“Baraka Obama” Participated in Post-Show Discussion of Tribute Play to Saul Alinsky

IS OBAMA’S PAST FINALLY COMING TO LIGHT?

by Sharon Rondeau

Saul Alinsky, who died in 1972, was known as a powerful community organizer

(Mar. 5, 2012) — The website of Andrew Breitbart, who died suddenly and unexpectedly last week, has released a playbill advertising the opening of a play entitled, “The Love Song of Saul Alinsky.”  Written as a tribute to Saul Alinsky, a communist agitator and advocate of community organizing, the play ran from September 4 to October 3, 1998 and again from October 9 to October 25, 1998 in two Chicago locations.  Both runs of the production took place on consecutive weekend evening and Sunday matinee performances.

In the press release, reproduced in graphical form, “Sen. Baraka Obama” is noted to be one of the after-show panel discussion members.

The poster is done in black and red relief.  Michelle Obama wore a black and red dress on Election Night, 2008 deemed “striking.”  The Obama daughters wore black and red dresses, respectively.

In book form, the play is available from various booksellers, and the author, Herb Schapiro, is a co-author to at least one other publication.

The poster advertising the Alinsky play features the “clenched fist,” which is a symbol of “solidarity and resistance.”

While Alinsky stated in the prologue to his book that he “was not concerned” about those seeking “the dark security of dependency,” he also mentions “the enemy from within,” which he describes as a “hidden and malignant inertia that foreshadows more certain destruction to our life and future than any nuclear warhead.”  Alilnsky dedicated his book Rules for Radicals to Lucifer, the devil.

According to Wikipedia, Alinsky is “generally considered to be the founder of modern community organizing.”  Obama is also noted to have been a “community organizer.”  Between 1992 and 2004, Obama conducted “leadership training sessions” for members of ACORN, also acting as the organization’s lawyer in some instances.  Some ACORN members were accused and convicted of voter fraud after the 2008 election.  Alinsky concentrated on “organizing” poor Chicago communities in the 1950s, having himself been born there in 1909.  Alinsky has been credited with “radical social action” on behalf of poor people.

Hillary Clinton wrote a college thesis on Alinsky which referred to a “fight.”  According to the same source, “Barack Obama after finishing Columbia University went to Chicago and began to work in a organization Alinsky helped to start.”

In Rules for Radicals, written in 1971, Alinsky said, “My fellow radicals who were supposed to pass on the torch of experience and insights to a new generation just were not there…” and “A revolutionary organizer must shake up the prevailing patterns of their lives—agitate, create disenchantment and discontent with the current values, to produce, if not a passion for change, at least a passive, affirmative, non-challenging climate.”

Perhaps more revealingly, Alinsky states in the first chapter of Rules for Radicals entitled “The Purpose,” “In this book we are concerned with how to create mass organizations to seize power and give it to the people; to realize the democratic dream of equality, justice, peace, co-operation, equal and full opportunities for education, full and useful employment, health…This means revolution.”  Alinsky’s method required the organizer to “pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

Is that what was done to Joe the Plumber in 2008?  Is that why anyone questioning or disagreeing with Obama is called a “racist?”  Is that why this writer was called a racist last week?

In 1998, “Barack Obama” was a state senator from Illinois.  The year before, he voted against a ban on the practice of partial-birth abortion, which causes an unborn child to be born prematurely and then killed.    What else was “Baraka Obama” doing in 1998 and other years which Americans know nothing about?  Even now, his state senate records are not available to the public and were shielded from scrutiny during the 2008 election?

In 2004, one website suggested that America should “fall in love with Barack Obama,” partly because of his “stirring life story,” which the Cold Case Posse and other researchers have now called into question.  In 2007, The Weekly Standard stated that Obama graduated from Harvard “magna cum laude” but presents no evidence to support the contention, and Obama’s university records have never been released to the public.

Obama reportedly worked as a community organizer in Chicago from 1985-88 and was the first executive director of a group called the “Developing Communities Project” before beginning Harvard Law School.

Recently, Obama has named his 2012 voter registration endeavor “Project Vote,” the organization with which he worked in the early 1990s with Sanford Newman, its founder.  Newman is an attorney and gave $2,300 to Obama for America in 2008.  Sanford, also known as “Sandy,” was a mentor to Obama and chose him to lead the local Project Vote office in Cook County, IL.  Project Vote reportedly pressured officials to refrain from investigating claims of voter fraud during the 2008 election.  ACORN members have visited the White House since Obama took office despite the group’s ties to election fraud.

Sandy Newman is currently president of “Voices for Progress,” which “conducted tightly managed volunteer-based voter registration programs, and pioneered the strategy of having volunteers register voters on food stamp and other social service lines. By the time he left Project VOTE! in 1993, it had registered over 2 million new low-income and minority voters, won a dozen lawsuits protecting voting rights, become the nation’s largest minority voter participation organization, and conducted voter registration drives on the largest scale in US history.”

Is Sanford related to “Uncle Fred” Newman?

Given Obama’s interests in 1998, is it any surprise, then, that he pushed through a national health care bill which the majority of Americans did not want? And who will achieve the “Champions for Change” award as a reward for “teaching others about the benefits of the Affordable Care Act?”

Is it any surprise that Obama has been advocating that a college education is a necessity?  Is it really necessary?  What kinds of ideology are promoted on America’s college campuses today?

Why was Obama’s first name spelled differently than the way in which he had been known in the Illinois state senate?  Was he using an alias for a reason, or was it a simple misspelling?  Has he used other aliases?

Breitbart’s former website, biggovernment.com, has been redesigned since his passing, and his staff plans to “go forward infused with Andrew’s fire, his fight, his humor and his warrior spirit.”  Breitbart had announced that he possessed information vital to vetting Obama prior to the 2012 election. The major media companies did not probe Obama’s past during 2007 and 2008, leaving the American public largely unaware of his background.  Obama’s medical, school and college records have been concealed from the public, and the image of his long-form birth certificate was judged to be a forgery by a Cold Case Posse operating in conjunction with the Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff’s Department.

Could America have been hoodwinked by “Barack Obama?”

Was Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America” intended to “push America even farther down the road to socialism” and “economic justice?”  Is that why a “record number” of people are now receiving supplemental food assistance?

Is Obama an Alinskyite?  Is that what Americans wanted when they voted for Obama in 2008?  Had they known his connections, would they have supported him?

And in the wake of allegations of fraud and forgery, will Americans vote for him again?  Will the Democratic National Committee support him?

Breaking, 1:12 p.m.:  Nine state Attorneys General have claimed that the Obama regime has violated the U.S. Constitution and “broken laws.”

3 Responses to "“Baraka Obama” Participated in Post-Show Discussion of Tribute Play to Saul Alinsky"

  1. Veritas   Tuesday, March 6, 2012 at 11:28 PM

    That deception, pen, is TAQIYYAH…Obama is fooling no one except the “true believers” who would kiss Stalin’s or Chavez’s toes if they could be in their presence. Netanyahu knows exactly the situation we are in. As they used to say on “Laugh In,” we can “bet our bippy!”

  2. A pen   Tuesday, March 6, 2012 at 2:15 PM

    The fact that Obama praises strategists who aim to destroy the constitution by deception is all that one need understand. It doesn’t matter what form of government he would see replace it either. All that matters is the process we are guaranteed by law and entitled to by law is not being utilized. There is no legitimacy in anything gained by deception. That includes a claim to be able to legislate or even interpret the law in any way. Usurpation by deception is a coup by force as certain and deadly as by arms. If the use of a hand held tool signifies a complex thought one better look closer at nature as deception is her oldest and most complex weapon and it’s shared right down to the simplest organisms. The hand tool simply makes the dispatching of masses possible.

  3. "Zeb"   Monday, March 5, 2012 at 1:18 PM

    Alinsky’s book is a must read, twice, for conservative “radicals”. Alinsky is your basic evil person and his writing shows that but his philosophy, if it can be called that, comprises the playbook for liberal activities. If you are in the game but don’t know how the game is played; you loose!

    Pay particular attention to the nuances of Alinsky’s take on means to an end. Alinsky was way to clever to use any means to an end. He spins that differently, as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.