Final Hawaii Petition Letters Sent

FRAUD, TREASON AND BIG MEDIA COVER-UP:  WHAT WILL HAWAII’S NEW GOVERNOR DO?

by Sharon Rondeau

Gov. Neil Abercrombie was sworn in to office in early December 2010, a month earlier than most states' swearing-in ceremonies for new governors

(Mar. 17, 2011) — The following letter has been sent to Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie with all of the signatures of those who signed our Hawaii Petition since March 1, 2010, when we sent our first mailing.  The letters were sent certified mail with return receipt requested.

March 17, 2011

The Honorable Neil Abercrombie
Governor, State of Hawai`i
Executive Chambers, 
State Capitol
Honolulu, Hawai`i  96813

Dear Governor Abercrombie:

I am quite certain that you are aware that there is widespread public concern as to whether  or not Barack Hussein Obama II is eligible to serve as President in accordance with Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, which requires that the president-elect be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States of America.

You may not be aware, however, that four Supreme Court Decisions have authoritatively explained that those born of two U.S. Citizens, on U.S. soil, are “natural born Citizens” [cf. The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814); Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830); Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875); United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).]  In fact, the Supreme Court of the United States has never admitted the use of this term to describe the citizenship of any other category of citizen.

Barack Obama, however, claims as his father, Barrack Obama, Sr., a man who was a Citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies in 1961.  He makes this claim in his book, Dreams from My Father, and via the release of an electronic image of a Hawaii Certification of Live Birth.  If such is the case, he cannot legitimately hold the U.S. Presidency due to his British citizenship at birth.

Moreover, you yourself have recently stated publicly that the State of Hawaii has no long-form, official birth document on file for Barack Hussein Obama, contrary to your predecessor, Linda Lingle, who stated that her “health department director” had “seen” the original vital records belonging to this man about whose past we know so little.  If Obama was not born in Hawaii as he has claimed, then he has committed massive fraud upon the American people and is exposed as a liar and traitor to this country.

If the records Hawaii possesses were filed under a different name, then Barack Hussein Obama has also committed massive election fraud for which your Health Department employees are knowingly providing cover.  Since the Health Department refuses to confirm that the online image posted by several websites during the 2008 presidential campaign is a composite released by them, it is obvious that the image is a contrived forgery designed to deceive an uninformed public in coordination with a government-controlled, complicit media and elected officials.

Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the previous Health Department Director, also misrepresented the number of requests for Obama’s original birth certificate when she testified to the state Senate committee regarding a bill which was passed last year to deter the public from inquiring about Obama’s information or anyone else’s under your UIPA law.

By virtue of the office he holds, whether constitutionally eligible or not, Obama is a public figure and his records should be open to public scrutiny, just as those of all past presidents have been.  It is patently absurd for the United States of America and its citizens to rely upon electronic images of alleged government documents, while the general public is refused an opportunity to inspect such documents.  Such behavior violates all that America represents and everything which our Founding Fathers fought and died for in the American Revolution.  We are a nation of the people, by the people, and for the people. Our government by nature must be open and transparent.

The State of Hawai’i echoes this long tradition of freedom when in its Uniform Information Practices Act it states  (92F-2):

…the people are vested with the ultimate decision-making power. Government agencies exist to aid the people in the formation and conduct of public policy. Opening up the government processes to public scrutiny and participation is the only viable and reasonable method of protecting the public’s interest. Therefore the legislature declares that it is the policy of this State that the formation and conduct of public policy—the discussions, deliberations, decisions, and action of government agencies—shall be conducted as openly as possible.

WHEREFORE, being that upon entering the office which you presently hold, you swore: “that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Hawaii, and that I will faithfully discharge my duties…to best of my ability” (Hawai’i Constitution Article XVI, Section 4); and,

WHEREAS, the Hawai’i Constitution in its Preamble declares:  “We reaffirm our belief in a government of the people, by the people and for the people, and with an understanding and compassionate heart toward all the peoples of the earth”; and,

WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States of America imposes in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, the absolute requirement of being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States, in order to hold the Office of the U.S. Presidency; and,

WHEREAS, four Supreme Court decisions have defined that a “natural born” citizen is one born of two U.S. citizen parents, on U.S. soil (cf. see above), it having never defined or used the term to signify any another class of citizenship; and,

WHEREAS, Barack Hussein Obama II, in releasing an electronic image of what purports to be a Hawaii Certification of Live Birth, issued in 2007; has (1) claimed a British subject as a father, and (2) waived all right to oppose the disclosure of the originals on the grounds that such a disclosure would be “a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy”[92F-13(1)]; and,

WHEREAS, on July 27, 2009, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai’i Department of Health, publicly admitted that said department has in its possession “the original vital records of Barack Hussein Obama” — even though for nearly all U.S. Citizens there is only one original vital record — and  furthermore since at the same time  she claimed  that he was a “natural-born American citizen” — a statement which seemingly both contradicts his claim that his father was Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr., and which does not specify his actual nationality, in a manner consistent with the terminology of 8 U.S. Code § 1401; and,

WHEREAS, the Hawai’i Uniform Information Practices Act specifies in 92F-12 that “each agency shall make available for public inspection and duplication … information collected and maintained for the purpose of making information available to the general public” (subsections 1 & 15), such as is the above mentioned press release of Dr. Fukino.

HENCE, as the above constitutes both a reasonable basis for doubt as to the citizenship status of Barack Hussein Obama II, in a matter touching the national security of these United States of America, and a reasonable basis to demand and allow for the disclosure of his vital records by the State;

And WHEREAS, inaction by Hawai’i State officials in disclosing these original vital records contributes to the growth of suspicions, doubts, and a weakening of the legitimacy of the State and Federal government; and,

WHEREAS the defense of the legitimacy of these institutions is a sufficiently compelling State interest (cf. Hawai’i Constitution, Article I, Section 6) overriding Obama’s rights to privacy in this matter;

THEREFORE,

We, the undersigned, demand in the name of an open and transparent government, accountable to the people it serves, that the State of Hawaii release ALL VITAL RECORDS which pertain to the individual known as “Barack Hussein Obama II,” and ALL government documents pertaining to the preparation of the public statements made by Dr. Fukino in regard to the same which are in possession of any State government office or agency, registry, or held by any governmental officer (such as the State Attorney General) or representative, whether these be original, amended, modified, or otherwise, and that such a release,

(1) Be publicly announced,

(2) Provide the general public the opportunity to personally view the originals under conditions which would guarantee their safety and protection,

(3) Include an independent verification of the authenticity of the documents,

(4) Be done immediately, that is, within the next 30 days, or as soon as possible, and

(5) Be effected by whatever legal or administrative means are necessary, whether by order of the State Governor, the Director of the Department of Health, or by a special enactment of the State Legislature, or by whatever other effective means.

If Hawaii officials, past or present, have been lying about either possessing or not possessing Obama’s original birth records, contrary to the laws cited above, that is tantamount to treason against both the Hawaii and U.S. Constitutions and will be prosecuted as such by We the People.  The Post & Email is in possession of a voluminous amount of email correspondence paid for by donors which demonstrates clearly that employees at the Hawaii Department of Health have stonewalled, obfuscated, and failed to answer inquiries made in accordance with the  UIPA law.  Your local media is also complicit.

If Obama had been born in Hawaii, he would have a long-form birth certificate such as  that which both former Elections Clerk Tim Adams and you say does not exist, a sample of which is included with this letter.

We are also aware that the Hawaii Democrat Party changed the wording on its nomination form in 2008 and apparently relied on the DNC form signed by Nancy Pelosi which deemed Obama constitutionally eligible for the presidency.  The wording, required by Hawaii statute, was present in the nomination forms for 2004 and 2000.  Why was the wording removed in 2008, and why did the DNC issue a nomination form which stated Obama was constitutionally eligible ONLY to the state of Hawaii?

The Post & Email received the documentation proving such from the Hawaii Elections Office only after threatening legal action because it violated the UIPA statute and the Office of Information Practices refused to act in a timely manner to uphold our right to obtain the records.

It is our understanding that your Lt. Governor, Brian Schatz, was Chairman of the Hawaii Democrat Party until he resigned to run for his current position on your ticket; perhaps he would know something about why the required wording was eliminated on the nomination form for Obama.  If he doesn’t, he should.

We will continue to pursue this matter until all of those involved in the cover-up are brought to justice.  We sincerely hope that you will assist us in uncovering the truth.  Both your political future and the future of the United States of America depend on it.  Treason against the U.S. Constitution is a very serious matter.

Very truly yours,

Sharon Rondeau
Editor
The Post & Email, Inc.
P.O. Box 302
Stafford Springs, CT  06076
www.thepostemail.com
editor@thepostemail.com

cc:  The Honorable Brian Schatz
Lieutenant Governor, State of Hawai`i
State Capitol
Honolulu, Hawai`i 96813

Ms. Loretta J. Fuddy
Acting Director
State of Hawaii Dept. of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu, HI  96813

1995 Hawaiian "long-form" birth certificate with name of delivery doctor, registrar's name, signature of parent, signature of "Birth Certificate Clerk," and name of the hospital where the birth took place
Enlarged details of 1995 Hawaii birth certificate

39 Responses to "Final Hawaii Petition Letters Sent"

  1. jtx   Tuesday, March 22, 2011 at 12:11 PM

    TYVM for your efforts to bring the eligibility question to earth along with those playing games to keep the question out of the public eye.

  2. Joe The Blogger   Monday, March 21, 2011 at 5:14 PM

    “The letters were sent certified mail with return receipt requested”.

    Hi Sharon,

    Have you received confirmation of delivery yet? If the signature is legible, you could telephone the individual and ask him or her to confirm if the letter was handed to Abercrombie.
    ——————
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: No; they were just mailed out late on Thursday.

  3. susanm   Monday, March 21, 2011 at 12:55 PM

    ALL I CAN SAY IS,…………..DEMAND IT…………DEMAND IT………….DEMAND IT.
    EVERYONE ELSE WHO DEMANDS ANYTHING GETS IT………..
    SO DEMAND IT.

  4. JeanWTPUSA   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 11:32 PM

    Thanks for the lead on doctor lead. I’ve got a few things in the works going on right now to find the right recruit. As far as for the “excuses” that are likely to come from the HDOH if I can find a relative willing to request the long-form, I’ve adopted the “nothing ventured, nothing gained” philosophy. I’ll keep you all posted.

  5. ms. helga   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 1:12 PM

    Reduced to its most simple terms, we have reached the final predicament.

    GOOD versus EVIL

    Now let each side present its case AND STATE which side it is on.

    A. BIRTHERS (Constitutionalists)
    B. Non-Birthers (Non-Constitutionalists)

    Now shake hands and come out fighting!

    ms. helga (“USURPERVILLE”

  6. Daywalker   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 12:44 PM

    > Lucas did say he would show his receipts for travel

    Then why hasn’ he already? Doesn’t take much to scan them and put them up, does it?

    He’s dancing around it like Andy Martin is dancing around the “show your birth certificate” issue.

    All we need is to see the stamps in his passport for going into and out of Kenya. Until we’ve seen those, his “BC” is as worthless as Obama’s forged Internet image of an alleged COLB.

  7. stormyweather   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 11:19 AM

    @Joe Butz – I received the same letter and sent the following return email:

    Dear HDOH Staff, HDOH Acting Director & Ms. Takase:
    (Ms. Takase, I have copied you on this email to the HDOH so that you follow-up to make sure that the HDOH sends me the correction to their denial of access that I am requesting from them as follows:)
    Please correct the denial of access I am returning to you (below). I request that you provide me a denial of access that includes the specific legal citations for the statutes (that actually exist) under which I am being denied access.
    For example, you cited HRS93F-13. That statute does not exist, so, do not include it in the corrected denial you send me.
    Also, you cited HRS92F-22. Those exemptions only apply to individuals requesting access to their own personal records under Part III of the UIPA, so don’t apply them to my request. I am NOT President Obama. And if you actually believed I was, you would have disclosed the records I requested.
    Furthermore and lastly, you cited HRS338-18. Please specify WHICH part of that statute applies, (a)-(g). Do not send me an incomplete, nonspecific citation.
    This is not a new or second request for records under the UIPA and is not to be treated as such. In other words, applying ‘Act 100‘ (the ‘birther law’) would be entirely improper as a response to this email because this is simply a request that you clarify and correct the denial you already provided me. I am entitled to a proper and legal denial of access containing the complete citations of the Hawaii Revised Statutes under which I am being denied access.
    Please also state the specific records to which I am being denied access.
    I have a legal right to a judicial appeal in response to your denial and cannot possibly find a lawyer who can understand the denial you provided me as-is. It is your responsibility under the OIP administrative rules to provide me a proper denial of access (http://www.state.hi.us/oip/rules.html#27114):
    “(b) When the agency intends to deny access to all or part of the information in the requested record, the agency’s notice to the requester shall state:
    (1) The specific record or parts of the record that will not be disclosed; and
    (2) The specific legal authorities under which the request for access is denied under section 92F-13, HRS, or other laws.”
    Thank you.

  8. Ro   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 8:36 AM

    Lucas did say he would show his receipts for travel in a radio interview I heard myself with a conservative talk show host. I think the copy he has is legit.

  9. SapphireSunday   Saturday, March 19, 2011 at 8:58 PM

    Sharon, thanks for all your hard work. I hope Abercrombie reads your letter and feels suitably uncomfortable. I would if I were he.

  10. SapphireSunday   Saturday, March 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM

    Good point and good memory!

  11. SapphireSunday   Saturday, March 19, 2011 at 8:55 PM

    That’s a brilliant idea, JeanWTPUSA. I wish I’d thought of it! However, I bet you anything they will tell you there’s an exception for “genealogical” requests–that being that it has to be something like 75 years after the event. Or whatever they decide to pull out of their rears this time. It will be something. You can count on that.

    They’ve stonewalled and obfuscated several years now. With regard to the receipt for the COLB, they refused that one, too, iirc. I know it was requested. I think it was even appealed to OIP (is that the right acronym?). You might find an answer here: http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/

    Just read through the entire article that comes up first and follow the links. It’s a summary of all the requests she and another person made, and the responses from the HDOH. I believe that they wouldn’t provide the receipt and wouldn’t say that it didn’t exist. Too many details to remember, actually.

    Bottom line: They’re not going to easily cough up anything. Imho, they’ve gradually dug themselves a mighty deep hole and now they haven’t a clue how to get themselves out of it.

  12. SapphireSunday   Saturday, March 19, 2011 at 8:44 PM

    You said a mouthful, there, Papoose! Good one.

  13. Tim   Saturday, March 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM

    Obama cannot accept Qaddafi attacking his own people.

    Is duping your own people much better, Mr. Obama?

  14. ch   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 6:15 PM

    A truly great letter. A relative of Obama was in Orly’s lawsuit. He had requested the birth certificate for geneology. Hawaii stonewalled, delayed, and they actually rewrote their access laws about a year ago, and it changed how that relative could access…I think it changed to the original person had to release to relative. They also had in the previous law that those who had justifiable reason to see…some sort of wording that would include citizens needing to verify their president!! Hawaii changed their own access laws, and Sharon should get copies of the law in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, to see what changes have been made, and it would show the participation in fraud.

  15. Kingskid   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 4:47 PM

    You do such thorough and well-researched work, Sharon. My hat is off to you! BTW, the more I think about it, the more I am convinced that the Republicans may have been ignoring the obama issue so assiduously because their hands are dirty also. Maybe there was a quid pro quo arrangement with the dirty Dems for McCain and Obama running for their respective parties. Or maybe it is simply like Pat Caddell said today on Hannity’s program: the Republicans are just stupid (for all the lost opportunities for them to reign in spending). The stranglehold that both corrupt Parties hold on this country has got to be broken! It would have to be either a viable, third-Party backed by millions across this country, or for states to rise up en masse and do what Montana is doing–pushing the feds back over their state line! I no more think we are going to lose this country; I think it has already happened. The question now is: What do we do now? Where do we go for leadership and honest government? Is it time to stop expecting the feds to do what they refuse to do and put our efforts behind the 10 Amendment effort?

  16. GaryW   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 4:27 PM

    Sharon,

    Just an observation. Perhaps you have provided a loophole for the Hawaiian Obots to IGNORE your request by asking for release of records for “Barack Hussein Obama II”. There may be no such person. Barack might been spelled with two ‘Rs’ (I have heard his father’s real name is spelled that way). There may be no “II’ attached to the name. Also the records may in fact be under the name Barry Soetoro or Soebarkah (Not sure how to spell it). You get the idea. Technicalities. Perhaps the language should be revised?
    ———————
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Requests have been made for many such names with variations: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/08/did-hawaii-have-any-records-on-obama-before-2006/

    We did not know about “Soebarkah” at that time.

  17. sky   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 3:11 PM

    heard of rally 3-19-2011 washingtondc @national mall, 8-5pm, another rally 3-20-2011 all state capitals @ whitehouse 12–4pm.

  18. Joe Friday   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 2:30 PM

    James G. Borden says: “A true copy of Barack Hussein Obama II Certificate of Birth has been exposed and it proves that Obama was born in Kenya, Africa.”

    Unsubstantiated claims gain no provenance by repetition. We have nothing that can be considered a verifiable “true copy” of Obama’s birth certificate. The only thing that exists is a piece of paper that has been presented by an easily discredited source. To make matters worse, that source isn’t even willing to provide documentation supporting his alleged travels.

    It is this unfounded belief in evidence that is not supported by anything more than being what they want it to be that makes “Birthers” look like gullible fools. They want everybody else to ask the tough questions, but for some reason they don’t think the same should apply to what they present.
    ——————-
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Yes, anyone making such claims should have the proof.

  19. Bob1943   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 1:34 PM

    I just hung up after the most infuriating phone call I have made since the beginning of my knowledge of Barry’s ineligibility. At Senator John Boozman’s office I was put on the phone with his “expert” on this subject. She said, in a very robotic way, the leaders of Congress had gotten together, and based on the documentation Obama had provided from Hawaii of his eligiblility, they were not going to take any action on the issue. She also said the Supreme Court refused to take up the issue. When I asked her why they refused she said, “they don’t have to say”.

    Her response to me was stunning in it’s absolute absurity, although I can’t deny she was being honest about nothing being done. I asked her to send me a letter repeating what she had just said, and she is going to do that. Any discussion of the facts was a total waste of time. Talking to her was like pulling the string on a talking doll that repeats the same statements….over and over and over.

    It’s worse than I thought, and I thought it was really, really really bad.

  20. Birdy   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM

    To paraphrase a politician from the past “Ask not what Sharon can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.” If you have a good idea, pursue it. All of us must pitch in. Sharon can’t do it all while we sit back and watch the show. Be a participant, not just an observer. I know I’ve spent a lot of time, effort, and a bit of money trying to get this issue resolved (obviously with no success).

    Sharon, this is an excellent petition. Very clear and concise. Every one of these articles, petitions, and letters that you publish moves the issue forward and adds to people’s knowledge. You continuously shine the light on facts that should not be forgotten. What’s more, all of these publications by the P&E, NaturalBornCitizen, Apuzzo, and other new-media outlets and legal filings by Taitz, Apuzzo, Donofrio, Wrotnoski, Hemenway, and others continues to add to the historical record of this time in our history. Thanks for your tireless effort.

  21. RO   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 11:31 AM

    Another cousin is Dr. Milton D. Wolf a radiologist. He has a website http://www.wolffiles.blogspot.com
    He is also a Tea Partier
    email: milton@planetkc.com

  22. Tim   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 11:29 AM

    Great letter Sharon! It’s irrefutable on many levels.

    Richard Nixon once said that the American people have the right to know if their president is a crook. Coming from Nixon, this statement had an extra weight. But now it looks like the American people have this right no more.

  23. johnny says   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 10:08 AM

    sharon / perhaps david la larocque is correct. a copy of this letter and or a similar letter should go to the president of the u. s. senate and the speaker of the u. s. house of representatives . thank you.
    ——————–
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Anyone has The Post & Email’s permission to print it off and send it.

  24. JeanWTPUSA   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 10:00 AM

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/n/a/2011/03/17/state/n032457D00.DTL&object=%2Fn%2Fp%2F2011%2F03%2F17%2Fd5702c8e-deb2-4a88-bcd9-75b12b321dc5.jpg&type=newsbayarea

    I will be in Tuscon in late April for the Tuscon Teaparty and I can stop by and visit Dorma Lee Reese, the Usurper’s 3rd Cousin to speak to her about requesting BHO’s BC if someone can locate her contact information and email me to me. If anyone can find out more info on Dorma, please contact me through my website http://www.wethepeopleusa.ning.com. I am the administrator (JeanWTPUSA). Thanks.

  25. JeanWTPUSA   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 9:53 AM

    http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Barack-Obamas-long-lost-Irish-American-relatives-not-impressed-by-their-presidential-links-118229804.html

    Based on the above article, BHO appears to have many “Irish” relatives who are not that thrilled about their blood ties to the Usurper. These individuals should have a “tangible interest” in obtaining a copy of BHO’s birth certificate. Can anyone reach out to them to ask them to request a copy from the state of Hawaii?

  26. RacerJim   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 7:31 AM

    The above reminds me of a similar problem with 2004 Democratic nominee John Kerry’s records during the election. Briefly, the Honorable Discharge posted on Kerry’s campaign website was issued in 1978 by then-Secretary of the Navy after the latter had ordered a review of Kerry’s discharge. 1978 was 6 years after Kerry’s Term Of Service expired (when he should have received his discharge) and the Secretary of the Navy would not have had any reason to have Kerry’s discharge reviewed except upon written request by Kerry himself per Navy regulations. No such request was ever forthcoming despite many FOIA requests to the Navy.

    http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41200

  27. James G. Borden   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 11:38 PM

    A true copy of Barack Hussein Obama II Certificate of Birth has been exposed and it proves that Obama was born in Kenya, Africa.
    James G. Borden
    Newsletter Editor
    AMERICAN PATRIOTS’ MOVEMENT OF AMERICA
    National Headquarters
    Hilo, Hawaii 96720

  28. NEIL TURNER   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 11:34 PM

    Outstanding effort, Sharon. That was more than another straw on the treasonous muslim’s camel-jockeying back … that was a whole bale of hay.

    Great job!

  29. Papoose   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 10:13 PM

    we have the right to know.

    what we know already.

  30. Texoma   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 9:49 PM

    Very good letter, Sharon. Just want to point out that there have been five (5) US Supreme Court cases which affirmed the definition of a natural born citizen as being born in the country to citizen parents, and I am not aware that Shanks v. Dupont is one of them. The Shanks case affirms that a child born in the US does get his/her citizenship from the father, but it does not actually use the term “natural born citizen”. Here is a quote from that case:

    “… for children born in a country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake of his national character as a citizen of that country.”

    In addition to The Venus (1814), Minor v. Happersett (1874), and Wong Kim Ark v. US (1898), the other two Supreme Court cases are Scott v. Sandford (1856) and Perkins v. Elg (1939). In Scott v. Sandford, the court quoted Vattel’s definition. In Perkins v. Elg, the court found Miss Elg (born in NY to naturalized US citizens) to be a natural born citizen.

  31. Joe The Blogger   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 7:45 PM

    Well done, Sharon.

    As a result of this letter, Abercrombie will be flushed out of his carefully crafted liar….whoops….. lair.

  32. johnny says   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 7:33 PM

    sharon / this is a great letter. i hope it went to the commie governor by certified mail requesting a return signed receipt. it may have been appropriate to warn him against providing any forged birth documents. dr. jerome corsi of wnd.com has stated if that happens he will expose them for it and the situation will only be exacerbated.

  33. Mary Oele   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 6:23 PM

    Finally! So glad to see this. I hope my name is on this petition. I signed enough online petitions regarding this matter,…………

  34. Joe Butz   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 6:02 PM

    I got the following in a letter from the State of Hawaii:

    “Vital records disclosure laws protect all birth, death, marriage and divorce records held by the department and all amendments, changes, supporting records, and requests related to vital records.” (HRS §338-18).

    “A certified copy of a vital record (birth, death, marriage, or divorce certificate) is issued only to an applicant who has a direct and tangible interest in the record. The following persons are considered to have such an interest:

    * the registrant (the person whom the record is concerned with);
    * the registrant’s spouse;
    * the registrant’s parent(s);
    * a descendant of the registrant (e.g., a child or grandchild);
    * a person having a common ancestor with the registrant (e.g., a sibling, grandparent, aunt/uncle, or cousin);
    * a legal guardian of the registrant;
    * a person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant;
    * a personal representative of the registrant’s estate;
    * a person whose right to obtain a copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction;
    * adoptive parents who have filed a petition for adoption and need to determine the death of one or more of the prospective adopted child’s natural or legal parents;
    * a person who needs to determine the marital status of a former spouse in order to determine the payment of alimony;
    * a person who needs to determine the death of a nonrelated co-owner of property purchased under a joint tenancy agreement; and
    * a person who needs a death certificate for the determination of payments under a credit insurance policy.”

  35. jd   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 5:42 PM

    Would it be helpful for them to add that they did issue that electronic copy? Also can we get the receipt of the money Obama paid for the bc he showed on his website?
    ———————
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: People have requested to see the form or letter Obama would have had to send to the Hawaii Department of Health to release his records. They have never addressed the question as far as I know. I asked it of Factcheck.org, who also ignored three letters with the same question.

  36. Obama Researcher   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 4:52 PM

    Also you can add that Obama himself admits he was born a British subject to the British Nationality Act of 1948. How can he be born a British subject citizen and also be an American NBC. Would the Founding Fathers of our country allow a British born citizen be President after fighting an 8 year war of independence throwing off British rule? if so where is that stated in the Constitution.

    Where in the Constitution does it say that the Constitution shall be over ruled by Sharia Law. I thought the Constitution was the Law of the Land. The top document of law frow which all other laws derive their legal powers.

  37. Obama Researcher   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 4:45 PM

    I would have added the fact that the state released the information on a football coach because they said the people had a right to know. Adding that certainly the people have even more rights to know about a president then a football coach.

  38. California Birther/Dualer/Doubter   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 4:34 PM

    Bam! That is one heckuva petition — one that hits on all the pertinent points. Great job! I just signed the petition. That was 10 bucks well spent. The officials will probably turn up their noses at it, but we can always hope that the well-researched and irrefutable facts will be enough to make them squirm in their seats and wonder whether the gig is up.

  39. Bob1943   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 3:54 PM

    That is a great letter. I am glad that my name is one of those on the petition.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.