Dear Commanding General – MG Carla Hawley-Bowland:

AN OPEN LETTER TO COMMANDING OFFICER OF THOSE ACCUSED OF THREATENING TO TASER LT. COL. TERRENCE LAKIN

by Cody Robert Judy, ©2010

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin reported that he overheard an officer say, "Just taser him and throw him in the van" to prevent him from speaking to the press after his Aug. 6 arraignment over his questioning of Obama's eligibility.

(Aug. 14, 2010) — There are three things I would like you to consider, General, in this letter:  my reference to your chain of command and duty towards the United States Constitution, my Amicus Curiae for Lt Col. Lakin, and my request for you for LTC Brodsky.

1- REFERENCE TO YOUR CHAIN OF COMMAND
To the question which you as a General are duty bound to take a side on; ” Are Lakin’s orders, under military law,  not depending on the president but on the chain of command?

It is not acceptable, under the Constitution of the United States, to distinguish authority of the “chain of command” from any other source other than the President of the United States. If there is a distinction, then there must be a Constitutional source other than the President for the authority flowing through the alternative military chain of command, and there is none. The U.S. military is an instrument of We The People’s executive power, duty bound to our U.S. Constitution. The Constitution vests the whole of that power in the President of the United States. To avoid any misunderstanding, it explicitly states that the President is the Commander in Chief of all the Armed Forces of the United States. To be Constitutional any and all authority flowing through the chain of command must originate in the President, and any and all orders issued to officers in that chain of Command must ultimately depend upon and exercise the President’s Constitutional power, and by that he first must be qualified as our Constitution so states, a natural born Citizen.

If a Superior Officer issues a command relying on the authority of an individual claiming to be President of the United States, but not in fact Constitutionally eligible for the office, obedience to that questionably lawful order is inconsistent with the sworn duty to uphold the Constitution.

The Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama for the Office of President is challenged by myself, who has standing or equal say as a fellow candidate, and I tell you he is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, and tell you He is NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY QUALIFIED FOR THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT. Officers of the military are not obliged to defer to that authoritative and constitutionally-authorized judgment of the Supreme Court, or Congress; you don’t have that liberty.  Their dereliction leaves the doubt constitutionally unresolved, so that every military officer, and indeed every citizen of the United States, is a hostage by any action performed by Barack Obama wieldng the executive power of the U.S. MILITARY by usurpation. Indeed, Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be President, and the Constitution plainly states that the executive power passes to the Vice-President.

The framers of the U.S. Constitution established a unitary executive in ORDER to avoid a self-destructive requiem of the U.S. government by a multi-headed chain of command in the Executive Branch, whose doubtful assertions of authority on one side or the other could force elements of the Armed Forces of the United States to base their discipline and obedience on personal loyalties and dependencies inside the military rather than their duty to the people of the United States, whose permanent will is the U.S. Constitution, NOT the result of any popular election.We are a Constitutional Republic and we cannot afford every individual’s rights placed on the table of sacrifice. It is the duty of every military officer to clarify and confirm authenticity of a Commander In Chief, in ORDER to uphold the Constitution.

Lt. Col. Lakin is not the one who has mistaken his actions, General, but so far shameful derelict-of- duty military authorities, even you, IF you do not conscientiously stop this evasion of duty towards We The People and our Constitution. You are left without cover, or excuse of one who has so testified to you the truth. I am available for your question and you have my sworn testimony that Barack Obama fails the two-pronged test for being a natural born Citizen, and thus constitutionally qualified for that office.

You must act with that witness now for our United States Constitution General.

2-IN THE HONORABLE MILITARY COURT

U.S. ARMY (Plaintiff)
v. Amicus Curiae under UCMJ
LAKIN (Defendant)
Cody Robert Judy- Amicus Curiae LTC Driscoll
______________________________________________________________________________
daniel.driscoll@amedd.army.mil
cc: www.personalinjuryattorneylaw.com info@jensenlawyers.com att: Jenson & Associates- c/o Attorney Paul Rolf Jensen

Re: Amicus Curiae on behalf of the defendant Lakin

Amicus Curiae Concern for Defendant in the matter of U.S. Army v. Lakin in the matter wherein Lakin was charged:

“With one specification of a violation of Article 87, Missing Movement and four specifications of a violation of Article 92 (three specifications of Failure to Obey a Lawful Order, and one Specification of Dereliction of Duty),” said Chuck Dasey, spokesman at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, where Lakin is assigned.

*Motion to file leave of Amicus Curiae is respectfully submitted if applicable in UCMJ
______________________________________

Reasons why the Amicus Curiae from Cody Robert Judy is applicable to this Court:
______________________________________

• Cody Robert Judy was a candidate in the 2008 elections for President of the United States, who has filed litigation in two Federal Courts regarding the qualifications of Sen. John McCain, and Sen. Barack Hussein Obama who now occupies the White House. Here are the following internet links in support:
http://www.codyjudy.us/crj4ussenatorut_031.htm Judy vs. McCain
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama Judy vs. Obama

Cody Robert Judy also recently testified in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial as an injured presidential candidate, who by being in the same Presidential race as Obama has standing, and who swore to tell the truth at the trial where a Tenth Amendment Court was held, a Jury selected, Defendants were served and given the chance to defend themselves, six days of trial witnesses and evidence were produced, and the Jury rendered a guilty verdict on 17 counts ranging from fraud to sedition on Barack Hussein Obama, Michael Sovern, and Columbia University. The closing arguments are here:

http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=8342
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2010/100519/ftpgObamaTrial.html (News)
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2010/05/12-cia-columbia-jury-are-chosen-and-13.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBJihJBePcs 31 sec. video witness Michelle Obama

The Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 32 Investigation, paragraph 1, reads:

(a) No charge or specification may be referred to a general court-martial for trial until a thorough and impartial investigation of all the matters set forth therein has been made. This investigation shall include inquiry as to the truth of the matter set forth in the charges, consideration of the form of charges, and recommendation as to the disposition which should be made of the case in the interest of justice and discipline.

a. While the Federal Courts have an interest in procuring justice in the matter, the technicalities of those courts and whatever rulings have or have not transpired do not apply to facts and information relevant to this matter. So it is that this court may also consider whatever evidence it seems true and faithful to the U.S.C.

(b) Your statement in paragraph 6 making a unilateral ruling on the role Congress may or may not play in any eligibility determination is incorrect. Obama has been sued prior to his (presumably) legally becoming President since he had never shown himself to be legally eligible to hold that office and in fact lied on his Declaration of Candidacy. Your pretense that somehow Congress could impeach a person ineligible to hold office actually is contrary to what would happen in the matter of an ineligible person who was sitting in the presidential seat of authority as a usurper.

(c) The framework necessary to straighten the executive branch should be recognized by this court as a matter of jurisprudence, and if there exist evidence that would release the charges by statutes of compliance towards duty, that should be considered equitably. If there is one advantage of a military court, it is that of examining evidence and testimony minus the political fever at large. Now I challenge this court to hear my testimony, and to examine the evidence herein as a matter of defense for Lt. Col. Lakin as I do have direct standing in the matter which surrounds the issues with which he is so charged with, and I offer myself as witness on his behalf feeling it would be beyond my ability to withhold my testimony as a natural born Citizen of the United States who has standing in the 2008 Presidential Election, in the defense of the same military which is sworn to protect me and uphold the United States Constitution.

(d) The framework of the CIA Columbia Obama Trial held in Harlem, NY May 14-19th 2010, brought a comprehensive and collection of evidence never before packaged in such a way at great cost and sacrifice and should be presented for Senate/House Congressional Trial to Judicial Committee by a coalition of presenters, and to this Military Court. Men of courage such as Maj. Gen. Paul E. Valley (retired): citing the Constitutional Authority as such:

a. U.S.C. Art. I, Sect. 8, Clause 10 the Congress shall have power “to define and punish Offenses against the Law of Nations;” for “Natural Born Citizen” requirement subject to Art.II Sect. 1, Clause 5, in the directive of Clause 6 [In case of the Removal of the President from Office – due to –inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office] Obama can’t be impeached as he was never qualified to be President.

(e) Today in this article http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=164409 your Honorable Sir, Major General Paul E. Vallely stated: “We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetero (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) … based on incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty and violation of the U.S. oath of office and the Constitution,” he said in remarks delivered to a Lincoln Reagan dinner in Virginia City, Mont., last week and published today on the Stand Up America website. “And a call for a national petition for new elections to select the next president of the United States of America must be initiated,” he continued. “We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government.”

I, Cody Robert Judy, do affirm that I have submitted this testimony and evidence under no obligation or threat of harm, and do so with my own volition and with the utmost integrity to relate the facts whereupon I am so relevant in the matter, and upon necessary means am willing to come to this court and so testify to the court’s satisfaction under cross-examination and oath.

I further say not.

Cody Robert Judy /s/ affixed this 9th day of June, 2010. Wednesday 8:16pm

Witness in CIA Columbia Obama Trial- as an injured 2008 Presidential Candidate
http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

3-IN THE HONORABLE MILITARY COURT

I request that you insure that LTC Brodsky cease interfering in your chain of command “Don’t Tase Him Bro”.

Very Sincerely Yours,

Cody Robert Judy

——————————

Editor’s Note: Cody Robert Judy is a candidate for U.S. Senate from the state of Utah for 2010 and former presidential candidate in 2008.

8 Responses to "Dear Commanding General – MG Carla Hawley-Bowland:"

  1. Aussie   Monday, August 16, 2010 at 4:44 AM

    It might be difficult to go after the man behind Wikileaks. He is Australian, or at least that is what I understand is the situation. He is in hiding….however, I do believe that the USA has a right to capture this person and bring him to the USA to face trial… if as I understand the man is Australian, then he should face trial in Australia… what he has done is reprehensible. He has put the lives of thousands on the line…

  2. Thomas   Sunday, August 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM

    This is obviously the highest disregard for Freedom that can ever be had , The Commander in Chief will not take of few brief minutes to show that he is the “Constitutional President ” If “OBAMA” would simply allow his credentials to be examined this whole situation could be over with in a matter of minutes !!

  3. James   Sunday, August 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM

    Mrs. Rondeau,

    Post and Email should send its own letter and also make a phone call too.

  4. A pen   Saturday, August 14, 2010 at 9:30 PM

    And one may wonder no longer why the founders forbid a standing army.

  5. Cody Judy   Saturday, August 14, 2010 at 6:57 PM

    Thank You Post & Email, and you’re correct.

  6. Tim   Saturday, August 14, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    It is incomprehensible that the Pentagon would go with savagery after a highly decorated LTC Lakin while practically ignoring the WikiLeaks who causes real damage to our intelligence and people.

  7. Tom the veteran   Saturday, August 14, 2010 at 1:15 PM

    It is incomprehensible to me that the court will disallow Lt.Col Lakin “discovery”. If the courts can get away with that, then, may God help us all! Surly, anyone in their right mind can understand a defendents right to produce evidence that will prove his/her innocence! If this case doesn’t finally bring things to head, then I don’t know what will other than pitchforks and lanterns on the steps of the capital!
    God’s watchfull eyes has saved this Nation more than once. Let’s pray that he will do it again, but he must be getting pretty tired of it.
    God speed to Lt.Col. Lakin.

  8. Joe The Blogger   Saturday, August 14, 2010 at 12:19 PM

    Great letter, but I must draw attention to a couple of ‘typos’.

    ‘obedience to that questionably lawful order is consistent with the sworn duty to uphold the Constitution’.
    I think you meant to say INCONSISTENT.

    Also, it is important to write ‘natural born Citizen’, exactly as it is written in the original hand-written Constitution. The original intent of The Framers of The Constitution is paramount in this matter and so the original expression of that original intent must be accurately cited.
    ———————
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Thank you for those observations. When we post others’ work, we try to be careful not to change it if it is copyrighted material. But your points are well-taken and those corrections will be made for the sake of accuracy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.