“ONCE IT STARTS, IT’S OVER”
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2013, Presidential Candidate, blogging at codyjudy
(Sep. 18, 2013) — It’s been a quietly kept secret in Congress, but this week word leaked out that the case on Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President is indeed in the cross-hairs of Congress, but here’s the surprise: it has just as much to do with the Republicans as it does the Democrats, which would be required for it to have success.
The most promising case (that would be a reverse on Judicial Review whereby the Judicial Branch usually reviews a law passed by Congress as abiding by the Constitution or not), for Congress in the eligibility arena is indeed the low profile case of Democratic Party Candidate for President Cody Robert Judy that landed without a hearing in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 because of its multiple reviewed index in 2012 and January 2013.
Barack Obama’s coattails just aren’t what they used to be, and in the face of mounting evidence his long-form birth certificate is a forgery, the devastation prospect of de-funding Obamacare with the House Revolution gaining steam, with champions R-Sen Mike Lee UT and R-Ted Cruz-TX Senate, Democrats are coming off the coattails of Obama in many ways with the 2014 elections looming and the American People still seething over Syria, Benghazi, NSA spying, IRS profiling and over a dozen more scandals pointing directly at the White House.
Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse was given the task of determining simply whether identity documents handed out by Obama from the White House Press Corps Room were authentic or if it represented an act of fraud or deception. The first step in that would be determining if the document Obama handed out was authentic or a fabrication.
Lead investigator of that Cold Case Posse Mike Zullo’s determination that the document was indeed a fraud was also indeed slipped into Cody Robert Judy’s Georgia State Court case against Barack Obama as an eligible candidate who, by his actions of fraud, was actually hindering Cody’s campaign for president in the Democratic Party Primaries in 2012.
Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse findings were released March 1st, 2012 and were promptly inserted as legal evidence in collaboration of Cody’s insistence that Barack Obama was not a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the President by the demands of the Constitution as far back as before the 2008 Election where Cody inserted a U.S. Supreme Court Case against Barack Obama in an Emergency Motion filed to the Federal District Court case he had against Sen. John McCain and the Republican National Committee. Judy v. McCain Case Number:2:2008cv01162
Filed: September 3, 2008 , that had to do with the same issue and McCain not being a natural born citizen with his foreign birth in Panama’s local hospital.
In the following interview with Detective Mike Zullo, supporting evidence from document expert and witness in the Alabama Supreme Court are discussed. Though the first two minutes is repeated in the video, one can skip ahead to see the entirety.
New Interview w Mike Zullo
[For video, see here]
The importance of this is also termed in legal jargon as having objected to qualification before Obama entered into office, not only in 2012 but in 2008, which maintains the grievance as unsatisfied by justice with prima facia evidence before trial which is sufficient to prove the case, which then led to the egregious manner in which Cody’s case was handled by the Clerks of the United States Supreme Court.
Cody’s case was sent to the Court some 7 months and over 7 times before he was actually given a case number. The only significant difference upon which Cody was granted a case number was the two other Georgia cases having to do with Obama’s eligibility that had also made their way up to the Untied States Supreme Court in theory giving the Clerks cover for a dismissal on “Standing.”
You might ask what “Standing” is and why it was used in this manner to dismiss so many of the Obama eligibility cases.
There are three standing requirements:
1) Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
2) Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
3) Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.
Judy v. Obama 12-5276 case represented the ONLY case which satisfied all three directives of the “Standing” argument; however, if you want this to be covered up, what do you do?
You wait until there are two other cases from the same State Supreme Court to come up where the “Standing” argument can be used because there is no candidate for President in them, and you shove the one where the “Standing” argument is not applicable in between them and call it an innocent mistake.
That’s exactly what happened with Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and hearings in Congress can get to the bottom of it very quickly!
The biggest reason Congress has kept it a secret is that it is not something that is a mystery to its conclusion. Once it starts, it’s over for Obama because even Democrats in the United States Senate would be forced into submission in the overwhelming face of hard and convicting evidence.
[If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign,” or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here: ]
Editor’s Note: The Post & Email asked Judy the source of the information about Congress’s alleged scrutiny of Obama’s eligibility, to which he responded, “It came from a source high up in the Government of the United States.”
Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.