Spread the love

by CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. (Ret), blogging at CDRKerchner, ©2022

Obama Achieves His Wish/Plan for a 3rd Term as Defacto President with Biden as His Stand-in and Front-man

(Sep. 15, 2022) — Obama is the defacto President again, not Biden. Obama can now continue and accelerate his Marxist lifetime goal to completely change/subvert the USA and its constitution, all the while Biden gets the blame. Obama has pulled it off and got his wish/plan for a 3rd term with someone else as his stand-in and front-man, and the country and constitution suffers for it. Biden is filling that role for Obama. As Obama often has done, he announces his devious but real plans as a joke with a smirk on his face, either before or after he has accomplished his evil and subversive plans, to implement his “Dreams from My Father” and undermine, weaken, and bring down the USA. Especially to weaken our military and also implementing the Cloward-Piven Strategy on steroids on our southern border.

Obama told Stephen Colbert in an interview when asked about if he ever thought about serving for a 3rd term:

“… if I can make an arrangement where I had a stand-in or front-man or front-woman and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff and I could sort of delivering the lines while someone was doing all the talking and ceremony, I’d be fine with that …”

Source with video: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/obama/video-2303768/Video-Obama-jokes-term-missing-fascinating-work.html

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists

P.S. Also read the following essays regarding the presidential eligibility term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of the U.S. Constitution:

1. A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. The constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html or https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

Join the Conversation

6 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. As you are the editor of this great post (Sharon, on your own website,
    I HUMBLY ASK why don’t you correct the run-on sentence and paragraphs as follows (on your website) when the paragraph details another topic?

    GREAT ideas from CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired), but hard to read post only bc of the apparent unprofessional run-on sentences and paragraphs that perhaps can confuse other reader’s? Question: Why isn’t there a break in the paragraph between the following run-on paragraph?

    “(Sep. 15, 2022) — Obama is the defacto President again, not Biden. [Declarative statement and pause.]

    [BREAK] Obama can now continue and accelerate his Marxist lifetime goal to completely change/subvert the USA and its constitution, all the while Biden gets the blame.

    [BREAK] Obama has pulled it off and got his wish/plan for a 3rd term with someone else as his stand-in and front-man, and the country and constitution suffers for it. Biden is filling that role for Obama.

    [BREAK] As Obama often has done, he announces his devious but real plans as a joke with a smirk on his face, either before or after he has accomplished his evil and subversive plans, to implement his “Dreams from My Father” and undermine, weaken, and bring down the USA. Especially to weaken our military and also implementing the Cloward-Piven Strategy on steroids on our southern border.”

    Sharon, as you are an editor and author here, are you afraid to edit and correct some submitted posts on your website? I posted a few comments & humble links to your http://www.ThePostEmail.com website and a few posts on your Twitter handle @ThePostEmail about the Cloward-Piven strategy that were accurate.

    I was surprised to see that you actually sent to me a nasty threatening email that I can’t post links and comments to your website.

    This happened after I sent you money in a donation, and you asked me in your reply email if I could please send to you more donations because you needed them.

    If you don’t allow humble Conservative Christian free speech & links in your comment section that completely support our Constitutional Republic gov’t that USA has, and Christian mainstream media and Catholic links of hymns, songs, etc. that I sent you in comments, and you refuse to allow on your website; I have no desire to send to you any more donations, as you requested.

    You also do not want people to post links and information on your Twitter posts, which like most of your articles here on your website get NO comments. Extremely easy to see why. At this point, I perhaps stop by here two times a year. Goodbye.

    P.S. You likely won’t post this comment because you don’t allow any comments that you do not agree with.

    1. I don’t know if you are simply taunting The Post & Email, but we respond:

      1. The post on which you are apparently commenting is one by Cmdr. Kerchner, who occasionally submits his blog posts to The Post & Email for republication. You can criticize his or anyone else’s writing style, but it is not our role to teach people how to write. Rather, The Post & Email is a newspaper launched by citizens, run by citizens, contributed to by citizens, and shaped by citizens who express their concerns in everyday language as opposed to elitist journalists. While we often privately offer tips on improving one’s writing skills, we do not do the heavy editing you are suggesting unless it is to our own reporting, meaning anything authored by me.

      So we are not “afraid,” but rather, choose to take what people have written and either publish it or not. Spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are, however, corrected if and when they appear.

      2. I believe you have The Post & Email, or me personally, confused with another website, as we have never solicited money from anyone, nor have we ever asked for “more donations” after receiving an initial one. If you are not confused, then you have made a blatantly false accusation.

      3. If you wish to post “links and information on our Twitter posts,” you are welcome to do so; there is no block set on those unless someone placed it there by hacking the account.

      4. As far as “Conservative Christian” material, that is allowed as long as it is not off-topic from the post on which you are commenting. In fact, we have writers who embrace what I would consider to be “conservative Christian” values. Our spam filter, however, may block comments with numerous links and very little text.

      5. If you did submit comments that were not published, they either did not come through or were marked as spam, but I do not recall seeing them.

      6. Your accusation that I “sent a nasty threatening email that I can’t post links and comments to your website” is patently false and subject to legal action. Please produce the email you are referencing.

      7. Lastly, if you do not find The Post & Email informative, go elsewhere for your news.

      Sharon Rondeau, Editor

  2. CDR KERCHNER: Even if Obama was ineligible to be president per Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, he was/is a COMMUNIST-MENTORED, DISCIPLE OF MAO AND MARX, UNDOCUMENTED (forged documents do not count!), ONE-TIME HOMOSEXUAL, CRACK COCAINE USER, MONEY LAUNDERER, RADICALLY-DISPOSED MUSLIM, ARAB AMERICAN (ethnically 94% Arab American, whereas only 56% African American Black), FRIEND OF DOMESTIC TERRORISTS (Bill Ayers and The Weather Underground, The Nation of Islam, Black Panthers, and others), SERIAL CRIMINAL (dozens of times over), CIA AND DEEP STATE SPONSORED, MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE, who “STOLE” America’s presidency and command of our unsuspecting men and women in the armed forces, which, in my marginally qualified view, is TREASON. By the way, everyone, I do believe the obvious: Obama was not and is not a natural born American citizen! SO, WHAT DO YOU THINK HE HAS BEEN HIDING ALL THESE YEARS? WHY ISN’T IT A TOPIC OF SERIOUS WIDESPREAD DISCUSSION? WHY IS OUR GOVERNMENT’S FOCUS ON ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING POLITICAL, EXCEPT THE TRUTH ABOUT THE TAKEOVER AND PROMISED (by Obama) “TRANSFORMATION” OF OUR COUNTRY (not just a small part of our Capitol building)? Anyway, thanks for your service to our country, CDR Charles Kerchner. Tom Arnold.

  3. fuhrer obama was not eligible to be president and the devildemocommiecrats and establishment republicans knew it but wanted America destroyed so they stood by him so he could do what they wanted to happen!!!!! biden is merely the bobblehead dummy doing the talking while fuhrer obama is calling the plays and continuing to destroy the nation he hates!!!!!!!!!!

    1. I’m sure my member of Congress knew Obama was and is a total fraud. The problem was Congressional leadership told him what he could say about Obama and he obeyed. Once Obama was sworn in he, like every member of Congress from both parties, had violated their sworn oath to protect the Constitution. Rather than face the consequences of that, and with some members of Congress far more serious crimes associated with Obama, (Pelosi for example), all of Congress, both parties decided to cover for Obama to protect themselves. The Unipartyy became more Uni and the crimes got bigger and the swamp got deeper as the cover-up of The Obama Fraud continues today…..and tomorrow………….