IS OBAMA’S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER PART OF A MANUFACTURED FAKE IDENTITY?
by Sharon Rondeau
(May 16, 2011) —Susan Daniels is a licensed private investigator who has researched the use of the social security number currently being used by Barack Hussein Obama which she has determined was issued in the state of Connecticut, where Obama has neither lived nor worked. Daniels has stated that the number had originally been assigned to a man from Connecticut born in 1890.
Daniels is president of Susan Daniels & Associates, which is located in Ohio and was incorporated in 1995. Prior to opening her own company, Daniels worked as a private investigator for Friedrick Investigations in Lakewood, OH, including in the areas of medical malpractice, background investigations, and litigation support. She was also employed as a “stringer” (correspondent) for the Cleveland Plain Dealer for 17 years, covering Board of Health meetings, trials, local county commissioners’ meetings, and performing public records research.
Author Jack Cashill has consulted with Susan Daniels on the issue of Obama’s social security number and has written a book, Deconstructing Obama, which presents Cashill’s evidence that Obama did not write his own autobiography, Dreams From My Father. Cashill believes that Bill Ayers, founder of the Weather Underground and acquaintance of Obama, actually wrote the book.
Ayers became a “Distinguished Professor of Education” at the University of Illinois but has been described as an “unrepentant domestic terrorist” who had bombed the Capitol building in 1971 and the Pentagon in 1972. Ayers and his later wife, Bernardine Dohrn, had built bombs which accidentally killed Ayers’s girlfriend at the time, Diana Oughton, in 1970. The Weather Underground had planned unsuccessfully to bomb Ft. Dix, a U.S. Army base in New Jersey and has been accused by one writer of treason.
Obama has been described as “comfortable” in the company of such former terrorists and radicals. Ayers and his wife still live in Hyde Park, where the Obamas lived before moving in to the White House in January 2009.
There is evidence that Ayers committed identity fraud, stealing birth certificate numbers from young children who had passed away. Ayers helped to launch the political career of Barack Hussein Obama in his home in Chicago in 1995 but in 2008 played down the relationship between Obama and himself. Obama and Ayers worked together on the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which funneled millions of dollars to organizations designed to provide educational “reform.” The final report of the Challenge stated that despite the many millions spent on the project, “the Challenge had little impact on student outcomes” (page 14).
During her investigation of Obama’s use of the Connecticut social security number, Daniels also located two social security numbers associated with Michelle Obama, one of which Daniels stated does not belong to her.
On September 30, 2009, Daniels submitted a sworn affidavit of her findings for both of the Obamas which was assimilated into the Barnett v. Obama lawsuit. A second sworn affidavit was submitted on October 19, 2009. Following a dismissal by Judge David O. Carter on October 29, 2009, the case was recently granted a hearing on the merits by a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Upon request, C-Span and other major news media were allowed in the courtroom during the proceedings, which began on May 2, 2011.
In March 2011, Daniels wrote to the Social Security Administration and told them that Obama had been using a fraudulent social security number. Of the response she received, she said, “Usually if you get something back from the government, it will say, ‘You’re wrong because of Section such-and-such…’ They’ll cite something proving that you were wrong and why you were wrong. This one is a four-sentence letter, and it said, ‘After reviewing the information you provided, we disagree with your conclusion that a person’s social security number depends upon the address of residence.’ ‘We disagree!’ It’s hysterical, because they didn’t cite any reason why I wasn’t right. It’s not a question of opinion; it’s whether or not my contention was accurate.”
Ms. Daniels has recently done a number of radio interviews and stated that there is more attention being focused on the matter of the social security number which Obama is using.
MRS. RONDEAU: When did you first start investigating Obama’s usage of the social security number?
MS. DANIELS: It was in August 2009. I had a client who asked that I investigate the number. When I started, I never expected to find anything. But I looked anyway. There are databases I can access that anyone else who wasn’t licensed or a member of law enforcement could not. They have really good information. I started looking at the bigger ones, and of course, nothing came up. But I found a smaller database – and there are so many out there that are available to investigators – and I put in “Barack Obama, Chicago, IL,” and up popped all these addresses with the social security number.
I was stunned. There were probably eight pages of them, and when it came up, it said, “issued in Connecticut,” and then the years 1977-79. With the help of some other people, I have now been able to pinpoint exactly when it was issued: it was March of 1977. The way I did that is that two different people had sent to me requests for social security numbers. I had found that the person who possessed the number right before Obama’s was dead, and once they’re dead, you can get the person’s information, because there is no longer any expectation of privacy. So his number ends in “25.” From Social Security, I have certified documents regarding numbers “24” and “29.” Both of those were issued in March 1977, so I know unequivocally that if he had gotten it, that’s when it would have had to have been, and he would have had to have been living in Connecticut.
At that time, he was 15, because he wouldn’t have been 16 until August of that year, and he was presumably in Hawaii in high school. The minute I saw “Connecticut” – I’ve been licensed for 16 years now and know what I’m doing – I knew it was phony. I tell people, “If it had been California, it might have gotten my attention, but not much…” But when I saw “Connecticut,” I thought, “We have a big problem here.”
MRS. RONDEAU: It’s the farthest from Hawaii that it possibly could be, it seems.
MS. DANIELS: Yes, you can’t get any farther. What I was told is that he was being groomed to become the mayor of Chicago. Nobody ever dreamed that he’d end up as president. He started using this number in 1986, and that’s in addition to the phony Selective Service card he got. He has felonies galore. But the first time I see his use of it is 1986; that’s when it started, up to and including addresses when he was senator in DC. So he continuously used that number.
There are tons of other social security numbers attached to his name. Some were partial, some complete. But the trouble is, I and others could never document him with any of these other numbers.
MRS. RONDEAU: Where do people get the idea that there are 39 different numbers that he has used?
MS. DANIELS: They should stop asserting that, because it takes away from legitimate ones that I have found. When this is all done, I’ll tell you what my whole other theory is about him with all of these other social security numbers, and it’s a fraud, too. It’s a big scam. But regarding the one number, I knew it could not have been his.
When I first found the social security number, I put it through a database that verifies social security numbers, and it came up with his full name, middle name and everything, and said “Issued in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979.” It had his date of birth in both the foreign way, with the day, month and year, and also the way we do it, month-date-year.
Now what about the 1890 date? In 16 years, I had never seen anything like that, never, and I’ve looked at thousands of social security numbers. We know that he could not have gotten that number; he was nowhere near there. Despite the stories that people try to dream up, there is no way. I knew that Social Security did not come into effect until 1936, and it was voluntary. Lots of people never got social security numbers; my grandparents never had them. So what I figured out is that in 1977, somebody who was born in 1890 would at that point have been 87 years old. I figured they were probably sick, probably poor, and would have needed government help to get medical care. They would have had to have had a social security number, and that’s how I think that number plays into it.
Recently, I ran Obama’s addresses again, and they are still on the same database on which I found them originally. I noticed that with all these addresses is a phone number, and it occurred to me that it has to be a cell phone number because it’s at all the different addresses. It was obvious it wasn’t a land line. So I ran that, and it came up with 10-12 pages of addresses. Some of the pages had the Connecticut social security number; some don’t. However, they had the date of birth, 8/4/61, and one page jumped out, and in three places, one right after the other, for date of birth, it says “1890.”
MRS. RONDEAU: So does it appear that he took the social security number of a person who was deceased?
MS. DANIELS: Yes, that’s exactly what happened.
MRS. RONDEAU: Some researchers believe he got the birth certificate number of a child who was deceased.
MS. DANIELS: I absolutely believe that Obama stole a dead person’s social security number. I’ve spent a tremendous amount of time trying to figure out who might have had it first, but when they gave it to him, they would have removed that information. However, somewhere, there is a death certificate that has this social security number on it.
MRS. RONDEAU: Has anyone put in a FOIA request for the death certificate containing that number?
MS. DANIELS: Yes, Orly has tried repeatedly to get it, and they won’t give her anything. It won’t do any good, because the information won’t exist anymore at Social Security. They will have scrubbed it out, because Obama has had it for so long.
Jack Cashill wrote a story for WorldNetDaily not long ago; in fact, it was St. Patrick’s Day, about me, and in it, he said, “How do you think they got that number?” and I said, “His grandmother worked part-time at the Probate Court in Hawaii, and Bill Ayers used to brag about doing that kind of thing.” Well, Cashill went right to the Bill Ayers’s book and found a direct quote about how he was so good at coming up with new identities for people, and they always start with the social security number. I’ll send you the story, because Cashill has a direct quote out of Ayers’s book.
Editor’s Note: The following two paragraphs are the information which Ms. Daniels sent us quoted from Ayers’s Fugitive Days:
After the Baltimore fiasco, stealing ID was forbidden. Instead we began to build ID sets around documents as flimsy as a fishing license or a laminated card available in a Times Square novelty shop called “Official ID.” We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart, and the best source of those were dead-baby birth certificates. I spent impious days over the next several months tramping through rural cemeteries in Iowa and Wisconsin, Illinois and North Dakota,searching for those sad little markers of people born between 1940 and 1950 who had died between 1945 and 1955. The numbers were surprising: two in one graveyard, a cluster of fourteen in another. Those poor souls had typically been issued birth certificates—available to us at any county courthouse for a couple of bucks and a simple form with information I could copy from the death announcement at the archive of the local paper—but they had never applied for a Social Security card.
Collecting those birth certificates became a small industry, and within a year we had over a hundred. For years I was a paper-made Joseph Brown, and then an Anthony Lee, remarkably durable identities. My on-paper official residences: a transient hotel in San Francisco and a warehouse in New York.
————————-
The Social Security Administration has even changed all of its documentation to say that the assignment of a number doesn’t necessarily depend on the state where you live. What they’re doing in June, and I know it’s a direct result of this Obama thing, is they’re going to start randomization, and that is going to be a nightmare for law enforcement.
MRS. RONDEAU: It reminds me of the same thing that the state of Hawaii did. They used to say that the short-form birth certificate wasn’t enough to determine if a person was of Hawaiian ancestry for the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands. In 2009, they changed their website to say that the short form was fine.
MS. DANIELS: And now they’re refusing to issue long-form birth certificates. I belong to a fabulous group of investigators, an international association. Most of the people in it are retired military, retired government workers; a lot of them have incredibly impressive credentials. Eighty countries around the world have members in it. I did a survey of the entire United States and the way each state handled the issuance of birth certificates. I probably got about 25 responses which told me exactly how the state worked it. Then I called the Department of Health in every other state and asked them, and there are only six states in the entire country which do not give out the long-form birth certificate. Hawaii is the most recent as a result of its recent announced internal decision.
Even people who live there, whose children were born there, can’t get them. Most people don’t really understand what’s going on here, what they’re hiding. The next-closest one to Hawaii was 2002 in Colorado, and the next-closest one 1994. This is not common to forbid someone from obtaining a long-form. What if a person simply wants to have it? It’s insane. For the longest time, Hawaii has been saying that Obama couldn’t get a copy of his, and I thought, “How stupid are we? ” In his position, he can do whatever he wants, and he is and does.
MRS. RONDEAU: You mentioned finding many addresses for Barack H. Obama. Do all of these residences belong to this Barack Obama, or could there be more than one?
MS. DANIELS: Oh, yes, because a lot of the cases have duplicate addresses on them, including law firm offices; the house in Chicago which he does not own, by the way. I don’t know if you read that story in WorldNetDaily or not.
MRS. RONDEAU: Yes, I did.
MS. DANIELS: Someone had contacted Jerry Corsi, and Jerry Corsi sent him to me. I helped him. He had a lot of information, and I went through different databases and verified it for him. He told me just recently that Obama has never had anything in his name. He and Michelle lived in a condo in Chicago, but I think it was hers originally. All of the addresses are legitimate for him. There was one in Massachusetts where he had all the parking tickets that didn’t get paid until 2007.
MRS. RONDEAU: Why would someone have that many addresses?
MS. DANIELS: That’s not unusual. What is unusual is if I run somebody’s social security number, a red flag will go up in my head if it shows up with, say, 20 different home addresses. This tells me that this is not a stable person. I could give you a whole profile on too many addresses. With him, they were all legitimate addresses. None of the other addresses for the other social security numbers came up. I tried to check those back and forth but couldn’t do anything with them.
Valerie Jarrett, also from Chicago, is in Washington now, and they were all friends. Daley is there, too. What a coincidence!
I knew I couldn’t get any additional information from the Social Security Administration. However, the letter I received from them is fabulous, because it says, “We got your request to look into this, and we don’t agree with you.” They support the fact that they received a request to look into it. I expected to get nothing.
I have a decent education; I have a Bachelor’s and a Master’s degree. I’m certified as a paralegal and have been since 1977. As I was sitting here I thought, “If I can find a lawsuit…” because I had heard that there were so many that had been filed against him, “maybe the attorney under discovery can request information about this social security number.” So I found Orly Taitz, and I called her. I said, “I have found a fraudulent social security number for him.” And she said, “I have that.” So I said, “OK, never mind.” But then Orly said, “I have the first five numbers,” and I answered, “I have the whole thing.” Then I filed an affidavit which had to be done within the next couple of days.
Editor’s Note: The Post & Email contacted Dr. Orly Taitz to inquire about whether or not the affidavits have been included in any of her lawsuits against Obama, and she answered, “Those affidavits are part of the case, which was presented to Judge Carter and later went to the 9th Circuit.”
People have tried to drag me into “Oh, you must be one of those birthers,” and I have said, “No, I understand what those people are doing. I’m not a party to that; I’ve never attached myself to the birth certificate issue.” When people ask me, “Well, where do you think he was born?” I say, “I have no idea, and I have no interest where he was born. My interest is the Connecticut social security number; that’s the only thing on which I focus.” To me, that’s the smart way to do it. There are a lot of other people to go after the other things. If people have called or asked me to do something, I have been more than happy to help them; I just don’t want my name associated with it because I stick with this one issue.
And the reason that I was looking for “her” info…the former first “whatnot”…is that a friend here, in Eastern Europe, informed me yesterday that a colleague of hers, at an international bank…was convinced that in America the police literally drive around and randomly gun down black people.
Horrified, I asked her where this friend of hers had gotten such ludicrous information. She said the woman had been watching the Oscars and apparently saw some film that was either nominated or…I don’t know…something that wasn’t entirely clear. And I asked, “Does she really believe America is like that?”
She said, “She is, because she read Michelle Obama’s book.”
So, I have been searching far and wide for all the information that I can find to both discredit MO and document evidence that the USA is not like that. As is very often the case, I found myself at Larry Elder’s YouTube channel.
And I know the following film is a Larry David film and he is a liberal shill, but Elder shows this in his movie and it is actually “entertaining”, if you want to pull yourself away for a respite. The film is Sour Grapes. Not critically acclaimed but actually pretty well written for what it is.
So, I see that my previous comment is actually in the text of the story. I happened to find Orly Taitz’ website today, while scouring the internet for information regarding the former first trans person.
So, I thought I’d come over here and see if the issue was addressed…well, but of course it was. This is one stop shopping.
I agree completely with the editor’s note that it is much smarter to approach this in the way that we can’t talk about birth certificates as much as that “pesky” Social Security Number.
In the event that someone on the preceding comments has not already said this: Bill Ayers, in his interview with Megyn(?) Kelly, said outright that he had stolen dead babies SSN’s…FYI.
At the link below, see the unredacted Standard People Search to review the 105 records associated with the keywords “Barack Obama, Chicago Illinois”.
This is 8 pages of different addresses and SSNs for Barack Obama. Look closely at the pages:
On page 2, it says LWYR.
Look at the different SSNs, but the name and DOB remains the same in all of them.
On page 2, one entry says:
042-68-4425
Issued: 1977-1978 in CT
Also on page 2, the entry on line # 5 from the top is:
485-40-5154 (DECEASED)
Issued: 1954-1955 in IA
On page 3, entry # 5 from the top is:
423-28-2951
Issued: 1988-1989 in AL
On page 6, on line 3 from the top:
350-60-2302
Issued: 1975-1976 in IL
The numbers I’ve typed may have errors, as they are very hard to read on the doc…BUT, what remains is there are many different SS numbers with different issue dates and states and many different addresses, while the name and DOB on every one is Barack Obama and 08/04/1961.
Here’s the link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52844374/People-Search-105-Records-for-Barack-Hussein-Obama
When I look at those, I don’t really understand. What does it mean when it says “possible high risk”?
It seems like the SSN issue gives us another shot at snagging him. It’s not a civil issue, its a criminal issue. It’s something that the average person can easily understand and become outraged about. It’s a gotcha.
He only has a few potential ways out:
– It was given to him by parent or guardian and he didn’t know it, or at least claims he didn’t know it was fraudulent. Unfortunately for him, the time is past when he should have come clean and made this right. Another problem is thay at least 16 such numbers are positively linked to him.
– He was with the CIA or in witness a protection program and can prove it.
– He will stonewall us on it and our own officials will enable him to get away with it.
Nesara is now reporting that the main social security number being illegally used by Obama originally belonged to Jean Paul Ludwig. Mr. Ludwig was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 about March 1977. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut but he spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died. Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Courthouse and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals. The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig’s death, and since he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and no questions were raised. It is suspected that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a US citizen–either because he was born outside the US or because he became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro—-merely searched the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits and selected Mr. Ludwig’s SSN for Obama.
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2011/05/obamas-ssn.html
Does Harvard Law School not include this federal law in the curriculum?
TITLE 18 USC
PART I CHAPTER 47 Fraud and False Statements
§ 1001. Statements or entries generally
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
The description of how Obama obtained the fraudulent SS number he is using seems like a very likely scenario.
Jean Ludwig 045-26-8722
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53023338/Jean-Ludwig-SSN-Record
Obama uses 042-68-4425
As Brigitte pointed out, it seems someone found a record of some guy named Ludwig, who was born in CT and lived in HI, and they ran with it.
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/04/15/obamas-fraudulent-social-security-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-53195
Oh by the way the US does give SS #s to foreigners because here is a copy of Obama’s father’s signed SS application
http://webofdeception.com/obamafatherss5.jpg
Seniors number was 575-44-4342
Tried to look and it said I was “forbidden” to access the site.
Norm G, try again. I just accessed it and copied and pasted the signed SS app. If you want to give me your email add, I’ll email the copy to you.
True story- a few months ago my son bought a used pickup truck from a dealer. They had just gotten it in, had checked over the engine but had not cleaned the inside yet. My son took it “as is” and when he got it home he noticed the previous owner had left a ton of stuff in the center console. Mostly junk mail and old insurance papers. My son went through it looking for receipts for service on the truck and comes across the previous owners birth certificate and other important papers in an envelope. When we tracked the guy down and talked to him on the phone to verify his mailing address it was apparent he was just an older gentleman (79 years old), who lived alone and was as shocked as we were that he had left the papers in the vehicle. Moral of the story? If you have older relatives living near you–please watch out for them.
I keep going back to Bill Ayers. While living underground did he befriend an older sick guy who bragged he never applied for a SS #, did he manage to “borrow” the guys birth certificate after he died, hire some old drunk off the street to play the part of poor old grandpa Ayers was helping to get a SS card, telling him just nod your head “yes” to everything, haul the drunk to the local office tell the SS people poor old grandpa can’t read and write– he can just put his “X” on the signature line, but I will have to actually fill in the info? Put his mailing address down? Or maybe even take the old guy himself down to the SS office? But manage to intercept the card?
Years later in 82/83, after he had turned himself in, did he pass it on to the “O” man just in case he ever needed to start using a absolutely pristine SS #?
And now heres the SS Admin acting all stupid. Gosh these bureaucracies have the deck stacked against the American citizens. Maybe they should answer the question how many 15 year olds have a mailing address 5000 miles away (((pick your mail up much?))) and don’t use their card until they’re 25.
To the Editor.
I believe the title of the book is “Fugitive Days”, not “Fugitive Dreams.”
—————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies Thanks; you’re right!
I just read on Drudge that Air Force One has landed in Connecticut with Obama on board.
I wonder if he’ll be stopping in at the local Social Security office to “update records”??!!
Just wonderin’
ELmo
hussein dunham selling forgery t-shirts!!!..
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/05/obama-campaign-hawks-birth-certificate-t-shirt-campaign-claims-its-a-mobile-version-of-truth-squad-t.html
“A Gallup poll released last week indicate that 65% of those polled say the president “definitely” or “probably” was born in the U.S…These numbers are trending towards the correct belief that the president was born in the U.S.”
They’re some relentless characters. They are bound and determined to tell the rest of us what to believe.
Agreed. The affidavit in the link Tim provided is well written and to the point proving the fraud of Obama. Everyone needs to read it.
The CIA appears to be running USA ever since the Coup in 63.
And they have no regard for Americans nor the constitution.
Do not be diverted by Bill Ayres
The CIA run America today
This man cannot be impeached; impeachment is for those who got in because they earned it. Mr. wannabe got in because our gutless Congress did not do their do diligence to learn about people like they are supposed to, and they continue by not doing the job they swore to do…. to protect the constitution, the country and the people. Wheres our military when are they gonna wake up. Yeah, no impeachment, but he needs to go; this country can’t afford him, and his life was based on lies. I don’t know why he wasn’t confronted after the first one. DON’T FORGET ABOUT “RON PAUL” WITH HIM MAYBE WE CAN DO IT RIGHT THIS TIME. He needs to beat big “O” with facts, example……”Sir, on March 28th you said this ‘n this, on April 15th you did this…” can you explain? and the the transparency issue…and many,many more.
A.Z.
Sorry, Ron Paul has proven, repeatedly, that he will do absoluely nothing about the only issue that matters, Obama’s usurpation of the presidency.
Agree.
The founders would not have decreed that a president must be a nbc if it wasn’t the most important thing. It comes before making other laws because the president signs the laws in and enforces them. It is FIRST. Without it, forget the rest. I feel that so many in our own movement tend to overlook this.
And there was, and is, no other republican who is with us on this issue since Trump. None.
I agree Bob1943. Ron Paul does not believe this is an important enough issue to stand up for. He won’t get my vote. If this issue is not resolved, the rest don’t matter – Our country is gone.
ELmo
Thats the ONLY issue that matters to me!!! I won’t vote for any of them that won’t address the issue!
Check out the link that Tim recommends! FOLKS, THIS IS HUGE!!!
Sharon–PLEASE check this out!!! Have Susan check this out!!!
Linda and Tim…………
SO right, it is huge. Just now read it.
Basically it says……
The typed letters do NOT follow the curve on the page.
The 2 rubber stamps dates of AUG 8 1961 are not only different font size
but MADE UP from 2 colors, black and dark green.
OCR would not have been needed by HDOH.
And so much more.
So the layered document is clearly a Frankenstein monster………….
and yes, a FORGERY.
The United States’ government is a criminal enterprise. Get used to it. I used to think Congress was filled with fools and cowards, but that was an overly optimistic assessment. Congress and the courts are fully complicit in Obama’s fraud.
If Obama worked at Baskin-Robbins has Baskin-Robbins ever say they have records showing he did work at B-R? And if so how come B-R has not named a ice cream flavor after Obama? A good name for a ice cream flavor for Obama would be “The Hidden Secrets Swirl”…lol
Excellent interview, excellent work!
Small correction: ‘birthers’ are not focused on the birth certificate and never have been. That is a media meme designed to focus on the Constitutional issue of natural born citizen…
Dr.Kate,
In my experience I have found that “Birthers” are a very diverse group (regarding their beliefs and focuses). I have the following to be SOME of the many issues that are the “Focus” of some of the many people who are called “Birthers” (and who proudly wear the label):
1). Birth Certificate Issues
2). Natural Born Citizen Issues
3). Social Security / Selective Service / Fraud Issues
4). Certification of Nomination issues
5). Obama’s suspicious “evasive” behavior
6). Obama’s lack of the very issue he ran on – “Transparency”.
7). Some simply believe that the electorate has a right to know who their President is, where he came from and what he stands for. They believe that most of the records that Obama has under seal should be “Public Records” if you are a “Public Official”.
Sometimes and for some “Birthers”, the focus changes (depending upon the latest revelation). Birthers are a large group and (IMO) cannot be pigeonholed that simply.
Just a thought Dr. Kate – Keep up the good work.
ELmo
Someone needs to talk to Terry Lakin and get him up to speed about the fact that bo put forth a forged birth certificate. He seems satisfied with the forgery, because I am sure he doesn’t know that it is a forgery.
——————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: I do not know for sure, but he might not be at liberty to discuss it.
Re: Legal proof that Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/55594183
Obama signed that Executive Order stating all his records had to remain sealed. That means that any NEW records created for him would also remain sealed. Or, if Obama obtained several new SSN’s in 2008, no one would know because the records would be sealed. If Obama used each one of those SSN’s to collect from the Pigford settlement, no one would know because the records would be sealed. Any tax records Obama filed would be sealed and any tax return he releases to the public is probably as fake as his B/C.
Since foreigners can have SS#’s, I don’t understand why Madlyn Dunham didn’t just get a SS# for her grandson. Why all the subterfuge? How much damage could he have done by the age of 15 if she’d stolen someone else’s in1977? Was he a punk with a record?
I’d read somewhere that he was at Occidental as a foreign student with a 999 SS# (999’s were given to foreigners) and according to one of his professors, was not a good student. There was also speculation that he may have dropped out. He admitted that he was a lousy student in high school. So how does someone like this get scholarships?
I’d be interested in knowing how he got into Columbia because apparently there’s only evidence (some national college registry) of him being there one year (’82-’83) with no entrance application (according to Hugh Hewitt), and no one remembers him. So he may have been enrolled there, but hardly ever attended. Now his handlers are saying he graduated magna cum laude. Not buying it at all; IMO, they’re just trying to revise history to create this larger than life character. No one, not even the class president, nor 400 pre-law students nor one of the professors who would have taught him remembers Barry at Columbia and the AP scoured 5 years’ worth of yearbooks and he doesn’t show up in any of them. It’s as if he is a “legend” where he was given a whole new identity to bamboozle the masses. So was he really being groomed for mayor of Chicago that far back and got further than he thought? I’d read that he ran for Congress out of Chicago, lost and then decided he wanted to go to Harvard. Apparently, he couldn’t get in on his own (guess that magna cum laude from Columbia was just nonsense) and he needed the Saudis to pay his way. His own birth dad had been thrown out of Harvard for allegedly being a polygamist and an illegal. The Saudis approached Percy Sutton (Malcolm X’s former lawyer) through an intermediary to use his connections to get Barry into Harvard, and I’d also read that Ayers’ dad also used his connections. Apparently, Ayers’ dad is or was very wealthy. So this Ayers connection probably goes back a long way.
The idea of the “Stolen SS#” is probably circumstantial evidence leading one to believe that Obama is NOT even a Citizen. Grandma Madelyn stole the SS# for him for the same reason she wanted him registered as a US Birth: To secure the blessings of being a US Citizen. If she procured a “Foreign SS#”, his foreign birth would be a public record – The Birth Certificate (as we find out) can be kept quiet under the veil of “Privacy”. I’m no expert, it’s just my sense of why it might have happened that way (IMO).
ELmo
The question that must be answered is why those in Congress or other areas of governmental authority did not investigate this prior to 2008 or atleast now that all this information continues to come to light. I think the answer tells us our country is in grave danger and that the rule of law is gone.
These articles and information are great but I firmly believe that unless a real legitimate birth certificate can be located that shows he was born outside of the USA or we get his adoption records that show he was not an american citizen, we are stuck with Obama. Even though Obamas own admission as to his fathers birth means he is not a natural born citizen and thus ineligble, this is not going to get us anywhere as the average person does not understand it. They will understand a real Kenya birth certificate. The Republicans have no real challenger and this guy will be reelected. Then we will long for the days of 2009-2011 as Obama will only make things worse.
I hope Ms. Daniels, Corsi, or whomever is heading these investigations are doing everything they can to get this information because what we have now is getting us nowhere toward putting the usurper behind bars.
Jeremy, my heart tells me that a lot of the republicans know already and privy to play a part in allowing Obama to run for President. I feel a lot them know, both sides of the aisle. I also feel they have purposely allowed it to fulfill their agenda and felt they had their chance when Obama was elected Senator. They knew all they needed to do is put him in the run for President and then use the race card to carry him through. They found a brilliant writer to write everything he says, maybe even Ayers himself even though he claims not contact. He is being used as puppet and the knew he would be and doesn’t care…this was a setup from the start and McCain was a part of it.
Justsayin, you say, “….I feel a lot them know, both sides of the aisle. I also feel they have purposely allowed it to fulfill their agenda and felt they had their chance when Obama was elected Senator….” I agree with you that Repubs and Dems all knew about BO being ineligible and are complicit. And I can understand how the Dems would enable his election to fulfill their agenda. I also believe McCain is complicit. However, I do not understand how Repubs (including the RINO McC) could get their agenda through by enabling BO. What agenda did the Repubs have that they believed they would get through by enabling BO? I guess what I’m saying is, I agree the Repubs are just as guility and complicit as the Dems, but I don’t understand their agenda they wanted to get through via BO being a usurper. Can you help me with this question?
Great work Susan Daniels!
If BO/BS worked at Baskin-Robbins on King St. in Honolulu and got a ss number for the job, the first 3 numbers would be 575 or 576. I don’t know a single person in Hawaii that has a different three-digit number issued from another state that they never had anything to do with.
Keep hammering ’em Susan!!
This is a classic citizen’s arrest opportunity for millions of Constitutional Law patriots. If the Attorney General refuses to arrest an admitted criminal user of a fraudulent s.s number any patriot can make a “citizens arrest of that criminal”. One of O.B.’s press sessions will work. Placards outside the whitehouse will help, etc.
One of the press sessions is a good idea, but there would have to be about 50 people doing the citizens arrest. The minute one lone person stood up and attempted to arrest BO, he would be wrestled to the ground. This is the problem with trying to catch BO anywhere outside the WH. He is always surrounded by bodyguards, so it would have to be a group of citizens that did it.
So, according to what the facts are: a SS was issued in March 77 to someone applying from Connecticut. Two birth dates are associated with this SS. 1890 and August 4, 61.
The SS records show activity on this SS since 1986 in the name of Obama. Nothing before.
Why is there no activity or addresses on Obama’s SS before 1986? At this point, he had gone to Occidental, held jobs etc. All activities needing a SS.
So either he had another SS or he was operating under a foreign identity, or both as foreigners can have American SS.
One does not need to be an American citizen, nor even an American temporary resident to apply for an American SS. Plenty of foreigners have American SS given to them, baring employment restrictions, for the sake of conveniency if they can prove they need it to for instance open a bank account in the States.
“Why is there no activity or addresses on Obama’s SS before 1986?”
Could it be because Barack Hussein Obama II went by his legal name of Barry Soetoro (Soebarkah?) and used Barry Soetoro’s Social Security number prior to 1986? The Barack Hussein Obama II name and Social Security number were set aside, kept clean and preserved until the time came for Barry to become Barack and go into politics in Chicago. In the meantime, Barry Soetoro could default on debts, work on an impressive criminal record (a habit Barack found hard to break, which is evidenced by the stack of parking tickets from 1988 that he finally paid in 2008), and whatever else, all of which would disappear – POOF! – when Barack became Barry.
By the way, I suspect Barack Hussein Obama II is an alias name used by the man whose legal name is still Barry Soetoro, just as it has been since his now deceased stepfather adopted him when he was just a little boy.
OK. Now I am confused. I thought last week or so I read all kinds of stuff on the original card holder, even located his military registration and found he showed two places of death — one in California and one in HI — and it was about the time O would have been at college in CA????? Anyone else remember that and know where we all read that?? Honestly, I thought it was here since this is the first place I go for updates on The Fraud??
——————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: I don’t believe it was here.
I have no idea why my comments always go to moderation. I can be reached at email to verify who I am, with personal info. Although my email address is a .uk, I do indeed live in US.
Here is link to more on Mr Ludwig the original holder of the number. Mr. Ludwig had two numbers, interestingly and many of the docs for Mr. Ludwig are displayed. Weird that nothing happens, when in broad daylight, our president shows major signs of identity fraud that would have landed anyone else in jail by now.
http://colonel6.com/2011/04/27/barrack-obama-used-the-ssn-042-68-4425-on-his-selective-service-form-one-problem-that-ssn-was-issued-to-jean-paul-ludwig-is-barrack-obama-guilty-of-social-security-fraud/
——————-
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Everyone’s comments go in to moderation before being published. That is our policy.
“Jean Ludwig’s SSN has no relation to the SSN Obama has/is using. ”
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/04/15/obamas-fraudulent-social-security-numbers/
Probably http://www.orlytaitzesq.com or puzo1.blogspot.com
In another interview, I believe miss daniels said the ludwig thing was not true. That’s what i recall.
Sharon:
Just for the record, since I don’t see anyone else mentioning it, besides the criminal element searching out records of dead infants, the recycling of social security numbers has long been connected to federal witness protection programs. A more sinister government connection surfaced in regards to Vietnam era POWs and MIAs who were supposedly brought back to the States but denied reconnection with family and friends. I can’t remember off the top of my head, but this may have been mentioned in Monika Jenson Stevens’ book, Kiss the Boys Goodbye, which is an excellent investigation of the government’s betrayal of our military and our country.
bacsi
So Obama is in a federal witness protection program? That would probably be defied by his nationwide candidacy. ;-)
dotdotcom can you contact me at my blog: giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com ?
The email is at the top of the blog.
I went to your blog and I don’t see any email listed…can you ask me whatever you want to know here?
I just sent the following as a direct message to Darrell Issa via twitter and will keep sending it to him…anyone who has twitter, please feel free to copy this and tweet it everywhere:
INVESTIGATE Obama’s BC/SSN fraud. Read http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/16/the-post-email-speaks-with-susan-daniels-private-investigator
All of the altered, forged BO documents have a August 4, 1961 birthdate. As he is clearly circa age 60 with a birthdate maybe 1952, the fake 1961 birthdate is used to tie all of the altered, forged documents to the BO Story. Such as Stanley Ann Dunham born November 29, 1942 was age 17 at the related conception date of the 1961 birthdate and a student in a Washington state high school.
Let me see, you know Obama is 60 because you counted his wrinkles, and you know Stanley Ann did not graduate from High School in 1960….how? Did you check her high school yearbook?
This is just another in a long list of BO documents that are faked and forged. Nobody has found a legitimate BO document. A photo posted on this site asking where is BO’s daddy is a fake. Stanley Ann Dunham lacks beautiful hair and BO is characterized by Dumbo ears not apparent in all of the ‘famly’ photos.
Sure, a 49 year old man looks younger than a 60 year old man. If you reread the post it mentions Stanley Ann Dunham’s birthdate. Anyone born on Novermber 29, 1942 is Class of 1961. All states have school attendance cutoff dates and in Kansas it is August 31. These people focusing on forged birth certificates and other BO documents are wasting their time and confusing the issure. The signatures on the latest birth certificate are forged.
The Nazis have free access to government databases. Google has lots on the Nazis. BO is not black or half-black, so don’t call him that or claim he is son of Stanley Ann. He is an Asian.
If I’m understanding this right the first 3 numbers of a SS # are determined by the ZIP Code of the mailing address shown on the application for a SS number? is that right?
So if it’s a Connecticut ZIP code for the mailing address the card is assigned the Connecticut code.
Ok so the card is obtained in March of 1977 when Obama is 15 years old, but first used in 1986. Funny you should mention Bill Ayers. I did some searching.
In 1977 Bill Ayers was still underground, — who knows where he was, he didn’t turn himself in until 1980 but fast forward to 1982/1983 and Obama is reportedly at Columbia learning the Cloward-Piven Strategy and where is Bill Ayers?
A quarter mile away going to Bank Street College of Education. I would bet almost anything if Obama’s info from Columbia was released he’d have the same address as Ayers had for 82/83.
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaEducation.htm
By 1986 Ayers is at Columbia and Obama is in Chicago as a community organizer. If you look over The Obama File at the above link Obama and Ayers are tied together again and again,
I believe there’s a life long friendship between the two. Like I said funny you should mention Bill Ayers.
And if life-long friends, perhaps the same age, or at least close?
Interesting and compelling read. Thank you Susan and Sharon.
The letter Daniels received from the SSA states accurately; the truth ,that –‘a person’s SS# [doesn’t] depend upon the address of residence’
They are referring to the(“residence” of the) person to whom the number is to be assigned-the applicant named on the form-
The SS# depends (or depended- pre 6/2011)upon the MAILING address.
THEY’RE PLAYING AROUND WITH YOU/US
THE FIRST 3 DIGITS IDENTIFY THE REGION CORRESPONDING TO THAT OF THE ADDRESSEE NOT THE ADDRESS OF THE PERSON BEING FURNISHED A NUMBER BY THE SYSTEM
WHAT WE NEED IS THE ADDRESS AND THEY(SSA) HAVE IT WHERE THIS NUMBER WAS SENT
WAS ANYONE CONNECTED TO B.O. JR MAINTAINING A CONNECTICUT MAILING ADDRESS DURING THIS ERA–FOR ANY REASON(STANLEY ANN WHILE LIVING OVERSEAS FOR EXAMPLE)?
I was reading on a site yesterday all about Dorn and Ayers “terriorist” activities (I don’t remember what the name of the site was) and Connecticut was one of the places Dorn and Ayers worked out of, if I remember correctly.
It is going to take a lot of trees to hang all the criminal Obama enablers. Perhaps we owe a debt of gratitude to the environmental whackos after all…
I just hope someone is playing Santa; making a list and checking it twice!
LOL!! That’s funny….but, it’s not, if you know what I mean.
Corsi book starts NOW!!!!…….
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=299345
I wonder if Ms. Daniels ever tried to find an old microfiche of the Social Security Death Index for 1977 and checked for the SSN there? I would think someone in the ancestry field would possess such aged information; ie: the LDS or a smaller research group.
I know why he didn’t show the “long form” until this point: He didn’t have one. Perhaps better put, Hawai’i hadn’t created one for him.
As others have said, it has actually now become a conspiracy and not an issue of “forgeries”. Does an online image mean anything?
No, but the fact that HDOH has linked it and the form has been shown to a few media outlets stamped makes me believe that they DO in fact have a document, however UNoriginal it is.
The story is so inconsistent, this has to be the reality:
I’m guessing all of the COLB images initially were put out to to buy time for the Obama LAW camp to convince HDOH to compile a “long form” birth certificate.
Obviously, this form was not yet created when Abercrombie opened his stupid mouth and realized that there was no form available. Think of it: How do we go from Fukino’s half written/half typed description of the “original” vital stats, then on to Neil Abercrombie’s “I can’t find it” to “Oh, here is the long form” within that short of a period of time?
They convinced Hawaii to make the document under some crazy statutes. This is why people have a hard time trusting law. It’s about the argument, generally, NOT the realities …
As I see it there are only 3 avenues left:
1. Stanley Ann’s passport records 1960-65 that have been “destroyed”
2. The birth certificate number order problem (possibly baby Virginia if that story is in fact true and leading somewhere)
3. Identity / SSN fraud
I was thinking of printing out this whole article and faxing it to Issa et al in DC plus Governors and Attorneys General but I read your copyright rules and I’m not allowed to do that, right? I sure would love to be able to get this article out there…
———————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Oh, no, anyone can print out any of our articles to send to anyone. That is why we had the printer-friendly icon put at the top right of each article. The copyright is to prevent others from reprinting our work and claiming it as their own.
Oh yaaay, I will print it out and start faxing…I will also post the link to it on other forums and get others involved in yet another fax campaign (we’ve done several fax campaigns on the eligibility issue).
I’m not sure your readers know that they can send your articles…maybe it’s just me but I did not get that from your copyright page, I thought I had to have a subscription or special permission to send out your articles. You might want to explain it better…
——————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Periodically I issue a posting which reminds readers of our comment policy, our printer-friendly capability, and the ability to tweet our articles as well as general updates and initiatives. Any news article can be sent to anyone once it is published. Again, the copyright protects the work as our intellectual property but does not prohibit anyone from sending the material to someone else. We want our readers to do that!
I printed out the article and unfortunately, it’s 6 pages long and very small print so that really won’t work for faxing. I got a twitter account and started tweeting the link to Darrell Issa, hopefully he will read it!
———————-
Mrs. Rondeau replies: You may also copy the link which appears at the top of each article when it is opened and paste it into an email. Whether or not congressmen accept links in communications, I do not know; but it is a good way to distribute the information without having to print or fax. The nice thing about the printer-friendly option is that it allows you to disseminate the information to those without computers or internet access.
It makes sense to me that Madelyn would have sought out a SSN for Obama that belonged to a very old gentleman who conveniently had obtained his SSN late in his lifetime. She knew he would likely soon die and this would make the elderly gentleman a perfect candidate for a con artist trying to establish a fake identity for her young son. She knew the 1977 date of application for the SSN would fit nicely with Obama’s age of about 15 years and the gentleman’s death would then mean that there would be no overlap in use between Obama and the gentleman.
Back then… prior to the 1970’s… most old folks, told the government, ” I do not want a USA social security number, I do not want a hand out from the government…” Not too far back ago, most people would send their USA government checks back to the USA government, because it was a complete insult… and shameful… This even included an old person from 1890 that, I am sure did not want a hand out from the USA government…. So your story… rings true… the old gentleman would Never even know… because he threw away anything that had to do with a social security card and any money from the USA government… I remember, my elders saying the same thing… “I ain’t going to take a hand out from anyone, and not the government!” To them it was so Un American… Many of these Elder Americans and even some of these Americans now, did not I repeat NOT want a Social Security Number… it marked them as the Beast 666- therefore they threw them into the trash and ignored anything the USA government said about IRS or Social Security… infact… one old timer said… ” you should have not burned your draft card during the viet nam war…. you should have burned your social security card and told the United States of America, that you were lied to and you are not part of their USA social security plan!” Who knows…. alls I know is… they are sticking hands down babies diapers, and little kids pants now. SS or TSA what is the difference….. and they do not even change nor clean their hands and dirty gloves in between each fingering and touching of United States Citizens… so basically you are getting germs from the guy or gal before they touched up…. one should do a FOIA on their, the tsa’s, gloves, hands and hygiene…
Not so these days, I am afraid. bon appetit TSA HMM HMM HMM sickkkkoooos
Not so. My daddy applied for an SS card when they came out in 1936 or whenever it was. I applied for mine when I was like 13 or 14, not because I worked, but I asked my daddy if it was okay if I applied for one. He said yes and got the form for me.
The mark of the beast, 666, is something different that you may realize. Where do you get the mark? Isn’t it in your forehead and hand? By what the Bible teaches, what and who your worship means what’s in your brain, and they say your forehead; then your works mean your hand or hands. So who you worship applies to your forehead and your works for the true or false deity apply to your hands, meaning your work. It’s not a specific mark. Just make sure that you know the true deity, meaning Yahweh. If you study it, you’ll see.
Good work by Miss Daniels.
Obama assets valued at $1.8M to nearly $12 million
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2720638/posts
Why can’t she find the name of the deceased person if indeed the Connecticut SS# was issued too prior to Obama?
———————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: The answer is in the article.
Wow! Tons of evidence that Obama/Soetoro is using a stolen SS number as just one of many illegal actions like, for example, usurping the presidency, and there is nothing we can do about it?
Is there something bad wrong here or what?
Another great and informative discussion on a exposing this fraud in the White house. Keep up the great work. Every single person who puts in the effort is just another star for America! ;) Thank You!
Cody Judy
Donald Trump Recieves Cody Judy’s Standing In CIA Columbia Obama Trial
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qhKvQ9o_E8
Cody Judy says there is nothing in the Constitution that says you can’t lie about who you are? HUH????????????????????????????? So that makes OBam okay?
What about the fraud ss# that he used on his income tax form. That IS lying!
The quote was there is nothing in the U.S.C. that says Obama cannont lie about his personal life, his college career, his professional life,… this is true. The biggest demand in the Constitution is for Obama to be a ‘natural born citizen’, and everything else as I said really requires an A.General to look into for crimes to be punished by the law., or for Congress to consider and use the Power of Subpoena to call Obama upon the witness stand.
I certainly didn’t say it was ethical, but we do need to stay focused to push Congress into holding hearings on his “Natural Born Citizen” requirements. These are sure – his father is British, by British law he is a subject through his father. This is not allowed by the Constitution’s demands for a natural born citizen. We need People to push Congress on this.
The reason why I will explain briefly. The oath candidates take is affirming they are qualified, and that is the only thing Obama has sworn to. Because he did swear to it, unlike the rest of his lies which were not sworn to under oath, we have a base for Congress to consider under oath, even as Bill Clinton was impeached after swearing under oath to Congess.
Hope that explains my position, and our position. Unlike other crimes we find Obama committing, don’t be fooled by the fact he literally has/mayhave excusable power with attorney generals for things we may not know about such as his work with the CIA undercover, witness protections for that and its a big can of worms to get prosecuted.
What we have in simple terms is his oath that he was a natural born citizen, and that was used to de fraud the American vote. Congress can jump on that rather then a single prosecutor. If you think what I’m saying is wrong? Try finding an attorney general to prosecute the alleged President. They will run and hide as fast as the single judicial judges have. Congress has great weight together if The People will push it.
Cody Judy