IS THIS JOURNALISM OR SLEAZE?
by Sharon Rondeau

Is Bill Bowman being paid by the Obama regime to attack those who want the U.S. Constitution upheld? Does The Examiner know what he is writing?
(Feb. 14, 2011) — The Post & Email has been made aware of an opinion piece by someone named Bill Bowman who writes for a publication named “The Examiner.” He apparently calls himself the “Birther Movement Examiner” and has written a series of articles on “the Birthers.” A full listing of his articles as presented by The Examiner is here.
Bowman’s article today refers to the editor of The Post & Email as a “hobby seditionist.” Bowman is reportedly “an award-winning journalist” and author of a book entitled Savage Lies: The Half-Truths, Distortions and Outright Lies of a Right Wing Blowhard which allegedly “fact checks the first three political books by radio commentator Michael Savage.”
As Mr. Bowman has never contacted The Post & Email via email, our office telephone number, nor by standard mail, he knows nothing about this writer or whether or not I write for The Post & Email as a “hobby.” In fact, his statement is completely inaccurate, because as editor I am paid for my work, rendering his term “hobby” completely false.
The Post & Email was founded by John Charlton in August 2009 to expose government corruption, particularly in light of the questionable eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President of the United States. No one, whether liberal, conservative, Republican, Democrat, Independent, nor Libertarian, should object to the exposure of corruption in government; not even Mr. Bowman, who states that he supports the U.S. Constitution.
The Post & Email also supports in their entirety the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and the U.S. Constitution. The First Amendment in the Bill of Rights deals with freedom of speech, of the press, and “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” That is the point behind exposing corruption in government: making it known to the public, contacting our elected officials about the corruption, petitioning them to correct it; and if they fail to do so, bringing them to account, which means voting them out, bringing them up on charges if indicated, and meting out fair punishment according to the provisions of the aforementioned founding documents.
In a previous article, Bowman stated, “Sharon Rondeau is a professional harpist and full-time America hater. As editor of the Web-based Post & Email, she has plenty of opportunity to display her anti-Americanism through her own writing and by publishing screeds written by other America haters.”
But what about Bowman’s “screeds” which are full of falsehoods? Is he not also availing himself of “plenty of opportunity” to express his own opinions without impunity?
The Post & Email has never exposed any individual’s personal information, whether or not he or she agrees with our viewpoint, to the public. We have never revealed IP addresses, occupations, first or last names, or places of residence, although we have this information on many of our political opponents. We do not pick fights with nor slander writers with opposing viewpoints. We believe there are more important things to do. Apparently Mr. Bowman does not employ the same high standards.
If Mr. Bowman is an award-winning author, why is he spending his time denigrating LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, Dr. Orly Taitz, Ron Ewart, Dr. Lyle Rapacki, this writer, or anyone else, for that matter? He fails to provide links to support the claims he makes, instead preferring to editorialize and ridicule people, complete with obscenities unpublishable at The Post & Email due to our editorial policy.
Bowman provides as one of his “preferred links” the website “Fogbow,” about which The Post & Email wrote several weeks ago after it came to light that Fogbow took the database of another like-minded website, Politijab, in violation of Politijab’s promise to its subscribers not to share personal information with a third party. If Bowman considers Fogbow a “preferred” site, then it is not surprising that he would employ the same questionable tactics.
It would seem that an “award-winning” author would at least be able to express another publication’s title correctly. We are not “the Post and Email;” but rather, “The Post & Email.” That is a detail that a good journalist should have gotten right, in this writer’s humble opinion.
Since Bowman states that he can be contacted through The Examiner despite the lack of an email address, The Post & Email has sent the following communication to The Examiner using the contact form on its site:
From: Sharon Rondeau
To: contactus@examiner.com
Date: Monday, February 14, 2011
Re: YOUR WRITER BILL BOWMAN – POSSIBLE LEGAL ACTION FOR DEFAMATION
I am the editor of The Post & Email, an electronic newspaper incorporated in the state of Wyoming.
Your writer Bill Bowman has named me as a “hobby seditionist,” and as the owner of a corporation, I plan on using the full force of law to refute his defamatory remarks in his column today here: http://www.examiner.com/birther-movement-in-national/orly-taitz-walt-fitzpatrick-and-the-post-and-email-axis-of-anti-americanism
I am demanding a retraction of the term “hobby seditioninst.” I believe in enforcing the provisions of the U.S. Constitution, which hardly makes me a seditionist.
If I do not receive a retraction from you or Mr. Bowman within the next 72 hours, I plan on consulting our corporate attorney about legal action against your publication.
From the lack of editorial ethics apparent in Mr. Bowman’s piece today, your publication appears to be nothing but drivel. Publishing personal information about anyone defies proper journalistic standards. The Post & Email has never given out personal information on anyone, whether or not the person agrees with the views expressed by our newspaper.
I will be awaiting your response.
Sharon Rondeau
Editor
The Post & Email, Inc.
www.thepostemaoil.com
We also left a message for The Examiner staff by telephone.
Opinions are not facts. Mr. Bowman is entitled to his opinion on any matter, but if he insists on labeling people “seditionist,” “crazy,” and “traitor” when they are not, then we will take action. The Post & Email supports Mr. Bowman’s right to free speech, but we will not tolerate speech directed against our staff or persons whose cases we have covered which is false or defamatory.
I am contacting our attorney in the morning.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Possibly Related Posts:
- » Okubo responds to public outcry for investigation
- » Atty. Orly Taitz to Represent Three Presidential Candidates in Challenging Obama's Eligibility
- » Orly Taitz Petitions District of Columbia Court
- » Fitzpatrick moved to smaller cell in Monroe County jail
- » Second Update: Exclusive: Orly Taitz Reports on New Hampshire Ballot Commission Hearing





Bill Bowman is a nobody. People write for the Examiner as a hobby. Talk about the ass-fault (sic) calling the tire, black.
The Examiner is nothing more than a blog that offers people an opportunity to be a community columnist. It is NO DIFFERENT than the Townhall.com or even Answers.Yahoo.com, or Ask.com.
The columnists are not chosen on the basis of their credentials, but GEOGRAPHY.
This guy is trying to be another David Weigel, but without the cred.
We’ve seen losers like him repeatedly on liberal blogs everywhere.
What I posted at this article….
Post and Email represents one of the last places where true investigative reporting is done.
The MSM has taken some internet images and declared all is well. Yet none has tried to to an interview with the supposed ‘reporters’ of the famous Fact Check ‘story’. Ms. Rondeau has attempted to do this. Ms. Rondeau has attempted to seek out facts and challenge government officials on their statements. No MSM reporters have come close to doing that – including you.
When reporters ask tough questions of people like Brian Schatz, leader of Hawaii Democratic Party, why he refused to certify Obama’s constitutional edibility maybe there will be confidence in the media.
The MSM has failed to do its fiduciary responsibility in being the watchdog of government. They have abdicated their responsibility in free society and left it to the new generation of watchdogs.
Asking tough questions in the search of the truth is not sedition – it is called reporting in a free society.
Continue reading on Examiner.com: Sharon Rondeau at the Post and Email haz a mad about me – National birther movement | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/birther-movement-in-national/sharon-rondeau-at-the-post-and-email-haz-a-mad-about-me#comment-14443971#ixzz1EAd5pGpB
I say don’t worry about it. I have never even seen his paper and I go to the big Barnes and Noble downtown that has everything. It even has other countrys newspapers but not his.
Since 2008 this has been my thoughts;
First, they ignore you [2008-2009]
Then, they insult you[ 2009-2011]
Then, they fight you[ 2010-2011]
Then, YOU WIN! [ 2012]
abdallah’s supporters have absolutely nothing in the law to support the Usurper and Impostor, so insults and four letter words is all they have.
Thanks Sharon for all you do and for your excellent researched articles.
ABDALLAH BORN A BRIT AND CAN NEVER BE LEGIT.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SoXxjK9yCQ
I recall have seen three desparate iterations of Obama’s Hawaii “Certification of Live Birth” posted on various pro-Obama web-sites as proof of his Hawaiian birth. The one shown in the video was the first iteration posted and did not have a raised seal on it as Anderson Cooper said it does. Yet another misrepresentation/lie.
I’ll avail myself of two comments on this page; after looking at The Examiner, my own opinion from a media perspective is that they don’t present a very professional appearance. It could be entirely original, but feels as though it was made from a template, in my opinion. This could explain a lot.
More to the point, is the lawsuit really worth it? I’d speak to a lawyer and see what your many DIFFERENT options are, including striking back in kind. Perhaps I shouldn’t give away the strategy here publicly, but if you can hit a nerve without leaving YOURSELF open to suit, that is, match him and do him one better without crossing a legal/civil suit line, he may start railing against you day and night. That could be a good thing, as it brings the P&E further to the surface on the internet and spreads your message while making you more successful. As Barnum used to say, “There’s no such thing as bad publicity.”
IMO, I think it’s clear that his extremely over-the-top attacks are what one would expect from what strikes me as – in MY opinion – a political hack and most fair-minded people will understand it for what it is. If he draws you into a courtroom crossfire, if he has big money in his back pocket and wants to make this a crusade, he could starve you to death on court costs. For all we know that may be the plan to put you out of business.
There is one thing of which many of us feel comfortable; conservatives have much thicker skins than liberals because we know the truth supports us. So getting into an editorial war with him might be the proper approach, since he struck first.
Maybe a nice, and truly fair editorial examining his journalistic roots and ‘awards’ might be in order, if the facts are fairly portrayed and work in your favor. As we know about Obama’s citizenship scandal, sometimes the truth is all you need. And then you’re opponent is beaten in the worst possible way: by the merciless judgment of reality.
All advice here considered by anyone is at an “at-your-own-risk” basis. I assume no responsibility. But figured I’d offer food for thought, just the same.
You’re doing God’s work, IMO, Sharon. This is a good site.
Mr. Bowman works for Rick Blair who has recently become the CEO for Clarity Digital Group. The Examiner.com is a division of this and both are fully owned by Phillip Anschutz, the billionaire from Denver, Colorado. Bowman is a glorified blogger who gets paid for volume. The Examiner.com is known for having little if any oversight or editing for their “bloggers” who plagiarize and piggyback on controversy. Bottom feeders, Sharon. Blair does have Anschutz’s capital behind him, though, so a lawsuit could be difficult. Check it out.