HEARING SCHEDULED TO BEGIN AT PRESS-TIME
by Sharon Rondeau
(Nov. 18, 2011) — The Concord Monitor is reporting that four members of the New Hampshire House of Representatives have stated that in their opinion, Obama’s short- and long-form birth certificates are forgeries.
The reporter has called Orly Taitz, the attorney who filed a complaint with the New Hampshire attorney general and secretary of state, a “birther,” a term which has been used by the newspaper previously by describing one of the representatives as having “planted the seeds of controversy” by questioning Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the presidency.
Gardner had reportedly referred Rappaport’s concerns to the New Hampshire attorney general, who apparently took no action.
The legislators in agreement with Taitz’s challenge, which is scheduled to be heard as this article goes to publication, are Lucien Vita, Laurence Rappaport, Harry Accornero, and Carol Vita.
Rappaport, representing the Coos-1 district in the New Hampshire House, had brought his concerns about Obama’s eligibility to the attorney general and secretary of state in 2008 after becoming a plaintiff in one of Taitz’s lawsuits that same year. Rep. Carol Vita of the Strafford-3 district had joined him. Vita and Rappaport had questioned whether or not Obama was a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution and had cited Obama’s alleged use of “multiple social security numbers.”
Taitz filed a lawsuit after she was denied information through the Freedom of Information Act in regard to the application for which the social security number which Obama is using was granted. After Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC denied Taitz’s request to see the application, he commented that it “was not her lucky day.”
Accornero, who represents Laconia in the New Hampshire House, has publicly accused Obama of treason over his immigration and economic policies.
Dear New Hampshire Elections Committee,
Please find enclosed my application, appropriate fees and forged birth certificate to be included on New Hampshire Presidential Primary ballot on January 10, 2012.
Sincerely, Adolf Hitler
They danced around it!
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/11/new-hampshire-elections-committee-rules.html
Ugh, the committee passed the buck on this, saying it doesn’t have jurisdiction on criminal matters. What a joke. Isn’t the purpose of the committee to ensure a fair process and to act on anything that smacks of fraud? The Constitution is getting bypassed by these folks!
Another miscarriage of justice. They claim it’s not in their jurisdiction, because it’s a criminal matter. Whether criminal or not, strong evidence has been suggested that he is INELIGIBLE, which is well within their jurisdiction. Are they being deliberately obtuse?
Tony Dolz, of California, also sent a complaint to the NH Attorney-General. We’ll see what his excuse is.
Why was notice of this hearing pulled off Drudge and appeared nowhere else on MSM?
OH my gosh, I am on the West Coast and I am anxious about the outcome in NH. Let’s hope that someone will listen and not just pass it around like a hot potato