IS HE THE FATHER OF “BARACK OBAMA?”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Nov. 4, 2011) — On November 2, 2011, blogger Martha Trowbridge published an article which contended that Barack Hussein Obama II is a manufactured identity for the son of black supremacy activist Malcolm X.
Malcolm X was born in 1925 in Omaha, NE to a homemaker and Baptist minister who reportedly supported Marcus Garvey, a proponent of “black nationalism” and the “Back-to-Africa” movement. Garvey has been described as having laid the framework for the Nation of Islam.
Like his father, Malcolm X became a minister, but in the Muslim rather than the Christian faith. Having converted to Islam while serving a prison sentence, Malcolm X became prominent in the organization until 1964, when he left and founded his own group, Muslim Mosque, Inc., which developed ties to larger Islamic organizations and universities.
Malcolm X traveled widely in Africa and made a pilgrimage to Mecca in 1964, after which he changed his name to El-Hajj Malik al-Shabazz. Malcolm X gave a speech in Cairo during his travels. Barack Hussein Obama II gave a speech there in 2009.
On April 27, 2010, The Washington Post “mistook” a photo of Malcolm X for Barack Hussein Obama, publishing it in place of a photo of Obama featuring his visit to an Iowa wind energy facility.
Malcolm X reportedly preached that “the white man was the devil.” He advocated “voter education” over civil rights and voter “legislation” passed by Congress. During the early 1960s, blacks were referred to as “Negroes.” Malcolm X called Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. an “Uncle Tom.” After his pilgrimage to Mecca, Malcolm X reportedly abandoned his black separatist views to the surprise of many of his followers.
On October 16, 2011, Obama spoke at a dedication ceremony of a statue honoring Dr. King.
Attorney Percy Sutton worked for Malcolm X and his family “for several decades” and also described Barack Hussein Obama II as “brilliant” and deserving of a Harvard education. Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, a “top Saudi advisor,” reportedly financed Obama’s education there. Al-Mansour has his own page on the Aswat al-Islam website and has accused “Christian founders” of “participating in segregation.”
There has been speculation that Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama Sr. were never married and that there is no “relationship between the Obamas and the Dunhams.
Are there physical resemblances between Obama and Malcolm X?
Obama stands 6 feet, one inch tall. Malcolm X was 6 feet, 3.5 inches tall.
Both became public speakers.
Are their facial expressions similar or different? Do they have the same smile?
Both have stated that they are Muslim. Both have traveled to Africa and the Middle East.
Was Stanley Ann Dunham in Chicago in the early 1960s? Was she in New York at the time of Malcolm X’s assassination? Did she have short or long hair at that time? Have photographs of her been altered?
A writer for a “black” newspaper opined:
Unlike other U.S. presidents, President Obama knows who Malcolm was and what he stands for. Like many males with African roots, President Obama was moved by Malcolm’s life story. A cursory reading of his autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” will prove this point…
When Malcolm visited Africa in 1964, he visited Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. It was during that trip that he met with Kenyan President Jomo Kenyatta, Ugandan President Dr. Milton Obote, and President Julius K. Nyerere and Muhammad Babu of Tanzania. Babu, Malcolm and Leroi Jones (now Amiri Baraka) held a meeting during this period in New York City. Malcolm talked about meeting President Kenyatta. Malcolm, however, was also aware of Kenya’s Oginga Odinga.
In 1958, Malcolm married Betty Shabazz, and the couple subsequently had six daughters. Malcolm reportedly had relationships with other women in which he “made many mistakes.”
Did Malcolm X also have a son? A biography of Malcolm’s life written by Columbia University professor Manning Marable suggests that he was not faithful to his wife, nor she to him. Marable died just before his work on Malcolm X was published.
If so, does the son wear his father’s eyeglasses? At least one other person believes so.
I will politlely exclaim OMG !!
What definition of NBC are you using and how did you acquire it?
I agree he can be thrown out of office for all manner of fraud, deceit, treason,
and violations of OUR CONSTITUTUTION.
Thank you for this story. Pam Geller on Atlas Shrugs printed a conjecture about this in 2008, although she later wrote that she did not ascribe to it. The Post Email is prudent, however, in revisiting this matter. Other sources have reported that Malcolm X may have known VERY WELL the family of Stanley Ann et al. Obama the Elder, may have been the perfect “instant daddy” to avert a scandal. Wasn’t the visiting student from Kenya receiving a “scholarship” through a Nation of Islam front organization? If so, the connections were there to save Malcolm’s reputation. The truth is coming out to America’s benefit, and to the strengthening of our democratic institutions. There are many questions to be answered.
As Pam Geller stated, ” HOW COULD STANLEY ANN DUNHAM HAVE DELIVERED BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA JR. IN AUGUST OF 1961 IN HONOLULU, WHEN OFFICIAL UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RECORDS SHOW HER 2680 MILES AWAY IN SEATTLE ATTENDING CLASSES THAT SAME MONTH?”
It amazes me how easy it would be to blackmail Obama. Matter of fact, it is highly likely to have already occurred. For example, if I were Putin, when Obama visited me in Moscow and after hosting the obigatory state dinner, I would have a KGB agent save the dinnerware used by Obama and have it subjected to a DNA analysis. Then I would direct another undercover agent to the U.S. to shadow Malcolm’s daughters until the agent succeeded in obtaining an eating utensil with saliva on it. It could be as simple as retrieving a throw away cup at a fast food restaurant. If there was a DNA match, I would have Obama in my hip pocket. I would also be confident that Obama would sell the U.S. out if it meant saving his behind. A mighty nice position in which to have the President of the United States. This is why it is absolutely ludicrous that there is no formal legitimate background clearance procedure for the President. Indeed, I do not believe there is any background investigation for any elected official. How crazy is that? Something has got to be done about this major shortcoming. As we know, the courts claim the pre-election vetting process for elected officials is performed by the public AND considered adequate. How crazy is that?
I don’t know about the Malcolm X paternity, but I believe you are ON to something here, challenger. Surreptitious DNA testing. But you are probably right about it already being done. Come to think of it, it probably doesn’t NEED to be done as they probably already KNOW who the despicable, con artist, usurper at the helm of this country really is.
On vetting: How on earth can the courts claim candidates are vetted by “the public”, when “the public” are no more than herd animals to be manipulated this way and that way, at the whim of those in power? What a sick, twisted system we have let gain control of our once great country.
HOW did this happen? OH, I know, it’s NOT POLITE to discuss uncomfortable subjects where there might be dissent, or even heated debate, like Politics and Religion. And then, of-course, there are the indoctrination factories we send our children to every day… at the sick, twisted system-controllers’ ie government’s mandate… for further squelching of any thought or discussion about anything important, like principles, ethics or honesty. And to add insult to injury, WE are PAYING them to remove any last vestige of freedom we had in this country. Talk about SAPS!
One curious aspect to the “Obama” saga is: how on earth – with all the millions he earned from book royalties, in addition to his and Michelle’s impressive income – is he strapped for funds?
Quote:
“As we know, the courts claim the pre-election vetting process for elected officials is performed by the public AND considered adequate. How crazy is that?”
It’s totally crazy, and it means the far-left Obama or someone like him loving main stream media, (and Fox is useless, “controlled” opposition), will insure there is never another true Conservative elected by hiding the past of the tyrant they are backing, and pushing every lie and accusation about their opposition to the lead-in on the nightly “news”.
Prime example, media treatment of Obama and Sarah Palin.
If the “vetting” of candidates remains this way America is doomed for the future, even if Barry were marched off to jail today.
Although I mentioned this on another post, DNA would be a very good detective in this matter. Perhaps a lawsuit of ID theft would require the matter to be settled once and for all.
Thousands each day are added in demanding some confirmation of who barry soetero really is. The continual obfuscation by team barry is now working against him. Without solid documentation of his past more and more people are concluding he is a fraud. Until he disproves the suspicion, it will diminish even the last loyal sheeple to his deceitful temporary run as putative POTUS.
As I recall, Malcolm X was an American citizen, and if it is found that BHO’s father was Malcolm X, and that BHO was born on US soil, the eligibility question becomes moot. This does not remove the fraud perpetrated on the American people by BHO and his gang with the fraudulent birth certificates, but the eligibility problem goes away.
The whole obama affair smells of corruption. Always has, always will.
It does not become moot. Citizenship and allegiance are established at birth and not at conception. It is Obama Senior’s name that is on the birth certificate, and so he is the father at the time of birth, and so it is his citizenship that got passed on to Obama Junior, and not that of the biological father. Obama was born with a foreign allegiance on account of the foreign citizenship of his father at birth — Obama Senior.
I have always contended that Obama is qualified as a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ – which, incidentally makes the left’s ridicule of me as a ‘birther’ thoroughly ludicrous.
The fraud is not in his eligibility. It’s in his presented identity.
Presidential Election Fraud emanating from deliberate identity misrepresentation is unprecedented in America. [Think also of his prior campaigns at the state and national level, in which he also presented himself as “Barack Hussein Obama”.] Once proven, the associated charges against him will be staggering, at the local / state level, all the way up.
Not to mention the publisher of his books. And the readers demanding refunds!
Whenever I see him photographed with heads of state, I can’t help but wonder: what on earth are they going to feel, when they discover they fraternized and conducted business with a con man?
One of the few conclusions I have come to, relating to Obama’s ability to stay undercover, would be his possible link to Malcolm X. It appears that nothing about Obama is real or truthful.
Good article, Sharon!
Question: How does a “Pacific Islander” land in Ivy League schools in NYC and Cambridge, MA and later end up in Chicago to navigate unscathed the cesspool that is Chicago politics all the way to the national stage.
X marks the spot…
Love your humor, Mike!