<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Post &#38; Email &#187; Law Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/category/law-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepostemail.com</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Department of Justice embraces Obama&#8217;s Politics of Tyranny</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/09/department-of-justice-embraces-obamas-politics-of-tyranny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/09/department-of-justice-embraces-obamas-politics-of-tyranny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Mob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commander Charles F. Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural born citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usurpation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=10167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ARGUES IN KERCHNER VS. OBAMA APPELLEE BRIEF THAT U.S. CONSTITUTION IS NOT THE LAW OF THE LAND Legal Analysis by John Charlton (March 9, 2010) — Many U.S. Citizens have not awakened to the fact that the U.S.A. is no longer a Constitutional Republic, but a tyrannical state, overthrown from the very day Chief Justice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/09/department-of-justice-embraces-obamas-politics-of-tyranny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court grants motion in Obama eligibility case</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/23/court-grants-motion-in-obama-eligibility-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/23/court-grants-motion-in-obama-eligibility-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Michael A. Chagares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner v. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Apuzzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KERCHNER V. OBAMA CLEARS LEGAL HURDLE by Sharon Rondeau (Feb. 23, 2010) — In an order dated February 22, 2010, the Hon. Judge Michael A. Chagares has granted the motion from Mario Apuzzo, Esq. to file an over-length appellant brief, thereby moving the case forward. The limit normally allowed in such filings is 14,000 words, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/23/court-grants-motion-in-obama-eligibility-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taitz seeks Obama&#8217;s records to defend herself in CA Bar complaint</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/taitz-seeks-obamas-records-to-defend-herself-in-ca-bar-complaint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/taitz-seeks-obamas-records-to-defend-herself-in-ca-bar-complaint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 06:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Captain Connie Rhodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Clay D. Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Lamberth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Royce Lamberth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royce Lamberth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taitz vs Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRIEF FILED IN D.C. COURT BEFORE JUDGE LAMBERTH SEEKS RESPONSE IN 12 DAYS by John Charlton (Feb. 14, 2010) — Whatever you think about  Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., if but a shred of objectivity remains in your mind, you have to admit that to rebut a complaint made to the California Bar Association for her [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/taitz-seeks-obamas-records-to-defend-herself-in-ca-bar-complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerchner case will test Third Circuit Court&#8217;s adherence to the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/kerchner-case-will-test-third-circuit-courts-adherence-to-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/kerchner-case-will-test-third-circuit-courts-adherence-to-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esq.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Apuzzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural born citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=7838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[APPELLANTS&#8217; BRIEF LEAVES NO WIGGLE ROOM by John Charlton (Feb. 13, 2010) — Kerchner et al. vs. Obama &#38; Congress is without doubt a case that will go down in the history books of law, and the Appellate Brief written by Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Esq., is a veritable treasure trove of Constitutional Law and interpretation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/kerchner-case-will-test-third-circuit-courts-adherence-to-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allen vs. Soetoro appealed to 9th Circuit Court</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/allen-vs-soetero-appealed-to-9th-circuit-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/allen-vs-soetero-appealed-to-9th-circuit-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Soetoro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank R. Zapata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth L Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lolo Soetoro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Ann Soetoro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CASE INVOLVES FOIA REQUEST FOR RECORDS OF BARRY SOETORO &#38; FAMILY by John Charlton (Feb. 13, 2010) — Just how long does it take to get information from the Federal Government via the Freedom of Information Act?  That question is being answered by the proceedings in the case Allen vs. Soetoro.  Mr. Ken Allen of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/allen-vs-soetero-appealed-to-9th-circuit-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez claims right to commit fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/09/judge-arthur-j-gonzalez-claims-right-to-commit-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/09/judge-arthur-j-gonzalez-claims-right-to-commit-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfredo Altavilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrylser bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Anderer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Arc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Arthur Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Donorfrio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Carco LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Pidgeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=7589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RULING, DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, ATTEMPTS TO STRAIN GNATS AND SWALLOW CAMELS by John Charlton (Feb. 9, 2009) — Last Friday, Arthur J. Gonzalez, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Federal Court, Southern District of New York, issued his judgment denying the Motion for Reconsideration filed by attorneys Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/09/judge-arthur-j-gonzalez-claims-right-to-commit-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donofrio &amp; Pidgeon defend Motion for Reconsideration in Chrysler case</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/23/donofrio-pidgeon-defend-motion-for-reconsideration-in-chrysler-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/23/donofrio-pidgeon-defend-motion-for-reconsideration-in-chrysler-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfredo Altavilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrylser bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Anderer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Arc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Arthur Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Donorfrio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Carco LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Pidgeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=6535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHARGE DEFENSE WITH COMMITTING FRAUD ON THE COURT Legal Analysis by John Charlton (Jan. 24, 2009) — Yesterday Attorneys Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon filed their reply to the Defenses objections to their own Motion for Reconsideration in the case RE: in Chrysler LLC et al., on behalf of 76 former Chrysler  dealerships, whose owners [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/23/donofrio-pidgeon-defend-motion-for-reconsideration-in-chrysler-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apuzzo files opening brief in Kerchner vs. Obama &amp; Congress Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/20/apuzzo-files-opening-brief-in-kerchner-vs-obama-congress-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/20/apuzzo-files-opening-brief-in-kerchner-vs-obama-congress-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDR Charles F. Kerchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eligibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome B. Simandle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerchner vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Apuzzo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=6369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRIEF IN THIS LANDMARK CASE IS A MASTERPIECE ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND RIGHTS by John Charlton (Jan. 20, 2010) — Yesterday, Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed the opening brief on behalf of the Plaintiffs in Kerchner et al. vs. Obama &#38; Congress before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. This case regards the evident [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/20/apuzzo-files-opening-brief-in-kerchner-vs-obama-congress-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taitz defends her Motion to Transfer Barnett vs. Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/12/taitz-defends-her-motion-to-transfer-barnett-vs-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/12/taitz-defends-her-motion-to-transfer-barnett-vs-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett vs. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quo warranto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=5866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USES OPPONENTS&#8217; ARGUMENTS AGAINST THEM &#38; ASKS POINTED QUESTIONS by Dr. Orly Taitz, © 2010. [Editor's note:  Dr. Taitz' pleading speaks for itself; therefore it is being reproduced here in its entirety] In the civil action:  Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al., U.S. District Court, for the Central District, Middle Division of California Filed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/12/taitz-defends-her-motion-to-transfer-barnett-vs-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donofrio &amp; Pidgeon file Motion for Reconsideration in Chrysler case</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/26/donofrio-pidgeon-file-motion-for-reconsideration-in-chrysler-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/26/donofrio-pidgeon-file-motion-for-reconsideration-in-chrysler-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Rondeau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfredo Altavilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrylser bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Anderer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Arthur Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Donorfrio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Carco LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Pidgeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=5010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DEALER&#8217;S PILING ON, IN LEGAL BID TO DEFEND RIGHTS TO THEIR FRANCHISES by John Charlton (Dec. 26, 2009) — Last night Attorney Leo Donofrio filed an Omnibus Motion to Reconsider in the case RE: in Chrysler LLC et al., in the name of Attorney Stephen Pidgeon and himself, and on behalf of more than 20 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/26/donofrio-pidgeon-file-motion-for-reconsideration-in-chrysler-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

