<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Post &#38; Email &#187; Kerchner vs. Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/tag/kerchner-vs-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepostemail.com</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Curious Incident of the Justices Who Did Not Bark!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/12/07/the-curious-incident-of-the-justices-who-did-not-bark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/12/07/the-curious-incident-of-the-justices-who-did-not-bark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 04:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atty. Mario Apuzzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice John Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohens v. Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's eligibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherlock Holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Blaze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=28853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HAS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT RENDERED ITSELF IRRELEVANT? by jtx (Dec. 7, 2010) — It seems that history &#8211; and literature &#8211; are known to repeat themselves. I refer to the short story printed in 1894 by a certain A. C. Doyle entitled “Silver Blaze” which contains what must be one of the better-known Sherlock [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/12/07/the-curious-incident-of-the-justices-who-did-not-bark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opposition Brief does not address Kerchner case</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/15/opposition-brief-does-not-address-kerchner-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/15/opposition-brief-does-not-address-kerchner-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural born citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's eligibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=10741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BUT RATHER, A SELF-SERVING ONE OF THEIR OWN CREATION Guest Editorial (Mar. 15, 2010) — Fool me once, shame on you&#8230; The present response by the defense in the Kerchner et al action genuinely reminds one of the above idiom in that the defense counsel had already used what amounts to the same response in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/15/opposition-brief-does-not-address-kerchner-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Department of Justice embraces Obama&#8217;s Politics of Tyranny</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/09/department-of-justice-embraces-obamas-politics-of-tyranny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/09/department-of-justice-embraces-obamas-politics-of-tyranny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Mob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commander Charles F. Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural born citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usurpation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=10167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ARGUES IN KERCHNER VS. OBAMA APPELLEE BRIEF THAT U.S. CONSTITUTION IS NOT THE LAW OF THE LAND Legal Analysis by John Charlton (March 9, 2010) — Many U.S. Citizens have not awakened to the fact that the U.S.A. is no longer a Constitutional Republic, but a tyrannical state, overthrown from the very day Chief Justice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/09/department-of-justice-embraces-obamas-politics-of-tyranny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerchner case will test Third Circuit Court&#8217;s adherence to the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/kerchner-case-will-test-third-circuit-courts-adherence-to-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/kerchner-case-will-test-third-circuit-courts-adherence-to-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esq.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Apuzzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural born citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=7838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[APPELLANTS&#8217; BRIEF LEAVES NO WIGGLE ROOM by John Charlton (Feb. 13, 2010) — Kerchner et al. vs. Obama &#38; Congress is without doubt a case that will go down in the history books of law, and the Appellate Brief written by Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Esq., is a veritable treasure trove of Constitutional Law and interpretation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/kerchner-case-will-test-third-circuit-courts-adherence-to-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apuzzo files opening brief in Kerchner vs. Obama &amp; Congress Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/20/apuzzo-files-opening-brief-in-kerchner-vs-obama-congress-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/20/apuzzo-files-opening-brief-in-kerchner-vs-obama-congress-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDR Charles F. Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eligibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Apuzzo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=6369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRIEF IN THIS LANDMARK CASE IS A MASTERPIECE ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND RIGHTS by John Charlton (Jan. 20, 2010) — Yesterday, Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed the opening brief on behalf of the Plaintiffs in Kerchner et al. vs. Obama &#38; Congress before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. This case regards the evident [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/20/apuzzo-files-opening-brief-in-kerchner-vs-obama-congress-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3rd Circuit Court of Appeals sets date for Kerchner vs. Obama &amp; Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/25/3rd-circuit-court-of-appeals-sets-date-for-kerchner-vs-obama-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/25/3rd-circuit-court-of-appeals-sets-date-for-kerchner-vs-obama-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDR Charles F. Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commander Charles F. Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRIEFS DUE BY JANUARY 4TH, 2010 by John Charlton (Nov. 25, 2009) — The long process of appealing the ruling of Judge Jerome  B. Simandle, who dismissed the case of Kerchner et al. vs. Obama &#38; Congress has begun.  The Federal 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has set the due date for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/25/3rd-circuit-court-of-appeals-sets-date-for-kerchner-vs-obama-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apuzzo on the D.C. Code&#039;s Quo warranto provisions</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/10/apuzzo-on-the-d-c-codes-quo-warranto-provisions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/10/apuzzo-on-the-d-c-codes-quo-warranto-provisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDR Charles F. Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Donofrio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Apuzzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN REGARD TO ELIGIBILITY CASES Attorney Leo Deonofrio has been leading a crusading effort to clarify the understanding of, publicize and advocate the use of the D.C. Quo warranto provisions.  Recently he has commented at his blog, naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com, about the D.C. code and the Barnett vs. Obama case, and responded to Attorney Mario Apuzzo&#8217;s previous [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/10/apuzzo-on-the-d-c-codes-quo-warranto-provisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerchner Appeals!</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/27/kerchner-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/27/kerchner-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDR Charles F. Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell J. LeNormand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald H. Nelsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eligibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowell T. Patterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Apuzzo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NATIONAL SECURITY DEMANDS A HEARING ON THE MERITS! by John Charlton (Oct. 27, 2009) — Attorney Mario Apuzzo, esq., announced this afternoon at 2:45 PM ET that the Plaintiffs in Kerchner et al. v. Obama &#38; Congress et al.. have appealed their case to the 3rd Circuit Court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Plaintiffs in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/27/kerchner-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Department of Justice &quot;Messed up&quot;, when they filed Notice of Simandle&#039;s Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/27/department-of-justice-messed-up-when-they-filed-notice-of-simandles-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/27/department-of-justice-messed-up-when-they-filed-notice-of-simandles-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Captain Pamela Barnett vs Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDR Charles F. Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George S. Cardona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge David O. Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyes vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usurpation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LEAD PLAINTIFF IN KERCHNER VS. OBAMA SAYS HIS CASE SUPPORTS PLAINTIFFS IN BARNETT VS. OBAMA by John Charlton (Oct. 27, 2009) — During the last 14 months, American citizens motivated by their desire to see the Constitution upheld as the Supreme Law of the Land, have undertaken many disparate and individual actions to demand proof [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/27/department-of-justice-messed-up-when-they-filed-notice-of-simandles-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter to the Editor — Oct. 26, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/25/letter-to-the-editor-%e2%80%94-oct-26-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/25/letter-to-the-editor-%e2%80%94-oct-26-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharon Rondeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usurpation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your dereliction of duty is contemptible, but we will prevail! by Sharon Rondeau Dear Editor, I am sending Judge Simandle this letter, today, in the mail: October 24, 2009 U.S. District Judge Jerome B. Simandle U.S. Courthouse Fourth &#38; Cooper Streets Camden, NJ  08101 Dear Judge Simandle: RE:  KERCHNER V. OBAMA I am appalled that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/25/letter-to-the-editor-%e2%80%94-oct-26-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

