Spread the love

SENT ELECTRONICALLY AND WILL BE MAILED ON OCTOBER 10

by Sharon Rondeau

Does the documentation received by the Kansas Secretary of State affirm that a forgery is real?

(Oct. 9, 2012) — In an article published earlier today, The Post & Email reported that it had not received documentation identified as having been responsive to a Kansas Open Records Act (KORA) request made on September 17 and for which payment was remitted on September 21.

The Post & Email has received a response from Atty. Ryan Kriegshauser, the KORA officer for the Secretary of State, which reads:

Ms. Rondeau:

I looked at the file and confirmed we did receive your payment of $8.16 on September 24, 2012.   The attached documents should have been sent by mail the same day or shortly thereafter.  I will go ahead and get a hard copy to you in the mail today which will not go out until tomorrow.   I am not sure why you did not receive these documents but I will check with the others in my division to see how this was processed.

Thanks.

RYAN KRIEGSHAUSER  | DASOS, Legal Counsel and Policy
Kansas Secretary of State| 785-368-8030 P | 785-368-8032 F | www.sos.ks.gov
Memorial Hall, 1st Floor | 120 S.W. 10th Avenue | Topeka, KS 66612-1594
 
Learn all about the new election law at www.gotVoterID.com.

The PDF sent by Kriegshauser can be viewed here:  Verification Documents Kansas

Most of the images were sent from the Arizona Secretary of State’s office to the Kansas Secretary of State.  There is an email from Deputy Attorney General Jill T. Nagamine, as with Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s request, and there are several pages relating to the lawsuit filed by Atty. Orly Taitz against the Mississippi Democrat Party and other defendants.  One of the documents is a verification statement on “OHSM FORM V01,” which is identified as having been created or amended on “8/01/01” but cannot be found in a search of the Hawaii Department of Health’s website.

The verification “forms” received by Atty. Scott Tepper in the Mississippi case and Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett are different and appear to respond to the specific questions of each.

Kriegshauser’s response validates news reports which stated that Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach’s office had requested information from Hawaii, Arizona and Mississippi about Obama.

Page 10 of the 15 pages released to The Post & Email is a “Statement of Examination” signed by Terryl K. Rushing, a “staff attorney employed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.”  In her statement, Rushing affirms:

I, Terryl K. Rushing, am a staff attorney employed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.  As such, I am aware of a Verification of Birth regarding the Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II, that is currently in the custody of United States Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson.  With the permission of Magistrate Judge Anderson, I have examined that Verification of Birth.  I have also examined a document filed in the case of Dr. Orly Taitz, et al. v. Democratic Party of Mississippi, et al, Civil Action No. 3-12ov280HTW-LRA, that is pending in this Court.  The document that I examined from that case is No. 35-2, which is titled Verification of Birth.  I have compared the Verification of Birth in Judge Anderson’s custody to the Verification of Birth that was filed in the above-referenced case, and their contents are identical, with one exception.  The document in Judge Anderson’s custody contains, over the signature of the State Registrar, a raised seal that says, “Department of Health, State of Hawaii.”

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.  Executed on the 14th day of September, 2012.

Statement of Examination signed by Atty. Terryl K. Rushing of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

Why does one “Verification of Birth” have a raised seal and the other does not?

A law enforcement investigation found that the image presented to the public on April 27, 2011 by the Obama White House as his “long-form birth certificate” is a forgery.  The verification forms affirm that the information contained in the birth certificate is on file at the Hawaii Department of Health.

Does the Health Department therefore possess a forgery?

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. How did Obama get a Top Secret clearance without a past? Someone knows and is keeping a deep dark secret.
    Common sense dictates high suspicion when;
    When Executive power granted to a President upon his inauguration his first action seals all personal and past records from scrutiny, is an action that borders on criminal.
    Take for example the checks and balances in the military to prevent a hostile force from impersonating a high ranking official and turning our own forces against us. Not just in the USA, but in military forces all over the world.
    1. Orders must be verified, in Obama’s case that verification has been nullified and neutered via executive fiat and judicial fiat (Holder)
    2. Credentials must be available for verification of authenticity; Obama’s basic documents have NEVER passed muster, and have even proven criminal in nature.
    3. Inside information and support; There is NO WAY one person accomplished this level of breach of National security. The tendrils extend way beyond the scope of the District of Columbia.

    How many supporters have done their little job of shredding that piece of paper, or have received that extra $ amount to make sure notice is not brought to the attention of responsible parties.
    Imagine the political pressure a sitting president (like a General) could bring to nearly any situation.
    No need to imagine, we see this every time we look at DC.
    Common questions that are dismissed;
    Where does the money come from?
    Where did the money go?
    How did that oversight occur?
    Why are certain people in critical positions fired or sanctioned?
    Why are incompetent people appointed to positions of power?
    Why are laws (or executive orders) not being challenged that clearly are in violation of the Constitution. (TSA) (By the way has ANY TSA case ever gone to court?)

    There is NO WAY one person is capable of doing all of this. Is it however possible for a group affiliated with a Political Party to conduct such subterfuge?
    I would have to say “Absolutely”
    How they can see these actions as being good for the Country mystifies me, but it is NOT about America.
    It is about them retaining and acquiring all of the power.
    Keep you mind sharp and ask the tough questions, challenge the status quo, and I guarantee, if someone complains about a topic, you hit a nerve. A nerve they did not want exposed.
    So dig.
    Walt lost material goods he spent a lifetime earning.
    However, LtCmdr(Ret) Walter Fitzpatrick III, honors ever true blooded American Patriot with his fighting spirit and as far as I am concerned is one of the richest Americans in history.
    What ever I can do may not be as obvious as Walt, but I too love my Country.
    God Bless America.