IN TWO SEPARATE CASES, AGs WORK TO FORESTALL
by John Charlton
(Sept. 12, 2009: 9:45 PM Eastern DLST) — Just minutes ago Niel Turner issued a public announcement, based on his personal communications with Attorney Orly Taitz, who is presently in Washington, D.C.; regarding Taitz’s two cases, Captain Pamela Barnett vs. Obama, and Captain Connie Rhodes, M.D., vs. McDonald.
In the more recent case, Rhodes vs. McDonald, in GA Federal Court, which regards Capt. Rhodes request for an emergency stay of her deployment to Afghanistan, on the grounds that Barack Hussein Obama has not demonstrated his lawful holding of the office of U.S. President, Attorney Taitz disputed the claim of the government attorneys, that Capt. Rhodes “failed to show in Court”, according to Turner.
Turner declared: “The Government attorneys lied to Judge Land in court (in Columbus, GA) on Friday when they told the judge that the Flight Surgeon, Capt. Rhodes (who is the plaintiff refusing to obey orders for deployment until they can be proved to be ‘lawful orders’) , just failed to show in Court, when they knew that she was ordered to remain on base back in Kansas.”
During the hearing on Friday, in this case, Attorney Taitz rebutted this false claim, by producing “a notarized statement from the plaintiff (that had been scanned and then emailed to her), stating the facts of the matter.” It was “perjury, pure and simple,” says Turner; ” And, needless to say, the Judge was ‘PISSED’ (Orly’s words – in English, and in Russian, I believe).”
Attorney Taitz will be back in Court, on behalf of Capt. Connie Rhodes, in the Columbus Federal Court House, at noon, on Monday.
In the meantime, Dr. Orly Taitz will return to California, to begin discovery in the case, Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al.
The Post & Email had previously reported widespread speculation that discovery would commence in the principal action. At that time Mr. Turner could not verify exactly for The Post & Email the status of the matter. Now Turner, after speaking with Taitz has clarified, declaring that discovery will begin.
Orly is proceeding with ‘DISCOVERY’ based on:
a. Judge Carter’s words in Court to proceed in a timely and expeditious manner;
b. the Government’s (Cardona) Application for Stay: “This court should stay … with the exception of any discovery which Plaintiffs can demonstrate …that they need in order to counter said motion (to dismiss).” It is arguable that the original hospital birth certificate is absolutely essential to demonstrate that dismissal is not appropriate in this case;
c. and the actual COURT ORDER by Judge David O. Carter setting a Scheduling Conference for October 5, 2009 (CASE NO. SA CV09-0082-DOC (ANx) in the Case of BARNETT et al v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA et al., especially lines 3 – 6 (page 2): … the Court encourages the parties to begin discovery before the Scheduling Conference. The parties shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Rule 26(a) and thereby obtain and produce most of what would be produced in the early stages of discovery, because at the Scheduling Conference the Court will impose tight deadlines to complete discovery.
“Let the subpoenas and the servings begin,” concludes Turner.
Update Sept. 13, 2009 — 11:40 PM E DLST: Dr. Orly Taitz has published a post about this case at her blog; and the above mentioned affidavit of Captain Rhodes, stating she prevented by orders from attending the hearing; both of which confirm above annoucement by Mr. Turner.
Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.