Spread the love

A “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” CANNOT HAVE DIVIDED LOYALTIES

by JB Williams, ©2013

“The Law of Nations” is thought to have influenced the Framers as they wrote the U.S. Constitution and determined the types of citizenship required for various federal public servants

(Jun. 4, 2013) — Like Rubio, Texas Senator Ted Cruz has seized the Tea Party limelight by simply saying many of the right things in the early going. Of course, Rubio is now showing his true colors in his mad dash to legalize illegal immigration and help millions of illegal aliens become democrat voters, making him one of the biggest political turncoats in recent history.

Failing the biggest test of all, Rubio refused to disqualify himself for president and vice president and hold Obama accountable for his massive identification fraud. Cruz is on track to make the same mistake, telling FOX RNC shill Sean Hannity that he is a Natural Born Citizen because his mother was a citizen of both the United States and Canada.

Like Rubio, Cruz was born to a Cuban Father. Rubio was born in Miami, the son of two Cuban parents residing in the United States. As a result, our 14th Amendment naturalization statutes granted Marco citizenship via naturalization laws only.

But Cruz was born in Calgary, Canada, to a mother who held dual citizenship in the USA and Canada, and a father who held dual citizenship in Cuba and Canada. On what basis does Cruz think he is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States?

Similar to Rubio, Cruz may have inherited US citizenship from his mother at birth, but if he did, it was only due to 14th Amendment naturalization statutes. He is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States.

After living under the constitutional crisis of Obama fraud for five years, we apparently have to address this issue once again.

There are only three primary types of legal citizenship in America, according to our constitution, our laws and history.

1.    Native Born Citizens – Inhabitants of the territory at the time the United States was formed as a sovereign nation, as-in Native Indians – and “anchor babies” – those born on US soil to parents of foreign nations, given basic citizenship rights under 14th Amendment naturalization statutes.

2.    Naturalized Citizens – Immigrants from foreign nations who go through the legal naturalization process of becoming a US citizen under 14th Amendment naturalization statutes.

3.    Natural Born Citizens – Simply stated, “true Citizens” who inherit their US Citizenship from a natural birth father who is a legal citizen of the USA at the time he transfers Citizenship to his natural offspring, free from any foreign entanglements or obligations, dual or divided national loyalties.

According to Article II – Section I – Clause V of the US Constitution, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, (or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,) shall be eligible to the Office of President;”

Contrary to modern revisions of history, our nation was not founded on the basis of British Common Law — it was founded on the basis of Natural Law, as stated in the opening preamble to the Declaration of Independence dated July 4th, 1776 –

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

A treatise on Natural Law written by Emmerich de Vattel titled The Law of Nations is the known point of origin for the borrowed term found in Article II of the US Constitution, Natural Born Citizen.

The operative text found in Chapter XIX – Section 212 of the Law of Nations concerning the true definition of Natural Born Citizen is not the opening sentence – “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” Misuse of this sentence out of context has only added to the confusion surrounding the true meaning of Natural Born Citizen.

The operative definition of Natural Born Citizen is as follows –

1.      “As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”

2.      The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.”

3.      “I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

In short, if one gains simple US citizenship as the result of 14th Amendment naturalization statutes of any kind, they cannot possibly be a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, end of story!

Like Rubio, Cruz was born the son of a Cuban father who did not hold any form of US Citizenship at the time of Ted’s birth. Therefore, Ted’s father, Rafael Cruz, could not transfer Natural Born Citizenship to the United States, that which he did not possess at Ted’s birth.

Marco Rubio was born a “dual citizen” of Cuba via his father, and the United States via 14th Amendment naturalization statutes.

Ted Cruz was born in Calgary, Canada on December 22, 1970, a “divided citizen” of three nations at birth:  Cuban via his father, Canadian via his birth place and the USA via his mother, under 14th Amendment naturalization statutes.

The Natural Born Citizen requirement found in Article II of the US Constitution was placed there for one reason alone… to make certain that no one with dual or divided national loyalties via birth or blood line, could ever hold the highest office in our land, the office of Commander-in-Chief.

Sadly, the democrat party has thus far succeeded in violating Article II of the US Constitution with Barack Hussein Obama, son of Kenyan father Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., who at no time in his life was a citizen of the United States.

Instead of dealing with this very real constitutional crisis which becomes worse every moment it is allowed to continue, the RNC appears intent upon capitalizing on Obama’s massive fraud by pushing their own constitutionally ineligible darlings like Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal and Nikki Haley.

If any of these four RNC darlings were what they claim to be, true American heroes, they would all stand up, disqualify themselves from high office and demand the immediate removal and prosecution of Barack Hussein Obama for the most massive and deadly identity fraud ever perpetrated on the human race.

RNC media shills like Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Megyn Kelly, Glenn Beck and Mark Levin are either the biggest fools on the planet, or the biggest liars on TV and radio. All of them have refused to address the greatest constitutional crisis in American history while attacking and insulting every American who believes in Article II as much as any other part of the constitution.

At one time, these folks appeared to stand for truth, but no more. All of them have become wealthy by helping to spread the lies and in so doing, they have become complicit in a fraud that will likely cost America its entire future.

As I pointed out five years ago, people who care nothing about Article II, care nothing about the constitution, the Bill of Rights or anything else were not put in place to protect and preserve the American way of life.

The only question that remains is what will the American people do about it? In the face of numerous anti-American affronts to freedom, liberty and the rule of law from a known fraudulent administration so corrupt that it would make Middle Eastern dictators blush, will the American people ever rise up and do anything about it?

America has never faced such evil from within. There is nobody we can trust in Washington, DC today. Can we trust the American people to do anything about it?

Yes, I am sick of this topic… But the people aren’t standing yet!

Jb.uspu@gmail.com

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Barbara Mabray
Thursday, June 6, 2013 8:38 AM

Per CDR Kerchner’s Blog:
Senator Rubio’s father was not a naturalized citizen when Marco was born in 19671 per National Archives data. His father applied for naturalization in September, 1975. Thus Marco’s father passed Cuban citizenship at birth to Marco Rubio per Cuban law, US law, natural law and international law.
Being a dual citizen at birth, Marco Rubio is not a natural born citizen of the United States.
Articles/Reports-CFK, News Announcements

gigclick
Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:59 PM

The Republican Party is believing that Rubio will be POTUS. They obviously haven’t read Art.2 Sect.1 of our Constitution and learned to translate “natural born”. Rubio’ parents came to the U.S. and waited 4 years to file for citizenship, meanwhile, the mother got pregnant and had Rubion before they became citizens. Rubio cannot legally run for POTUS though he can be Senator or Congress. Again they show loyalty to “immigration” card mentality, which is a stepping stone for higher quests in office climbing and political gains. What is going on in both parties is criminal but it’s working just fine for the corrupt pulling paychecks from DC. These are not the people I would have voted for and it has become so dirty, it almost looks clean. Something must be done to remove both parties from power and a new system must be forced into place that will allow the people to vote on what is needed for the people, not allow the government to be taken over to game the system for more political gain.

Chamberjac
Wednesday, June 5, 2013 1:23 PM

“The Law of the Nations is thought to have influenced the framers of the Constitution”

The problem here is that this is not stated anywhere in the Constitution, there fore it is guessing about the mindset of the framers. It may very well be true, but unless it is in writing, who are we to claim to be mind readers and make interpretations to fit our own desires.

Ted Cruz is well versed on the Constitution. Do you not think that he has researched his own situation ? Or are you implying he is dishonest ?
——————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: News reports state that George Washington borrowed “The Law of Nations” from the local library and never returned it: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2010/may/20/george-washington-library-book, which gives rise to the belief that it was a well-used reference.
More evidence of the influence of “The Law of Nations” on the Framers: http://www.schillerinstitute.org/fid_97-01/971_vattel.html

http://americanfoundingprinciples.com/2012/09/18/law-of-nations/

Chamberjac
Wednesday, June 5, 2013 12:34 AM

The difference between Barack Obama (assuming he was born in Kenya or some other foreign country) and Ted Cruz is that both mothers were American citizens only Obama’s mother was too young to pass on US Citizenship to her new born son according to the US laws at that time. Ted Cruz’s mother was old enough to pass citizenship unto little Ted. From all the Constitutional Experts I have spoken with they say the Fathers Citizenship is irrelevant. Just repeating what I have been told by experts.

Loggia
Tuesday, June 4, 2013 9:13 PM

Could this be why Congressperson after Congressperson, esp. on the Republican side, respond to their constituents’ myriad complaints about Obama with “He was born in Hawaii, period!”

In other words, they don’t WANT to deal with “natural born” because then CRUZ, RUBIO, JINDAL and even SANTORUM get disqualified (Santorum’s dad was still Italian so Santorum had Italian citizenship rights at birth as well as American).

Both parties are playing loose with the Constitution and that dooms us all!