HAS THE “NATURAL BORN” CLAUSE BEEN NULLIFIED?
by JB Williams, ©2012
(May 3, 2012) — Some still call Barack Obama president out of pure ignorance, but others brilliantly call him President with a very specific agenda in mind. It’s all over but the crying now… as Article II of the U.S. Constitution is officially dead.
Since the nobody Senator from nowhere rose to DNC fame during the 2004 DNC Convention and was subsequently hustled into the highest office in our land despite his blank résumé and invisible past, people have been desperately searching for an honest forum in which to ask – Who is this yahoo, where did he come from and how the heck did he become America’s first openly Marxist White House resident?
Why isn’t there a single honest journalist or court anywhere in the country willing to even entertain the litany of obvious questions which the Marxist-in-Chief has effortlessly dodged since 2004?
For some, ignorance is bliss, until they find out the ultimate price of ignorance. But for others, there is a very clear agenda in play and Obama is indeed the Muslim Messiah who is ushering in real change at breakneck speed. It just isn’t the kind of change people expected when they foolishly voted for the first class traitor in 2008.
Back in June of 2011, I exposed evidence of congressional efforts to alter or eliminate Article II Natural Born requirements for the offices of President and Vice President in the run-up to the Obama Era. Both Democrats and Republicans scrambled to eliminate the limitations on who can and cannot hold the highest offices in our land, failing in at least eight different attempts. So, they are removing it via precedent.
The Clintons had the dirt on Obama but refused to use it to defend against Obama’s assault on Queen Hillary, the expected DNC nominee for 2008.
In return, Hillary became Obama’s Secretary of State, helping him take down Middle Eastern allies and raising the Muslim Brotherhood to Middle Eastern leadership. Today Hillary is seeking to head the World Bank… and Bill hopes to become the next Secretary General of the United Nations, just in time for Global Governance to take full bloom.
Now, according to Natural Born Fox News Reporter and self-appointed constitutional expert Bret Baier and GOP USA, Natural Born Citizen is now defined as “anchor baby.”
These “experts” have determined for over 300 million Americans that everything is okay here, nothing to see, folks…keep moving along…
“The Constitution requires that the president be a “natural born citizen,” but does not define the term. That job is left to federal law, in 8 U.S. Code, Section 1401. All the law requires is that the mother be an American citizen who has lived in the U.S. for five years or more, at least two of those years after the age of 14. If the mother fits those criteria, the child is a U.S. citizen at birth, regardless of the father’s nationality.” (Note that the discussion is “citizen” not “Natural Born Citizen)
Yet GOP USA goes on to conclude – “Bret lists several examples of who would be considered a natural born American. In short, people like Marco Rubio or Bobby Jindal can breathe a sigh of relief. They are good to go.”
Ahah! BINGO! Obama lied his way into office, so we can lie our own guy into office too! We can run our own fraud against their fraud. Bret Baier is the legal expert the GOP USA will rest the entire future of freedom upon, setting Barack “the fraud” Obama free just so that they can run their token Cuban on the GOP ticket in the hopes that they can steal the illegal alien vote away from Obama….
Gee Whiz, since we have Bret, why do we need a Supreme Court?
It’s an official free-for-all now… The Founders intended for anchor babies to hold the highest office in our land. Yeah, right! Have you lost your mind?
What a sick perverted joke!
In the good old days of real journalism, investigative reporters were interested in uncovering and reporting facts so that consumers of their product were better informed and more capable of making intelligent decisions as a result. Back then, the facts were allowed to develop opinion and shape political decisions.
Today, facts are often nothing more than opinions which are based upon cherry-picked facts or facts invented on the spot to serve an agenda and deliver a prescribed outcome. Bret Baier’s opinion, as ill-informed and misguided as it is, was immediately cherry-picked by GOP USA to clear “their guy” Marco Rubio for a Vice Presidential run. Baier lies and GOP USA swears to it…all with a specific purpose in mind. Every modern journalist lives in direct violation of journalism ethics.
On at least eight different occasions, members of Congress tried to re-define or eliminate altogether the Natural Born Citizen requirement for the Executive Branch. This, along with Senate Resolution 511 declaring John McCain a Natural Born Citizen on the basis of his Citizen parents, despite being born in Panama, proves two things –
a) at least 99 Senators knew the true definition of Natural Born Citizen, Citizen by bloodline;
b) they have no intention of ever equally applying that definition to Barack Hussein Obama (or Marco Rubio).
No matter their propaganda efforts, the facts remain…
- There are four types of citizens in America: Natural Born, Native Born, Naturalized and Illegal Alien
- Only one of them, the Natural Born Citizen, can hold the office of President or Vice President according to the Constitution
- Natural Born Citizen is based in Natural Law, not man-made law. Native, Naturalized and Illegal are all based upon man’s laws
- Our Founders borrowed the term Natural Born Citizen from Vattel’s treatise, The Law of Nations, an authoritative book on the subject of Nature’s Laws and their impact on nations and citizens.
- Vattel defines Natural Born Citizen very specifically and even explains why…
1) “As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”
2) “The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.”
3) “it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
All “legal” citizens of the United States have equal rights under Constitutional rule of law. However, the highest political offices in our land were carefully and purposefully reserved for only ONE type of Citizen, the type with a blood loyalty reaching well beyond any geographic boundaries.
A Natural Born Citizen has something no other citizen has, a blood loyalty. Blood is thicker than water, remember?
I was born and raised in Ohio and yet I have no loyalty to Ohio whatsoever, even though many of my family members still live there today. How do Native Born believers explain this? What loyalty does an anchor baby have to our country? None whatsoever… People don’t really believe that human beings are born with some special unalienable loyalty to soil, do they? What about an inherent loyalty to Father or family?
Barack himself is a grand example of the Natural Born issue the Founders worried about. Despite the drunken abusive nature and absence of Obama’s birth father throughout Barack’s life, Barack still holds a deep blood loyalty to his Father, even compelled to write and publish a memoir based upon his father’s dreams. Barack meant nothing to his father, yet his father still means everything to him. There is no loyalty stronger than blood loyalty…
Why did our Founders exempt themselves from the Natural Born requirement? – “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution…”
Most of our Founders, including Jefferson and Adams, were born on U.S. soil, making them Native Born Citizens at birth. So, why did they have to exempt themselves from the Natural Born requirement? If Native Born and Natural Born were one in the same, why did they have to exempt themselves from the Natural Born requirement? The answer is as obvious as the question – Native and Natural Born are NOT the same things…despite Bret Baier’s expert opinion or the GOP’s illegal alien agenda.
As we can easily confirm, Native Born is only a statement of birthplace, which often has nothing whatsoever to do with the child’s nationality. Millions have been born outside the territory of their home country and their citizenship is not in question, as citizenship is first and foremost inherited from the parents, not the place of birth. The country of the parents is that of the child and this condition exists in Nature.
What is the motive for removing the Natural Born requirement?
How do you embrace a Global Government when only Natural Born Americans with a blood loyalty to our sovereign nation can hold the highest offices in the land? It’s just another piece that must be put in place before Global Governance can fully materialize.
Only once foreign born leaders are able to hold the White House, can we become a full member of the Global Community that was put in play by President Bill Clinton.
For decades, it was Democratic Socialists via the Democrat Party that advanced the Global Socialist Governance agenda in the shadows and then, in plain daylight. Today, Marco Rubio marks the moment in history when Republicans have gone public with their efforts to eliminate the Natural Born definition as well, and our sovereign nation along with it, in favor of Global Socialism.
Since Natural Born Citizens seem willing to sit idly by and allow the utter destruction of what was once the freest most prosperous nation on earth, maybe it’s time for foreign-born enemies to control the country. How can foreign-born enemies do any worse than the spineless Citizens who have allowed it to happen?
The truth is easily accessible. The truth matters. People are not as ignorant as they appear, they are simply that evil. When the truth does not suit their agenda, they invent a new truth based entirely upon lies.
Only God can help a nation so sick!