- Law Cases
(Jan. 23, 2013) — The problem of using the social security number as an identifier is the fact that a social security card contains no biometric identifiers of any sort, making it essentially impossible to tell whether a person using a certain SSN is truly the person to whom it was issued without relying on some other means of documentation (which may itself have been falsely procured through use of a fraudulent SSN).
SSN-042-68-4425 is the number that Obama has been using since 1979 when he was 18 yrs old. A number that he acquired from CT while living in HI? Below is the stolen SSN number that Obama is using and it has been broken down so we can understand how a social security number derived.
As a result of the June 1936 decision, the current SSN is composed of three parts:
At the inception of the program, all SSNs were assigned and cards issued based solely on information provided by the applicant. However, in the 1970s, SSA began requiring proof of age, identity, and citizenship.
All applicants are required to provide evidence of:
In-person interviews are required for individuals aged 18 or older applying for original or new SSNs. An individual signing the SS-5 on behalf of another (for example, a parent for his or her child) must establish his or her own identity.
In 1979 when Obama was 18 yrs old and supposedly ran off to college for the first time, well he needed an identifier for his supposed identity. It is now a known fact that Obama has never had a legitimate long form birth certificate to prove his identity. Now let us reason this, if one does not have a valid birth certificate of any kind then there is one document that is virtually impossible to acquire with out a valid birth certificate and that is a social security card that is used as an identifier in our country. Well, without a birth certificate to get a social security number he had to get one somehow.
Read the rest here.
© 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.
Categories: Blog of the Day