Why We Must Stop pb

“IF NOT NOW, THEN WHEN?”

by Gunnery Sergeant John McClain, USMC, Retired, ©2013, blogging at Gulf1

(Jun. 6, 2013) — One of the pressing questions today is the depth and breadth with which the central illegal government is criminally investigating and pursued various “news media” personnel.  There are two major issues to be delved into, first, the fact the current administration has been using the law and its application freely to target perceived enemies, and at the same time to reward supporters, donors, and set free criminals convicted, yet not sentenced.

The second issue is one of this same criminal and illegal central government investigating and pursuing “whistleblowers,” those people who know these crimes are being committed, and have done their In Pursuit of the media civic duty in bringing the crimes to the light of day.  This issue is one which took almost two centuries of continuous conflict of interest before citizen action was able to force Congress into passing various “whistleblower protection acts” and has included great efforts by individuals to get those laws actually enforced.

What has taken place over the past five years is by no means new; the term “Gerrymandering” came out of the fact that a Massachusetts candidate for Governor named “Gerry” was caught manipulating the vote, and the scandal made his name emblematic for voter fraud and cheating.  What is new is the fact the crimes are being committed in the open, little attempt is being made to conceal the acts or their nature, and the first illegal alien president has been able to use the charge of racism to deflect every iota of criticism put against his administration, even while the crimes are blatantly continuing.

The crimes of this administration began with the suggestion Obama was eligible to run for the office of president after he ran and took an Illinois Senate Seat in a campaign fraught with fraud, corruption, and proven out, after the fact, ignored by the State, all while the favored candidate successfully won the election with public claims of “His Kenyan Birth,” not only printed on his own campaign brochures, but published in the leading papers, and followed around the world by UPI, and archived, as evidence of his crime, in virtually every nation in the world.

Ordinarily, I would be fit to be tied over the fact government is taking direct aim at media for exposing crimes; however, it is hard to gin up any real animus or anger, given the fact the media now crying has been carrying water for this illegal alien, has done everything in its power to deny all challenges to his integrity, and brazenly lied about every facet of his crimes in office.

Up to five years ago, the “poster child” regime for taking liberties with government power and abusing them to extremes has been held, unequivocally, as the “Nixon-Agnew” partnership, and their “burglary of Democrat Offices in the Watergate Building.”  It was scandalous for “a president and his staff to be leading a burglary operation against the Democrat party,” and while the first six years of their joint turn in the executive were relatively conventional; the resignation of a vice president and then president made them history and precedent-setting.

Today, we are standing witness while an illegal alien has committed acts of fraud from his time as an Illinois Senator, through his partial term as Senator from Illinois, and through the entire campaign, with the continuation to this very moment; and were it not for the fact “his pet media” has been targeted, we wouldn’t even be hearing about this issue, just as it has been ignored for five years.

Nothing any citizen, no claim made by any expert, no charge properly affixed to his name has been countenanced to this point, and it is almost amusing to watch this sudden flurry of anger, hubris, from the very people who have taken crime to new levels to cover for their darling, who has now turned on his own.

That this illegal alien continues in his ongoing criminal conspiracies is not at all surprising.  That he has turned on those who’ve carried his water was to be expected as well.  Even the most ardent of followers must have some level of truth which matters, and Obama has found things his most ardent supporters can’t and won’t countenance, and they have exposed him.

Now the question is whether “We, The People” will bother following up and put this communist-installed illegal alien out of the office he stole, and prosecute him for his acts of treason.

Why We Must Stop

I engage in conversation with a number of staunch conservative readers, some of whom suggest while my enthusiasm is right, my constant call for a radical overturning of our form by stopping completely, taking in a full consideration of our State as A Nation, comparing where we are with where logic dictates our Founders would expect, and use this to decide as “A People who are A Nation” just exactly what we believe in as a foundation of our Nation and Culture, is a precarious and dangerous opportunity for someone to step in and control the direction we head, and turn us more immediately under tyranny.

It is suggested that a call for revolution is a stand against our country, calling it into unnecessary risk, with a high likelihood of our going astray in the midst.  To this, I reply, “What course are we on which is not leading directly to subjugation under world government?  What are we doing to keep from being forced into whatever arrangements the inability to service our ‘Government’ debt, will allow others to impose upon us?”

I stand dead firm; the founding principles are not even routinely considered with regard to the proposal of legislation. No consideration of principle goes into the question of whether legislation is even constitutional; the sole issue is whether those in the majority believe they have the votes to make it happen.  I have been closely observing this phenomenon since forty years ago in high school, finding it criminal then, when there remained a modicum of respect for first principles, yet I am castigated today, when there isn’t the slightest consideration of principle in day-to-day Congress.

I am told opening the way of revolution entails risks I haven’t considered; the risk of any such well-intended and well-planned rising up being led astray by those with other than best interests being the chief thing I am suggesting to risk for my call.  But I ask, who could rise up and possibly presume to deliberately act to cause greater damage to our Nation than the current communist Muslim who has been installed in office?  What ideology could possibly be more destructive and more harshly antithetical to American Principle than unabashed communism, coupled with violent radical Islam, as we see our current president demonstrating as his own belief system, and his intentional outcome for his “complete transformation of our Nation”?

My question to all those detractors is this:  you know where we stand today; we have never had greater, more forceful criminal acts come out of a central and illegal government.  Never in our history has the leader of this nation been in closer connection with the designated self-declared enemies of our Nation, actively supplying them with weapons, and openly supporting the exact enemy which the western world has identified as having put us openly, tauntingly in their cross-hairs, with our commander-in-chief openly aiding these rebels by transferring American weapons to those fighting against our forces.  How can any act to restore our Nation to its proper stance, to restore the rule of law over government, how can any act designed to return our Nation to its foundation possibly be more hazardous than continuing on this path which leads straight into subjugation under the nations our government has become totally indebted to, far beyond any means of even servicing the debt?

Perhaps one can say my call for revolution, for the rising up of responsible citizens, to take back control of our Nation from the Children of Darkness, the liberals, can be considered risky, but to those who suggest such, I ask:  What choice is there but to either accept their intent and goal, or at this juncture, rise in rebellion?  Sure, forty years ago a “responsible electorate” could have chosen to cleave to first principles and throw out the communists, the socialists, and cleanse our Nation, but it wasn’t done, and we are here now.  If not now, then when?  If not by revolution, then by what manner and means would you find “the republic”?

Semper Fidelis,
John