TRUMP VS. CLINTON: UNDERSTANDING TRUMP’S CLAIM OF HILLARY CLINTON BEING “FIRST BIRTHER”
by Cody Robert Judy, Presidential Candidate, ©2016
(May 9, 2016) — Sometimes I think being a Federal Declared Official Democratic Party Candidate for President who is mostly covered up, except by the Federal Election Commission, is a call to be a reporter. Maybe write some things reporters and newspapers hate blogs for because of their heightened ability of Free Press? Let’s face it: Barack Obama’s motive for getting into the divorce/custody records of his political opponent in 2004 was indeed about “reporting” a Republican’s marital infidelities.
In a quick review, Jack Ryan had been a successful businessman prior to his U.S. Senate campaign in 2004 against Barack Obama, and for a community organizer to outdo a successful businessman with a net worth of tens of millions of dollars in Illinois, getting elected would need some gasoline. You need some real dirt for fire combustion against your political adversary and tapping the guilt of Ryan in front of Republicans’ ‘moral code’ was designed as a well-justified plan in unsealing his divorce/child custody records leading to his withdrawal.
Ryan would later complain it was really an unprecedented maneuver. “Jack Ryan has characterized what happened to him as a ‘new low for politics in America.'”[15] According to Ryan, it was unprecedented in American politics for a newspaper to sue for access to sealed custody documents. Ryan opposed unsealing the divorce records of Senator John Kerry during Kerry’s race against George W. Bush in 2004, and Kerry’s divorce records remained sealed. Ryan subsequently made a statement requesting “Let me be the only person this has happened to. Don’t ask for Ted Kennedy’s. Don’t ask for John McCain’s. Don’t ask for Joe Lieberman’s. Just stop. This is not a good precedent for American society if you really want the best and brightest to run.”
The desensitization of the public has nearly come full circle for the Clintons as they face the new generations of voters learning all about the part Hillary Clinton played in her own enabling of Bill Clinton’s indiscretions that produced thousands of dollars in fines for them to pay off.
It’s really never been about liking Bill and Hillary Clinton as imperfect people; they are likable enough, but rather, a commitment to the Truth that America has a deep yearning for which the Clintons have constantly gotten in the habit of withholding or politically shaping for the public in ways most perfect for them.
Who knows why the public wants the Truth or if they prefer to be treated as children in a family?
What is it exactly that is hoped-for in the accomplishment of revealing Truth?
Whether getting to the Truth is to ‘justify’ behavior by pointing out misdeeds of people who are elected is the misfortune we all know of ever finding someone perfect, or if it’s based on the simple respect we hope they have for us, our vote to put them in the seat of authority, to handle the truth in a way greater than being treated in a child-adult relationship, I’m not sure, but what we do know is that TRUTH can be hard for politicians to bear when it is testifying against them. There’s a long line of politicians who have found their fortune, fame, and political seat wiped out with the revelations of truth, so there must be something to it that is not overrated.
Read the rest here.
Are you on the ballot in all 50 states?