections. If they are not paying state income tax then they should not be allowed to vote in state elections.
But please understand that all these current governments are de facto and are run by the banklords and their de facto money.
All Rights Reserved,
/S/ Steven Pattison