Spread the love

CITIZEN REMINDS “JOURNALIST” BILL O’REILLY THAT HIS JOB IS TO ASK QUESTIONS

February 22, 2011

Bill O'Reilly anchored the program "Inside Edition" and worked for ABC and CBS News before joining the Fox News Channel

Dear Mr. O’Reilly,

This will be dismissed by you as you have in the past, but I just had to write after your demonstration of dismissal of the doubt of the now more than 50% of the American people.

First, we are not “birthers” as you and others want the rest of the world to believe. Unlike you, we want to know the truth. We do not accept an announcement or two that could be placed by anyone or a COLB (wonder if you know what that is?) as proof that a candidate is a natural born Citizen, as stated in Article II, Section I, paragraph 5 of the U. S. Constitution, qualified to be President of my country.

Your pontification with Megyn Kelly the other night leads me and others to suspect that you are as much a part of what is wrong with America as the 100+ years of progressive rule. You should pay more attention to Glenn Beck, who always says, “Question with impunity.”  Your lack of integrity is apparent on this subject.

As so-called journalists, maybe the question you and others should be asking is “Why has Obama spent millions of dollars on hiding his past when he could have resolved the issue with a simple authorization to release his records, even his official birth certificate, which really is not the issue, as his father was a citizen of Kenya under British rule? Wasn’t he also adopted by an Indonesian citizen, and where is the documentation of repatriation if he was born in the United States?  Or do you retain American citizenship when you become a citizen of another country? I don’t know that this is what happens in that situation.

Maybe you should be asking how he obtained the funds to attend the most prestigious schools in America? Another question  which “We the People” or “birthers,” as you like to call us, do not yet have an answer for is, “How did he travel to a country (Pakistan) when it was not a country American Citizens could legally travel to?” Maybe it is of no concern to you why Obama has several social security numbers in an age of increasing identity fraud?

Finally, why does this so-called President allow a decorated military officer to lose everything obtained over an 18-year career for asking the question of his Commander-in-Chief (Are you constitutionally qualified to be POTUS?) and be incarcerated in Ft. Leavenworth? Like the founders of this great nation, Lt. Col. Lakin did more to “Protect and Preserve” the Constitution than any politician or judge since.

For you, Mr. O’Reilly, I agree this e-mail is not pithy but verbose with too many questions, which you may consider beneath you to answer or already answered (in my opinion, they have not been). I just wanted you to hear from someone whom you, in your bombastic and dictatorial way, like to denigrate; one who watches your program but will be watching a lot less.  I think the list of people like me is growing the more you continue to make statements as you did the other night which only point out how little journalistic integrity you have retained in your climb to stardom.

A great question I would like to hear you answer is, “Who is it you are referring to when you state at the end of your show, ‘We’re looking out for you’”? You state you were once a teacher, but I wonder if you were not more of an Indoctrinator and Dictator who made your students afraid to disagree with you.

Name & town, name & town…

Lloyd Carter

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

53 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:46 PM

Bill O’Reilly is a Pinhead, in fact he is the Top Pinhead. His so-called No Spin Zone is nothing more than Fox News version on tabloid news. If O’Reilly did his job and actually do some research he would find that Obamas life is so full of lies, it’s no wonder he has to use a teleprompter everywhere he goes. If Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, why is it that NO Hospital in Hawaii will admit that Obama was born there???????? Being the first black Prez, and no one will admit that he was born there. Oh wait, members of the Kenyan Government have admitted he was born in Kenya.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:25 PM

Clearly O’Reilly is taking his marching orders from Murdoch and News Corp. His arrogance in doing so is beyond belief. The guy is a shill and a fraud. He doesn’t deserve the “number one watched cable news show status,” and why should the reader believe this is so? O’Reilly needs to be brought down a peg or ten. It’s time to boycott this bloviating windbag. Maybe he should move over to MSNBC? That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C.

sky
Reply to  Jim Campbell
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:54 PM

Soros is mad at murdoch,Beck, and O’reilly,So who do you think these men have to answer to?

Tim
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:48 PM

The Democraps fuse on the unions is much shorter than that of the 60% of the population on the illegal president:

Democrat urges unions to ‘get a little bloody when necessary’

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/145627-dem-lawmaker-on-labor-protests-get-a-little-bloody-when-necessary

sky
Reply to  Tim
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:57 PM

your state capitol 2-26-2011 11:00-3:00pm rally against democrat unions

A pen
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 8:37 AM

It is the job of a newscaster to report news and the journalist to ask questions. Bill O is neither. He is a paid personality who is hired to give an opinion. The idea is that just like a campus professor; people will be attracted to the personality enough to adopt their reasoning or mantra without question. Naturally in the world of sales, which is exactly what these people engage in, sex sells and it is put to use too. There are few real journalists and few real educated people who have opinions based in facts gathered. They are not sales people and do leave you feeling quite uncomfortable as they do not coddle, pander or please, they educate. To debate honestly on air would require Bill O have people sit across from him he really is at odds with. No TV personality hired to sway the masses will ever sit across from a real debater. NEVER If any would like a shot at showing their colors just sit down with Michael Savage for an hour. Now that would be an opinion hour I’d watch. I would also like to see congress have a weekly session on air with Judge Napolitano just to show the public they are up to the job we hire them for. Oh, the improvements to media that could be made if there were any real intent to provide a public service.

Bob1943
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 8:13 AM

Republican candidate Andy Martin to launch first anti-Obama campaign ad today.
He says it will be very good:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/02/first-2012-ad-on-obamas-credentials.html#comment-form

sky
Reply to  Bob1943
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:55 PM

Rally at state capitols febuary 26,2011, 11:00 to 3PM

Bob1943
Reply to  Bob1943
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:06 PM

Andy’s Martin’s Obama eligibility ad is released. I think I am underwhelmed.

Check it out:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/02/first-2012-ad-on-obamas-credentials.html#comments

MichaelN
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 2:26 AM

English common law which is touted as the source to define ‘natural born’ has been misrepresented in the courts and subsequently by those who with blind faith, have followed the mistaken reading of the particular English common law case.

That case was Calvin’s case in which a child born In England to an alien father visiting England as a friend, would be born an English ‘natural born subject’. (NBS)

So it has been opined that therefore a child born in US to an alien is a ‘natural born Citizen’.

Sure the child born in England to a friendly alien is an English NBS, but in England the alien is considered a ‘subject’ (aka a ‘citizen’ in US terms)

But in US, an alien is not considered a ‘Citizen’, the alien must apply and be granted citizenship by due process.

So basically to be an English NBS, one had to be born in England to a ‘subject’ (aka an alien visiting as a friend)

The status of the father mattered.

Ergo: it took TWO qualities to be met to be an English NBS, and they were ‘nature’ or ‘procreation and birthright’

Here is a quote from Calvin’s case that proves this

“Calvin the Plaintiff naturalized by procreation and birth right …”

http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=911&chapter=106337&layout=html&Itemid=27

This was NEVER mentioned in the courts, either deliberately omitted when citing English common law, or by error in reading what Lord Coke actually said in Calvin’s case.

Fact:
even in English common law, it takes of the parents and of the soil, to make a ‘natural born subject’ of England and it takes the same to make a ‘natural born Citizen’.

i.e. Sanguinis and soli.

This omission of “by procreation and birthright” has lead to error, and the error has festered over time and been parroted by majority of legal community as if it is true that it is only of the soil (soli) that matters.

But it is NOT TRUE …………. it takes BOTH the citizenship status of the father and born in the land of the father’s citizenship to make a ‘natural born’.

Daniel Cutulla
Reply to  MichaelN
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:05 PM

> but in England the alien is considered a ‘subject’ (aka a ‘citizen’ in US terms)
But in US, an alien is not considered a ‘Citizen’

That is correct. The English Common Law term “subject” refers to anyone who is under the actual jurisdiction of the king. So aliens (except diplomats and foreign troops) are subjects as long as they’re on British soil. The child of such an alien, if born within the kingdom, is evidently under the king’s jurisdiction at birth and thus a natural-born subject.

In the US, “citizen” means more than just “subject to the jurisdiction”, obviously. So you are right that it is at least not obvious, if not far-fetched, to simply transfer “subject” to “citizen” and assume that “natural born citizen” and “natural born subject” are analogous.

The Obots try to gloss over this issue where they simply replace “subject” with “citizen” and claim that everything is to be interpreted for “citizen” as it was for “subject”.

> even in English common law, it takes of the parents

That’s not quite correct; as you state yourself before:

> The status of the father mattered.

So one parent would suffice. See also de Vattel who writes “il faut être né d’un père citoyen” (“one needs to be born of a citizen father”).

In all fairness, since today there is no more legal inequality between men and women, today we must look at the mother as being equally entitled to bestowing her status upon the child.

That is the point where I disagree with others around here who claim that you need *two* citizen parents.

Not that this matters in Soetoro’s case where neither birth on US soil nor birth by a citizen mother have been proven at all.

RacerJim
Reply to  Daniel Cutulla
Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:34 AM

The Obots wouldn’t care if Obama himself admitted he isn’t a “natural born Citizen”, all they care about is that he is POTUS. Unfortunately it looks like Congress and SCOTUS wouldn’t care either, all they seem to care about is preventing the worst Constitutional crisis in history and perhaps some of the worst race riots in history.

Barbi Dee
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:30 AM

Is anyone aware that our Hitlertarian leader-Obummer got his private army (Ready Reserve Corp) sneaked into the healthcare bill??? How unusual that Bill OLiar , nobody in the media and definitely NOBODY in congress has informed the public!!! Information is available on google No other American President had a private army!! Hitler DID!!They only allowed him $17,500.000 for this luxury????-while America is bankrupt??????? When is enough-enough????????????????????????????

Ed '74
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:53 PM

O’Reilly’s comment about this ” It doesn’t matter”
Once the ‘truth’ comes out, they will be all over it as if they were the ones that discovered it. Yes, Beck bothers me because he is such a ‘constitutionalist’ except about being an NBC to be president.

Barbi Dee
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:52 PM

Isn’t it WONDERFUL that Allen West “WOULD ASK what PASSPORT Obama used to travel to Pakistan”————–However, Why has he not asked about passport or Lt. Col. Terry Lakin????????? As Obummer is allowed to continue his mission of the destruction of America–and not 1 congressmen will question his eligibility—-does Allen West reaaly believe it might be a good idea to ask this question in 2 or 3 years?????????ANOTHER—-PHONY—-FRAUDULENT—-POLITICIAN!!! Ask Now-or shut up and get your pink slip in 2012!!!!!!!!

Bob1943
Reply to  Barbi Dee
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:26 AM

I agree, so far Allen West has done and said nothing on Obama’s most obvious ineligibility.

He is on his way to being as useless as the rest of Congress on the one issue that, until it is resolved, should be the ONLY issue.

NUTN2SAY
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:44 PM

I’ll make this short!
With what we know about the cover up of the illegal usurper and O’Reilly’s stance on the matter…..THE NO SPIN ZONE …IN REALITY….. IS THE ULTIMATE SPIN ZONE!
No longer worth watching!

Bill G
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:05 PM

Allen West is on video in response to a question about Obama saying, “I would ask what passport he used to travel to Pakistan” Good question from a courageous patriot.

johnny says
Reply to  Bill G
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:36 PM

to bill g. —– i believe allen west made that statement during the campaign. he said that he would ask that question but he has not done it since he got to washington. he is just going along to get along. that was just campaign rhetoric. it got him elected and the voters got fooled once again.

Barbi Dee
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:47 PM

Sent an e mail to friends@fox.com. Told the staff to go to P&EM.com and read the letter and comments to Bill OLiar! Billy Boy will not respond to the truth! Why don’t these DICTATOR LOVERS move to Cuba, Venezuela,etc.etc?? WE THE PEOPLE WILL GLADLY GIVE THEM A 1 WAY TICKET. This includes all the media, the ENTIRE CONGRESS and supreme court!!!!!!!!!!!

Christopher Rossie
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:35 PM

When Bill says “We’re looking out for you” he means the Saudi Prince and Rupert.

bill
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:47 PM

Yes Patriots,The Scam Stream Media are up to their necks in complicity in cover up of the biggest fraud that has even been foisted on the American people.Just
as sure as I am, the sun will rise,the truth will also.cheers

mganzi
Reply to  bill
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 7:37 PM

Not only the SSMedia are up to their necks, but with the potential GOP nominee season almost upon us, do you think there is one conservative candidate who would take this on? Will Palin (if she runs)? Barbour? Perry? Bachmann? McDonnell? Christie? Daniels? DeMint? Not to mention rinos like Mitt. If it’s true that over 50% of Americans question 0’s eligibilty in some form, you would think that it is the most direct and least expensive campaign approach to get instant attention including driving the MSM up a wall.

One candidate who announces on April 15 and says “I’ve decided to run and I want to see Mr. Obama’s long form birth certicate. Here is mine. My father and mother were born in the United States, so I am a natural born citizen and meet all the Constituional requirement to run for POTUS.
——————-
Mrs. Rondeau replies: The Post & Email does not endorse candidates for any public office, but Andy Martin, who has declared himself a presidential candidate, has stated in recent news releases that he is making a television ad aimed specifically at the presidential eligibility issue. The first one is expected to be aired tomorrow.

C. Lowell
Reply to  mganzi
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:04 AM

> but Andy Martin, who has declared himself a presidential candidate

The same Andy Martin who still refuses to show his birth certificate until Soetoro shows his?

RO
Reply to  mganzi
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:54 AM

I maybe thought Andy was viable but he thinks Orly is nuts. I won’t tolerate any criticism of her. He has already lost my vote.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:43 PM

If you recall O’Reilly’s very first tirade against lunatic birthers two years ago he stated “We have seen the birth certificate and Obama was born in Hawaii.” That was a blatant lie. The Kenyan birth certificate had not even surfaced at that point. O’Reilly is bald faced liar.

A.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:42 PM

This letter states almost exactly what NUMEROUS emails that we have sent to O’Reilly, Megan Kelly, Beck, & Hannity state. No responses at all. Actually, Chris Matthews, ironically, DID ask the question recently — “where is the long form birth certificate?” Why is there a FOX blackout on ANY eligibility issue?

Read: “OBAMA – INELIGIBLE TO SERVE – LIES, CRIMES & DEADLY AMBITION” (At Amazon). Get ALL the legal facts that prove Obama is NOT Eligible to be President under the U.S. Constitution and also proves Obama was born in Kenya, and so much more!

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:03 PM

O’Reilly is a PINHEAD…certainly not a patriot.

Bob1939
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 3:54 PM

I just flat out refuse to watch any of these idiot-lying-traitorous-foolish “talking heads” anymore, (any/all of them). Whenever I may happen to read in TP&E that one of these fools has waken up and is starting to tell the truth, then I will start watching that one only – maybe; however I just don’t expect to see that happen any-time-soon, or before the revolution starts. In the meantime I think of all of them with the same disgust and disdain as I do for obama, and I trust that their ratings will drop substantially because of their ignorance and stupidity. At least drop to the level of their only remaining viewers, who would probably be as stupid as they are.

iluvamerica
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 3:07 PM

O’Reilly paid Obummer for that Super Bowl interview . O’Reilly paid with his “Birther Show” a few days later. He rebuffed those crazy “bithers”. Obama liked that pay-off better than a big roll of money in his pocket. The motto “We are looking out for you” = bull.

Stock
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:38 PM

Try contacting Megyn Kelly-someone there may have a conscience or a spine

Barbi Dee
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 12:43 PM

Every employee at Fox is OWNED by Rupert Murdoch! (Rupert is a Bilderberg and his goal is to collapse the U.S for The New World Order). Heaven forbid that any of his puppets such as Huckabee or Palin get elected to presidency in 2012. They would complete any unfinished business for Obummer and assure the total destruction of America.. Remember Obummers charming personality when he was campaigning and do NOT get fooled by any other Bildebergs, CRF or Trilateral puppets. Bill O is a despicable lieing piece of garbage! Most people know HE IS A FRAUD!

stormyweather
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:57 AM

Now here’s an interesting read. I’ll bet not one person in the media will pick this story up and run with it as they have orders NOT to give credence to “birthers” and this would result in the floodgates opening on The One.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

NEIL TURNER
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:10 AM

O’Reilly does not need to ask the question:

“Maybe you should be asking how he obtained the funds to attend the most prestigious schools in America? ”

Anyone who has seen the transcripts and verdicts of the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL, held May 14-18, 2011 in NYC, and publicly available here: http://www.CRS-Reports.org, knows that Barry’s ‘foreign-student’ funded attendance at Occidental with his wealthy arab muslim roomates in CA in 1979, and his non-attendance at Columbia (for his fake Degree in Political Science), and his Saudi-funded attendance at Harvard, proves that he is not a natural born Citizen of the U.S., and that funding for all these schools was from either our tax dollars (through the CIA) and/or mulsim world-dominance money-from kings and potentates and terrorist orgainzations.

Treason and Sedition abound in our land, and it’s time for We The People to stand up to it.

Lloyd in California
Reply to  NEIL TURNER
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:21 PM

Neil, you are wrong. O’Reilly or someone with his audience needs to ask it. The answers you provide here are to a very limited group and mostly lead to a dead end. All of the Questions about elegibilty, and life history should and must be answered. Consider this, what will be in his Library in Chicago or Hawaii when he completes his term? How will he present all of the hidden documents and lies. Will the media just rewrite his past? I hate to think how all those who drink the kool aid will feel when it all comes out. The damage will have been done. There is a Pro Wrestler who wears a saying on his shirt “Never Give Up”. I think that is a motto we all need to invoke in causing the removal of this fraud for the sake of this country.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:54 AM

would you get in a ny cab with 0’pinhead driving?

Crazy old coot
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:43 AM

The more the left goes after fox news, the more I believe that they are just trying to drive more people to believe the lies fox news puts out. To get any “real” news, you have to go to the internet. Fox news is just another version of the MSM only they are more sly about the lies.