Update: Theresa Cao: National Call to Action

THE SEASON FOR TREASON

by Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III

Sir Thomas More refused to take an oath of allegiance to King Henry VIII of England, who had split from the Roman Catholic church to set up the Church of England. In 1535, More was tried for treason, convicted and beheaded. He was later sainted by the Catholic church.

(Mar. 16, 2011) — On March 15, 2011, Theresa Cao, who shouted “Except Obama!  Except Obama!” from the U.S. Capitol Gallery during the reading of the U.S. Constitution, had a pre-trial hearing at the Superior Court on Indiana Ave. NW in Washington, DC.   Ms. Cao had considered dismissing her public defender, Ms. April L. Downs, but had a conversation with her at the hearing in which Ms. Downs reportedly agreed to represent Ms. Cao on the basis of her “constitutional rights.”

Ms. Cao reported that no supporters from the community attended yesterday’s hearing.

Prior to yesterday’s court date, Ms. Cao had received an offer from a government prosecutor for a plea deal.  Originally it was understood that the plea would be “not guilty,” but today Ms. Cao stated that it would have actually been a plea of “guilty”  and would include probation.  There was a second offer called an “FTO” which Cao reported would include a urinalysis.

“I would have to sign a paper indicating my criminal responsibility…if I signed a form, I would be implicating myself in criminal activity,” Cao said.  She has decided not to accept either offer.

She reported that her previous legal counsel, The Rutherford Institute, urged her to take a “guilty” plea.

On Monday, March 14, 2011, Ms. Cao filed a Motion to Dismiss with the court.  She reported that two copies were stamped for the judge at 2:56 and 3:12 p.m., respectively, at the Superior Court at the District of Columbia.  The judge, Marisa Demeo, said that she could not address the Motion to Dismiss at yesterday’s hearing; therefore, a status hearing was scheduled for April 12, 2011.  The judge reportedly stated that Cao’s case “stipulates a jury trial.”

Cao said that a third option would be for the government to dismiss her case and will be meeting with Attorney Downs next week on March 22, 2011.

Update, March 19, 2011

Theresa Cao is calling for a “National Call to Action” to citizens across the United States to issue the charge of treason against Barack Hussein Obama to begin on Sunday, March 20, at all state Capitols and outside of the White House from noon to 4:00 p.m.  3-4 days a week and every Sunday. She stated that the National Call to Action is twofold:

  1. Treason has been committed by Obama, and the people need to come out in large numbers to demand his removal from office. She is urging every American citizen to file a treason complaint with a county grand jury, FBI office, or U.S. attorney;
  2. A continuation of her efforts in front of the White House and in Washington, DC proper for the past three years which she has termed “Heaven’s Bailout.”  She is also calling for people “to turn back to the God of Israel, Who is the Word of God, Yeshua-Jesus, the Messiah.  The Word of God represents the promises of God in the Holy Bible; Who is Yeshua-Jesus.”

Of the timing of the National Call to Action, Cao stated, “This coincides with the Purim miracle feast of Queen Esther, who saved Israel from annihilation.”

Ms. Cao reported today that she has teamed up with several preachers from Southern California in her National Call to Action.  The Post & Email will be publishing a story regarding the team members’ recent arrest by Washington, DC police, which they stated was a violation of their First Amendment rights, within the next week.

Cao’s two websites are Get Heaven’s Bailout and Got Heaven’s Bailout, the latter of which is temporarily off-line.  Her Facebook page is here.

The Post & Email’s previous coverage of Theresa’s court case and activism have been published here, here and here.  WorldNetDaily covered her here and here.

Background Information

SOETORO-OBAMA commits an Act – TREASON– against the United States of America by forcibly resisting the United States Constitution successfully installing a rival, unconstitutional competing government.

Precedent is The Whiskey Rebellion and the takeover of our Grand and Trial juries

Other examples of treason against the U.S.Constitution are:

  • Obama declares war on the states (Arizona, for example)
  • Leftist Judge Rule ObamaGov can force U.S. Citizens to buy its products (Health care bill outcome).
  • Lieutenant Colonel Lakin’s attainder court-martial (click here and click here).
  • The North American Union: Every attempt to erase U.S. boundaries and recant U.S. Sovereignty (click here).

Theresa Cao in Washington, DC in an undated photo

Treason is destroying America…as Obama always intended (for another list click here).

A sample treason complaint letter can be found here and here.

The Post & Email had previously reported on Ms. Cao’s arraignment hearing held on January 19, 2011 following her arrest on January 6.  In her Motion to Dismiss, Cao states:

“The Sixth Amendment also guarantees my right to know the nature and cause of the accusations alleged against me.  Again, since no valid complaint was filed by an alleged injured party, I was deprived of this right also, and was denied the right to face my accuser.  Since there is no lawful accuser, I cannot face a fictitious accuser, thus again, the charges alleged are bogus and fraudulent.”

Ms. Cao shared her Motion to Dismiss exclusively with The Post & Email, which is presented in its entirety below.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CRIMINAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES,                                        )           Case No. 2011 CMD 1048

Plaintiff,                                                          )

vs.                                                                     )

Theresa S. Cao,                                            )

Alleged Defendant, Sui Juris.                )

MOTION TO DISMISS

COMES NOW, by special appearance, without accepting the jurisdiction of this Court, alleged Defendant, Theresa S. Cao, a living, breathing, flesh and blood, sovereign woman on the land, an American Citizen and District of Columbia Citizen, with and claiming all her inherent, unlimited, unalienable Constitutionally guaranteed Rights, secured for her by the federal and state Constitutions, with her name properly spelled only in upper and lower case letters, and who hereby respectfully moves this Honorable Court to dismiss the captioned case on the following lawfully based grounds:  [Reference # 1 to # 4 below and following Exhibits Listed, A to Z, ONE to TWENTY-FIVE]

In addition, I’m filing this motion unrepresented by this court appointed attorney, Attorney April L. Downs, as she has not upheld her Constitutional oath to assist me with my case.  Counsel of record withheld from me vital information pertinent to my defense and misrepresented to me vital information pertinent to my defense, based on the following reasons but not all inclusive:  I specifically asked Attorney Downs to research information, which I requested over one month ago in which she failed to obtain on my behalf and in addition, Attorney Downs has purposefully not been forthright with the Plea Deals/Offers made to me by the Prosecution, namely not indicating to me that both the “Stet” Docket and the “FTO” aka. First Time Offender, is one in the same Plea Offers/Deals, made by the Prosecution.

I hereby dismiss Attorney April L. Downs as my Public Defender.  WHEREFORE, alleged Defendant respectfully moves this Honorable Court to grant the request for a new appointed Public Defender, who will assist me in my defense, as I am guaranteed the right of counsel, as affirmed in the 6th Amendment, the Bill of Rights, of the Constitution of the U.S.

1. Amendment I [The First Amendment] of the Bill of Rights, of the Constitution of the U.S.A, declares “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

I committed no crime, since I was simply exercising my right of free speech and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

My “intent” in attending the historical first-time reading of the Constitution of the U.S., in the U.S. House of Representatives, House Floor, was to witness the newly installed 112th Congress, as of January 5, 2011, to commence to uphold and defend the Constitution of the U.S., as the New Speaker of the House, John Boehner, and Members of Congress, affirmed in there sworn “Oath of Office”.  [Reference:  Exhibits J, L]

In addition, the Express, a publication of the Washington Post, dated 12.30.2010, story headline: “GOP’s New S.O.P. [Standard Operating Procedure] As they take charge of the House, Republicans plan to put a new focus on the Constitution” cites Incoming Speaker of the House John Boehner: “We always hear members of Congress talking about swearing an oath to represent their constituents when in reality the only oath we take is to the Constitution.” Adding, “We pledge ‘to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.’ No more, no less.”  [Reference:  Exhibit K]

I arrived at the U.S. Capitol House Gallery, ~10:30am, with the reading of the Constitution of the U.S. commencing ~11am. The people in the House Gallery, including myself, were asked to leave, after the initial round of seating sequence, so as to permit other people to have their turn in the Gallery; we were also informed that we could line up once again and return to the House Gallery.  I returned to the House Gallery for a second time, but do not recall the time frame; I believe the Congressmen were reading ~ the latter portion of Article I, of the Constitution of the U.S.  Hence, I did not know that I was going to be present at the reading of Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the U.S.

Because Commander Fitzpatrick’s complaint naming Obama in Commission of the Crime of Treason, on March 17, 2009, remains unanswered, I was forced to act.  Mr. Obama admits his Treason by way of his silence; silence is agreement.  Colonel Lakin was forced to act for the same reason.  Mr. Obama tacitly admits his Treason.

Obama’s success to install the military police to replace civilian policemen is ongoing, and is an act of Treason.

I’ve been forced to act through the failure of law enforcement officials and all other government officials in positions of authority, who failed to defend and uphold the Constitution of the U.S., specifically, Article II, Section 1, the Natural Born Citizen clause.  This is the reason I stand before the court today.

I spoke on the spur of the moment, as an American Citizen, to defend God, Country and the Constitution of the United States and my “intent” was not to “disrupt”, but rather to publicly announce Obama’s Treason, on January 6, 2011.  Had this question been reconciled on March 17, 2009, nearly two years ago, neither myself nor Colonel Lakin, would have been forced to act.  [Exhibit V, W, X, Y, Z, Exhibit ONE, TWO]

2. Amendment IV [The Fourth Amendment] of the Bill of Rights, of the Constitution of the U.S.A., declares “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath of affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Further, no one allegedly injured by my alleged actions made a written complaint against me; therefore, I was unlawfully arrested, which is a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

3. Amendment V [The Fifth Amendment] of the Bill of Rights, of the Constitution of the U.S.A., declares, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

The arrest deprived me of due process rights secured in the Fifth Amendment, since I was deprived of my liberty without Constitutionally compliant due process of law.

4. Amendment VI [The Sixth Amendment] of the Bill of Rights, of the Constitution of the U.S.A., declares, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”

Still further, I have the Sixth Amendment right to confront my accuser, but since there is no accuser, since no complaint was filed against me, these charges are bogus and fraudulent, and do not meet Constitutional mandates, thus, must be dismissed.

The Sixth Amendment also guarantees my right to know the nature and cause of the accusations alleged against me.  Again, since no valid complaint was filed by an alleged injured party, I was deprived of this right also, and was denied the right to face my accuser.  Since there is no lawful accuser, I cannot face a fictitious accuser, thus again, the charges alleged are bogus and fraudulent.

In summary, I spoke on the spur of the moment, as an American Citizen, to defend God, Country and the Constitution of the United States and meant no “intent” to disrupt Congress on January 6, 2011.

I am guaranteed all rights of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the U.S., as affirmed in all the Amendments of the Bill of Rights.

Reference:  Exhibits A to Z, Exhibits ONE to TWENTY-FIVE.

Exhibit A. [Copies of my Mini-Hardcopy Book References: Declaration of Independence, circa 1776 / Constitution of the U.S.A., circa 1787 / Bill of Rights, circa 1789, specifically Amendment I – Amendment X aka. First Amendment – Tenth Amendment / Copyright, National Archives Museum, Washington, D.C.]

Exhibit B. [Copies and Transcripts of my Book References: Bill of Rights from Exhibit A, “James Madison proposes the Bill of Rights to the House of Representatives”, circa June 8, 1789]

Exhibit C.  [The Charters of Freedom: Authentic Reproductions on Antiqued Parchment: The Declaration of Independence, circa 1776 / Constitution of the U.S.A., circa 1787 / Bill of Rights, circa 1789, specifically Amendment I – Amendment X aka. First Amendment – Tenth Amendment / Copyright, National Archives Experience, National Archives Museum, Washington, D.C.]

Exhibit D.  [Copy of the Visitor’s Guide: National Archives Experience / Rotunda for the Charters for Freedom: “The Declaration of Independence”, circa, 1776, The “Constitution of the United States”, circa 1787, “The Bill of Rights”, circa 1789, “Magna Carta”, circa 1297]: View one of the most important documents in the history of democracy.  In 1215, when King John confirmed Magna Carta with his seal, he was acknowledging the now firmly embedded concept that no man – not even king – is above the law.  The charter established important individual rights that have a direct legacy in the American “Bill of Rights.”]

Exhibit E.  [“The Magna Carta”: Sotheby’s New York, December 18, 2007 / circa 1297 / National Archives Museum, Washington, D.C.]

Exhibit F.  [Copy of the pocket-sized, Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence, by the United States Senate, 111th Congress, 1st Session, July 29, 2009 / These booklets are available for staffers and constituents in the Senate Office Buildings]

Exhibit G.  [Copy of “Law of Nations” circa 1759, 1787, 1792, etal. Vattel, Emer de / 31-Library of Congress Online Catalog Listing / Book 1, Chapter XIX, Sec.212: The natives, or Natural-Born Citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens…The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.]

Exhibit H.  [Copies of “Law of Nations”, Vattel, Emer de / from various sources noted in Library of Congress Book Requests, dated March 11, 2011 / Book 1, Chapter XIX, Sec.212: The natives, or Natural-Born Citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens…The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.]

Exhibit  I.  [1-page Document/Article “But ‘Natural Born’ is not defined in the Constitution?  Yes it is!” dated December 13-15, 2010 by Ltc. Eldon Bell, Retired Military Doctor/Officer of the Armed Forces of the United States of America states: The Constitution and Emmerich De Vattel’s LAW OF NATIONS has the answer to any questions regarding citizenship abroad and any laws crossing national boundaries: Excerpt 1: Constitution of the U.S., Article II, Sec. 1 & Excerpt 2: De Vattel’s LAW OF NATIONS, circa 1758 Book 1, Chapter XIX, Sec.212]

Exhibit J. [Original, The Washington Post, dated January 7, 2011, story headline: “‘TO FORM A MORE PERFECT UNION,’ BUT READING SPARKS SOME DIVISION”; ‘We the People,’ the abridged version: New Speaker John A. Boehner led more than 130 fellow lawmakers in a recitation of a slightly shortened edition of the Constitution on Thursday.  A few passages and their readers: FIRST AMENDMENT, GABRIELLE GIFFORDS [D-Ariz.], as noted in #1]

Exhibit K.  [Copy of the Express, a publication of the Washington Post, dated 12.30 2010, story headline: “GOP’s New S.O.P. As they take charge of the House, Republicans plan to put a new focus on the Constitution” cites Incoming Speaker of the House John Boehner: “We always hear members of Congress talking about swearing an oath to represent their constituents when in reality the only oath we take is to the Constitution.” Adding, “We pledge ‘to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.’ No more, no less.”

Exhibit L. [Reference: youtube.com Videos from Swearing in Ceremony & Commencement of 112th Congress, on January 5, 2011 and the Reading of the Constitution of the U.S.A., at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2011 / Reference: Oath of Office, Exhibit N]

Exhibit M.  [Reference: youtube.com: cspan.com “Birther Arrested during House Reading of the Constitution – 1/6/2011 / youtube.com: birtherreportdotcom, 1/6/2011 / etal.]

Exhibit N.  [Document/Article: “How Will Turmoil in the Middle East be resolved?” dated February 6, 2011 by Major General Paul E. Vallely / thepostemail.com / “The Oath is Simple and Reads: “I DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT I WILL SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC, THAT I WILL BEAR TRUE FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE TO THE SAME, THAT I TAKE THIS OBLIGATION FREELY WITHOUT MENTAL RESERVATION OR PURPOSE OF EVASION, AND THAT I WILL FAITHFULLY DISCHARGE THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE ON WHICH I AM ABOUT TO ENTER: SO HELP ME GOD.””

Exhibit O.  [Website Reference: citizensoftheconstitution.com / Margy and Jack Flynn]

Exhibit P.  [Website/Book Reference: “Sui Juris: The Truth in Record, A Process for the People to Access the Courts by Pamela & Will Gaston / avoiceforchildren.com]

Exhibit Q.  [Document: “Supreme Court Oath Taking Procedures”, Supreme Court / Office of the Curator / Public Information Office / Updated: 07.23.2009 / SCOTUS / Washington, D.C. 20543 / 202.479.3211]

Exhibit R.  [Article: “Supreme Court: A to Z” / American Government A to Z Series / Fourth Edition / Kenneth Jost / CQ Press / pp. 310 / Specifies both “Constitutional” and “Judiciary Act of 1789” Oaths of Office]

Exhibit S.  [Sworn “Oath of Office” of POTUS / President of the United States / To be Obtained from Library of Congress]

Exhibit T.  [Article/Statement: from Paul E. Vallely, MG, US Army [Ret.], Chairman – Stand Up America, dated March 13, 2011, for Theresa S. Cao]

Exhibit U.  [Document/Article: The “Battle for Our America” Series – Part One dated March 10, 2011 by Paul E. Vallely, MG, US Army [Ret.], Chairman – Stand Up America / standupamericaus.com]

Exhibit V.  [Document/Article: “Two-Year-Old Treason Complaint against Obama has Never Been Answered: It’s Going to Take Large Numbers of People”, dated March 11, 2011 / thepostemail.com / Reference: LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III, United States Navy Retired / thejaghunter.wordpress.com]

Exhibit W.  [Document/Article: “Treason: Two-years and Counting, 3.318 Unanswered Criminal Complaints Naming Obama in Commission of Treason!  What Are You Prepared to Do?” / thepostemail.com / thejaghunter.wordpress.com / Reference: Exhibit Above.]

Exhibit X.  [Document/Article: “Criminal Allegations Regarding the Commission of Treason, dated March 17, 2009 / thejaghunter.wordpress.com / LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired]

Exhibit Y.  [Document/Article: “Treason is Destroying America…As Obama Always Intended!” dated February 25, 2011 / thejaghunter.wordpress.com / LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired]

Exhibit Z. [Document/Article: “Has Monroe County Admitted to Violating the Law?: The Judge Can Pick the Foreperson from Wherever They Choose” dated February 25, 2011 / thepostemail.com / thejaghunter.wordpress.com]

Exhibit ONE.  [Document/Article: “Our Grand Juries Have Been Taken Away: So Let’s Take Them Back” dated January 23, 2011 / thepostemail.com / thejaghunter.wordpress.com / LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired]

Exhibit TWO.  [Document/Article: “Operation American Freedom” dated October 14, 2009 / thejaghunter.wordpress.com / LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired]

Exhibit THREE.  [Document/Article: “Since When is Treason a “Diversion?: Entrenched Politicians Ignore and Commit Treason Against the U.S. Constitution”” dated March 11, 2011 by Neil Turner / thepostemail.com]

Exhibit FOUR. [Copy Nuremberg Defense: Principle IV / Safeguard Our Constitution, SafeguardOurConstitution.com / “The Case Against Ltc. Lakin” states: Since the Nuremberg trials after World War II, the Principles espoused at Nuremberg disallowed military officers from using the defense of “following orders.”*  From 1946 onward, military officers had a positive duty to establish the lawfulness of their orders and are informed of their “duty to disobey.”  *Principle IV]

Exhibit FIVE.  [2-page Document/Article: “Shariah Law vs. the Constitution”, dated March 3, 2011 from “Shariah: The Threat to America” or free download at shariahthethreat.com]

Exhibit SIX.  [Copy from Headline story from American Thinker / hillbuzz.org / Pamela Geller of atlasshrugs.com who broke the story on FEB 20, 2011, entitled: “AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION IS FIGHTING FOR SHARIA LAW IN THE U.S.”

Exhibit SEVEN.  [Copy of Headline story from Daily Mail Reporter, dated February 20, 2011, entitled: “EXTREMIST CLERIC TO LEAD WHITE HOUSE PROTEST CALLING FOR MUSLIMS TO ‘RISE UP AND ESTABLISH ISLAMIC STATE IN AMERICA’, British extremist Anjem Choudary – who once said ‘the flag of Islam will fly over the White House’ – has announced he will lead a demonstration calling on Muslims to establish Shariah law across America”]

Exhibit EIGHT.  [Article Headline story by Michael Carl dated March 5, 2011 / worldnetdaily.com / Related to Exhibit SEVEN / Quotes from Pastor Terry Jones and Frank Gaffney indicating Shariah Law vs. Constitutional U.S. and the threat of Shariah Law to America’s Republic.

Exhibit NINE.  [Copy of Headline story from citizenwarrior.com, dated February 2011, entitled: “SHARIAH FINANCE WATCH HAS LIST OF SHARIAH COMPLIANT BANKS”, According to Shariah Finance Watch…there are two reasons to boycott such banks: First of all, Sharia compliant banks are required to donate two percent of their profits to Muslim “charities,” which are often jihad-related groups, because of course, jihad is an inextricable part of Islamic doctrine.  Secondly, the widespread existence of such policies at banks ostensibly legitimizes Sharia law – a backward, misogynistic, intolerant, totalitarian form of law that has no place in the modern world.]

Exhibit TEN.  [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated December 2008] “SHARIAH FINANCE 101 TAUGHT AT THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT”

Exhibit ELEVEN:  [Article “Peter King to Proceed with Muslim Radicalization Hearings” dated March 6, 2011 / centrepointnews.com / dailymail.co.uk]

Exhibit TWELVE.   [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated November 8, 2010, “CONGRESS REPORT CONCEDES OBAMA ELIGIBILITY UNVETTED: ‘THERE IS NO SPECIFIC FEDERAL AGENCY’ TO REVIEW CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAL OFFICE”]

Exhibit THIRTEEN.  [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated December 29, 2010, “‘WE NO LONGER HAVE A REPUBLIC SUBSERVIENT TO CONSTITUTION’, OFFICER: LAKIN CASE IS END OF ‘RULE OF LAW’ / See full Post & Email interview]

Exhibit FOURTEEN.  [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated December 20, 2010, “ARMY ‘BIRTHER’ JAILED AT LEAVENWORTH: SUPPORTERS RALLY AROUND DOCTOR WHO CHALLENGED OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY”]

Exhibit FIFTEEN.  [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated December 16, 2010, “LAKIN SENTENCED: DISMISSAL, 6 MONTHS, DOUBTS ABOUT OBAMA’S INELIGIBILITY NO EXCUSE FOR DISOBEYING ORDER”]

Exhibit SIXTEEN.  [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated December 11, 2010, “MCINERNEY: CONGRESS WILL REVIEW LAKIN CASE, 3-STAR GENERAL WARNS: PHYSICIAN ‘IS NOT GOING TO GET A FAIR TRIAL’”]

Exhibit SEVENTEEN.  [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated December 2, 2010, “LAKIN’S ATTORNEY: CONVICTION ‘CERTAIN’, ‘HE’S VERY DISAPPOINTED IN MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEM’”]

Exhibit EIGHTEEN.  [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated, February 4, 2010, “OBAMA’S PRAYER: ‘DON’T QUESTION MY CITIZENSHIP’, RAISES ISSUE OF ELIGIBILITY IN SPEECH AT ANNUAL BREAKFAST GATHERING”]

Exhibit NINETEEN.  [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated, February 6, 2010, “‘GOVERNMENT WANTS TO BE YOUR ONE AND ONLY GOD’, FARAH: TEA PARTY’S SUCCESS ONLY MEASURED BY RECLAIMING NATION’S CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS”]

Exhibit TWENTY.  [Copy of Headline story from worldnetdaily.com, dated, February 23, 2010, “WHITE HOUSE ‘ON BOARD’ PALESTINIAN UNILATERAL STATEHOOD THREAT, U.N. WOULD RECOGNIZE NEW NATION OUTSIDE OF NEGOTIATIONS WITH ISRAEL”]

Exhibit TWENTY-ONE.  [Document / Liberty Counsel: “Right Wing Extremist Card” citing “U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY / DHS / Describing “RIGHT-WING EXTREMIST” as “Domestic Terrorists”]

Exhibit TWENTY-TWO.  [Book Reference: “In the Name of God. Amen: Rediscovering Biblical and Historic Covenants / Daniel J. Ford / copyright 2003]

Exhibit TWENTY-THREE.  [Book Reference: “The United States Constitution: What It Says, What It Means / National Archive Museum / Washington, D.C.]

Exhibit TWENTY-FOUR.  [Book Reference: “The Freedom Wars: What You Can Do To Preserve Your Rights” by John Whitehead / Founder of Rutherford Institute / rutherfordinstitute.org]

Exhibit TWENTY-FIVE.  [Book Reference: “Do You Know the Bill of Rights: A Complete Guide” / by Rutherford Institute / Reference: Exhibit TWENTY-FOUR]

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing valid, lawfully based reasons, alleged Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court to dismiss this case in its entirety, with prejudice.

Respectfully submitted,

All Rights Reserved

___________________________

Name:  Theresa S. Cao

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Theresa S. Cao, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion to Dismiss, was hand delivered on March 14, 2011, to the prosecuting attorney, Mr. Ronald C. Machen, at the following address:

Name of Attorney:  Ronald C. Machen Jr.

Office Name:  U.S. Department of Justice / U.S. Attorney / District of Columbia

Street Address:  Judiciary Center / 555 Fourth Street, N.W.

City, State, zip:  Washington, D.C. 20530

All Rights Reserved,

___________________________

Theresa S. Cao, American Citizen

EXHIBIT B

Exhibit B. [Copies and Transcript of my Book References of the Bill of Rights, “JAMES MADISON PROPOSES THE BILL OF RIGHTS TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES”] The Amendments which have occurred to me, proper to be recommended by congress, to the state legislatures are these: FIRST.  That there be prefixed to the constitution a declaration – That all power is originally vested in, and consequently derived from the people.   That government is instituted, and ought to be exercised for the benefit of the people; which consists in the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the right of acquiring and using property, and generally of pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.

THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE AN INDUBITABLE, UNALIENABLE, AND INDEFEASIBLE RIGHT TO REFORM OR CHANGE THEIR GOVERNMENT, WHENEVER IT BE FOUND ADVERSE OR INADEQUATE TO THE PURPOSES OF ITS INSTITUTION.  FOURTHLY.  THE PEOPLE SHALL NOT BE DEPRIVED OR ABRIDGED OF THEIR RIGHT TO SPEAK, TO WRITE, OR TO PUBLISH THEIR SENTIMENTS; AND THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AS ONE OF THE GREAT BULWARKS OF LIBERTY, SHALL BE INVIOLABLE.

THE PEOPLE SHALL NOT BE RESTRAINED FROM PEACEABLY ASSEMBLING AND CONSULTING FOR THEIR COMMON GOOD, NOR FROM APPLYING TO THE LEGISLATURE BY PETITIONS, OR REMONSTRANCES FOR REDRESS OF THEIR GRIEVANCES.

NO PERSON SHALL BE SUBJECT…NOR BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW…

THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE TO BE SECURED IN THEIR PERSONS, THEIR HOUSES, THEIR PAPERS, AND THEIR OTHER PROPERTY FORM ALL UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED BY WARRANTS ISSUED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, SUPPORTED BY OATHS OF AFFIRMATION, OR NOT PARTICULARLY DESCRIBING THE PLACES TO BE SEARCHED, OR THE PERSONS OR THINGS TO BE SEIZED.  [Approximately 6-10 Peace/Shalom Activism Posters and 1-book manuscript? are reported stolen to my Condo Concierge Director]

IN ALL CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS, THE ACCUSED SHALL ENJOY THE RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL, TO BE INFORMED OF THE CAUSE AND NATURE OF THE ACCUSATION, TO BE CONFRONTED WITH HIS ACCUSERS, AND THE WITNESSES AGAINST HIM; TO HAVE A COMPULSORY PROCESS FOR OBTAINING WITNESSES IN HIS FAVOR; AND TO HAVE THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR HIS DEFENSE.

THE EXCEPTIONS HERE OR ELSEWHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION, MADE IN FAVOR OF PARTICULAR RIGHT,S SHALL NOT BE SO CONSTRUED AS TO DIMINISH THE JUST IMPORTANCEOF OTHER RIGHTS RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE…

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CRIMINAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES,                                        )           Case No. 2011 CMD 1048

Plaintiff,                                                          )

Vs.                                                                   )

Theresa S. Cao,                                               )

Alleged Defendant.                                        )

MOTION TO CLAIM AND EXERCISE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

COMES NOW Theresa S. Cao, alleged Defendant, sui juris, a living, breathing, American Citizen, who claims and exercises all inherent, unlimited, unalienable Constitutionally guaranteed Rights, and whose name is properly spelled only in upper and lower case letters, who, now, will accept this Court’s jurisdiction, based on the following valid reasons:

1. I am guaranteed all rights of the Constitution of the U.S., affirmed in all the Amendments of the Bill of Rights.  See: Exhibit B. (Book References for the Constitution of the U.S.A., Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, Copyright, National Archives Museum, Washington, D.C.)

2. I am guaranteed all rights aforementioned, based on …

3.

WHEREFORE, alleged Defendant respectfully moves this Honorable Court to grant the requested Motion to Claim and Exercise Constitutional Rights aforementioned, valid lawfully based reasons.

Respectfully submitted,

All Rights Reserved

___________________________

Name:  Theresa S. Cao

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Theresa S. Cao, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion, was sent by first class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, or hand delivered on this ….day of March, 2011, to the prosecuting attorney, as follows:

Name of Attorney:  Ronald C. Machen Jr.

Office Name:  U.S. Department of Justice / U.S. Attorney / District of Columbia

Street Address:  Judiciary Center / 555 Fourth Street, N.W.

City, State, zip:  Washington, D.C. 20530

All Rights Reserved,

___________________________

Theresa S. Cao, American Citizen

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CRIMINAL DIVISION

Theresa S. Cao                                                )           Case No. 2011 CMD 1048

)

vs.                                                                    )

)           DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION

UNITED STATES, et. al.                               )           OF DOCUMENTS

MOTION FOR DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY / FOIA REQUEST FROM MY RECORDS

COMES NOW Theresa S. Cao, sui juris, a living, breathing, American Citizen, who claims and exercises all inherent, unlimited, unalienable Constitutionally guaranteed Rights, and whose name is properly spelled only in upper and lower case letters, who, now, and demands PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS necessary to my defense.

ALL questions are to be answered and all discovery completed before upcoming hearing in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, the next hearing set for March 15, 2011.  All parties are going to be called as witnesses, will be cross examined and shall disclose fully and completely the information demanded.

All records herein requested are to be brought forth in a timely manner by all parties and discovery shall be completed before TRIAL can proceed.  Many records requested contain EXCULPATROY EVIDENCE, necessary to my defense and for impeachment of witnesses.  Any requested records that are withheld will be criminal obstruction of justice and withholding of evidence, and all parties are being held accountable in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Case No. 2011 CMD 1048.

In addition to the records listed in the attached FREEDOM OF INFORMATION/PRIVACY ACT demand….

All records are discoverable not only under the FOIA/PRIVACY ACT and all information is critical to the public knowledge of the methods and operations of government agencies.

Any hearings or trials held before discovery is completed by all parties will be a violation of my civil rights and liberties of due process, and all parties shall be held accountable.

Parties specifically named are in bold type and are all being INDIVIDUALLY SERVED, as well as those named in the body of the FOIA DEMAND AND ADDENDUM.  All parties are expected to read the entire document and produce records that apply to them wherein demanded.

1.  The PROSECUTOR, shall produce a complete witness list, and complete information disclosing the intended testimony of each witness; also the relevance and purpose of each witnesses testimony that they are going to call.  I expect an accurate list that will not be changed many times before trial, as in past proceedings.  I expect this information in a timely manner, at least TEN DAYS before any trial in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

2.  The COURT, shall produce records from every hearing in Case No. 2011 CMD 1048.  All court AUDIO and VIDEOTAPES, transcripts and exhibits shall be produced before hearings or trials.

3.  The U.S. CAPITOL POLICE, ………. involved with Case No. 2011 CMD 1048…

4. The SECRET SERVICE & all FEDERAL AGENTS….involved with Case No. 2011 CMD 1048

5.  The LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT, specifically CHAIRMAN….MAJ. HOUSE LEADER, JOHN BOEHNER, REP. JOHN…GOODLATTE, FROM NEW JERSEY and the 112TH CONGRESS, shall produce records of their SWORN OATHS/AFFIDAVITS OF OFFICE BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S.

6.  The JUDICAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT, specifically CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS, & ERIC HOLDER, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, shall produce records of their SWORN OATHS/AFFIDAVITS?? OF OFFICE BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S.

7.  The EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT, specifically BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and JOE BIDEN, shall produce records of their SWORN OATHS/AFFIDAVITS OF OFFICE BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S.

ALL DISCOVERY SHALL BE PRODUCED IN A TIMELY MANNER BEFORE UPCOMING HEARINGS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Respectfully submitted,

All Rights Reserved

___________________________

Name:  Theresa S. Cao, sui juris

DATE:

Copies attached to Case No. 2011 CMD 1048

and served on all parties named in attached

certificate of service.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Theresa S. Cao, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion, was sent by first class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, or hand delivered on this ….day of March, 2011, to the prosecuting attorney, as follows:

Name of Attorney:  Ronald C. Machen Jr.

Office Name:  U.S. Department of Justice / U.S. Attorney / District of Columbia

Street Address:  Judiciary Center / 555 Fourth Street, N.W.

City, State, zip:  Washington, D.C. 20530

All Rights Reserved,

___________________________

Theresa S. Cao, American Citizen

42 Responses to "Update: Theresa Cao: National Call to Action"

  1. lana   Monday, March 21, 2011 at 10:14 AM

    I hope Patriot and good Christian Theresa Cao got massive support for her pilgrimage in every state capital yesterday and that patriots are camped all over the White House. That will be a sight for my sore eyes.

    Someone here offered to pay for 500 patriots to come to Washington for her trial. How do I get on the list? I will come but I don’t have the money. Bless you, patriot, for the offer.

  2. johnny says   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 10:30 PM

    to racer jim and others —– obama has ordered an unconstitutional war against libya. do you still support this unlawful order being carried by the troops. the military forces should be refusing these illegal orders issued by a illegal alien usurpur c. i. c. that is the support our troops need. the military should be defying all these orders and the support should be for that refusal of illegal orders. i put my support there.

  3. johnny says   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 7:22 PM

    to racer jim —– all the troops in uniform should be encouraged to refuse orders from soetoro / obama until he can prove that he is a legal potus and c. i. c. that is the way i will support them. i will not support them being sent off to die and get wounded by a usurpur illegal alien criminal who is issuing unlawful orders to begin with. all military in uniform should follow behind lt. col. lakin then the usurpur would have no support and he would crumble.

  4. RacerJim   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 11:19 AM

    I just sent my Congressman and Senators the following email:

    “By ordering cruise missle attacks against Libya yesterday without first seeking, much less obtaining, Congressional approval, Obama declared Congress null & void.

    How does it feel to be declared null & void by Obama? Has the usurper gone far enough for you now?

    A Proud Birther
    A Proud Vietnam Veteran”

  5. evergreen   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 12:53 AM

    unalienable rights, must get this right

  6. evergreen   Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 12:50 AM

    there are laws that required him to prove his eligibility
    ARS 16-311 in Arizona, still on the books
    OCGA 25-2-5 in Georgia
    Maryland Code Elections Law 5-201

    see those laws were just actively NOT enforced, we’re waiting for some one to sue these states attorney generals offices to get them enforced for 2012

    also the 20th amendment required obama be qualified by congress, he was not

  7. CDR Charles Kerchner, Jr.   Saturday, March 19, 2011 at 4:15 PM

    When Theresa Cao gets her full jury trial which she has asked for, and which is her constitutional right, we that attended the LTC Terry Lakin “kangaroo court” court martial should try to make it there as a show of support. Who knows. If the trial is scheduled for after the date of LTC Terry Lakin’s release he may also be able to attend to show his support for her, as she did for him. So let’s follow this trial schedule and see if our “constitutionalist” crew from across the nation can re-unite to show our support for Theresa Cao when she is put on trial by jury. If the government puppets doing Obama’s bidding were smart they would drop all the charges against Theresa for her simply exercising her “political free speech” rights in the “People’s House”. Those political free speech rights are guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. If they take her to trial she will get an excellent opportunity while defending herself in court in front of a jury to exercise her “political free speech” right about Obama’s ineligibility as part of her defense. Obama should tell his appointed puppet judge to just dismiss the case or tell the prosecutor to drop all the charges. Otherwise, it’s going to be not so good for Obama with this full jury trial, imo. Theresa Cao was overcome by emotion and spoke out from her heart and they decided to punish her and intimidate her. It did not work. Now she has got them where she wants them and the press is not going to ignore this jury trial.
    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
    http://www.protectourliberty.org

  8. RacerJim   Saturday, March 19, 2011 at 7:53 AM

    Countering A.N.S.W.E.R., Code Pink, IVAW et al of similar ilk and protecting memorials to our troops from vandalism doesn’t make sense to you? Oh well.

    Last night there were some 50-odd of us on each of the four corners at the main entrance to Walter Reed Army Medical Center waving all sorts of “Support Our Troops” signs and American Flags, and garning lots and lots of honks and hand-waving from passing motorists. A handful of pinkos showed up but left after an hour or so. The highlight of the evening was, of course, welcoming the bus returning Wounded Warriors and their families back from their free Friday night dinner out.

  9. johnny says   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 9:52 PM

    this rally makes absolutely no sense to me . the troops are being given illegal orders by a foreign national usurpur in the wh and instead of concerning themselves with arresting soetoro / obama you want to support the taking of these unlawful orders. the objective should be to serve treason and fraud and forgery charges on the usurpur and put him on citizens trial. you just keep circling the wagon and you are going to have soetoro / obama for his life time. there will be a communist dictatorship to live under permanently. you people had better wake up and quick.

  10. johnny says   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 9:39 PM

    starla and neil / if the court is determined to railroad theresa to jail nothing will make a difference. you saw what happened to lakin. they may do the same with her. we are not going to solve this problem sitting in front of our laptops.

  11. ramboike   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 5:47 PM

    For RacerJim:

    With all due respect, it’s very possible I don’t understand the point you’re making, but as I’m comprehending it now, I can’t agree with what you’re stating.

    Is our Constitution the supreme law of America?

    Is the Article II eligibility clause part of that supreme law?

    Does it or doesn’t it mean that any candidate aspiring to be on the ballot for the presidency have to prove [provide proof] he meets that lawful standard?

    So would Daniel have it right when he states, “the candidate must prove he is eligible, not others that he is not”.

    This has been 1 of the sticking points for me since Oct. ’08.

  12. Starla   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 4:21 PM

    THE OFFICIAL COMPLETE CONTACT INFO IS COMPILED VERY EASILY HERE FOR ALL OF THE “CURRENT” 112TH FEDERAL CONGRESS MEMBERS THAT ARE IN OFFICE TODAY, FOR ALL OF THE 50 STATE GOVERNORS, & FOR ALL OF THE STATE CONGRESS MEMBERS. PLEASE BROTHERS & SISTERS, PASS ON & SHARE THIS INFORMATION WITH EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN EVERYWHERE FAR & WIDE!!!!

    http://www.conservativeusa.org/mega-cong.htm

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    “FROM THE WHITE HOUSE TO THE BIG HOUSE: 25 IMPEACHABLE CRIMES AND COUNTING”

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/25831

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    “50 IMPEACHABLE CRIMES AND COUNTING”

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26650

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  13. RacerJim   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM

    From: Patriots for America
    http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topics/march-18th-19th-in-dc?commentId=2734278%3AComment%3A279604

    March 18th – 19th in DC

    We will all meet Friday night at the front gates of Walter Reed Army Medical Center to partner up and support Free Republic in support of our Wounded Warriors. This is located at 16th and Georgia Ave.

    Fred will be there with some very important dignitaries, who will address the Group. Due to security we can not disclose their identities at this time. Fred will also give out the rules of engagement for Saturday the 19th. Muster will be at 8:30 AM Foggy Bottom Washington Park and march over to the Memorials. Anyone who arrives late will be able to catch up with us between 21st and 22nd and Constitution Ave NW. The weather in DC will be fantastic, See you all in DC as we face down our enemies and stand tall for America and the Heroes who fight for us.

    God speed

    SassySuz

    Visit Guardian Eagles at: http://guardian-eagles.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

    Below are all the details for this weekend. Please join us as we stand proudly for our troops against the anti-war, tantrum throwing, destructive, ungrateful, immature, whiny moonbats who will come out in droves to protest our troops and their mission. This is the first time IVAW has targeted Walter Reed on Friday night (usually the Pink Pests) so please join us!!! Let’s show our troops that as long as they keep fighting over there for all of us, we’ll keep fighting over here for them! Please forward this out to everyone on your lists.
    Thank you
    Beverly Perlson
    The Band Of Mothers
    Details Below:

    MARCH 18, 2011 WALTER REED

    WHERE: Main gates of Walter Reed, Georgia Avenue and Elder Street, NW. Plenty of street parking and also park in the lot. Entrance off Elder Street.
    WHEN: Friday, 6:45 PM to around 9:30PM when we cheer a bus load of Wounded Warriors and their families coming back from their weekly dinner. The dinner is sponsored by The Aleethia Foundation, founded by a wounded Vietnam Vet. They could also use some donations.
    The DC Chapter of FreeRepublic will have flags, banners, posters, snacks and drinks.

    MARCH 19,2011 FREEDOM PLAZA
    ANSWER, Code Pink, IVAW, and others of their ilk are still protesting against our troops. We need to continue supporting our troops and defending their honor. We need to be a voice for them. Our soldiers still need the support we gave them in March, 2007 during the first Gathering of Eagles.

    WHERE: Washington, DC — We have permitted FREEDOM PLAZA (Main gathering point) at 14th and E Streets, NW. Blue and Orange FEDERAL TRIANGLE Metro Station is close to station

    DATE: Saturday, March 19,2011

    WHEN: Gather at 10AM at Freedom Plaza, then at 11AM we will go to Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House till we are no longer needed to support our troops.
    The DC Chapter of FReeRepublic will have the Walter Reed MOAB, flags, banners, and posters. At Freedom Plaza we will also have snacks and drinks.
    The moonbats will be gathering at Lafayette Park at noon and will protest in front of the White House after their speeches damning and disparaging our brave troops.

  14. RacerJim   Friday, March 18, 2011 at 8:35 AM

    With all due respect Daniel, I know of no law which requires a candidate to prove they are eligible unless/until a court of law demands they do. The only thing I know of is that the Hawaii Democratic Party was required by Hawaii law to include the phrase “under provisions of the United States Constitution.” in their Official Certificate Of Nomination of Obama & Biden to the Hawaii Department of Elections, and they didn’t.

  15. NEIL TURNER   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 11:52 PM

    Daniel Cutulla;

    I believe that there is a difference here when I say that the evidence has been entered in the record:

    First, Theresa is a defendent, not a plaintiff, with alll the rights of a defendent for self defense, and anyone can use the publicly posted details of the case as evidence, and refer people via links to it. (it can be used as a P.S. on NumbersUSA.com faxes for example).

    Second, LTC Terry Lakin may have been a defendent, but he was denied his Consitutional rights to self defense – because it was an illegal and unconstitutional courts martial.

    Third, LTC Lakin could have stood up and made a statement like: ‘I do not recognize this ‘Court’, it has no jurisdiction in the Consitutional Republic that I, and you, are sworn to uphold. You can imprison my body, but you cannot imprison my heart, my mind, or my soul.’
    Instead, he was intimidated with long term imprisonment, and decided that he had done his part. The rest is up to us.

    Let us not let the efforts of these patriots be in vain, as every step brings us one step closer to our goal of restoring our Constitutional Republic.

  16. Starla   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 6:43 PM

    Theresa,

    When Neil Turner said on Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 1:36 AM in his comment,
    “What a brilliant ‘Motion to Dismiss’. Absolutely brilliant. Add to the fact that there is no accuser named, the fact that Congress was not yet ‘in session’, the charge of ‘disturbing Congress while in session’ becomes doubly bogus,” Theresa, I completely agree with Neil.

    I pray that you use the above brilliant information added by Neil Turner in your perfect legal defense of being a 100% innocent law abiding American citizen whose Forever Living God-Given Inalienable Civil Rights, Liberties, & Freedoms that are outlined, protected, and guaranteed in the USA Bill Of Rights & the USA Constitution that the court cannot remove or take away from you.

    When Neil Turner says, “What a brilliant ‘Motion to Dismiss’. Absolutely brilliant,”
    I agree with him. I read through your legal response(s) and they are brilliant, Theresa. Please Stand Strong In Trust, Faith, & Courage through this unjust ordeal as LORD JESUS CHRIST EMMANUEL & His Holy Angels of GOD are Standing With You & Will Strengthen You through this.

    Do Not Let This Wicked Court Intimidate You Whatsoever Into Taking A Plea Bargain When You Are A 100% Innocent Law Abiding American Citizen!! Theresa, simply continue to fire any court appointed lawyer who will not answer your questions completely and professionally, who will not defend you & uphold your Constitutional protected Civil Rights & Freedoms in a court of law according to your manifested expressed desires & will, who will not gain and disclose all discovery documents to you; and who are treasonous traitors who subvert the Rule Of Law in the USA Constitution & refuse to perform their legal duties they are sworn to perform for you.

    This is a false charge that must be dismissed, Theresa. File again the “Motion To Dismiss” at the appropriate time with an attorney, as soon as possible. Many Americans are Standing Together With You & LORD JESUS CHRIST EMMANUEL, Theresa, throughout this trial. Theresa, Please Be & Remain In Complete Peace & Faith In Christ At ALL Times. Hopefully, We The People can gather with you, Theresa in person in prayers & works, trust, & faith in the FOREVER LIVING CREATOR, ALMIGHTY GOD, THE MOST HOLY TRINITY, in, with, & united to CHRIST JESUS THE LORD.

  17. GaryW   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM

    StopObama…I gladly would take you up on your offer. I am on the west coast and anxious to meet my friend and true patriot, Theresa. See more at my blog: giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com.

  18. StopObama   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 11:34 AM

    So, that’s one!

    Who else shall join us on the barricade?

  19. Bev   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 11:04 AM

    If you listen to Obama he uses Inalienable rights all the time. It’s Unalienable rights. WOW Theresa WOW. You go girl. There are MILLIONS that are behind you even if we aren’t there.
    Thank you for loving America.

  20. Daniel Cutulla   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 10:26 AM

    > the evidence of massive fraud and treason is now IN THE RECORD

    It’s been on the record of many court cases challenging the eligibility of Obama/Soetoro. Sadly this has not brought us one step further.

    After the case of LTC Lakin, I am careful with predictions like “this will blow the whole thing open”. We thought this would happen with Lakin as well, but alas! it didn’t…

  21. Daniel Cutulla   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 10:24 AM

    > All the founders were charter citizens with non-citizen parents because the country did not exist when their parents gave birth to them. And there were many citizens at that time who were born on U.S. soil but not to citizen parents.

    The problem I have with that argument is that it is inconclusive. The US did not exist when all relevant candidates were born (even if they were geographically born on US soil, it wasn’t legally US soil when they were born), so even if ius soli was sufficient for NBC, the grandfather clause was still necessary as none of the potential presidents would have conformed with ius soli alone.
    Therefore I think that the “two citizen parent” argument cannot be reliably based on the grandfather clause.

    > Obama’s birth certificate is relevant only if it confirms that Barack Obama Sr. was his father he claims in his book and on his website.

    Or if it confirms another non-citizen father.

    > Arthur took all his family documents and burned them in his back yard effectively covering up the fact of his ineligibility to hold office

    But eligibility requires positive proof – the candidate must prove he is eligible, not others that he is not. So I don’t see how burning his documents would have helped him. After all, the total absence of documents doesn’t help Obama/Soetoro either (if you don’t count his enablers covering it up). If he cannot prove natural born status, he cannot be eligible.

    (I think we both wrote the exact same thing a couple of weeks ago here as well. ;))

  22. lana   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 9:40 AM

    I just wish some one – any one would show up at court to support her. I ca’nt afford it since I had to bail my kid out again but I hope that every one in DC, Virginia, Maryland and Penn would show up next time. It breaks my heart that she keeps asking for support and never gets it.

    Her stuff she gave to court was amazing and I hope this means that one of our great lawyers has come to help her. Orly or Mr Appuzo maybe?

  23. RacerJim   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM

    I have no faith whatsoever that Theresa would get a fair jury trial. The Judge is an Obama appointee, the jury pool went 245,800 vs 17,367 (86%) for Obama in 2008 and still support him, and we all know the Washington Post is a liberal rag.

  24. Kevin J. Lankford   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 8:43 AM

    I must say, obviously Ms. Cao is not the naive little fool they take her for. All true
    “American Citizens” should be very proud of her courageous spirit.

    Unfortunately, we all know there has yet to be anyone to receive an honest and true
    hearing on obama’s eligibilty. Hell, boehner, nor any of the rest of congress intended
    to give our Constitution an honest and true hearing.

    I pray for Ms Cao’s success, and that she may further disrupt their veil of corruption

  25. Neil Turner   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 1:36 AM

    What a brilliant ‘Motion to Dismiss’. Absolutely brilliant.

    Add to the fact that there is no accuser named, the fact that Congress was not yet ‘in session’, the charge of ‘disturbing Congress while in session’ becomes doubly bogus.

    And now the treasoners have opened themselves up to further exposure of the truth: the evidence of massive fraud and treason is now IN THE RECORD.

    Let us all assist in making sure that that public record is exposed for all to see, so that the TRUTH can set us free.

    Thank you, Theresa, for stepping up to the plate so boldly. They can falsely imprison your body, but they cannot imprison you heart and mind. God Bless.

  26. Neil Turner   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 1:19 AM

    I met Theresa in December 2008 in D.C. when I was there for a Press Conference concerning lawsuits proclaiming Obama’s fraudulent election. We prayed together at the Lincoln Memorial.

    Theresa is a true warrior in this fight to restore our Constitution. If your offer to pay for my attendance – from California – is true, then I will be there – ready for battle.

    The Motion to dismiss is brilliant, and I, for one, will exploit it to the max in my writings.

    So let Sharon know – and I will be there.

  27. Stephen Thorburn   Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 12:10 AM

    A simple point of logic…If two citizen parents were not required for ‘Natural Born Citizen’ status then there is no possible logical reason for the adoption clause in Article 2 Section 1. All the founders were charter citizens with non-citizen parents because the country did not exist when their parents gave birth to them. And there were many citizens at that time who were born on U.S. soil but not to citizen parents. The founders knew it would take a generation to produce the first ‘Natural Born Citizen’ born on U.S. soil from parents who were citizens and free from any direct foreign birthright allegiances. The founders needed to include the charter citizens in order to have Presidential candidates (themselves) until a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ could be available for candidacy. Obama’s birth certificate is relevant only if it confirms that Barack Obama Sr. was his father he claims in his book and on his website. Barack Obama Sr. was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth.

    President Chester Arthur faced a challenge by those who believed his father was not a citizen when Chester was born. Before the authorities could seize them Arthur took all his family documents and burned them in his back yard effectively covering up the fact of his ineligibility to hold office. It was only recently in 2009 that a researcher found documentation which confirmed that Arthur’s critics were right about his ineligibility because his father was not a citizen at the time of Chester’s birth.

  28. 1776reloaded   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 11:07 PM

    Patriot Cao,

    The Constitutional Rights you have dusted off in your motion for the world to see are like Gold Liberty Coins that have been hidden and covered for 100 years that are as shiny as the day they were covered, for they do not rust nor decay.

  29. StopObama   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 9:18 PM

    10,000 patriots must be standing outside that courthouse. I personally volunteer to pay for 500 of my patriots to attend if they cannot afford it themselves.

  30. no-nonsense-nancy   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM

    Theresa, thank you so much and God Bless you! I wanted to be with you this week but it wasn’t possible. You are the strongest woman I have met and I admire you so much. I will support you, always, as will many, many others across our country. My prayers are with you!

  31. Toria   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 8:50 PM

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/12432006/Unalienable-vs-Inalienable-Rights-Know-the-difference

    UNalienable vs INalienable (know the difference)
    Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,-‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;’ and to ‘secure,’ not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,

    The natural rights of life and liberty areUNALIENABL E.
    Bouviers Law Dictionary 1856 Edition
    “Unalienable: incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1523

    Inalienable rights: Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent
    of the one possessing such rights. Morrison v. State, Mo. App., 252 S.W.2d 97, 101.

    You can surrender, sell or transfer inalienable rights if you consent either …

  32. Papoose   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 6:51 PM

    A message to Terry Lakin. we’re counting down the days… looking forward to your release this Spring… hope you are faring well.

    Hope you know what’s going on out here.
    prison on another dimension… hmmm
    they are even spraying our skies, night and day.

  33. Starla   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM

    “Cao said that a third option would be for the government to dismiss her case and will be meeting with Attorney Downs next week on March 22, 2011.

    She is calling for a “National Call to Action” to citizens across the United States to issue the charge of treason against Barack Hussein Obama to begin on Sunday, March 20, at all state Capitols and outside of the White House from noon to 4:00 p.m. Of the timing, Cao stated, “This coincides with the Purim miracle feast of Queen Esther, who saved Israel from annihilation.”

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Theresa, the only correct & just action for the prosecutor & judge is to dismiss this legal lynching case as a non-existent crime. If the court should refuse to dismiss it, imho, then seek a jury trial. Theresa, I think the jury will agree & say that you are 100% innocent. Don’t let the corrupt court system intimidate you to accept any plea bargain for being a law abiding American citizen.

    Thank you Theresa for calling for a “National Call To Action” to hold “Obama” accountable for committing his High Crimes & High Treasons that he is obviously Daily Criminally committing in his out of control, 100% lawless Daily Serial Crimes in the USA.

    I will be sharing this article & participating in the “National Call To Action” in the state
    where I live. We should have a “National Call To Action 365/24/7.” Theresa, you did very excellent work in writting your legal response here. Bravo!!

  34. Papoose   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 5:38 PM

    Walt Fitzpatrick, I feel as though I know you. Thank you, too, once again, for all that you do keep the eternal flame flickering. USA! God Bless America.

  35. Papoose   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM

    Theresa, thank you from the bottom of my heart. There are no words to describe you, your courage and motherly love for our Country and its Constitution. You are a modern day Joan d’Arc moved by the voice of God to lead, protect and defend. It is an honor to know you. Your words at the most appropriate time are forever etched in my being and in the historical annals of our Nation, forever.

  36. Starla   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM

    Thank you Theresa Cao!!!!!!!

    “FROM THE WHITE HOUSE TO THE BIG HOUSE: 25 IMPEACHABLE CRIMES AND COUNTING”

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/25831

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    “50 IMPEACHABLE CRIMES AND COUNTING”

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26650

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    ALL CONTACT INFO IS COMPILED VERY EASILY HERE FOR ALL OF THE 111TH FEDERAL CONGRESS MEMBERS, FOR ALL OF THE 50 STATE GOVERNORS, & FOR ALL OF THE STATE CONGRESS MEMBERS:

    http://www.conservativeusa.org/mega-cong.htm

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  37. Bob1943   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 5:18 PM

    Let me add my thanks, Theresa, you are an American hero. If only our elected officials has just a fraction of the courage you have, Barry would be in jail and no longer pretending to be president while America and the World are so in need of real leadership.

  38. A pen   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 5:15 PM

    Into the fire she goes with nothing but a prayer. She will never be alone. The corruption will not stand this blow. She has struck at the heart and with terrific aim.

  39. Starla   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 5:15 PM

    Theresa, if people offered me a “plea bargain” with or without a guilty plea for simply exercising my God-Given inalienable freedoms of speech, I would tell them I refuse to take any plea bargain for simply exercising my freedoms of speech peacefully. I would tell them that you are violating my God-Given inalienable freedoms of speech, & you are violating my legal American citizen’s guaranteed protection of the Bill Of Rights & the USA Constitution & my civil rights!! And you must stop committing offences & crimes against my God-Given inalienable freedoms of speech that are clearly protected under the USA Constitution in the USA.

    Theresa, everyone who is so petty to actually charge you, prosecute you, & place you before this insane & corrupt court with this corrupt, outrageously criminal, & insane charge should, in my opinion, be fired, arrested, & charged for committing High Crimes & High Treasons, & Obstruction of Justice against your legal American’s sacred, protected, & guaranteed God-Given inalienable forever living freedoms, liberties, & civil rights.

    O dear GOD, I would have gladly attended this complete charade & farce of this corrupt court with you, Theresa. However, I do not live anywhere near DC. I am thinking about moving there from where I currently live. My sister was a lawyer in DC for many years. Theresa, I am definitely standing together with you & LORD JESUS CHRIST EMMANUEL very firmly in daily prayers & works with you.

    Theresa, Stand your ground firmly with LORD JESUS CHRIST standing with you & be at complete & total peace. Theresa, you are completely innocent of any criminal wrong doing in this. The people who are actually trying to prosecute this non-existent crime are the sick & petty criminals. Do you have an email address where you can be contacted?

  40. Thomas D Dowling   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 4:57 PM

    Thank you Theresa Cao!

  41. drkate   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 4:04 PM

    BRAVA BRAVA BRAVA Theresa Cao!! Absolutely terrific work…oh…if I could only be there I certainly would!

    Thank you, for all of Time, for HIS word, for all of us, for standing!

    Respectfully and with such admiration and affection…drkate

  42. 2discern   Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 3:49 PM

    Already a heroine of patriotism she now needs our full support. Are there local patriots that will stand with her? Attend the hearings, bring attention to the case in a very factual non-thug way. The force of truth demonstrated by demeanor under control is a vital weapon.

    Can Theresa via Sharon share the needs most pressing right now? We will respond.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.