FIRST AMENDMENT RALLY RIDICULED BY ELITISTS, GLENN BECK AND MORE
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2014, blogging at CodyJudy
One need not wonder about the valor that was exhibited among patriots today all over the United States of America as much as wonder about those who have forgotten the principles of the Constitution. The ridicule came as a threat from the power that has been assumed by the liar-in-chief irrespective of law and the demands that the Constitution articulates as qualifications for the Office of the President.
The threats of violence were endured by those peacefully assembling from many directions, but it was crystal clear that as the assembly was bipartisan, and those in the seats of honoring the Constitution who had desecrated their oaths was bipartisan, so was the ridicule, taunting, and even threats of violence bipartisan.
Glenn Beck made the top lists of ridiculers as was also most notably recognized by Rush Limbaugh. Mr. Beck ridiculed the act of Revolution, closely shading the people’s revolutions in the Arab Springs armed and encouraged by the Obama Administration as not something he ever wanted to be part of. Today he questioned the integrity of the Tea Party’s desire for the liberty and freedom and Rush Limbaugh said it was unfortunate that Glenn Beck had misconstrued the very important elements of peacefully gathering and assembling as constructs of the Constitution for the People in O.A.S.
Maybe it was because he hadn’t organized it that he was feeling left out, but the only thing that came to my mind is that Glenn Beck would have definitely been one of those opposing George Washington’s call for a restoration of decent principles associated as the pinnacles of citizenship and a list of intolerable grievances that were petitioned for redress today. He certainly wasn’t feeling, well, patriotic, nor was he giving the time of day for him, or any one of his 300 employees, to take a short walk down the internet freedom highway to OAS2014.com to see the consistent language of “peacefully assembling” and a demand for “redress of grievances” expressed in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
That was inexcusable and lazy at best, and I myself found it derelict and void of the parameters of journalism America has always favored in the watchdog of the Media. I was sickened with the taunts, rants, and paltry conduct unbecoming the civility Americans have enjoyed as Civil Liberties today. With so many feasting at the trough of the First Amendment rights of free speech today on the left, I often wonder at the delirious quasi- serving conundrum that they on one hand hold on to for dear life, but on the other disdain so madly the rights of others that have been infringed by Obama’s ineligibility.
They do not put together that the qualifications demanded in the Office of the President within the Constitution actually pose as Civil Rights to those in the Presidential Race such as myself who have literally been inflamed as an assault most grievous and unaddressed with not so much as a single hearing in the Halls of Justice clear up through the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.
No, not a single hearing, and it’s with wonder and awe that, completely devoid of intelligence, they cannot figure for themselves the resolve that “Citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” are two completely different and separate qualifications as is most notably recognized in the constructs of the Constitution within the same sentence.
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of the President…” Article II, Sect.1 Clause 5.
The United States Supreme Court did say that “a person born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents” was never doubted to be a natural born citizen in the precedent case Minor v. Happersett for no reason; expressing that there were doubts to the others effectively stated as precedent there was indeed a difference in a first- and second-generation citizen of the United States of America and the possibility existed in real time for the overthrow of the United States in the first much more readily than the second provided by time; or the natural defense of time.
Glenn Beck has a long history of assaulting the principles of the United States Constitution’s Qualification for the President; which is very important, as it literally hangs by the thread of a qualified person the whole of the Executive Branch and the authority that is given to it, including all its Cabinets and Bureaus as enforcers of the law, by We The People in the United States Constitution.
Read the rest here.