If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

ARMY MASTER FLIGHT SURGEON SAYS THAT JUDGE LIND’S DECISION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE FOR “EMBARRASSING” REASONS LEAVES AMPLE LATITUDE FOR AN APPEAL

by Eldon E. Bell, MD

The American Grand Jury was founded by Robert Campbell in 2009 to review evidence of the constitutional ineligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as president

(Sept. 4, 2010) — From American Grand Jury:  Dr. Eldon E. Bell is a retired U.S. Army Colonel and Master Flight Surgeon.  He is a Viet Nam and Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran. Currently Dr. Bell practices Medicine in a rural town in South Dakota. Eldon has served on a number of American Grand Juries.

In Courts-Martial:

“The ‘sole test’ for admissibility is whether the evidence of the misconduct is offered for some purpose other than to demonstrate the accused’s predisposition to crime and therefore to suggest that the factfinder infer that he is guilty, as charged, because he is predisposed to commit similar offenses. It is unnecessary that relevant evidence fit snugly into a pigeon hole provided by Military Rules of Evidence.” 404(b). United States v. Castillo, 29 M.J. 145, 150 (C.M.A. 1989).

Thus, in my view, the Judge has purposely opened the trial up for an appeal. Colonel Lakin clearly has an exemplary Character and military record. The Judge’s exclusion of the ELIGIBILITY evidence fails to pass the “Sole Test” requirement in courts-martial and must be allowed. Indeed, the entire case hinges on whether or not the Commander in Chief is legitimate or a USURPER unqualified under our Constitution.

Discovery of the ELIGIBILITY evidence is the only reason the distinguished military physician invited his own court-martial; he was unable to ascertain ELIGIBILITY because of demonstrated legal obfuscation and interference instituted by the attorneys representing the putative POTUS. Clearly Colonel Lakin is not predisposed to commit similar offenses with an unblemished 18+ year record and selection for O-6 prior to his invitation to Court-Martial.

One must ask the questions:

  • Who has the most to gain by avoiding discovery?
  • Why has over $2,000,000 been spent on legal delay when a $12.00 Certified “Long Form” Birth Certificate would answer all eligibility questions?
  • Who has the better character: An unblemished record Military Physician only seeking the truth, or an occupier of the Oval Office whose every action is illegitimate and that of a usurper until proven otherwise?
  • Who are the puppeteers pulling the strings of a “puppet” president?
  • Who is acting in the best interest of the U.S. citizens?


Join the Conversation

26 Comments

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Judge Lind has basically accepted Obama’s Executive Order at face value (EO 13489 issues on 21 Jan 2009 one day after he took the OATH) which claims to have put a presidential hold on all Presidential Records.
    Executive Order 13489 – Presidential Records
    The law he thought he was modifying to protect his pre election records is not covered because they are not managed by the Archivist:
    Specifically exempt 2201-7:
    (B) does not include any documentary materials that are
    (i) official records of an agency (as defined in section 552 (e) [1] of title 5, United States Code);

    (ii) personal records;
    (iii) stocks of publications and stationery; or
    (iv) extra copies of documents produced only for convenience of reference, when such copies are clearly so identified.
    (3) The term “personal records” means all documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion therof,[2] of a purely private or nonpublic character which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.
    Basically, he can only protect records which are derived from his tenure immediately preceeding swearing in, and while he was in Office.

    His birth records are not protected. They are state records.

    SO, you have someone thinking the records are blocked and they are not; making a false ruling on the thought process; and not assuring the protection of the integrity of the court.

    And when you look at EO 13552 (merge the Old MCM and new 13552 putting 13552 in red) you will see that there is enough change to permit the OBAMA Controlled Courtmartial to wiggle out of legal errors without being scathed. And, the insertion of “legal advisor” vs the older “legal officer” permits Obama to provide advise on his own outcome.

    And we call the United States Justice System the best in the world!

    Mr Chief Justice, are you watching the snowball from hell approaching you?

  2. According to the military code of conduct any and all evidence necessary for a proper defense of the defendant MUST be admitted.

    Therefore LIND is in violation of the military code of Justice, as well as her oath to protect and defend the constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Which means that LIND is THE ENEMY of the CONSTITUTION and of AMERICA itself!

    She must therefore subsequently be DISBARRED and arrested for violating her oath of office!

    Lakin is the HERO, LIND is the OATH TRAITOR!

  3. Even if his BC shows his father was an American and he is a natural born, he has a stolen SS card and he has lied about his past. This would be enough to remove him from office. He has still committed fraud.

  4. I am so heartened to hear of this “sole test” for the honorable patriot, LTC Lakin’s defense. Thank you The Post and Email and AGJ for printing Dr. Bell’s appraisal and recommendations. This is great!! Better and Better!

  5. The only “embarrassment” is how these weak and biased judges get appointed and make incompetent rulings. Judge Lind should read the new book: “Obama – Ineligible To Serve – Lies, Crimes and Deadly Ambition” – @ Amazon, Alibris, etc. Here the LEGAL FACTS that will get Obama removed from office, under the Constitution, are detailed and explained in plain language!! (She won’t have any problems understanding it!)
    This case will be appealed, but are we up against the same biased judge nonsense? Sure. Will the new Congress address this after November? Stay tuned and email your representatives.

  6. I believe that soon there will be a breakthrough in the effort to bring the usurpation of the Presidency of the United States of America to the constitutionally appointed venue (SCOTUS – not Congress because only a qualified candidate can be impeached and removed). Despite the machinations of the globalist elite (they exist, this I know), this manchurian president will be removed from office forthwith.

  7. Don’t forget, we now also have the State Department saying Obama has dual-citizenship! And who’s in the State Department? Hilliary, who’s mad at Obama for taking away the presidency she thought she deserved. We all know she wants to run in 2012. She just might end up with the documentation we need to prove he’s not Natural Born!

    For God and Country

    1. So is that the historical story line that ensures the Clinton legacy?

      Save America from Obama and waltz into the Presidency and

      into glorius history?

      Then onto greater glory on Dancing With The Stars!!!!
      Probably on the beach.

    2. Perhaps, but Hillary Clinton is a Marxist too and we don’t need that piece of work in the WH either. The other point is there could be trouble for her if she said so, because all this time she knew and did nothing about it…. called aiding and abetting treason.

  8. Is there no man/woman in our government BRAVE ENOUGH TO stand up to this man?
    Our country and our government is being “slashed”
    and not one will stand up to this man?
    Yes, we have our fine spoken conservative commentators
    and not one will stand up to this man?
    Our children and grandchildren will be burdened
    and not one will stand up to this man!
    Dear God please don’t let them push you aside !

  9. Quote:

    “■Why has over $2,000,000 been spent on legal delay when a $12.00 Certified “Long Form” Birth Certificate would answer all eligibility questions?”

    I am glad Dr. Bell is offering his support for LTC Lakin, but way too many people are saying all we need is a long-form birth certificate to settle this. Once again, even if Obama was born in Joe Biden’s lap he would not be a Constitutionally required natural born citizen.

    The real long-form birth certificate is important, but there is nothing it could say that would make Obama a natural born citizen if his father is Barack Sr.. If his father is someone else who was an American citizen, then Obama is a gone on fraud.

    1. I agree Bob. but I can’t understand how there are still any people left who believe that production of a “$12.00 Certified “Long Form” Birth Certificate would answer all eligibility questions?”
      You only have to spend about ten minutes reading this site to realize that the “Long Form” Birth Certificate (if there ever was one), is a peripheral issue.

      If Barack Obama II wants to prove that he is not the son of Barack Obama I, and thus is not a dual-national, then he, himself, will have to produce the original 1961 “Long Form” Birth Certificate to that effect (plus DNA evidence). In the process he would have to admit that he had lied about his life story. Of course, Obama could be hiding other facts or non-facts, as well.

      Obama is desperate to keep his options open.

    2. If it turns out that Obama’s father was actually a US citizen, then yes he would be a fraud. However, he would still not be a natural born citizen.

      It does not make any difference as to the real parentage of Obama, because Obama Senior claimed him as a product of the marriage. In the time of our Founding Fathers, all that was necessary was for the father of record to claim he was the father in actuality, which Obama Senior did in the divorce papers. In the time of our Founding Fathers there was no way to test (such as with DNA) for paternity. If a man claimed to be the father of a son, then that was good enough for all legal purposes of identity, passing on of inheritance, land grants, and especially citizenship.

      1. If it turns out that Obama’s father was actually a US citizen, then yes he would be a fraud. However, he would still not be a natural born citizen.

        Unless a US citizen was named as his father on his original, long form BC at the time of his birth. In that case, just in relation to his past and his identity, he’ll have even more fraud and deceit next to his name in future history books.

        It’s true, however, that only the man who is named as the father of the child on the original long-form BC at the time of the child’s birth matters in regards to citizenship. Even today, the legal father of a son – the father of the a son in the eyes of the law – passes on inheritance and land grants. If I’m not mistaken, he even passes on citizenship if he’s the legal father at the time of the son’s birth (children who are transferred legally and physically from their birth mother to adoptive parents immediately after birth, for example).

      2. Barack Obama was born a British subject. He can never be a Natural born citizen. He will never be eligible for POTUS. He is unAmerican as they come and it is now obvious whoever put him there is trying to destroy this coun try. There are no grey areas here. He has to go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We all must keep screaming about this. We will not stand for it.
        Are you listening Saudi Arabia, Are you listening George soros, Are you Rothchilds listening??????????????????