Carter alters Oct. 29th ruling, ex post facto

Spread the loveSAYS THAT IT WAS A DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT PERMISSION TO FILE A NEW AMENDED COMPLAINT Legal Analysis by John Charlton (Dec. 16, 2009) — On Sunday the nation saw one of the most noble gestures ever, when Dr. Orly Taitz filed a Motion for Clarification in the case of Barnett vs. … Continue reading Carter alters Oct. 29th ruling, ex post facto