by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015

(Jul. 22, 2015) — CATCH UP? Watch the Video that will bring you up to speed on Judy v. Obama 14-9396 Here:  SCOTUS MATRIX 


Let’s Dive In!

I decided to do a little research on the Cases that were also placed on the Pending Orders list in the June 18th Conference. The findings were interesting and revealed my case as rather an enigma in regards to the ‘forma pauperis’ standing being denied. There were 7 Cases in all that were denied proceeding with forma pauperis status or standing in the June 18th Conference.

It is true that if the Court finds in a case the petitioner to be abusing the Court process in multiple filings that Rule 39.8 was established to ‘Deny’ forma pauperis standing, or process to the Court without filing fees being paid. Rule 39.8 states:

If satisfied that a petition for a writ of certiorari, jurisdictional statement, or petition for an extraordinary writ is frivolous or malicious, the Court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis.”

The biggest question I had for the Clerk in my phone call was if my Case was denied based on this wouldn’t it be mentioned that it was pursuant to 39.8 and the clerk informed me that it would.

As I researched the Cases, indeed I found that to be true.

Cases that were denied forma pauperis standing that Conference day that had “pursuant to Rule 39.8 ” attached to their Cases were:

14-7802   The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied see rule 39.8
14-7899   The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied see rule 39.8
14-8081   The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied see rule 39.8
14-8082   The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied see rule 39.8

That left only two other cases mine and this one:

14-9747 Macak v. McDonald Sec. Vet Affairs I found the dismissal by the Circuit Court for Veterans Claims (link).

I called Mr. Macak and inquired wither he had paid for any Court fees in the lower courts. Based on the fact that this was essentially a veteran’s claim originating from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit case No. 1015-7011, there was never any cost involved.

In speaking with him I gathered that he is between 75-80 years old, has no more dependent children living with him (his youngest was 18 and he had twins that were 22 years old). He had a $1,200 dollar mortgage. His retirement entitlement between Social Security and disability was $4,100 per month.

I couldn’t help but think, “Good Lord, if I was clearing half of what he had coming in a month with no dependents I certainly could afford 2-4K in printing costs and a $300 Court Fee, and I’d feel like a pretty doggone cheap skate if I didn’t. This was a guaranteed income that Mr. Macak had. He has not filed for a Reconsideration from the Court on the denial of forma pauperis. I did and was given the conference on the motion for reconsideration for Sept. 28th.

With my income, you have to deduct product cost from sales. If you do not pay for product you certainly have no sales, not to mention my business is subject to ‘seasonal fluctuations’. Try to explain that to a Court that wants to know “gross”, not “net” and you can understand why a Magistrate Court Judge might ‘get it’ in the Lower Courts but the Supreme Court might have missed it.

Anyway, it’s just really bothered me that mine was denied, and seeing this information helped me make some sense of what may have happened in the Supreme Court of the United States. Also seeing the debunking of so many insults that have come to me over the insinuation that my case was amongst those whose was dismissed due to Rule 39.8 also made me feel better.

I really felt like our fundraiser was hampered by these assuages by those who are trying to derail this Case at every step of the way. They do not care how it’s done, only that it gets done. Its important to me for people to understand this has been a great burden on me and I am beside myself with the lack of help from the American public, even if I was rich enough to afford the fees and printing cost.


“Donald Trump: I really don’t know where Obama was born” and that’s an “old subject”?

Have you seen the Media trying to take Mr. Trump down on what he can’t do anything about? Yes, the Main Stream Media as exampled by this 1 minute video with CNN’s reporter, Anderson Cooper, goes for Trump’s jugular by trying to pin Mr. Trump down on where Obama was born. Notice Mr. Cooper never alludes to the qualifications of the Constitution that a natural born Citizen be ‘born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’; he focuses in on ‘where Obama is born’ because Obama already has lost the parental inherited citizen report based on his father being listed on the long-form as Kenyan rather than a U.S. Citizen.

Look, over 300,000 people have seen this over the last 9 days. That’s what you call a successful political commercial, so let’s FEATURE IT!

See the video and read the rest here.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.