Washington Times – Kerchner v. Obama & Congress et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari

SCHEDULED FOR CONFERENCE ON 23 NOVEMBER 2010 WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT

A Message from CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)

This advertisement will run in Monday morning's Washington Times National Weekly

(Nov. 21, 2010) — We are living through history in the making. Please read or re-read this historic Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court asking them to support and defend the Constitution…in particular Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, the presidential constitutional eligibility clause. Read or re-read the Petition then read this ad. Then meditate on the words in both and then pray that the Justices do the right thing on Tuesday and support and defend our Constitution and Republic and grant Certiorari and take up our case and seek the truth about Mr. Obama the usurper, impostor, and fraud now occupying the Oval Office. Mr. Obama and his puppet masters and his enablers in political power and in the main stream media have perpetrated and allowed to continue the greatest fraud on this nation in the history of our Republic and he needs to be exposed and removed. See the ad linked to below and via the image at the left for an overview of the Petition and the issues.

Washington Times — Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari Scheduled for Conference on 23 Nov 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court – Washington Times National Weekly edition – 22 Nov 2010 issue, page 5: http://www.scribd.com/doc/43541103/Kerchner-v-Obama-Petition-Scheduled-for-Conference-at-Supreme-Court-on-Tues-Nov-23-2010-WTNW-pg-5

QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT:
PETITION 10-446

1. Whether petitioners sufficiently articulated a case or controversy against respondents which gives them Article III standing to make their Fifth Amendment due process and equal protection claims against them.

2. Whether putative President Obama can be an Article II “natural born Citizen” if he was born in the United States to a United States citizen mother and a non-United States citizen British father and under the British Nationality Act 1948 he was born a British citizen.

3. Whether putative President Obama and Congress violated petitioners’ Fifth Amendment due process rights to life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property and Ninth Amendment rights by Congress failing to assure them pursuant to the Twentieth Amendment that Obama qualified as an Article II “natural born Citizen” before confirming his electoral votes and by Obama refusing to conclusively prove that he is a “natural born Citizen.”

4. Whether Congress violated petitioners’ rights under the Fifth Amendment to equal protection of their life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property by investigating and confirming the “natural born Citizen” status of presidential candidate, John McCain, but not that of presidential candidate, Barack Obama.

————————————————————————————–

Comments by CDR Kerchner (Ret):

Obama is not Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards. Obama’s father was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama’s father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama’s father was a foreign national, a British Subject. Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama’s maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.

History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example. After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected.

http://history.nd.gov/exhibits/governors/governors19.html

Also, two U.S. Senators although popularly elected and sworn in to the U.S. Senate were subsequently removed from office after it was learned that they were NOT constitutionally eligible when they were elected.

Albert Gallatin [U.S. Senator constitutionally ineligible and his seating unconstitutional and election & seating annulled]:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gallatin

James Shields [U.S. Senator constitutionally ineligible and his seating unconstitutional and election & seating annulled]:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Shields

Thus it is very clear that winning a popular election does not trump or nullify the constitution of a state or the U.S. federal constitution. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of the military and should be removed from office and his election, confirmation, and swearing in annulled.

Again, please take the time to read or re-read the Petition then read this ad. The questions and the main brief are only 36 succinctly written and easy to read pages. Then meditate on the words therein and then pray that the Justices do the right thing on Tuesday and support and defend our Constitution and Republic and grant Certiorari and take up our case and seek the truth about Mr. Obama the usurper, impostor, and fraud now occupying the Oval Office. Mr. Obama and his puppet masters and his enablers in political power and in the main stream media have perpetrated and allowed to continue the greatest fraud on this nation in the history of our Republic and he needs to be exposed and removed. May God help us, save us, and protect us in the days ahead.

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, visit this site and help the cause:
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com

Print Friendly

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: Editorials

17 Responses to Washington Times – Kerchner v. Obama & Congress et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari

  1. BobH

    Monday, November 29, 2010 at 10:15 AM

    10-446
    KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
    The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to
    file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a
    writ of certiorari is denied.

  2. FTroopChief

    Saturday, November 27, 2010 at 5:35 PM

    Beyond being a controlled election, uncontrolled millions in funds, Obama was not vetted, were the GOP complicit in this illicit election?
    How did Obama travel to Pakistan? Is he more powerful than Jane Fonda.
    Who is securing his school financial data? Where did the tuition come from?
    In his association wth Ailes and others, how close was Obama to the Communist Party? How llegal was his backng of the election in Africa? What did Obama discuss with the SCOTUS just before the electon?

  3. Daniel Cutulla

    Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 5:03 AM

    Neither. Its blog says:

    “On Monday at 10 a.m., the Court will release orders on cases considered at today’s private Conference.”

    So the Monday release applies to all cases considered yesterday, not just specific cases.

  4. Texoma

    Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 1:09 AM

    I find it interesting that he made this comment today — the same day that the Kerchner case went to conference at the Supreme Court. Rush is #1 in talk radio. If other talk show hosts follow his lead and make similar statements, then that could mean something. And if not, it would at least be very refreshing.

  5. Bob1943

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 11:35 PM

    Yep, Beck, O’Reilly, Hannity and the other Fox talking heads are worse than useless on the issue of Obama’s ineligiblility. I have to assume they have been told in no uncertain terms never to mention it unless it is in a mocking or ridiculing matter.

    O’Reilly especially, claims he saw Obama’s actual birth certificate. I suppose he means the phoney on-line COLB, cause I am certain he has never seen the long-form Hawaii birth certificate that Obama does not possess.

    Going to be fun to watch them all backtrack and eat crow when the truth is revealed to everyone.

  6. Checkmate

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 10:45 PM

    As I understand it the United States Supreme court leaves it up to the United States (CONGRESS) to do their job which they have failed to do.

  7. Checkmate

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM

    Bill O’ either lacks guts or Fox News forbids speaking about Obama never being vetted by either party. Without question this has been the cover-up of the century. Both (RINO) Democrats and Republicans are behind allowing an impostor in the oval office. It is about time the most popular talk show host (Rush) has found some courage. He will be in (GRAVE) danger of the wolf in the hen house.

  8. Chris

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 10:13 PM

    SCOTUS made its Kerchner v Obama decision today, but will not anounce the decision until Monday, the 29th. Somebody smarter than me will have to explain if the delay is good news or bad news.

  9. dennis

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 5:22 PM

    IT IS GOD BLESS.. the uNITED STATES of AMERICA.. not the big u.. the big you is the ACT of 1870 / 1871 corporation and admiralty law.. since then a STATE OF EMERGENCY.,,,. for you the person.. and not WE THEE PEOPLE READ YOUR CONSTITUTION……

  10. Bob1943

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 4:03 PM

    Finally, Rush Limbaugh actually comes right out and calls Obama the imposter that he clearly is:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hv9q_nR9EBY&feature=player_embedded

    May this open the floodgates of conservative talking heads to grow a pair and invite a “fair and balanced” discussion of Obama’s ineligibility and
    admitted total absence of vetting.

    Two years late,….but thank you RUSH!!

  11. NUTN2SAY

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 11:56 AM

    This be a good time to start a campaign where people can bombard the Supreme Court email website address and leave emails addressed to Chief Justice Roberts with everything we know about Natural Born Citizen including the words of Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite from the 1874 Case of Minor v Happersett. The Supreme Court from what I can tell only has a basic information email box so be sure to address emails to Justice Roberts! Contact “WEBMASTER” at http://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_webmaster.aspx

  12. Bob1943

    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 2:05 AM

    Sure seriousblack,

    It’s because they are afraid of the issue. As Justice Thomas said on video, “They are “evading ” the issue”. They lack the courage to do the right thing, and are hiding behind, “standing”, which means in plain English that they are protecting a known ineligible president from paying for the constitutional crisis he and his many enablers have placed our country in.

    Let us pray that the political climate has changed enough with the last election, and Obama’s plummeting popularity, for the Supreme Court to show that they are capable of protecting the Constitution without regard to the politics of the issue at hand.

  13. seriousblack

    Monday, November 22, 2010 at 9:14 PM

    Can anybody explain why the Supreme Court has already denied 7 cases….I looked it up……it’s true. Please help…..why would this be any different.. Here are the cases:

    Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz
    Roy v. Fed. Election
    Schneller v. Cortes

  14. susanm

    Monday, November 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM

    GOD IS ON OUR SIDE….GOD BLESS ALL, GOD BLESS THE U.S.A.

  15. thistle

    Monday, November 22, 2010 at 4:55 PM

    Best Wishes Cmdr Kerchner, Atty Apuzzo and the other plaintiffs in this case. Prayers are going up that the Supreme Court abides by the Constitution and their own oaths to it.

  16. Harry H

    Monday, November 22, 2010 at 1:18 PM

    Amen and Godspeed to Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., and his attorney Mario Apuzzo. They should both go down in history as national heroes for their defense of our Constitution.

  17. Starla

    Monday, November 22, 2010 at 1:03 PM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>