<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Post &#38; Email &#187; Laws &amp; Statutes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/category/politics/laws-statutes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepostemail.com</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The power Bush gave to Obama to become Dictator for life</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/29/the-power-bush-gave-to-obama-to-become-dictator-for-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/29/the-power-bush-gave-to-obama-to-become-dictator-for-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Charlton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laws & Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR 5122 (109th)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Warner National Defense Authorization Act 2007]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2007 LAW UNDID 200 YEARS OF TRADITION, WHICH PROTECTED CITIZENS AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT&#8217;S USE OF MILITARY AGAINST THEM by John Charlton (Oct. 29, 2009) — It&#8217;s the power Bush gave to Obama, by which the latter can install himself as Dictator for life, now that he has usurped the Presidency and pressured the Courts to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/29/the-power-bush-gave-to-obama-to-become-dictator-for-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Common Law Writ of Quo Warranto</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/13/the-common-law-writ-of-quo-warranto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/13/the-common-law-writ-of-quo-warranto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Charlton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws & Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We the People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=1474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ANTEAU&#8217;S SURVEY OF PROCEDURAL LAW, COURTS VENUE &#38; STANDING by John Charlton (October 13, 2009) — Some further documentation will clarify the nature of Quo Warranto in common law.  The following is excerpted from The Practice of Extraordinary Remedies: Habeas Corpus and other common law writs, by Chester James Antieau, 1987, which considers the multifaceted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/13/the-common-law-writ-of-quo-warranto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editorial: Oct. 13, 2009 — Quo Warranto is Our Inalienable Right!</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/12/editorial-oct-13-2009-%e2%80%94-quo-warranto-is-our-inalienable-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/12/editorial-oct-13-2009-%e2%80%94-quo-warranto-is-our-inalienable-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Charlton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws & Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inalienable rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=1461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BOTH IN COMMON LAW AND IN NATURAL LAW by John Charlton For those who are the true sons of the American Revolution no conclusion in law could be more obvious, clear, and simple. In common law the English Sovereign claimed a right to question the holders of offices which he had the right to bestow, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/12/editorial-oct-13-2009-%e2%80%94-quo-warranto-is-our-inalienable-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Present Dangers warned against Long Ago</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/12/present-dangers-warned-against-long-ago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/12/present-dangers-warned-against-long-ago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Charlton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws & Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Federalist Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Crime of Usurpation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usurpation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPERS, SPEAK TO THE NATIONAL CRISIS by John Charlton (Oct. 12, 200) — It is often said that those who remain ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it.  In the present national crisis, this could not be more true.  To get a better sense of the danger of usurpation of office, power [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/12/present-dangers-warned-against-long-ago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A History of Quo Warranto</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/10/a-history-of-quo-warranto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/10/a-history-of-quo-warranto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Charlton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws & Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9th Anne c. 20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eligibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eligibility Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[franchise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Bracton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurt von S. Kynell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newman vs. United States ex Rel. Frizzell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger St. German]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saxon and Medieval Antecedents of the English Common Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Thomas Aquinas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Langton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torbert v. Bennett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=1402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COMMON LAW ORIGIN,NATURAL LAW BASIS by John Charlton (Oct. 10, 2009) —  The nature of a quo warranto proceeding is as important to understand as its history, when considering arguments for and against standing and jurisdiction in cases seeking to resolve the national crisis brought on by the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by Barack [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/10/a-history-of-quo-warranto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 7th Circuit Court&#039;s Argument against Quo Warranto&#039;s use</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/the-7th-circuit-courts-argument-against-quo-warrantos-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/the-7th-circuit-courts-argument-against-quo-warrantos-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Charlton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws & Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beth Walston-Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Captain Pamela Barnett vs Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co. v. Village of Kinney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covington and Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Hager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edgerly v. Kennelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High's Extraordinary Legal Remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In re Yancey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Simpson Hastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knapp v. Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Ry. Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Apuzzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall v. Crotty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morin v. City of Stuart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newman vs. United States ex Rel. Frizzell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preamble to U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. ex rel. Robinson v. Bar Association of D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States v. Malmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Ex Rel. Stat. Wisconsin vs. First Federal Savings et al.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usurpation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Richards et al. vs. Juneau Independent School District et al.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=1348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AND ITS APPLICABLITY TO ELIGIBILITY CASES Legal Summary &#38; Analysis by John Charlton (Oct. 8, 2009) — Yesterday, Attorney Leo Donofrio brought again to the attention of the Nation, the existence of a case in the Federal 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, which strangely was not cited by acting Attorney General George S. Cardona, in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/the-7th-circuit-courts-argument-against-quo-warrantos-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Code on Quo Warranto explains McCain&#039;s Candidacy</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/d-c-code-on-quo-warranto-explains-mccains-candidacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/d-c-code-on-quo-warranto-explains-mccains-candidacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Charlton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laws & Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy to usurp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linda A. Melin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usurpation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=1339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LITTLE KNOWN PROVISION WOULD PROVIDE STANDING TO LOSER by John Charlton (Oct. 8, 2009) — On March 3, 1901, the U.S. Congress passed the law which established the Quo Warranto chapter of the current 1940 version of the D. C. Code.  The District of Columbia Code is the official registry of laws pertaining to legal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/d-c-code-on-quo-warranto-explains-mccains-candidacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quo Warranto in the District of Columbia Code</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/quo-warrento-in-the-district-of-columbia-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/quo-warrento-in-the-district-of-columbia-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Charlton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laws & Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Crime of Usurpation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usurpation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=1304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From time to time The Post &#38; Email will reprint in their entirety, pertinent laws and statutes which are in the news.  Such is the Quo Warranto Statute in the District of Columbia Code, following the on-line debate that has arisen from actions in the case Barnett vs. Obama. The following is the current version [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/08/quo-warrento-in-the-district-of-columbia-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->