Spread the love

AMERICA ON THE EDGE OF LOSING TRUST

by Cody Robert Judy, Presidential Candidate, ©2015

(Oct. 17, 2015) — FBI IS OUTRAGED! Clinton Cover During Investigation IMPLICATES OBAMA covering for Clinton to Save Dems from CHARGES of Criminal Conduct.

If Bernie Sanders plea for a debate about Issues rather then Emails, ‘we don’t give a da** about Clinton Emails’ was a ‘pass’ Tuesday night at the first Democratic Debate, America didn’t get the message the majority of women wanted appointed to positions in the Democratic National Party as more reports surface that many Democratic leaders were not consulted about the 6 Debates scheduled for Presidential Candidates this year, and instead have just been ‘told’ or ‘Notified’ the number was ‘set’ in stark contrast to the 27 Debates of 2008.

Of course going from 27 to 6 is seen as radical or extreme and more than one Democratic Party Leader is expressing concern about the ‘closed tent’ rather than the ‘Big Tent’.

Jim Webb who placed 2nd above Hillary Clinton in the Drudge Poll, accused the first debate of being ‘rigged‘ in frustration.

Mr. R.T. Rybak came out and defended Ms. Gabbard as leaders who were ‘told’ rather than consulted objecting to the limited access to the 20 some-odd Platforms within the Democratic Party struggling for a Stage to present ideas to the public with little sympathy from the tyrannical dictates of the unsympathetic charge for Hillary Clinton the focus group of females have corralled around.

The concern is two fold by most Democrats – not only has the Party limited itself to acting as a WALL between candidates and the public, but it is committing itself to the potential ramifications of the ongoing investigation into Secretary of State Clinton’s self-admitted ‘mistakes’.

When she chose a road much more ‘secret’ to do business of the state on two things happened. First she enabled herself freedom ultimately to clear email messages at her discretion without any over site or regard to the Public Trust. This essentially placed her business in the high level security office in a position to avoid Freedom of Information Access or ‘FOIA’ Request through her own judgement or filter.

The downside was in the fear of transparency, she simultaneously and potentially placed herself in dangerous proximity to crossing the line of national security sensitivity in espionage violations. Ultimately driving the investigation is the fact her private server was hacked and information leaked in the first place.

Read the rest here.