“HE WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO RUN”
Dear Editor,
(Feb. 15, 2011) — I e-mailed the following letter to Senator McConnell this morning:
February 15, 2011
Dear Senator McConnell,
I am writing to you as Senate Minority Leader, representing me as a Republican.
America has a non-documented, non-naturalized, Indonesian citizen-dual citizen usurper sitting in the White House, Barack Hussein Obama/Soebarkah/Barry Soetoro. His mother Ann Dunham Soetoro on her 1965 passport #F777788 issued July 19, 1965 renewed August 1968 which she ‘Subscribed and Sworn to(affirmed)’ on August 13, 1968 in Djakarta, Indonesia, in order to comply with the section of her passport regarding ‘United States citizenship’, removed or ‘struck out’ her son’s names Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) on page 2 in the section entitled ‘Amend to Include (Exclude) Children’ because he was adopted by her husband Lolo Soetoro and was ‘naturalized as a citizen of a foreign state’. His Indonesian step-father Lolo Soetoro gave him his name Barry Soetoro when he adopted him and entered Barry in an Indonesian school.
There is a vast difference between ‘citizen’ and ‘natural-born Citizen’ as required by the Constitution to be eligible for President and Vice-President.
Obama/Soebarkah/Barry Soetoro admits he was born of a foreign father who was born a British subject of a British colony and then became a Kenyan citizen, but Obama Sr. was NEVER a U.S. American citizen. Obama/Soebarkah/Barry Soetoro is therefore NOT a NATURAL-BORN citizen. If America is to believe the usurper’s claimed-but-not-proven-parentage, he was not eligible to run for President in 2008, under our U.S. Constitutional requirements. You, all of congress and the Supreme Court have defied our Constitution, by allowing this fraud and deception to continue in the Oval office of the people’s White House.
Obama/Soebarkah/Barry Soetoro’s purported mother, Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro (there is no long-form birth certificate provided to prove that she actually gave birth to him) was too young to confer U.S. citizenship on Obama at birth, since she was not yet 19 years old as required by law when he was born in August, 1961. At best he is an “anchor-baby”, and a DUAL-CITIZEN. There is no evidence that after he was adopted by his step-father Lolo Soetoro and entered in an Indonesian school listing Indonesian citizenship for him that he ever naturalized himself as an American citizen.
Please live up to the oath you took to our Constitution, Article. II, Section 1, that “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
The Constitution was read aloud in the House recently. During that reading a courageous woman named Theresa Cao called out at the time those very words above were read, “Except Obama, except Obama, help us, Jesus!” Her cry was the cry of millions of Americans who believe Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro is illegally holding the office of the President and Commander-in-Chief.
Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro has spent millions to hide his birth certificate and all his life documents, and he has withheld those documents, that would have exonerated a military hero, much-decorated combat veteran LTC Dr. Terrence Lakin, who now languishes in Fort Leavenworth military prison without income, without pension, without rank, because the usurper hides his documentation.
Former-speaker Pelosi sent 2 different certification forms to the Secretaries-of-State, 49 of them were lacking the crucial Constitutional requirement paragraph. Why did Former-speaker Pelosi certify to documents lacking the verbiage about Constitutional eligibility?
Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro used a Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was issued by the State of Connecticut in March, 1977 and was connected to someone born in 1890. Just how did the usurper obtain that SSN issued by Connecticut when he never lived in Connecticut, and no other state was allowed to issue that number?
You can verify that Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro used SSN 042-68-4425 to register for the draft, by going to the Selective Service website:
https://www.sss.gov/RegVer/wfVerification.aspx
and entering:
Obama
042684425
08041961
and up will come Obama’s Selective Service number 61-1125539-1:
Last Name: obama
Social Security Number: *** – ** – 4425
Date of Birth: 08/04/1961
Selective Service Number:
61-1125539-1
Date of Registration
9/4/1980
Senator McConnell, please live up to your oath to the Constitution to protect the U.S. from all enemies foreign and domestic, and investigate Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro’s fraudulent Presidential campaign, which under the Constitution REQUIRES the President to be a NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN.
Please uphold the principles of our Founding Fathers and our Constitution.
Senator McConnell, please do not turn a deaf-ear and a blind-eye and brush aside and disregard this eligibility Constitutional crisis.
Please take action to have Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro’s original, non-forged, long-form, parent-signed, doctor-signed and registrar-signed, birth certificate subpoenaed, along with his SS-5 application form for his Connecticut SSN, and provide them to the American people.
This issue of Obama/Soebarkah/Soetoro’s ineligibility for President is not going away. The American people in their millions will not let you or congress or the supreme court sweep it under the rug. There are 10 states working on passing state laws to require proof of Constitutional eligibility in time for the 2012 election.
Sincerely,
Paula Hoehn
Obama’s Mom was a US citizen. If Obama was Born in Hawaii as he claims, all his Dad would have to do is be NATURALIZED “before” the Birth of JR. He of course didn’t. Obama Senior never became a US citizen. Therefore JR is Disqualified.
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/02/supreme-court-of-united-states-to-give.html
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Shock: Supreme Court of the United States to give the Obama eligibility case ‘Hollister v. Soetoro’ another look on March 4, 2011…
ObamaRelease YourRecords on 1:17 PM
As first reported here and here, the Colonel Gregory Hollister v. Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama, et al, Petition for Writ of Certiorari, filed in the United States Supreme Court, was denied without comment and with no recusal from jUstice Sotomayor and jUstice Kagan. WND is now reporting that the Supreme Court of the United States will give the case another look. The case was Distributed for Conference on February 16, 2011 and is set for conference on March 4, 2011…
snip……
Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.
Paula’s letter indeed is one bang-up job. Is it me, or do I sense we are sitting on the mother of all powder kegs and none other than those whom we elected to defend the Constitution have inadvertently lit the fuse?
For all the LEGAL FACTS on why Obama is NOT ELIGIBLE read the new book: “OBAMA – INELIGIBLE TO SERVE – LIES, CRIMES AND DEADLY AMBITION” !!!!!!! (at Amazon). It details ALL the reasons, not just his long form birth certificate issue.
—————-
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Who is the author of the book so that we may give him or her credit?
Editor’s Note: A link to the book as advertised on Amazon.com is here: http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Ineligible-Crimes-Deadly-Ambition/dp/1439254001
Could it be an anonymous author, perhaps just A. Citizen?
MY Letter to anderson cooper and O’Reilly.
I understand that a gag order has been put upon you in December 2008 not to speak of the eligibility issue of Obama. However, by speaking about it and relating the wrong information only makes you look complicit and most all stupid.
Do you not understand that at least 180 million Americans know what a naturalized and natural born citizen is and that you do not. Actually, there are 4 different ways you can become a US citizen. That said, to be president of the United States, you MUST BE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. That means that you must be a natural born citizen and have TWO natural born parents in the United States.
Now, Obama admits that his father is Barack Obama SR. Well sir, Barack Obama SR was a Kenyan, British born national and never was or meant to become a citizen of the US. Therefore, Barack is not eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. You can say that he is a citizen but you can not say that he is eligible for the office of president. The same circumstances apply to the Vice President.
All presidents since 1787 were eligible except Chester A. Arthur. All presidents have proven they are eligible by releasing all documents of proof. Barack Obama is THE ONLY PRESIDENT WHO HAS NOT RELEASED ANY DOCUMENTS OF PROOF!
The rule of NATURAL BORN citizen was included in the constitution by our founders to prevent what has happened today. You have helped to install an un-American, muslim usurper to the highest office of the land. Barack Obama is a traitor and should be arrested and thrown in jail. He knows he is illegal.
If Barack had been born on the White House steps, he would not be eligible to hold the office of President of the United States.
He is destroying this country that is obvious to any human with half a brain with the help of George Soros his puppet master.
We want him removed from office and we will succeed.
Below is a link that explains Vattel and natural born. There are now over 200 lawsuits regarding this issue.
http://www.puzo1.blogspot.com
Barack Obama has been indicted in Tonowanda, NY Look it up. There is a warrant for his arrest.
Quote:
“That means that you must be a natural born citizen and have TWO natural born parents in the United States.”
Uh, should that not say, and have two parents who are U.S. citizens, not required that they be natural born ones….just citizens….which Obama’s father was not?
Bob1943,
“Uh, should that not say, and have two parents who are U.S. citizens, not required that they be natural born ones….just citizens….which Obama’s father was not?”
Yes.
“to be president of the United States, you MUST BE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. That means that you must be a natural born citizen and have TWO natural born parents in the United States”
It is sufficient for the parents to be naturalized citizens of The USA – as long as they had been naturalized by the time of the child’s birth.
It is essential, therefore, that the relevant documentation of the parents be shown and verified, before a candidate for POTUS or Vice-POTUS ie allowed to be included on the ballot.
Here is the bottom line… MOST of our politicans will NOT do anything about obama’s eligibility (as they only care about themselves & getting re-elected) Many citizens have tried to convince them & even tried to educate them on the issue…
Our only chance is to support those states that have the courage to introduce Bills on state level on eligibility, (I think there are 12 or more now) make sure you write to those brave representives who are introducing the Bills showing your support & to make sure that the issue of “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” is part of their Bills or they don’t get on the ballot… NO EXCEPTIONS!!
If enough states do this then those who are UNQUALIFIED will lose… & the truth will come out. Anyone who would oppose will prove they are hiding something. If they are telling the truth as far as qualification then they have NOTHING to worry about… right!
Arizona’s “Barry Bill”, which was expected to pass, failed to get out of commitee when three Republicans voted against it.
I have heard Montana’s bill has also already been shot down.
Look’s like someone may be “persuading ” the states not pass such a bill.
Nice try. I sent Mitch (3) e-mails and got the same form letters back. No one in Washington cares what the people think and there is no justice. They’re all in on it.
Just think, $12, a little courage, and a lot of honesty would make this issue “Go away”. But, too many power-mongers are in too deep already.
America has experienced a “Socialist Coup”, and most don’t seem to care !
O’Lier and Dick Morris discussed the BC issue tonight and once again failed to discuss the main issue, the Natural Born Citizenship requirement. I guess I am a real nut job by O’Lier’s view.
I wouldn’t be concerned about what Obama thinks about you. He is a narcissistic degenerate.
http://samvak.tripod.com/obama.html
You,in turn are a patriot.
Paula, you’re doing a great service with your pressure! Please keep on it and keep us posted.
This man should be ushered out of the White House in handcuffs before he takes us all over the edge and there is no returning to the America we once knew.
God Help America!!
Obama followers follow Obama:
http://www.gifbin.com/981396
Rick B., Paula could use our physical help more than anything else. Make copies of her letter, distribute as many copies to your church, service organizations, local political groups, etc as you can. Have each person sign their copy and mail it to McConell and Boehner and every member of congress. Thousands, if not millions, of this letter will make a difference and bring about the justice we demand. Too often a lone wolf is silenced by being falsely ridiculed by the left. Unfortunately, it is our individualism that could be our downfall.
Great idea Larry: Strength in numbers! Also, it’s a way that readers, who really care what Paula is trying to do, can make her initiative become that much more effective.
Let’s make Paula’s message go viral!
Hey Guys-McConnell already knows-he was there when they wrote SR511!
A truthful and accurate letter Paula – well done. The really sad part is that every day Congress does not act – is just one more day that this Obama-Jihadist-Operative is able to continue to DISMANTLE AND DESTABILIZE AMERICA. Bad enough if he was just a usurper who was truly trying to be another Ronald Regan, BUT NO, he is instead a Communist, Muslim, Jihadist Usurper who is now very successfully and methodically dismantling and bankrupting America in an uninhibited way with the help of Congress and every living Democrat. His atrocities are far too many to list herein, the latest being to Imprison War-Hero LTC Dr. Lakin, (stripping his pay and rank, and denying him due-process in a Court of Law), giving British secrets to the Russians, Disarming us of our Nukes (while Iran is being allowed to get them?) , selling the NY Stock Exchange to the Germans, STARK Treaty, Killing “don’t ask- don’t tell”, Wanting to move Gitmo detainees to California, and Introducing a budget with trillions more in uncheck spending. Maybe Congress wants to start grooming the Mogadishu-Somalia pirate-survivor of the Mersk attack to be the next POTUS, or possibly KSM after he is moved from Gitmo to California. HAVE WE LOST OUR BLOODY MINDS????????? Wake-up, wake-up, wake-up America; TIME HAS NOW RUN OUT.
I hope Paula Hoehn’s excellent letter makes it past the senator’s staff and is actually read by McConnell. I fear that all too often the addressee of eligibility letters never sees the letter and that some staffer just runs a formulaic reply by the congress-person for a signature–if the sender is lucky enough to receive any reply at all. If Hoehn does get a reply, maybe she will let us know.
Democrats led by leftist Harry Reid may be able to block a Senate investigation, but Republican senators still have powerful influence, and now that Republicans control the House, there is no excuse for any further delay in investigating Obama’s election fraud and holding public hearings. If that happens, the naked emperor will surely be exposed.
> now that Republicans control the House, there is no excuse for any further delay in investigating Obama’s election fraud and holding public hearings. If that happens, the naked emperor will surely be exposed.
Hogwash! If the Reps were willing to do something, they wouldn’t need a majority. If they just stepped forward and publicly proclaimed we are being controlled by a usurper, that would blow the lid open and no Dem majority could put it back on.
The fact that none of them has stepped forward is a clear message: they don’t want to act.
And we are lying to ourselves if we keep the “if only this one more thing happens (the GOP getting a Senate majority, the X doing the Y etc.), it will all be revealed” thinking alive. There is no way in h*ll any government official is going to do ANYTHING. Unless we get our Million Man March on and make them.
Mr. Farnsworth, I fully support a Million-Person March around the White House demanding Obama’s removal, but it is not necessary to abandon all hope of having Congress remove Obama per Section 3 of Amendment 20 of the Constitution. As your last sentence shows, your wish for mass demonstration and my hope for congressional action are not mutually exclusive. To suggest otherwise is truly hogwash.
As for delay, I said “there is no excuse for any further delay in investigating Obama’s election fraud and holding public hearings.” Do you disagree with that? Clearly you don’t think it will happen without mass protest, but it appears you actually do agree with me.
You also obviously agree with my statement that “If that happens, the naked emperor will surely be exposed,” because you say about the same thing: “If they just stepped forward and publicly proclaimed we are being controlled by a usurper, that would blow the lid open.” To come out slinging words like “hogwash” and “lying to ourselves” does not seem constructive when our views are so similar.
You are exactly correct, Hubert, the Republicans don’t have any excuses – at all; and furthermore, instead of being RINO weaklings, if they had been doing their proper jobs as Conservatives, and abiding by the Constitution, then Usurper-Obama and his commie-friends wouldn’t have gotten to first base without being exposed. Wake Up, Republicans!, this is YOUR very brief moment on stage – don’t blow it.
It’s a small matter, but Sen. McConnell is the Senate Majority leader.
—————-
Mrs. Rondeau replies: The Senate is still dominated by Dems, so the Republican leader would be the Minority Leader.
Paula, this is a great letter and I agree with all said here. I hate to say it but most of our SO-CALLED representatives in DC don’t have the integrity, much less the courage to stand up for what’s right for us and our country. All most of them care about is themselves and continuing to live high-on-the hog at our expense. Very distressing.
Excellent.
Congress knows pretty much by now. Now we start demanding his removal. They can no longer pretend he is legit.
Along with RO- now is the time to address Congress together. Although the nation is overwhelmingly disappointed with barry soetero’s fraudulent election, the larger scope of silence from all the DC players indicts the whole. There are so many huge monetary issues that are going on with each Congressperson they won’t address the puppetmasters that orchestrated the election from the get-go. Right now accounts are being found at the Vatican bank that would embarrass many politicians including the liar-in-chief. Not just hearsay, wait until the next WikiLeaks comes roaring out.
Folks! You know what? I think this whole business about Obama should be considered a historical revelation and also an indictment on our government. First of all it is obvious that our elected officials are determined to play a childish game with the American People! They swear oath to serve and protect the U.S. Constitution and yet it is now known they don’t even know what the U.S. Constitution means. It is also now known that they don’t even care to know what the U.S. Constitution means! AMERICA WE HAVE A PROBLEM!
Quick. Go and make comments. The libtards are out big today. The Daily News is running an article on O’s eligibility:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2011/02/16/2011-02-16_majority_of_2012_republican_primary_voters_are_birthers_do_not_believe_obama_bor.html
Amen
adding clap clap clap because said comment” too short” !
Very good letter Paula. Be proud that you are standing on the right side of the issue. I have contacted Speaker Boehner a number of times recently,on this issue. There is a lot of complicity occurring these days in the Congress and the Courts. It may be boiling down to a time when our unanswered pleadings will force “We the People” to make some citizen’s arrests.It may be that time now. Obama IS a traitor and a fraud. This situation is a large blemish on America’s reputation and standing in the world. Many of our elected officials have flagrantly abrogated their oaths of office. It is evident that the U.S. Government is infested with law breakers and misprisioners of treason,making them traitors as well. It is apparent that the higher eschelons just do NOT care about Obama’s criminal activities. Obama must be arrested. His continued access to Presidential authority is the gravest of National Security risk. A risk that cannot be allowed to continue unabated. I am an old,disabled veteran. I can only hope to be able to continue writing about this issue. I wish I were stronger. I would lead a charge to arrest Obama,if I could. Obama has been officially and legally charged with criminal activity. I know this because I filed a criminal charge against Obama in March,2010 (See City of Tonawanda,NY Police Department Criminal Information of Robert C. Laity against Barack Obama,#10-002-896). These charges should be addressed by the proper authorities. I have been sending updates to the US Attorney for the District of Columbia,Ronald Machen for months. I have been reporting daily to dozens of News outlets,contacting Congressmen and Senators at the same rate. We “Birthers” are not
“Crazy” as Chris Matthews,Sheppard Smith,Bill O’Reilly and others would have people believe. However,Obama IS a Traitor.
Thanks Bob. I do see your posts all over the place!
This will also fall on “Deaf Ears”, the “Representatives???” of the American Citizens care NOT for Pleas or Requests from them, after all, the are in “The District of Criminals”, the Fantasy-World of all that is Corrupt! “WE the People” spoke in unity and purpose in Nov., only to have the “Best of the Rest”, display en mass, the “Yellow Stripe” of Cowardice, and openly violate the “Constitutional Oath” that they all Swore and Attested to! WE all know the words, and the meanings of those words, but as in Star Trek: “RESISTANCE IS FUTILE, YOU WILL BE ASSIMILATED!!” We are all being assimilated into the “Common Collective”, purposefully and deliberately “Transformed” into Powerless Servants of the Elite! Destined to Serve blindly their whims.
“The NEEDS of the Many, OUTWEIGH the NEEDS of the FEW, or the ONE!!”
Name ONE that will forfeit “HIS LIFE, Fortune or His SACRED HONOR”, for his Country!
They are, all 535 of them, GUILTY of TREASON and “IN Contempt of the Constitution!”
The “Let them Eat Cake” crowd is Alive and Well in “The District of Criminals!”
May the LORD, GOD Have Mercy on America!!
Most of the proponents of jus soli use the Wong Kim Ark court’s holding, (as opposed to the decision) based on Lord Coke in Calvin’s case, where they concluded that a child of an alien, visiting, temporarily is an English ‘natural born subject’ so therefore a US Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ is one who is born of an alien, as long as they are born in USA.
But if you read Calvin’s case, where Calvin was deemed a ‘natural born subject’ of England, you will find that Lord Coke actually said:
“Calvin the Plaintiff naturalized by PROCREATION and birth right”
“There is found in the law four kinds of ligeances: the first is, ligeantia naturalis, absoluta, pura, et indefinita,42 and this originally is due by NATURE and birthright, and is called alta ligeantia42a and he that oweth this is called subditus natus.”
This was NEVER mentioned in the WKA court.
A reading of Calvin’s case proves that sanguinis was ONE of the TWO essential elements to qualify a ‘natural born’.
Quite the opposite to what the WKA court held.
It proves an error in the holding WKA court and this error has festered and grown ever since.
Bottom-line is that sanguinis IS essential in English common law & not only soli for ‘natural born’.
The very legally educated framers with their very learned and comprehensive knowledge of English common law, must have seen this holding of sanguinis and soli in Coke’s report of Calvin’s case, and the principle of sanguinis and soli was applied in the USC Art. II for a US ‘natural born Citizen’.
Given the clear intention of the framers to protect and secure the office of POTUS from any foreign influence and claim, the TWO element qualification principle was a perfect fit.
Maybe a writ of error is in order to be filed with SCOTUS, particularly to correct the Indiana decision in Ankeny case and maybe to correct WKA holding (not decision).
Striking at the heart of the festered error, like the WKA case would be a step toward stripping back the error from its origins.
Here is the correct reasoning and legal outline that properly describes Article II “natural born Citizen”
1) The Constitution embodies only two jurisdictions from where authority is derived, a Natural Law jurisdiction and a Positive Law jurisdiction.
2) Article II “natural born Citizen” is a unique construct that is not defined in English Common law, or U.S. Positive Law, but is defined solely in Natural Law and just declared in the Positive Law at Article II in order to be protected. Article II “natural born Citizen” derives its authority solely from the Natural Law jurisdiction of the Constitution as meaning one who is born a native sovereign of the country. Sovereign political rights are Natural Rights that are inherited from males (father) under the Natural Law jurisdiction, because it is males who create the Positive Law (government) to secure the natural political rights and membership in the father’s society that is inherited. (Explained by Vattel and declared as a self-evident truth of Nature in the Declaration of Independence.) This is probably due to the natural fact that under the Natural Law jurisdiction, males are physically superior in strength and aggression and no female can physically prevent a father from securing the political rights and membership of his children into his society.
3) When it comes to citizenship and political rights, the jurisdiction of foreign soil or a foreign mother are only considered to be a Positive Law jurisdiction in contrast to that of the father’s Natural Law jurisdiction. The soil is obvious because soil is always a Positive Law jurisdiction. A foreign mother might seem to be a Natural Law jurisdiction that is equal to the father’s, but upon investigation you will see that this is not so. Whenever there is a foreign father, then the political rights and membership of the children in the mother’s society are in question, and must be adjudicated and secured solely by the Positive Law via statute. Any citizenship or political rights must be defined by statutory authority due to the competing superior Natural Law jurisdiction of the father. The father’s Natural Law jurisdiction is always considered to be the superior controlling jurisdiction and forces the mother to be under the Positive Law jurisdiction for describing or securing any political rights or membership in the mother’s society.
Since the Natural Law jurisdiction is superior to and controlling over that of the Positive Law jurisdiction, it makes no difference where you are born or the citizenship status of a foreign mother, as both jurisdictions will only be Positive Law jurisdictions that will define the citizenship rights or political rights which will not compete with the father’s pre-eminent Natural Law jurisdiction no matter whether the father is native or foreign. Therefore your place of birth or the status of your mother are irrelevant as long as you have a citizen father.
4) Loyalty and Allegiance considerations. Any loyalties or allegiances that are derived from foreign soil or a foreign mother at birth, are only statutory in nature due to the Positive Law jurisdictions that are controlling in such matters, and so they are not inherited loyalties or allegiances from a citizen father due to the Laws of Nature for the reasons outlined above. Therefore, it makes no difference whether one is born into the Positive Law with foreign loyalties and allegiances or if one develops foreign Positive Law loyalties and allegiances after birth through migrating to some other country. Both situations are easily remedied by the repatriation requirements of Article II, that requires one to be born a native citizen of the country which is secured solely by a citizen father under Natural Law jurisdiction (Vattel), and the 14 year residency requirement in Article II that causes one to sever any foreign loyalties or allegiances that are derived solely form the Positive Law jurisdiction and repatriate and reestablish the loyalties and allegiances of the native father, that one is born inheriting as a function of the Laws of Nature which is the Natural Law jurisdiction. Patriot is derived from the Greek/Latin “patros” meaning “father”, so to repatriate means to return to the land of your father and take up his loyalties and allegiances. This is what Article II requires and provides for.
5) The term “natural born citizen” that is defined under the 14th Amendment and by U.S. case law and Supreme Court decisions is only referring to “subject” status as in one who is “subject to the jurisdiction of” the Positive Law, and so it is only a Positive Law construct of a “legal right” or privilege, not a Natural Right; and any political rights that are derived from “natural born citizen” status are thus only legal political rights and not natural political rights. This term is defined and borrowed from English Common law as a citizen “subject” of the King/State whose authority is derived solely from the king’s/state’s soil jurisdiction that the king/state claims dominion over. This is solely a Positive Law jurisdiction, as the King/State is not the source of Natural Rights only Positive Law “legal rights”. This is what differs “natural born citizen” from “natural born Citizen” . The former is a function solely of Positive Law and is a privilege of soil only, where a citizen father is not even required, and the latter is a function solely of Natural Law where ONLY a citizen father is required and the soil is irrelevant. Article II is a unique construct that has nothing at all to do with Positive Law or English Common Law, but rather represents the break with England and the form of monarchy political system that caused an automatic involuntary allegiance to the King/State by being born under the king’s/state’s soil jurisdiction. Instead the construct “natural born Citizen” is defined solely under Natural Law to represent the Natural Sovereign authority that all People inherit and are entitled to, that was the purpose of the Declaration of Independence and the war of 1776 that secured the recognition of these natural sovereign political rights to be inherited from our fathers that the King had refused to recognize.
6) One can see that not only is there a big legal difference, as defined by the Constitution and by Supreme Court cases, between “natural born citizen” and “natural born Citizen”, as just outlined in 5 above, but also between “Citizen of the United States” and the 14th amendment “citizen of the United States”. The term “Citizen of the United States” is referring to a sovereign State Citizen. The term “citizen of the United States” is referring to a citizen “subject” of the State that is declared in the 14th amendment to be a citizen “subject” of the State jurisdiction, as in a ward of the State, and not a sovereign State Citizen who is not a “subject” of State jurisdiction without voluntary consent and who is not a ward of the State. Here is a link with Supreme Court references that helps to clarify this distinction: http://usa-the-republic.com/mark%20of%20beast/AppendixC.htm
As you can see, a correct understanding of the Natural Law jurisdiction and the Positive Law jurisdiction –both of which are well-defined in law to be opposite and “opposed” jurisdictions, with the Natural Law jurisdiction being superior– perfectly defines and describes Article II “natural born Citizen” as only requiring a citizen father who creates you, and your place of birth and the status of one’s mother are both irrelevant. One need only claim the natural political rights in order to be a sovereign representative of the sovereign citizens of the country and then repatriate for 14 years to sever any foreign allegiances or loyalties, in order to qualify under Article II for the Office of President.
Great letter, Paula! *clapping*