“AN EROSION OF TRUST”
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015, blogging at CodyJudy
(Mar. 13, 2015) — There has been a volume written on Hillary Clinton’s partial release of emails, but at the heart of the issue as the people see it is the “Deterioration of Trust”. We along with Hillary agree in hind site it would have been better to use two different devices: one for work, and one for personal. It wasn’t too much to expect with a job so important as Secretary of State that is of course dealing with sensitive issues and top secret material on a daily basis.
My feelings are that in any discrepancy like this Hillary’s Choice not to use two devices in hindsight should not be the American People’s loss. Indeed, Hillary was in that office when the Government seized upon General Petraeus’s Scandal. As it happened in that, when he wouldn’t tow the line, this information became public very fast by the FBI. They knew he and is fling were using the same email account. He would leave a draft email she then would log on and find and vice-versa to communicate.
This type of collaboration could very easily have been happening just as easily with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton but she insists that we are understanding and trusting of her judgement to throw away and delete personal emails from Government Emails. Her choice to involve her personal email server in Government work is tantamount to losing her privacy in the concerns of treason.
In fact, we also have her in Office admitting the Clinton Foundation has taken money deemed unethical by the Obama Administration from Foreign Nations. The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government’s position and destroying evidence of her Family’s Foundation while she’s in office when it involves foreign nations is something we should TRUST was not done especially given the revealed donations and contributions of foreign nations deemed unethical by her boss at the time, Obama.
Wednesday, the Republican National Committee released a biting video of Obama stating foreign money was “a threat to our democracy.” and Mrs. Clinton was standing and smiling next to a few Middle East Leaders. March 7th was the Saturday before and former President Bill Clinton was defending ‘their’ acceptance of and resuming of foreign funds.
He said, being interviewed by comedian Larry Wilmore, “We do get money from other countries and some of them are in the Middle East,” he said. “For example, the U.A.E. gave us money. Do we agree with everything they do? No, but they are helping us fight ISIS, and they built a great university with NYU.” Similarly, he said, “Do I agree with all the foreign policy of Saudi Arabia? No.” But he said that country is making advances in education for women and girls.”
This is tantamount to admitting their Foundation was involved in a Foreign War and the treasury was being built up for it. How does that preclude the Clintons out of office from the Logan Act violations? There were some foreign donations accepted while she was Secretary of State and it is hard to believe that these contributions don’t have an email trail leading directly to Clinton’s Email Server.
An erosion of trust has taken place with the circumstantial evidence involving highly classified material and our Government’s position in foreign affairs. As the dollars to run for President are gobbled up by folks who are actually either not qualified for President like Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio as Obama did in the 2008 and 2012 elections, are we to assume no finance whatsoever has taken place for a Hillary Clinton run at the Office of the President?
As readily as oil and a stash of cash is sold, the evidence points to American Elections coming dangerously close to being financed by foreign money and in that process a huge disparity exist towards Candidates not positioned as closely as Mrs. Clinton is to it as well as a compromise of our American Republic.
“If any person or persons, owing allegiance to the United States of America, shall levy war against them, or shall adhere to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States, or elsewhere, and shall be thereof convicted on confession in open Court, or on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act of the treason whereof he or they shall stand indicted, such person or persons shall be adjudged guilty of treason against the United States, and SHALL SUFFER DEATH; and that if any person or persons, having knowledge of the commission of any of the treasons aforesaid, shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President of the United States, or some one of the Judges thereof, or to the President or Governor of a particular State, or some one of the Judges or Justices thereof, such person or persons, on conviction, shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason, and shall be imprisoned not exceeding seven years, and fined not exceeding one thousand dollars.”
This is not just about Hillary’s Email, involvement with foreign contributions, or running a shadow war. The suggestion that Hillary is protecting herself from Obama in what she calls her choice in hindsight that would have better served the American Public with one phone for Government and one for her Personal Use, is Hillary Clinton may have information on that server that holds Obama as ineligible in the Office of the President. Remember, she was one of the original Birthers? Now if that proves to be the case and she has not confided it to a Judge as I’ve asked her to write an Amicus Curiae several times in Tweets to her reported on this blog, then she makes herself very vulnerable to the follow up: Whomever “Shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known to one of the Judges of the United States shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason.”
Read the rest here.