Spread the love

REMOVAL FOR INELIGIBILITY IS THE CORRECT ACTION

by Devvy Kidd, ©2010, NewswithViews

Devvy Kidd's columns can be read at her website, at NewswithViews.com, and now here!

(Dec. 18, 2010) — “It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime.” ~Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason

From the moment Obama/Soetoro was sworn into office, Americans galvanized into Impeach Obama Now! factions.

However, there is a problem here because two wrongs don’t make a right, which is why I have not supported any petitions calling for impeachment.

Despite the continued protestations by Obama/Soetoro supporters and professional liars in the dominant media, there is no question the usurper camped out in the White House was never eligible to run for president of these united States of America. All the huffing, puffing, vile name calling and protesting does not and cannot alter the legal fact that Obama/Soetoro was born with dual citizenship. It is his father’s citizenship status at the time Obama/Soetoro was born that clearly makes him ineligible to be president.

We’re all aware of the 40 or so lawsuits filed to expose Obama/Soetoro’s perfidy and the decisions rendered by cowardly federal judges using the cop out – “standing” – as their justification in tossing the lawsuits. We’re all aware that even though tens of thousands of Americans demanded the electoral college not certify the vote for the impostor on the ballot, they also proved to be gutless cowards or political hacks who value party loyalty over the U.S. Constitution. The final stop on the way to certifying an ineligible candidate was the U.S. Congress who sat on their cowardly backsides, January 9, 2009, knowing full well there were millions of Americans questioning the legitimacy of Obama/Soetoro’s eligibility. Yet, not a single member of Congress (and that includes Ron Paul) stood up on the floor and objected. There is an orderly procedure that could have been triggered had one member of the Outlaw Congress stood up.[1] Instead, they all stood down and here we are today with a constitutional crisis that is not going away.

As Obama/Soetoro clearly was never eligible to run for the presidency, once he “took” office, he legally became a usurper. That action is defined as: to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right: The pretender tried to usurp the throne.

Now, we either believe in the supreme law of the land or we pursue an alternative path that sets a horrible legal precedent. What do I mean by that? You cannot impeach a usurper. To do so (even if the House were to file charges) would be to give legitimacy to Obama/Soetoro holding the office of president. That already happened once in our history with Chester Arthur. We cannot allow it to happen again no matter how frustrated and enraged we are about the actions of that empty suit sullying the people’s house. To give legitimacy to his presidency would cement all the bills he signed into law as if they were valid under the U.S. Constitution.

We also have to look at reality. Nutty Nancy Pelosi made it quite clear when the Democrats took control of the Outlaw Congress there would be no impeachment against George Bush, Jr. He was worth far more political currency to the morally and ethically bankrupt Democratic Party than removing him. The Republican Party is expected to gain more than enough seats in the house in the upcoming election. Congressman Darrell Issa [R-CA] has made it clear there will be no impeachment proceeding:

Issa: ‘Not a chance’ of Obama impeachment under GOP House
October 22, 2010

“If Republicans take control of the House, there is “not a chance at this point” that they will try to impeach President Obama, a top Republican lawmaker said this week. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who would helm the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if the GOP wins on Election Day, said that his party will not try to bring impeachment charges simply because it disagrees with the president….Look, disagreeing with the president — the president using his authority, maybe even misusing it — that’s not what impeachment’s for,” he added. “Do we have disagreements? Yes. Do we want to see that the president strictly adheres to process? Yes.”

I’m not going to rehash all the unconstitutional bills Obama/Soetoro has signed since he was unlawfully sworn into office. One should remember the only way a bill gets to a president’s desk is from the Outlaw Congress. That’s where the treachery begins. Having said that, without question, the entire nation is shuddering under the weight of Obama/Soetoro’s communitarian beliefs and actions. Everyday is a new attack on freedom and liberty spear headed by the usurper.

As I have said for quite some time, I firmly believe there is no way Obama/Soetoro will run in 2012. Certainly, continuing to raise the specter of another Obama/Soetoro term is good for ratings on Hannity, O’Reilly and conservative talk radio. It’s also a good theme for dangerous, vile individuals like Newt Gingrich to raise money for their political organizations.

However, Obama/Soetoro’s handlers (the shadow government) got away with fraud the first time around, they know it won’t happen a second time. There’s no way Obama/Soetoro can get ballot qualified in 2012 in a single state. Nancy Pelosi and others pulled off fraud with their candidate declarations to the 50 states of the Union in 2008, but they won’t get away with it a second time. Pelosi and her gang of coconspirators should also be indicted by a federal grand jury. Don’t think it can’t happen. There are many very smart, dedicated individuals working to see all who participated in putting Obama/Soetoro on states ballots are brought to justice.

How this will all play out, I don’t know. Obama/Soetoro has admitted to cocaine use; Larry Sinclair has accused him of being a user as late as 1999. Wayne Madsen recently penned a piece outlining how there is a crisis underway in the White House:

Wayne Madsen: White House in Crisis

Section 4 of the 25th Amendment likely to be invoked; Obama being shipped out!

“Washington has not witnessed so much top level White House intrigue since October 20, 1973, when a Saturday night saw President Nixon fire the Watergate independent counsel, the U.S. attorney general, and the deputy attorney general in the “Saturday Night Massacre.” Just ten days earlier, Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned after being charged with accepting bribes while governor of Maryland.

“In the case of President Obama, the senior firings are not happening during a single night but the recent involuntary sudden departures of the White House chief of staff and national security adviser, along with what WMR can confirm from multiple sources is a president who is suffering from Nixonian levels of paranoia, depression, and schizophrenia, has some top-level administration officials considering the first-ever invocation of Section 4 of the 25th Amendment — the involuntary removal of the president from office. The White House meltdown has the Washington political circuit buzzing under the surface.

“Unlike Watergate and the Iran-contra scandal, however, the corporate media is refusing to report on the breakdown of the Obama administration and the internecine political warfare within the Executive Office of the President.”

Madsen is a serious investigative journalist with excellent sources. The usurper has had the citizenship issue hanging over his head since mid-2007. He and Militant Michelle have been partying in their White House digs like there’s no tomorrow. Whenever there’s some heat, Obama/Soetoro hops on his favorite toy, Air Force One, and either goes on another vacation, visiting foreign countries or is out campaigning for his party. Anything to duck sitting around looking incompetent. I believe the fake First Couple know they are a one trick fraud and are living it up while they have the American taxpayers’ open checkbook at their disposal. Many pundits continue to remark how detached Obama/Soetoro seems and not really “into” the task of being president. I believe this reflects knowing he won’t be around for a second term. He does what he’s told and while living it up in style.

Should the usurper remain in office, there is no way he will get the nod at the Democratic National Convention. Take money to the bank on that. It won’t happen. There’s no way to salvage that shipwreck. Obama/Soetoro’s handlers might try to keep him in office as long as possible – if to do nothing more than checkmate any legislation coming out of the “new” Congress in January 2011. You see, if the usurper’s handlers throw him under the bus early, next in line is Joseph Biden, who I believe is in the early stages of dementia. Not a good choice for the global cabal running Washington, DC. But, let’s put that aside for the moment.

Is there any possibility that Obama/Soetoro can still be removed from office? Yes. There is still one case, Kerchner v Obama, which I have followed from the beginning. The wind has shifted direction since Leo Donofrio’s first case was discussed at the Supreme Court level in December 2008. Mario Apuzzo, attorney for Kerchner, et al, is a real warrior and has fought for his clients in the aforementioned case. It has now gone to the next step:

“Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 30 Sep 2010 and docketed 04 Oct 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court – Washington Times National Weekly edition – 18 & 11 Oct 2010 issues, page 5. U.S. Supreme Court Docket Number: 10-446. Response from defendants due to the U.S. Supreme Court by 3 Nov 2010.”

Let me shift gears for a moment. There’s an old saying: Timing in life is everything. HalfPastHuman is a web site that deals in predictive linguistics. Cliff has been pinpointing Nov 8 – 12 as a tipping point for events which could (I stress could) turn this country upside down. I’ve followed George Ure, Cliff, Bob Chapman and Gerald Celente for a long time. Quite frankly, it’s scary how accurate their predictions are in real time. Let’s look a few dates here to see what has my attention:

Nov 2 — National elections

Nov 3 — Federal Reserve Chairman, Helicopter Ben Bernanke, is expected to announce a new round of printing tons of worthless fiat currency which will, on cue, make the situation worse as far as the economy is concerned.

Nov 4 — Usurper, Obama/Soetoro leaves for India and other exotic locations. The original departure date was Nov 7, 2010. He is scheduled to return on Nov. 14th. An unusually long trip outside the U.S. for a president. Regardless of any “official” explanation as to why his departure date was moved up, I find it suspicious – as well as the length of time he is to be out of country.

Nov 11 – 12 — Next meeting of the G-20 group. Those geniuses are going to try to figure out how to reverse decades of unrestrained, irresponsible fiscal policies. Too late.

This year elections may not be decided by five minutes after the polls close. We know electronic ballot fraud as well as scanners and human fraud will play a huge factor, again. I am hopeful that candidates who allegedly lose — either by a landslide or close margin – will challenge the vote. Having the outcome of some races (especially the senate) drag on for weeks or even months will have more negative impact for our country. Recall the circus over the 2008 election between incumbent Norm Coleman [R-MN] and a vulgar, completely unqualified candidate, Al Franken. That recount lasted 238 days – roughly seven months. It could happen in less than ten days in a half dozen senate races. Fair election results must trump expediency — even if it means a joke like Franken gets into office. There’s that Seventeenth Amendment argument again…..

So….

The banking cartel is on the ropes with their money racket teetering on the brink, and with Foreclosure Gate now in full exposure, the problem is compounded by a factor of a few billion.

The usurper is beating it out of the country three days earlier than originally scheduled and is staying out of the country for a lengthy time.

One of the most important elections in our history is nine days away.

The international banking boys are going to meet in an effort to see which end of the Titanic they should stand on before half the world goes down in economic flames.

All these events clustered in a short period of time; Nov 2 – 12th. Just some food for thought.

Going back to the original theme of this column, besides impeachment, is there any other way to remove Obama/Soetoro? Yes, and it could have and should have been done more than a year ago. But, the requirements to qualify for under a Quo Warranto are stringent. Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon, both brilliant attorneys who have been involved in citizenship cases in the past, now represent roughly 82 Chrysler dealers in bankruptcy proceedings. The history is on Leo’s web site. It does require some reading time if you haven’t been able to keep up with it all. Leo and Stephen’s first obligation to their clients is the bankruptcy lawsuit, but that does not rule out a Quo Warranto which could happen before 2012. [2]

The Quo Warranto statute was specifically written to remove a usurper from office and that without question is Barack Hussein Obama. I know time is an issue for everyone as our beloved republic is under attack 24/7 by those who wish to destroy these united States of America. If you desire to fully understand the entire history behind natural born citizen, the Fourteenth Amendment as it relates to the usurper and quo warranto, I put it all together in one master file here. If you can’t read it all at one time, book mark the link and get back to it because it is critical in understanding the fraud perpetrated by Obama/Soetoro and his coconspirators.

Does this mean Barack Hussein Obama/Soetoro should get away with his crimes even if he stays until the 2012 election? Absolutely not. He has always known, as well as others, that he was ineligible to run for the presidency because of his dual citizenship. In my mind, there is no question the usurper is guilty under 18 U.S.C. §1343: wire fraud. Obama/Soetoro knowingly solicited campaign funds electronically (TV, radio, Internet) knowing full well his citizenship status made him ineligible. More than $600 million bux poured in and despite enough paper evidence to warrant a full investigation by the FEC regarding foreign contributions, they refuse. However, before the statute of limitations runs, the Department of Justice could indict Obama/Soetoro, and if convicted, he would spend decades in prison where he belongs.

I didn’t fall off the turnip truck yesterday and I’m not naive. At some point, all these holes in the dam will burst and the long arm of the law will go after Obama, just the same as justice should be done in bringing Bush to trial over his lying regarding the illegal invasion of Iraq; which is not a dead issue and that’s all I can say about it at this time.

Why are so many talented, decent Americans continuing the Herculean efforts to bring Bush and Obama/Soetoro to justice in a court of law? Because it is the right thing to do for our country. Every time we the people allow lawbreakers (like Marxist duo, Bill and Hillary) to get away with their crimes, the further our country slips into the muck of a banana republic. We cannot and must not allow that to happen.

As badly as we all want the usurper removed from the White House, it will not happen via impeachment. That comes out of the mouth of a powerful Republican who will, barring some disaster or major vote fraud, return to Washington in January. We cannot allow our rage and frustration to set another horrible legal precedent: you cannot impeach someone who has never legally held office. Usurper means that individual never occupied the office. We must stick to the correct legal remedy.

Right now we need to concentrate our efforts on winning the major fights underway, i.e., getting ALL of the unconstitutional ObamaCare repealed; some provisions are also in the stimulus bill that was signed into law and those must also be repealed and stopped. I would also like to stress how critically important it is to boot out all state reps and state senators who refuse to uphold the U.S. Constitution, who have destroyed their state economies with their foolish legislation and their refusal to take the necessary steps to secure your state from financial disaster; see link below. Get prepared because the worst is about to slam this nation. The elections on November 2, 2010, will not bring some magic bullet relief. It’s a long, hard road ahead.

Footnotes:

1- In the Shadow of Nemisis
2- Former Chrysler dealers fight back using the Quo Warranto

————————

Editor’s Note: While many of the dates and events mentioned in Ms. Kidd’s article are now behind us, it was her desire to remind the American people that impeachment does not apply to Obama because he was never eligible to run for nor occupy the office of President in the first place.

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

36 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4Freedom
Monday, December 20, 2010 5:22 PM

It takes 67 votes in the US Senate to convict a federal official and remove him/her from office. There are currently 47 Republicans in the Senate counting RINOs and moderates. Where are the other 20 votes going to come from, Democrats?

Monday, December 20, 2010 4:32 PM

I contend that impeachment would also validate his crime. He is a fraud, his story is a myth and he has no right to the legal treatment that would be given to a legitimate president.

Vic Hern
Monday, December 20, 2010 12:54 PM

Send emails and notes to all in government, to please give me/us your definition of Natural Born Citizen, keeping in mind to NOT confuse Natural Born with Native Born. Native born could easily mean born here……….with either parent a foreign citizen. Natural Born means born here and BOTH parents are CITIZENS,i.e. no foreign government (nor parent) may lay claim to your citizenship status, especially in times of peril, war or any range of disputes.

I like what A Pen states, and to paraphrase, OBAMA AND HIS PLAYERS DON’T GET TO DISAGREE WITH THE CONSTITUTION.

dennis
Monday, December 20, 2010 12:23 PM

what you fail to see is the ten squared miles of washington dc stood steadfast behind their ceo corporate gold FRINGED flag…. you have no standing according to the 14th amendment article 3… article 4… theRE lies ANSWERS’ LIKE’ …..the acts.. the treaties.. the executive orders….all are there standing up the ‘ foreign’ FEDRAL RESERVE ACT…. nothing but smoke and mirrors.. fiats……and ‘ MERS’

stand up and fight
Monday, December 20, 2010 12:02 PM

Everyone should now put all their effort into making sure Obama does not get re-elected in 2012.

Stock
Monday, December 20, 2010 8:26 AM

First, tell Issa that we are going to start a movement to impeach him for misprison of Treason-he is on notice. Second start radio ads-simple 30 seconds in a Did you know format-that a natural born citizen is required. That SR511 stated…. That Bho admits…..
That our government in the eyes of the world is illegitimate and a joke…..and we endanger the lives of soldiers and the nation each day that more illegal acts take place in our name.

Robert Laity
Monday, December 20, 2010 5:02 AM

A couple of points:

1. We don’t have “Throne[s}” in the USA.
2. At the precise moment that Cheney was reequired by law to ask for Objections to the electoral college tally,Nacy Pelosi broke out in raucus applaud. This either distracted Cheney or Cheney was in on the ruse. He never ASKED the required question “Are there any objections?”

Robert Laity
Reply to  Robert Laity
Monday, December 20, 2010 5:15 AM

Corrected link to Electoral College Tally:

Robert Laity
Monday, December 20, 2010 3:54 AM

Devvy, Impeachment is reserved for “Real” Presidents. The provisions of the Impeachment process are such that Obama could be retained by a vote of 67 Senators not to convict. We would then,still have a usurper in office. In the case of a bona-fides POTUS a majority 2/3s vote to retain would be due process. In the case of retention of a criminal who never was POTUS to begin with,that would be unconstitutional on it’s face.

The proper course is upon sufficient evidence (Presentments have already been served)
to show that there is reasonable belief that Obama has usurped the Presidency,Obama
should be ARRESTED and tried in the US District Court for the US District Court District of DC. The US Attorney in that District is Ronald Machen. I have provided him with extensive exhibits regarding Obama. He has ignored proferred evidence and request for an INJUNCTION against Obama from running in 2012 because of legal encumbrances that must,in the interest of National Security,be addressed.

Bob Porrazzo
Sunday, December 19, 2010 10:15 PM

You might want to see this…

Robert Laity
Reply to  Bob Porrazzo
Monday, December 20, 2010 3:59 AM

Obama is a Radical “Muslim” Supremacist and Traitor to the US:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUaGe63Aqv4
See 18USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,Sec.2381

What he did in Kenya constitutes TREASON. The Law I cited prohibits him from holding “ANY office under the US”. Obama can’t even be a Federal employee.

Tom the veteran
Sunday, December 19, 2010 1:24 PM

I have already sent letters to my Congressmen demanding that they now honor the oaths they took, or will take in the new congress, to defend the Constitution and demand a congressional investigation into the kangaroo court martial of Terry Lakin.

When Americans can no longer produce the evidence that will prove their innocence in a court of law, then we are no longer America!

I anxiously await the response from my Congressmen, but I won’t hold my breath!

Can it get any worse?

For God and Country!

Robert Laity
Reply to  Tom the veteran
Monday, December 20, 2010 4:03 AM

Tom, The DOD Inspector General has a hotline which I utilized today. It is a Whistleblower Retaliation site regarding the Military Whistleblower Retaliation Act. I filed a formal complaint/request for investigation in behalf of both Walt Fitzpatrick, Lt. Easterling and Terry Lakin, et al.

hotline@dodig.mil

Harry H
Sunday, December 19, 2010 1:12 PM

Obama is not prez because he is not what the Constitution says he must be. Therefore, he is only a prez-elect and can be removed per the 20th Amendment if Congress will simply declare that he is unqualified and then name an acting president.

Robert Laity
Reply to  Harry H
Monday, December 20, 2010 4:08 AM

Disqualified persons cannot be legally elected. Obama is not even a “Prez-elect”. Obama can be arrested as a common criminal by any law-abiding lawenforcement official with arrest authority in DC after obtaining an arrest warrant from a law-abiding Judge.

Harry H
Reply to  Robert Laity
Monday, December 20, 2010 12:39 PM

The election of 2008 happened. It was fraudulent, yes, but the 20th Amendment was clearly intended to deal with an unqualified president-elect. Read it.

Mia
Sunday, December 19, 2010 1:04 PM

The “Velvet Revolution” from Radio Prague (http://archiv.radio.cz/history/history15.html):

“… But by 1988 there were organized demonstrations demanding change – and just about one month after the fall of the Berlin Wall, communism in Czechoslovakia became a casualty as well.

The six-week period between November 17 and December 29, 1989, also known as the “Velvet Revolution” brought about the bloodless overthrow of the Czechoslovak communist regime.”

No need for violence, just refuse to play their game. But it will require effort and sacrifice on our parts. They’ve stacked the deck well. Obama and the ptb don’t think we have it in us. I think we do. I pray we do, because I believe with all my heart and soul that We The People are the only hope not just for this country… If the USA falls, the whole world falls.

Peaceful, lawful, non-violent civil disobedience. Well planned, strategic, national strikes, boycotts and protests that will cripple the system and make business-as-usual impossible until they redress our grievances, beginning with this illegitimate presidency and every fraudulent piece of legislation rammed thru and signed the last two years.
——————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Mr. Charlton had suggested an “Orange Revolution” here: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/16/americans-must-defend-america-as-no-one-else-is-left-to-do-it/

Mia
Reply to  Mia
Sunday, December 19, 2010 1:43 PM

Thank you — another perfect example!

From “OrangeUkraine”:

“The Orange Revolution was a movement of Ukrainian citizens that began on election day Sunday, November 21, 2004. The protest was against disreputable campaign tactics and election fraud by the administration presidential candidate. The “orange” in the title comes from the orange that was Yushchenko campaign color.

“The election day rally of many thousands of supporters grew in the following days to a rally of hundreds of thousands, with some people camping out along the central street in the city.”

And from Mr. Charlton’s article:

“However, I am convinced that no violence, let alone lethal, need be employed. An Orange Revolution is sufficient. The time for words, litigation, and political action has run out. We the People need to set a date and march on Washington, D.C. with arms and take back the government.

“Such an action must include the arrest, trial and conviction of all conspirators in the usurpation, both in the White House, in Congress, and in the Courts. It also must mean the confiscation of the property of all who supported the usurpation, both that of the Democratic Party and of the corporations, law firms, unions and private citizens who financially supported the takeover of the government. They are alone responsible for the trillions of national debt Obama has added to the Treasury; it is only right that their assets be seized to pay it back.

“Americans must defend America in this, her darkest hour, because no one else is left do to it.

“If America is still the home of the free AND the land of the brave, She will survive this hour. If not, the Republic has fallen.

“And bravery does not consist of words; it consists of deeds of valiant actions. And it is the brave, whose posterity will inherit the nation.”

(Exactly.)

AuntieMadder
Sunday, December 19, 2010 11:56 AM

“To give legitimacy to his presidency would cement all the bills he signed into law as if they were valid under the U.S. Constitution. ”

Not infinitely. His ineligibility could be determined after he’d been impeached and that would nullify all the bills he signed.

AuntieMadder
Reply to  AuntieMadder
Sunday, December 19, 2010 12:04 PM

“Right now we need to concentrate our efforts on winning the major fights underway, i.e., getting ALL of the unconstitutional ObamaCare repealed; some provisions are also in the stimulus bill that was signed into law and those must also be repealed and stopped. I would also like to stress how critically important it is to boot out all state reps and state senators who refuse to uphold the U.S. Constitution, who have destroyed their state economies with their foolish legislation and their refusal to take the necessary steps to secure your state from financial disaster; see link below. Get prepared because the worst is about to slam this nation. The elections on November 2, 2010, will not bring some magic bullet relief. It’s a long, hard road ahead.”

Most of us are good at multi-tasking and can do the things you list and contribute in ousting the usurper. It’s not either-or.

PS: Who is this Devvy Kidd person? Her article here reads like something written by an Obot/operative whose objective is to help keep Prezdint Jack*** in the White House for at least one full term.
—————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: I can definitely tell you she’s not an Obot. Go to NewswithViews and read some of her columns from 2008. She was one of the first writers to diligently expose Obama’s fraud and ineligibility.

Robert Laity
Reply to  AuntieMadder
Monday, December 20, 2010 4:27 AM

Auntie, The number ONE Priority is to get Obama OUT. His power must be STRIPPED and should have already been. The time is late. Repealing laws that he has signed are not as pressing. Obama must be curtailed from further damaging the US.

Robert Laity
Reply to  AuntieMadder
Monday, December 20, 2010 4:24 AM

Obama’s father was a foreigner. Obama is disqualified.
Obama is a Traitor. Obama is prohibited from holding office.
Only bona-fides Presidents can be Impeached.
Obama can be arrested. Non-Judicial Presentments,provide for in the fifth amendment have been served. The fifth amendment grants two alternatives for holding a person to answer for a crime. those are “on a presentment OR indictment of a Grand Jury”. In 1946 errant rulemakers claimed that the “Presentment” was “obsolete” and changed the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to do away with the “presentment”. Insofar as a Constitutional amendment has never repealed the “Presentment” they are still the law of the land:
http://americangrandjury.org/public/

See also Miranda v. Arizona:
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved,there can be NO RULEMAKING or legislation which would abrogate them”

A pen
Sunday, December 19, 2010 11:44 AM

As for WHAT Rep Issa said, said “that his party will not try to bring impeachment charges simply because it disagrees with the president” it is not an issue. It isn’t about disagreeing with the president, it is about upholding the constitution. The president doen’t get to disagree with that and neither does congress or the judiciary. Congress can ask the court for clarification of “natural born citizenship” and it must as redress requires they answer for the Jack Maskell memo which has opened the door for review of legal advice congress acted upon which the very form of is a disingenuous cover for a decision obviously already made in secret.

No criminal can remain in office when the crime was taking that office. That isn’t impeachment, that is called enforcement. Following that there can and should be a criminal trial.

The issue of the legality of laws signed can be addressed quite simply by having any challenge of those laws begin with a quo warranto process until each can be legally overturned while giving the new congress ample time to reconsider them or not. Most will fall within a very short time and not even be retaken by a house not under duress.

Robert Laity
Reply to  A pen
Monday, December 20, 2010 4:30 AM

Issa is wrong in even referring to Obama as the “President”. Obama has never been POTUS.

Larry M. Meyer
Sunday, December 19, 2010 11:23 AM

“YADA, YADA, YADA!! “WE the People” have known this “FACT” for over two years-tell me something I DON’T Know!!
Since PIGlosi and her band of Ingrates FALSIFIED the “Nomination Document” Before the “ANOINTMENT” of the “USURPER” all but the 40%+/- of the “KOOL-AIDE DRUNKS” were Aware!! Congress is Complicit in this Crime, they have ALL Violated their Swearing and Affirmation to “The Constitutional Oath” Violated “The Public Trust”, disregarded that Fiduciary Bonding, and should be Sued in Civil Court for these Violations so as to “Hit ‘EM Where it Hurts, In their Cash-Flows!!”
But wish in One Hand, and **** in the Other applies here!! Then add-in the Corrupt Judiciary, including SCOTUS, and the Military Chain-of-Command, re: Lakin, Kerchner, Fitzpatrick, and 421+ Lawsuits and there seems to be a Picture here~~SO, Patriots, Seems it is time to ????????

Robert Laity
Reply to  Larry M. Meyer
Monday, December 20, 2010 4:31 AM

“????” Translation= Take back our Country.

A pen
Sunday, December 19, 2010 11:04 AM

15 days to the new congress. Granting them another two weeks to formally receive input on direction, two more to respond and begin redress is fair. Beyond that there is ample legal ground to establish a defense of the constitution by force. Federalist 28 explains it, the Declaration of Independence is the precedent and the public, being the final and only true power in this government, has the right to hold a convention to declare the legitimacy of it’s actions and decisions to follow. CC2009 laid the foundation, the first course of actions were civil and rejected out of hand. Do we need a CC2011 or shall we simply proceed with enacting “operation clean sweep” ? http://standupamericaus.com/operation-clean-sweep:37371

Chime in and spread the word. Time is of the essence.

Mia
Sunday, December 19, 2010 9:26 AM

There is another option: Us. We The People. A peasants rebellion. A Velvet Revolution American Style. Civil disobedience. National sick-out day.

It’s like I used to tell my son (when he was a teenage punk), I brought you into this world and I can take you right back out again. Well… We The People fuel this machine… We The People can take it down.

We’ve exhausted all legal recourse — and been denied again and again. We’ve voted at the polls, and watched voter fraud dilute our will. We’ve called and written our congress critters ad nauseum. If we want to get the job done, we need to step up our game. Are we up to it? Are We The People willing to make the sacrifice? Are we men or are we mice? (Figuratively speaking, of course.)

Let’s exhaust all peaceful, non-violent, legal means before even considering armed rebellion, which will only put our families thru living hell.

Paul
Reply to  Mia
Sunday, December 19, 2010 6:59 PM

Like the tax day thing? That would suck for the feds if millions of people didn’t pay their taxes right away…..

One Pissed off Vietnam Veteran
Sunday, December 19, 2010 6:38 AM

“When peaceful revolution becomes impossible then violent revolution becomes inevitable” JFK

This, my friend, is where we are at. The terrorists (the WH, Congress, SCOTUS, many State Supreme Courts, MSM and the Joint Chief of Staff) have taken their first prisoner, LTC Lakin, and have another sitting in jail in TN (Walter Fitzpatrick). We all know that we cannot negotiate with terrorists. Their time is running out as the frustration level of all of us law-abiding citizens increases.

They may be partying now, but the price they are going to pay will be much greater than LTC Lakin is paying now.

Ed1974
Sunday, December 19, 2010 2:06 AM

I generally agree with NUTN2SAY above. Nothing is going to happen. The Quo Warrento, if that is viable , would have happened. Someone has to make it happen. Someone has to care.. It won’t happen, no one cares.

All these fancy lawyers are all blowhards, talk only. If I were a few years younger and had the time, I would make it happen. But, nope, won’t happen.

Robert Laity
Reply to  Ed1974
Monday, December 20, 2010 4:39 AM

Not “blowhards”. They are doing something.Some others are just interested in TV Reality shows or Bars.

NUTN2SAY
Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:39 PM

Let’s all face it! It’s been over two years now. Nobody in America truly and really cares if the U.S. Constitution has been officially discarded and that Obama is a White House usurper. If they did this matter would be national news by now and it isn’t! WE THE SHEEPLE have succumbed to the enemy and prefer slavery over freedom because it’s just easier that way! LONG LIVE TYRANNY IN AMERICA! IT’S THE ONLY WAY TO GO!

Robert Laity
Reply to  NUTN2SAY
Monday, December 20, 2010 4:44 AM

Stop saying “Nobody…truly…cares”. I Care. Go to Topix and read some of my 24,000 comments about Obama since November,2008. Ms. Rondeau ‘cares”. Lt. Col. Lakin “cares”. Millions of Americans care. There is a plethora of documentation of the immense efforts being undertaken,by many people in an effort to preserve our republic.

Obama WON’T win.

Paul
Saturday, December 18, 2010 9:13 PM

In all their efforts to avoid a major domestic civil disruption concerning the removal of an ineligible person from the office of the presidency of the united states, they, like many before them in history, are actually creating the circumstances for such a disaster.

There can be NO global government with a strong America.

Robert Laity
Reply to  Paul
Monday, December 20, 2010 4:48 AM

Obama is an advocate of the “new World Order” as well as “Dar-el-Saalam”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CV8Xt2VWvc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUaGe63Aqv4
http://www.nmatv.com/video/618/What-islam-Is-Not/
18USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,Sec.2381