SUBMITTED BY IWB ON SEPTEMBER 17th, 2013, AS REPORTED BY JOHN MacHAFFIE
by Dr. Thomas E. Davis, Col., USA (Ret.), ©2016
(Apr. 23, 2016) — The document cited above as the title of this article also serves as one primary source for the allegations made herein.
On December 4, 1928 (I had to look this up), President Calvin Coolidge delivered his last State of the Union Address. Of course I do not remember any of the address; I was just 3 going on 4 the following January. But, I do know that my Dad and Mother (pregnant with our last family member to be born on December 18th) were listening on a table-top crystal single-station radio (KVOO, Tulsa, OK). I suspect that this was the first time, to my recollection, that I had ever heard of or even knew what a president was.
By the time I remember hearing the next radio address, we had lost our Sharecropper farm at the very beginning of the Great Depression and the notorious Dust Bowl plaguing Oklahoma, and by 1933 were Okies living in “Oil City,” properly known as Cut Bank, Montana. I had acquired a rudimentary political education in the excellent school system and from the Whetstones, who published the weekly Cut Bank Pioneer Press newspaper.
The haughty and arrogant President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and leader of the Democratic Party had been elected in November 1936 to a landslide victory to his second term in office. His State of the Union message was delivered on January 6, 1937. Roosevelt held what were deemed “Fireside Chats” and one such was held on March 9, 1937. He reminded the people that in 1933 he had sought and obtained from the Congress a law requiring all privately-held gold to be exchanged for paper money, thus taking the United States off the Gold Standard. That law was subject to a lawsuit which reached the Supreme Court and its Constitutionality upheld by a vote of 5 to 4. Roosevelt was having difficulty getting his “Fair Deal” legislation upheld by the Supreme Court. He proposed appointing one new Associate Justice for every sitting justice over the age of 70, claiming the Court was overworked and far behind its scheduled hearings. That was a blatant falsehood, but he persisted.
He proposed his “Court-Packing” scheme under the high-sounding title, “Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937.” Read more at the following:
http://millercenter.org/president/speeches/speech-3309
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/roosevelt-announces-court-packing-plan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Procedures_Reform_Bill_of_1937
Obama, just as so many Democratic Party crooks before him have done, has committed multiple offenses, both great and small, but offenses or crimes as the case may be. Before enumerating the crimes of Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, a citizen must be aware that any and all crimes against the United States must be investigated by an agency of the Executive Department, i.e., the Office of the President. This is a situation our Founding Fathers never could have foreseen. That a Washington, an Adams or a Jefferson could or would commit treason was unthinkable. They did give consideration to there being at some point in time an “Obnoxious’ Chief Executive and how he might be dealt with. They settled upon the use of impeachment in lieu of skinning alive, beheading, drawing and quartering or hanging.
However, if the presumed good citizens in charge of the judicial processes refuse to take action, of what use is any control or punishment?
Title 18 of the U.S. Code outlines all federal crimes. Typically, federal crimes deal with activities that either extend beyond state boundaries or directly impact federal interests. Specifically, Obama’s acts of treason are covered by 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES – elaborating upon the Constitution’s primary coverage in Article III, Section 3.
Specifically, Barry Soetoro-Obama has of record twice committed treason. The first instance occurred when, in concert with his then-Attorney General, Eric Holder, he caused illegal weapons to be “walked” via the ATF into the hands of members of the Mexican drug cartels, enemies of the United States. At least one of the weapons was later used and identified as being the weapon used in the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.
The second instance occurred during the period beginning in late 2012 and early 2013, when Mr. Obama caused to be given to the Islamic Government of Egypt, an enemy of the United States, 20 F-16 Fighter Jets, 200 Abrams Battle Tanks and $1 million of non-appropriated American taxpayers’ monies.
The two actions noted above should certainly be sufficient cause to seek an indictment in the Federal District Court of Washington, DC. The United States House of Representatives should have, following the first instance, prepared Articles of Impeachment against both Obama and Holder, passed these articles, gone to trial in the United States Senate and then proffered criminal charges against both civil servants in accordance with the Constitution.
Such action may have brought to a halt the continuing criminal conduct by Obama and his despotic administration.
Among the other High Crimes and Misdemeanors committed by Mr. Obama and others are perjury by Lois Lerner and, in at least one instance, by both Mr. Obama and Mr. Holder. On or about April 23, 2010, Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona signed into law Arizona Senate Bill (SB 1070) fully consistent with the Constitution and following at least five requests by that state for assistance as provided for under Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10, Clause 3 states, “No State shall, …, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.”
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/tocs/a1_10_3.html
Justice Joseph Story in his “Commentaries on the Constitution” supports the Governor’s actions when he notes:
At “§ 1398. Still, a state may be so situated, that it may become indispensable to possess military forces, to resist an expected invasion, or insurrection. The danger may be too imminent for delay; and under such circumstances, a state will have a right to raise troops for its own safety, even without the consent of congress. After war is once begun, there is no doubt, that a state may, and indeed it ought to possess the power, to raise forces for its own defence; and its co-operation with the national forces may often be of great importance, to secure success and vigour in the operation of war. The prohibition is, therefore, wisely guarded by exceptions sufficient for the safety of the states, and not justly open to the objection of being dangerous to the Union.”
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a1_10_3s5.html
Not only did both men, purportedly constitutional scholars, incorrectly advise Governor Brewer, but they also sought judicial relief in the form of an injunction and did further invite others, including Mexico, to join them in seeking injunctive relief.
Rather than simply regurgitating the words of the author cited at the beginning of this piece, following is the link to his work:
http://investmentwatchblog.com/the-complete-list-of-barack-obamas-scandals-misdeeds-crimes-and-blunders/
Dr. Thomas E. Davis, Colonel, USA (Ret)
It is highly improbable that Eric Holder is a Constitutional scholar and that homosexual foreign enemy islamic terrorist Obama most certainly knows nothing of the feelings of the Founding Fathers expressed within the details of the United States Constitution.