Spread the love

WAS THERE HIDDEN MEANING IN EASTWOOD’S PANTOMIME?

by Sharon Rondeau

Clint Eastwood is well-known for his roles in Western movies and is now 82 years old

(Aug. 31, 2012) — Last night, during coverage of the Republican National Convention, the Fox News ticker included a quote from a TIME Magazine interview Obama had done which included a statement that if he were reelected to a second term, “there will be some popping of the blister” because of the “stark choice” between Romney and him.

What did Obama mean by that?

One of Thursday’s speakers was actor Clint Eastwood, who spoke to the now-famous “empty chair” and asked on several occasions, “What do you want me to tell Romney?” or a variation thereof.  Eastwood then referred to putative Vice President Joe Biden, who is known for his gaffes.  The questions Eastwood asked of “the empty chair” imply that Obama uses profanity to those around him.  TIME Magazine uses it for him and excuses it by saying, “We’ve heard worse from Vice President Joe Biden.”

Both major political parties have used profanity publicly.

The empty chair now has its own Twitter account to which someone on behalf of Obama, or Obama himself, tweeted, “This seat’s taken.” A Twitter account apparently begun in support of Obama “has now been suspended,” perhaps because of perceived threats to Mitt Romney.

List of Tweets by “Invisible Obama” which Twitter has shut down. The mainstream media did not provide the reason, although the operator of the Twitter account did.

The mainstream media continues to shill for Obama.  Was Eastwood actually “railing” against Obama’s policies and actions?  Did he actually “mock” Oprah Winfrey, or are mainstream reporters showing that they are thin-skinned when it comes to criticism of their preferred candidate?

The Obama campaign has reportedly “referred Clint Eastwood questions to Salvador Dali,” describing Eastwood’s soliloquy with the empty chair as “surreal.”  Were Obama’s surrogates attempting to use Alinsky tactics on Eastwood also?

Obama told TIME that he “has been geared toward that central goal of making sure that we have a strong, vibrant, growing middle class and we got ladders of opportunity for people who are willing to work hard to get into the middle class.”  What evidence is there of that?

Three and one-half years after Obama took office, he says he has been “so focused on acting to fix the economy.”  But what has he fixed?  What does Obama know about the economy?

Just before Obama’s inauguration, the national unemployment rate was reported by The New York Times to be 7.2%, “a 16-year high.” An arguably misleading report in USAToday, known to support Obama and Democrats, states that in December 2011, “The U.S. job market strengthened in the second half of 2011 and added 200,000 jobs in December while the unemployment rate fell to 8.5% from a revised 8.7% a month earlier.”  That rate, reported in January of this year, is still higher than the rate when Obama took office. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported earlier this month that the current unemployment rate is 8.3%, but Newsmax reports that that figure does not include those who are out of work and have ceased to try to find employment.  While the same source states that the job market is “deteriorated,” Trump and well-known entrepreneur Robert Kiyosaki said last fall that the “real unemployment” numbers were reaching “near Depression era levels.”

Last night, Eastwood said that “23,000,000” people are out of work, describing it as “a national disgrace.”

In a more recent interview with Fox News’s Greta van Susteren, Trump contended that “the real [unemployment] number” is 16%, and the “real, real number” is closer to “21%.”  Trump also called for Obama to reveal his passport records and college applications and had been scheduled to give a presentation at the Republican National Convention on the opening night last Monday, postponed because of Hurricane Isaac.

The unemployment rate for blacks as of May was 13.6%.

One reader described USAToday as “a classic and frustrating media failure.”  Regarding Eastwood’s presentation, the newspaper picked up on his illustration of remarks Obama allegedly has made, but called them “derogatory” rather than “profane” or “obscene.”

Obama has added to the national debt, bringing it from approximately $1 trillion when he took office o almost $16 trillion. The RNC reports that during its convention alone, over $8 billion was added.  The current public debt reported today is $15,994,163,673,965.66.  How can Obama claim “fiscal restraint” and lower spending with those numbers?

He created a “budget deficit record” early in his regime.

On August 23, Obama called the highest-ranked Navy SEAL a “general” instead of an admiral.  Does he know the difference?  He also called Rep. Troy Akin a senator when he is a candidate for the U.S. Senate seat held by Claire McCaskill, a member of Obama’s own party.

In Cairo in 2009, Obama claimed that “Islam has always been a part of America’s story,” but on what did he base his statement?  Thomas Jefferson’s battles with the Barbary Pirates, described as “ruthless, unconventional foes?”

TIME Magazine was the source of the article written on “extreme militias” naming Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III and Darren Wesley Huff as “twisted patriots” without obtaining their side of the story.  Did Obama talk to them about that story as well?

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. I think Clint should have used his other famous line for Obama….”Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?” But they probably would have had the DOJ arrest Clint. Either way, since they could not put Trump or Sheriff Joe on stage, Dirty Harry Callihan as a stand-in sends the same message to me. It only takes “one” with the truth on their side. The question is…do the Dems…”feel lucky” this time?

    Sheriff Joe and Trump will need to restrain themselves until after Obama is deemed the bona fide Democratic candidate. Once that occurs….”Let’s roll”!!!

  2. Is Trump waiting a bit before his “big surprise?”

    At some point, if Obama is removed from the ballot, there will be NO Democratic candidate as it will be impossible to meet the legal time guidelines to place one.

    Could it be that the Donald will time it “just right” to not only have Obama declared INELIGIBLE but also make it IMPOSSIBLE for the Dems to run a candidate?

    If so, the Democratic Party may want to dump Obama “a tout de suite” or risk the demise of their organization as a party.

    Or, perhaps, as an earlier POST EMAIL article conjectured, Obama will RESIGN once he realizes he is NOT winning and will be losing LOTS more than an election if he faces prosecution.

    All of a sudden, that luxurious bungalow in Mombasa is looking mighty cozy to Barry Soetoro.

  3. Obama,aka bari malik shabazz, is a hard core muslim and black power man just as his father mamcolm x was and he not only acts out dreams of his father but is like him in many ways. Being born of a white woman named ann newman who had an affair with malcom in 1960 in the bronx is nothing the new panther party wants to know and the secrecy is obvious.obama,being a synthetic identity and a planned usurper long ago by the democratic clan of 60’s radicals he is not really what they had planned.pelosi was key in forging the dnc papers to get him in. Clint eastwood is master of his craft and did well to interpret the current state of artificial pretensive affairs and the state of usurpation. His message was clear and to the point,done by a master.they can call him a white devil cracker but he’s just goog at doing what actors do.my kind of man!