Colorado Department of State: “We Are Not the Entity Responsible for Determining Eligibility”

HAS MISPRISION OF FELONY BEEN COMMITTED?

by Kathleen Gotto

Colorado was admitted to the Union under Pres. Ulysses S. Grant in 1876

(Jan. 5, 2012) — The following letter was sent to the below-captioned Colorado officials following emails to both offices regarding the filing of a ballot challenge against Barack Obama:

TO:     John Suthers, Colorado Attorney General
Benjamin Schler, Colorado Secretary of State

Gentlemen,

The Georgia Judge, Honorable Michael Malihi, has DENIED Obama’s Motion to Dismiss in the four lawsuits filed against him (see the pdf attached) on the grounds of his ineligibility to be on the 2012 ballot!

As you can see from the emails below, I contacted both the SoS and AG offices here in Colorado because of the constitutional ineligibility of aka Barack Hussein Obama to be a candidate in the 2012 election (he was also ineligible in 2008!).  BOTH your offices either totally ignored my email plea for help (AG Suthers), or blew it off as “not your responsibility” (Ben Schler, SoS).  Both the SoS and AG deprived the citizens of Colorado an honest and Constitutional election in 2008 and are obviously prepared to do the same thing in 2012.  How are Colorado’s Attorney General and Secretary of State not guilty of Misprision of Felony when both offices were informed of Obama’s ineligibility, but totally ignored the clear and present danger to our Constitution and our personal liberty?

Now, we finally have a judge in Georgia who has DENIED Obama’s motion to dismiss.  May God grant Judge Malihi the wisdom and courage to allow the truth to be told and the law to be upheld.  We need the truth to be exposed about the fraud squatting in our White House, the man who goes by the name of Barack Hussein Obama.  Obama lacks the requisite credentials to be a de jure president, and he undoubtably will be found guilty of many crimes he committed to pull off and sustain the deception.  It remains to be seen how many he will drag down with him.  All of those elected officials and government employees (state and federal) who were complicit in keeping this fraud hidden need to be exposed and face the wrath of the constituents they deserted!  Coloradans have been defrauded of our Constitutional right to have an honest election and both of your offices allowed that to happen!

We the people of all the states need to rise up against all of you who kept the truth hidden from your constituents and defrauded us of an eligible candidate in 2008 and 2012!  You are elected officials who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, but you failed to fulfill your oath.  You failed to protect the citizens of Colorado from a magnitude of fraud we have never before seen in this country.   Your nonfeasance allowed a usurper to steal an election, and systematically destroy our Constitution.  Pox on both your houses!

Kathleen Gotto

———————–

From: Kathleen Gotto
Subject: An issue needing Colorado AG decision
Date: November 14, 2011 6:41:27 PM MST
To: attorney.general@state.co.us

Dear Attorney General Suthers,

As you can see from my email below, which documented my contact with Colorado’s Secretary of State, I am a Coloradan deeply alarmed about the integrity of our electoral process.  As a registered “Nonaffiliated” voter, I have no Party interest; however, I am keenly aware of the Constitutional requirements to be eligible to hold the office of U.S. President.  One of those requirements is that one must be a “natural born citizen”.  Mr. Obama claims that Barack Obama, Sr. was his father and has admitted being born “subject to the British Crown” through his father, a citizen of the area we now call Kenya.   At the time of Obama’s birth, Kenya was under the protectorate of Great Britain; hence, the Obamas’ citizenship under the British Crown.  How can a person born subject to the British Crown be a “natural born American citizen”?  A natural born citizen is one who has two U.S. citizen parents, not just one.  And if that were not enough, there is mounting evidence of Barack Obama’s alleged fraud concerning his supposed Connecticut Social Security Number, Selective Service Registration, and several iterations of a birth certificate or certification of live birth, to name just a few of his questionable activities.

As I stated to Mr. Schler, and documented in my MFR below, I do not want to be disenfranchised and want only eligible candidates to be on the Colorado ballot for 2012.  If I cannot register my protest of a constitutionally ineligible 2012 candidate with the CO Secretary of State, I can only assume your office is where I need to register my protest.  If it is not your office, just where do Coloradans have to go to have our electoral rights upheld?

Thank you for your assistance in this very critical matter.  I await your reply.

Kathleen Gotto

——————

Begin forwarded message:

From: Kathleen Gotto
Subject: MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
Date: September 13, 2011 12:33:18 PM MDT
To: Benjamin Schler <Benjamin.Schler@SOS.STATE.CO.US>

Dear Mr. Schler,

Thank you for your return phone call yesterday and for the information you provided.  This MFR is to document our discussion as I elevate the issue of Barack Obama’s ineligibility to be on the 2012 (or 2008!) ballot for U.S. president.   In summation, my notes show that you stated Colorado’s Secretary of State has no statutory authority to verify the Constitutional or other eligibility of presidential candidates, and that the Democratic and Republican National Committees are the entities that have the responsibility to verify and certify a candidate’s eligibility to be on the ballot. The CO SOS merely accepts the statements of eligibility from the RNC and DNC on face value and determines sufficiency therefrom.

Additionally, you stated that any eligible Colorado elector could contest an election through Colorado’s District Court under the guidelines of Colorado Revised Statute 1-4-909.

Two questions come to mind:  (1) how can Colorado’s Secretary of State assure its citizens are not disenfranchised by political machinations by either one of the two parties with questionable certifications (of which there are manifold questions concerning Mr. Obama’s allegedly phony identification documents:  i.e., his birth certificate, Selective Service Registration, SSAN, et al); and (2) even if there is no “statutory authority” to verify the eligibility of presidential candidates, surely there is no prohibition to do so, especially when a state resident and eligible elector raises questions, which I have just done with your office.  It appears to me that the CO SOS has abrogated its responsibility to ensure Coloradans have unimpeded access to a fair and honest U.S. presidential election which only allows eligible candidates to run.

Mr. Barack Obama has just been found by the Social Security E-Verify System to be using a Social Security Number that is suspiciously fraudulent.  This new revelation, coupled with all the other investigations into Mr. Obama’s past, has just increased significantly the imminent danger to this country and the rule of law. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=344461

Also, to follow-up, here is information on the case I mentioned to you yesterday http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/ second article down.  You may find it of interest.

We are at a crossroads in this country and if the states do not uphold the rule of law or support and defend our Constitution, American citizens are in the highest danger. Every federal and state employee has the highest duty to its citizens and not to any partisan affiliation.  What will the CO SOS do about Mr. Obama’s serious, treacherous, and quite possibly treasonous identity fraud?

Kathleen Gotto

————————-

On Sep 9, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Benjamin Schler wrote:

Dear Ms. Gotto,

Thank you for your email inquiring about our office’s complaint process. We do not accept complaints regarding presidential candidates and their eligibility to run for office, because we are not the entity responsible for determining eligibility. I would be happy to discuss this matter in more detail with you over the phone. Please feel free to give me a call at 303-894-2200, ext. 6342.

Thank you,

Ben Schler
Colorado Department of State
Elections Division – Legal Specialist
1700 Broadway, Ste 200
Denver, CO 80290
p: 303-894-2200 x 6342
f: 303-869-4861

———————–

—–Original Message—–
From: Kathleen Gotto
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 1:47 PM
To: Public Elections
Subject: How to File a Complaint

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please advise me on where I can find instructions on how to file and submit a formal complaint to Colorado’s SoS re: a presidential candidate not being constitutionally eligible to run for president.  Thank you.

Kathleen Gotto

5 Responses to "Colorado Department of State: “We Are Not the Entity Responsible for Determining Eligibility”"

  1. John Sutherland   Friday, January 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM

    Kathy, good work. I’ll help if I can. Let me know.

  2. John Sutherland   Friday, January 6, 2012 at 10:52 AM

    Since this is a Colorado issue, and since I am a new resident registered voter in Colorado, I have already begun my inquiries into the eligibility issue. Someone at the state level has to be responsible for vetting the candidates or at least for verifying the party vetted candidates, otherwise anyone can run for office by just paying the fee (sounds like NH, eh?).

  3. dude911   Friday, January 6, 2012 at 8:32 AM

    misfeasance would be the omission of action that duty and statute demand…to wit…uphold the constitution of both state and country…by giving false and misleading information

    malfeasance would be the omission of action as above…with the intention of causing harm…that being…knowing ones duty to perform within constitutional guidelines, but evading that to advance the agenda of those whose intent it is, is to violate them…causing harm intentionally upon the state, the nation, and its people..

    misprision of felony also…”Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.” applies because congress itself set aside and ignored facts, which if competently reviewed…would have rejected placing obama as POTUS…making every elected office in Congress guilty of misdemeanor offense…failing to act to certify that the constitution is upheld…is also…

    Treason…adhearing to the enemies of the US…those whose intent to usurp the sovereign power of this nation…by placing an ineligible person as POTUS…violating the Constitution and laws of the USA…are guilty of Treason…because those people who have taken action to overthrow the authority and the constitution are enemies of the USA…

  4. kingskid   Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 9:16 PM

    Thanks for your input, Zeb. You’ve given me food for thought.

    Kathy Gotto

  5. "Zeb"   Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 4:05 PM

    It looks like a citizen can file a complaint of false swearing with a DA or AG against the DNC. They are obliged to investigate it. Note that the Colorado code is 424 pages long so there may be other avenues. Do not rely on the SOS for any directions to make a ballot challenge.

    http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/LawsRules/files/Title1Final.pdf

    Colorado Elections Code

    TITLE 1 ELECTIONS

    OFFENSES – GENERAL PROVISIONS
    1-13-101. District attorney or attorney general to prosecute. (1) Any person may file an affidavit with the district attorney stating the name of any person who has violated any of the provisions of this code and stating the facts which constitute the alleged offense. Upon the filing of such affidavit, the district attorney shall forthwith investigate, and, if reasonable grounds appear therefor, he shall prosecute the violator.
    (2) The attorney general shall have equal power with district attorneys to file and prosecute information or complaints against any persons for violating any of the provisions of this code.

    1-13-109. False or reckless statements relating to candidates or questions submitted to electors – penalties – definitions. (1) (a) No person shall knowingly make, publish, broadcast, or circulate or cause to be made, published, broadcasted, or circulated in any letter, circular, advertisement, or poster or in any other communication any false statement designed to affect the vote on any issue submitted to the electors at any election or relating to any candidate for election to public office.
    (b) Any person who violates any provision of paragraph (a) of this subsection (1) commits a class 1 misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-501, C.R.S.
    (2) (a) No person shall recklessly make, publish, broadcast, or circulate or cause to be made, published, broadcasted, or circulated in any letter, circular, advertisement, or poster or in any other communication any false statement designed to affect the vote on any issue submitted to the electors at any election or relating to any candidate for election to public office. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of this subsection (2), a person acts “recklessly” when he or she acts in conscious disregard of the truth or falsity of the statement made, published, broadcasted, or circulated.
    (b) Any person who violates any provision of paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) commits a class 2 misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-501, C.R.S.
    (3) For purposes of this section, “person” means any natural person, partnership, committee, association, corporation, labor organization, political party, or other organization or group of persons, including a group organized under section 527 of the internal revenue code.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.