Spread the love

AND IS THERE MORE TO COME?

by Sharon Rondeau

(Apr. 14, 2012) — “About a dozen” Secret Service agents and military members have been accused of misconduct while in Colombia in advance of Obama’s travel there for a Summit of the Americas conference.  The Secret Service employees were returned to the United States, while the military personnel were ordered “confined to quarters.”

An author of a book about the Secret Service said that the scandal “is the biggest scandal in Secret Service history.”  The Secret Service protects presidents, presidential candidates, former presidents and dignitaries visiting from other countries.  Mark Sullivan, the director of the Secret Service, said in the 2010 annual report, “I am proud and honored to lead this elite team of professionals — special agents, uniformed officers, administrative, professional and technical specialists — who personify our motto ‘worthy of trust and confidence’ every day.”

The Secret Service’s stated mission is to “uphold the tradition of excellence in its investigative and protective mission through a dedicated, highly-trained, diverse, partner-oriented workforce that employs progressive technology and promotes professionalism.”

Originally formed in 1865 to prevent the counterfeiting of U.S. currency, the Secret Service continues to investigate that and other crimes today.  After Patriot Act was signed into law in 2001, the Secret Service was given the responsibility of investigating “electronic crimes.”  Several of the Secret Service’s “Most Wanted” fugitives are accused of “identity theft.”  Other suspects have been arrested for “identity theft,” among other “online” crimes.

Then why are members of the Secret Service not investigating the image presented to the public on April 27, 2011 as Obama’s “birth certificate” which has been declared a forgery by an investigative team from Maricopa County, AZ?  Why are they not investigating Obama’s use of a social security number from Connecticut when he allegedly was born in Hawaii?  The Secret Service has purview over the investigation of “forgery” and “computer fraud.”

On March 17, 2009, LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III accused Obama of having committed treason by allowing U.S. Army troops to deploy and operate on the streets of Samson, AL under the direct supervision of General Martin Dempsey, who is now chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  Two days later, Fitzpatrick received a visit from two Secret Service agents along with a Sweetwater Police Department officer.  Toward the end of the interview, after which Fitzpatrick was not arrested, one of the agents told him, “We can’t arrest him, you know,” meaning Barack Hussein Obama, who Fitzpatrick had accused of being a “foreign born domestic enemy.”  Others have named Obama in treason since Fitzpatrick’s initial complaint was filed.

If the Secret Service could not arrest Obama in March 2009, could they do it now based on the Cold Case Posse’s findings?  Where is Obama’s documentation?

To our knowledge, neither the FBI nor any U.S. attorney in the country has taken action on criminal complaints against Obama and his criminal accomplices.  The U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee has joined forces with the Knoxville office of the FBI to disseminate false and misleading information about Georgia citizen Darren Huff as well as Walter Fitzpatrick, whose complaint against the Monroe County grand jury is misstated as “primarily from the refusal of the Monroe County grand jury to indict President Obama” because he “was “not the legitimate President of the United States.”  Rather, Fitzpatrick’s treason complaint against Obama and action against the acting grand jury foreman were unrelated.

Huff has spent nearly six months in a federal prison, although an eyewitness to the events in question stated that FBI agents perjured themselves at Huff’s trial.

Obama’s Secretary of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman have declared that they take direction from international entities rather than from the U.S. Congress.

Obama’s putative Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, failed to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes in the amount of almost $26,000, citing “carelessness.”  He has since paid additional penalties to the IRS.  Geithner has recently been questioned by New York City police regarding his possible role, as head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in instructing AIG to “limit its swaps disclosure” to the public.

Then there is Solyndra, in which $535,000,000 was loaned to the “green energy” company whose executives had supported Obama before the company declared bankruptcy last fall.

Obama has ties to convicted felons Tony Rezko and Rod Blagojevich.  His putative attorney general, Eric Holder, refused to prosecute members of the New Black Panthers despite a default on the part of the defendants, stating that they were “his people.”  The Philadelphia leader of the New Black Panthers, King Minister Samir Shabazz, also was not prosecuted and prohibited only from “displaying a weapon” within 100 feet of a polling location for the next three years.

Is that because Holder’s boss’s real identity is “Bari M. Shabazz?”  If so, what does that make Eric Holder?

If Obama is not a U.S. citizen, why is he occupying the presidency of the United States?  Why was his passport file “breached” in 2008?  Was it to create a forgery so that his true identity would be hidden?  Why else would a forged birth certificate and Selective Service registration exist?  Why else would he be using a Social Security number from a state in which he neither lived nor worked?  What happened to Quarles Harris, a witness in the passport breach investigation?

Holder and Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, have filed lawsuits against states attempting to enforce federal immigration laws or formulate their own in the absence of federal cooperation.  Holder’s Department of Justice has also filed suit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio for alleged “civil rights” violations.

Obama has instructed the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Division of Homeland Security to practice “prosecutorial discretion” in the “apprehension, detention and removal of aliens” from the United States.  Under the color of protecting the “Voting Rights Act,” Holder has sued Texas and South Carolina for passing legislation requiring photo ID of all voters.

Both Obama and Holder have been named one of ten most corrupt politicians by Judicial Watch, a national corruption watchdog group.

Rather than answer a U.S. Army officer’s questions about Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve, Obama’s military court-martialed and sentenced him, without allowing any discovery, to six months in Ft. Leavenworth prison.

And what about Michelle and the girls’ expensive trips totaling more than $10,000,000 while the nation suffers from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression?

In September 2009, Obama chaired and “set the agenda” for the United Nations Security Council, which had never been done by a sitting U.S. President.  By initiating military action in Libya without consulting with Congress, Obama may have violated the War Powers Act and the U.S. Constitution.  His excuse was that the law “doesn’t apply to Libya.”

What about Congress, who, according to one presidential candidate, is fully aware of Obama’s fraud but will not act?

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. All the law enforcement people work under the President. As long as they consider him legally elected, they serve under him. However, if it were to be proven that he was not legally elected or that he committed fraud and/or forgery in pursuit of the public office that he now holds… maybe that has another outcome. Let’s hope so.
    ELmo