Carter alters Oct. 29th ruling, ex post facto
Spread the loveSAYS THAT IT WAS A DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT PERMISSION TO FILE A NEW AMENDED COMPLAINT Legal Analysis by John Charlton (Dec. 16, 2009) — On Sunday the nation saw one of the most noble gestures ever, when Dr. Orly Taitz filed a Motion for Clarification in the case of Barnett vs. … Continue reading Carter alters Oct. 29th ruling, ex post facto
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed