ANNOUNCING THE PRESIDENTIAL ROYALTY BIRTHING SERVICES
DATE: November 16, 2010
FROM: the Desk of Jedi Pauly
TO: All Patriots of command rank (this means YOU)
ATTENTION ALL PATRIOTS
It has come to the command staff’s attention that the troops need a direction and purpose in the combined efforts to restore the Republic. Jedi Pauly has taken it upon himself to secure a “dot com” under the name Presidential Royalty Birthing Services (PRBS). The purpose of PRBS will become clear momentarily.
As a result of our legal department’s breakthrough on the mystery of the meaning of Article II “natural born Citizen”, (see Post and E-mail archive article by Jedi Pauly “The True meaning of Article II “natural born Citizen” A Scientific Legal Theory”), we are happy to report that a breakthrough in our combined war efforts has been achieved.
In order to facilitate the restoration of the Republic from the hands of our domestic enemies, it is felt that a psychological warfare operation effort must be undertaken in order to deprogram the brainwashed Obot masses who believe that Article II “natural born Citizen” means that anyone who is born on U.S. soil can qualify for the Office of President. It is to this end that our specialists in psy-ops have come up with a plan as a result of our scientific legal breakthrough in our understanding of Article II that can be directed towards any Obama supporters to convert them to our patriotic cause of restoring the Constitution and Rule of Law.
Our discovered breakthrough now permits us to go on the offensive. First the core draft concept.
OBSERVE:
THIS FOLLOWING IS THE DRAFT CONCEPT LETTER, TO BE MODIFIED AS NEEDED:
Dear Royal Person;
I am Mr. Jedi Pauly with Presidential Royalty Birthing Services Company, a new and rapidly growing start-up entrepreneurial enterprise. Due to your special status as a person with a Title of Nobility, we are very pleased to offer you a unique opportunity. As a result of the U.S. presidential elections in 2008, our Research and Development staff has discovered a unique quality and special property of Hawaiian soil that automatically causes children who are born on its soil to qualify for the Office of President of the United States. Due to these special natural powers of Hawaiian soil, your royal born children can now directly inherit political allegiance to the U.S. from Hawaiian soil, bypassing the Laws of Nature that ordinarily would require one to be born to a U.S. citizen father in order to inherit a political allegiance to the U.S and qualify under Article II for the office of President. You no longer need be a U.S. citizen father in order to produce children who qualify for the Office of President. Why should America be led by Presidents who are simple common folk, when everyone knows that the business of governing a society is better left in the hands of those with Titles of Nobility?
We are confident that you will not want to miss out on the opportunity of a lifetime to transform the United States into your own personal monarchy and make the world a better place. At Presidential Royalty Birthing Services (PRBS) we are honored to provide you with a unique service tailored to your special discriminating needs. For a modest fee of $100,000.00 USD, we will fly you and your family members First Class to our secure and opulently adorned Hawaiian luxury retreat, complete with natal facilities for the birth of your royal children. You will receive the best care and attention, and a golden certificate of “natural born citizen” status that will automatically qualify your royal children to meet current Article II requirements and claim an inherited political allegiance to the United States. With our certificate of “natural born citizen” status that is guaranteed and fully backed by the U.S. Congress, Military, and Department of Homeland security, and the U.S. courts, you can be the proud parents of your own Royal Presidential Monarchy.
As a special offer to Royals who are Muslims, we are offering a 10% discount as our way of helping you to bring Sharia Law to the United States through the Office of President. Once your royal child, who is born on Hawaiian soil, has one of our certificates that is fully backed by the U.S. government, then it will be a simple matter for you to fund their rise to power, and once they are elected to the Office of President, then your royal child can decree that Sharia Law will be recognized by Executive Order. We know you will not want to miss out on this golden opportunity to spread Islam in the name of Allah and fundamentally transform the great Satan that is America.
Our operators are standing by to arrange for your reservations.
Sincerely Your Servant;
Mr. Jedi Pauly
Founder and CEO of Presidential Royalty Birthing Services
By combining the above meme with a specially tailored introduction, a powerful mind weapon can be constructed that can manipulate the subconscious will of our enemies and turn them to our good cause. I will now demonstrate with a few examples.
Here is a simple example used on a standard civilian Obot named Tom:
Dear Tom;
Since you believe that the soil jurisdiction can qualify one for the Office of President under Article II, and that is what is meant by “natural born Citizen”, and that Obama is therefore a legitimate President, I thought you might want to get in on the ground level of a new company I am forming and buy some stock. It is called Presidential Royalty Birthing Services. Just read my draft outline below and I think you will get the picture. I have already secured a “dot com” and am in negotiations for the stock options. Let me know if you are interested. I am limiting to whom I make this offer.
Jedi Pauly
<INSERT DRAFT CONCEPT LETTER HERE>
Notice the tactical added advantage, that not only do we teach and deprogram the civilian, but we can also fund our war efforts by persuading our enemies to fund our own operations with their financial resources, weakening our enemies and strengthening us. Of course not all of our enemies are as plebian as our standard civilian Tom. When it comes to going up against the tougher enemies like career politicians who are supporting Obama and Treason, or a government agent like a Department of Homeland Security agent, or a Judge, then a modified approach is needed.
OBSERVE:
Dear Senator Orin Hatch;
Since you have stood behind and promoted the CRS memo that supports the position that anyone born on U.S. soil is a “natural born citizen” and therefore qualifies for the Office of President, and you have supported and continue to support Obama in office, we know you will be happy to learn that your efforts against the American People and their Constitution has caused you to create for yourself a golden opportunity that you are sure not to want to miss.
We at Presidential Royalty Birthing Services (PRBS) have developed a lucrative business model that we would like to offer you an interest in. I am sure that if you could make a reasonable contribution to the PRBS Political Action Committee, we could find a way to sell you an interest in our rapidly expanding enterprise at a very reasonable price. Please read our business plan draft outline below and I think you will agree that you will want to donate to our cause.
<At this point a modified concept letter will be inserted. Since we are dealing with a career criminal politician of the caliber of Senator Hatch, he is far too wily to be caught in as simple a concept letter as would work for our plebian civilian, Tom. We need a slight modification.>
OBSERVE:
Dear Royal Person;
I am Mr. Jedi Pauly with Presidential Royalty Birthing Services Company, a new and rapidly growing start-up entrepreneurial enterprise. Due to your special status as a person with a Title of Nobility, we are very pleased to offer you a unique opportunity. As a result of the efforts of Senator Orin Hatch and the U.S. Congress with regards to the U.S. presidential elections in 2008, our Research and Development staff has discovered a loophole in the Law that can cause foreign Royals to qualify their children for the office of President of the United States. Thanks to the efforts of both Democrats and Republicans, your royal born children can now directly inherit political allegiance to the U.S. from Hawaiian soil jurisdiction, bypassing the Laws of Nature that ordinarily would require one to be born to a U.S. citizen father in order to inherit a political allegiance to the U.S and qualify under Article II for the Office of President. You no longer need be a U.S. citizen father in order to produce children who qualify for the Office of President. Why should America be led by Presidents who are simple common folk, when everyone knows that the business of governing a society is better left in the hands of those with Titles of Nobility, which is supported by the ruling elite Lords of the U.S. Congress anyway?
We are confident that you will not want to miss out on the opportunity of a lifetime to transform the United States into your own personal monarchy and make the world a better place. At Presidential Royalty Birthing Services (PRBS) we are honored to provide you with a unique service tailored to your special discriminating needs. For a modest fee of $100,000.00 USD we will fly you and your family members First Class to our secure and opulently adorned Hawaiian luxury retreat, complete with natal facilities for the birth of your royal children. You will receive the best care and attention, and a golden certificate of “natural born citizen” status that will automatically qualify your royal children to meet current Article II requirements and claim an inherited political allegiance to the United States. With our certificate of “natural born citizen” status that is guaranteed and fully backed by the U.S. Congress, Military, and Department of Homeland security, and the U.S. courts, you can be the proud parents of your own Royal Presidential Monarchy.
As a special offer to Royals who are Muslims, we are offering a 10% discount as our way of helping you to bring Sharia Law to the United States through the Office of President. Once your royal child, who is born on Hawaiian soil, has one of our certificates that is fully backed by the U.S. government, then it will be a simple matter for you to fund their rise to power, and once they are elected to the Office of President, then your royal child can decree that Sharia Law will be recognized by Executive Order. We know you will not want to miss out on this golden opportunity to spread Islam in the name of Allah and fundamentally transform America.
Our operators are standing by to arrange for your reservations.
Sincerely Your Servant;
Mr. Jedi Pauly
Founder and CEO of Presidential Royalty Birthing Services
Notice that we simultaneously stroke the elite ego of Senator Hatch and the Congress and at the same time sanitize the special offer to Muslim Royalty by removing any reference to ‘Satan’ linked to America, providing political cover for Senator Hatch, the Congress, and the military. Not only do we cause Senator Hatch to want to donate financial resources to our cause, we also ensnare him in a quid pro quo that can be used to blackmail him.
Here is an example for a Judge:
To Judge Colonel Denise Lind;
It has come to the attention of the Board of Directors of Presidential Royalty Birthing Services, that your efforts to silence and punish Colonel Terry Lakin for standing up and defending his oath to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and Domestic has created a benefit that you could not have imagined. Not only are you successfully protecting criminal elements within the upper echelons of the military from charges of treason and military coup against the American People due to their continued support of the ongoing occupation of the People’s Office of President by Barack Obama, who is not qualified under Article II, but you have opened a financial opportunity for PRBS that our Board felt a need to reward you. Please read our draft concept business model below, and I think you will see that it would behoove you to give your public support and endorsement to our Corporation. I am sure we could reciprocate for your public endorsement with a lucrative stock option in our Corporation.
<INSERT DRAFT OR MODIFIED CONCEPT LETTER HERE>
In the last example, notice how we entice the Judge with the dark side force of greed with a quid pro quo, while at the same time we blind-side the Judge with the truth in law that her actions are criminal. The Judge cannot help but read the rest of the business concept and when she does she will be forced to learn the truth in law that proves that Col. Lakin is innocent and that her actions are part of a criminal overthrow of the government.
One last example. All the previous examples have concerned homegrown domestic enemies. The next example will show you how to deal with domestic enemies that are imported from foreign sources.
To the board of directors of CAIR;
Assalaamu alaykum my brothers. Allahu Akbar. I am Jedi Pauly, a fellow Muslim, and I bring you good news from the front in our efforts to Islamize America, the great Satan.
Thanks to the efforts of our Muslim brother Barack Hussein Obama, my brothers and I have formed a front corporation called Presidential Royalty Birthing Services (PRBS) to take advantage of the opening that our brother Obama has made for us, as a way to facilitate Sharia law in America.
We are seeking your support and donations to our (PRBS) Political Action Committee so that we may further our business plan that will lead to an American Caliphate. Please be generous as Allah has blessed our activities. Please read our business model below and I think you will realize how important our efforts are to our mutual goals. Please realize that this concept draft below is disguised by including European monarchy offerings but that is just a disguise to deflect any suspicions away from Muslims.
<INSERT APRROPRIATELY MODIFIED DRAFT LETTER HERE>
When you send your letters, just substitute your name for Jedi Pauly and say that you are a member of the board of directors of PRBS. Use your imagination and creativity but don’t eliminate the central meme which is that “natural born Citizen” means a natural born citizen who is created by a citizen FATHER, and not one by soil or by a female.
Well, I think you can get the picture of how this works. As you can see, our boys from their various departments have done a good job of providing us with the tools we need to win this war. It is requested that all those Patriots who wish to help in these efforts to restore the Republic and the Rule of Law should contact General Pauly at jedipauly@gmail.com for further operational brainstorming and tactical and strategic planning. Good hunting.
That is all for now.
Jedi Pauly
I have either read or skimmed some of your articles here, and, for one, am not impressed with your attempt to obfuscate the NBC issue. Obviously, you are not an attorney, and have no doubt that if you presented your arguments to be adjudicated by a competent and Constitutional judge, you’d be laughed out of court. I’m just not impressed by your education or other presumed accomplishments, and think your arguments here at TPE are suspect. It is you who does not get this NBC issue.
I was looking at Blackstone’s Commentaries and came across this which puzzled me:
“THE children of aliens, born here in England, are, generally speaking, natural-born subjects, and entitled to all the privileges of such.”
What is puzzling about it? It proves what I have been saying.
That’s precisely the point! They(Brits)were a monarchy, an empire building tyrannical regime — and WE(USA) were rebelling against the notion of being born into servitude HENCE ‘natural born Citizen
Have all American’s brains turned to mush?
Exactly. Thank you Tom.
Gernerally speaking they would not have been eligible to be
King, or Prince.
Just saying
That is a very good point because it proves what I have been saying and that the term “natural born citizen” without the capitalization and removed from Article II, as the term is used under U.S. case law to extend the privilege of citizenship via soil, has nothing at all to do with Article II “natural born Citizen” which is describing a condition of inheritance from a father who is a citizen and not the old usage from the days of Kings and his soil or “natural born citizen subjects”.
Jedi,
What is your reaction to the following statements ?
Laws of Nature and/or Laws of Science are basically the same things. They can usually be proven by mathematics. They are unchanging, immutable and inviolatable without serious consequences. They come from GOD !!! However, their effects can be modified temporarily by certain knowledgable, compensating actions. (E.g., Parachutes can alter the effects of the Law of Gravity, etc. — but, can’t cancel said Law.)
Laws of Men and/or Positive Law can NOT be proven by mathematics. Furthermore, they can be easily altered, and are often revised and/or cancelled, outright. Consequently, they are merely temporary “Opinions” of HUMANS.
Therefore, Positive Law is not a Science. (Science is based on Truth, not Opinion.)
Likewise, a Fact is a Truth. A Theory is a supposition or proposition put forth pending its proof or disproof, based on the Truth – yet to be affirmed, or found. Therefore, a Theory is not a Fact, per se. (A jury does not make a Fact, instead it “finds” (seeks) the truth (or “verdictum”) – by examination of Facts.) A Theory is temporary (not permanent) and awaits proof by one or more Facts or Truths.
This writer is not a Physicist, but was awarded 13 US Patents — before retirement as a (NYSE) Corporate Chief Engineer. In other words, has a faint acquaintance with the Laws of Nature (God’s Gift to mankind).
PS. Blackstone was writing about “Subjects”, who owe allegiance to a Sovereign (who ruled by “The Divine Right of Kings”). Our Founding Fathers were attempting to create a Republic comprised of “Citizens” (not Subjects) who were themselves THE Sovereigns, and who owed allegiance to their Republic – not some person. Hence, Jefferson’s assertion in the Declaration of Independence that, “All men are created equal …..” — by which they denounced and rejected the Divine Right of Kings.
Vattel’s writings were directed at Citizens, not Subjects. Therefore, the Founders often relied on Blackstone for conduct involving the English Common Law relative to such things as Commerce Law, etc., but relied on Vattel for Citizens’ conduct according to the Law of Nations (Natural Law). Laws decreed by a King (Positive Law), are not the same as Laws (Natural Law) created by God (Our “Creator”.)
Yes, I am in alignment with what you are saying. I see no problem with your analyses.
Very Interesting. I love it!
I think your point is well taken since we are given our father’s surnames at birth which historically identify our clans and ancestral homeland. Even a mother’s maiden named is called for in many instances as an identity marker. A surname may have a prefix as well, such as Mc, O, Von, De, Bin, etc. to declare that you are the “son of such and such a place.” Its only been in modern times that there is a shift in our surnames being that of our fathers. It was always considered an honor to pass on the “family” name.
Even barky gloats with pride in usurping the dreamy foreigner dad’s name.
Very good. I wish more could see the light that you shed.
Your theory may work on a few but the true blithering idiot will simply tell you that Blackstone says different than Vattel and you can’t prove Vattel was the source of NBC. They usually add in the “so there you ad hominem”.
The fact is you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink. Well, unless you give him salt.
What the constitution has to offer they already have. It is what it doesn’t offer is what they seek and that is their salt as well. What is stuck right in front of all of us is the simple truth that there is only one way to deal with usurpations and for those who are deaf to our dead forefathers and heroes only god can help them hear again. I am told he works by personal request for some and others by default while passing through.
Blackstone does not disagree. Prove it. Quote Blackstone and show us where it disagrees. It is easy to make assertions without proof. Until you show us how Blackstone “disagrees” I can not accept your comment as having any validity. I have read Blackstone and he is in total agreement with what I have written and with Vattel. I do not believe you know what you are saying.
Blackstone says…and I am paraphrasing…..that when it comes right down to it…the law of nature rules and one is to disregard what I have, otherwise, stated
No one can deny B.O. Jr his natural right ie the inheritance of his father’s status, at birth Blackstone wouldn’t do it. The United States(a free state?) doesn’t or ought not to be doing it( although it seems to be all right in this particular instance) and no one or “authoritative” body can accomplish this unless the individual involved submits to such servitude
Thank You. You are correct. Blackstone is in total agreement.
Question (for your FAQ’s section): Can my Mexican anchor baby qualify for this once in a lifetime opportunity if I take him to Hawaii and since his Mother is a Muslim can we qualify for the 10% Sharia discount?
NBC comes from the father.
See ( state) 14th ammendment debate below.
————————————————————————————————————————-
The debates and proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of the State of … By Michigan. Constitutional Convention, William Blair Lord, David Wolfe Brown
Mr. FARMER. Will the gentleman allow me to ask him one question ?
Mr. LOVELL. Certainly.
Mr. FARMER. Does the gentleman wish this Convention distinctly to understand, that he holds that children born here of foreign parents, who reside here until they are twentyone, have to take any preliminary steps to become citizens of the United States?
Mr. LOVELL. No sir; I do not
wish to bo understood in any such sense. I understand that according to the Constitution and laws of our government, when a father has declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States, when he becomes a citizen, his minor children also become citizens.
Mr. FARMER. Suppose that he does not declare his intention ?
Mr. LOVELL. If he does not declare his intention to become a citizen, for instance, if he be an Englishman claiming to be a subject of the Queen of Greai Britain and Ireland, claiming her protection as an English resident in this country, and he has children born to him, he has a right to claim that they, too, are English citizens, entitled to the protection of the government of Great Britain.
Mr. FARMER. Then it is a mere matter of election with him ?
Mr. LOVELL. We claim the same right in relation to our citizens who have children born abroad. Ought we to deny to citizens of other nations the privilege which we claim for ourselves ? Suppose that our minister in England has a child born on English soil; is that child a foreigner? No, sir; he is a native born citizen of the United States. Just so with a citizen of some foreign country who resides here for a time, and has children born to him; they are foreign, although born in this country. But this is a matter of no importance. I speak of it only by way of illustration.
http://books.google.com/books?id=xTsHKJgPG-oC&dq=can%20a%20foreign%20prince%20become%20president%20of%20the%20united%20states&pg=PA264#v=onepage&q=born%20citizen&f=false
Pauly – I read recently about scientific breakthroughs in DNA and embyro creation; essentially, they can create an embryo from the DNA of two women, literally creating a child with no father.
Would it be impossible for such a child to ever be President?
In my opinion it would need a Constitutional Amendment. So the answer would be that they could not qualify.
…if both donors were American citizens at the time of birth, and the birth occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States…. yes!
It’s good to point out, however whimsically, that an American father is required to be a natural born Citizen, a fact–not a theory–which by itself disqualifies Obama. But it is grievously wrong to accept as a premise that Obama was born in Hawaii. Pauly’s zeal for the fatherhood requirement leads him to falsely discount the primacy of birthplace. BOTH American soil and American paternity are required of a president; Obama has NEITHER, since he was born in Africa to a British Colonial father.
Sorry Harry but you are wrong as a matter of law.
Your mother and the soil are irrelevant for Article II purposes. Both your mother and the soil fail on two fronts. Neither one can prevent titles of nobility from attaining the office of President and we don’t inherit natural political rights and allegiances from soil jurisdictions because we are not a monarchy or from our mothers. Almost every nation in the world for thousands of years, including America, only recognizes natural political rights and allegiances to be inherited from males (your father). The one notable exception is Judaism which inherits membership into the society of Jewish people through females (your Jewish mother). In the case of Judaism, your father matters not and your place of birth matters not, as long as you have a Jewish mother then your membership and allegiance is to the Jewish society at birth. In the rest of the gentile nations, it is reversed and your mother matters not and your place of birth matters not but you must have a citizen father who creates you. You can be born in the White House on the fourth of July with Betsy Ross as your mother and you still will not qualify for President if you have a foreign father who created you. Study Vattel:
Vattel : “It is asked whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country are citizens? The laws have decided this question in several countries, and their regulations must be followed.(59) By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers”
Vattel makes it clear. In the absence of, or ignoring, the positive law jurisdiction (“by the law of nature alone”) when we are only talking about the natural law jurisdiction, both males and females (children) follow (means inherits) the political condition of their fathers. This makes perfect sense because the entire point of Article II is to remove from the jurisdiction of Congress and the Courts, which is only the positive law jurisdiction, any power to determine who qualifies for the office of President. This is why I keep stressing the importance of the capitalization because it conveys that we are strictly talking only about what is created by the laws of nature or the natural law jurisdiction in the absence of any positive law jurisdiction. By removing the positive law jurisdiction, we can simply interpret Article II to mean that we are talking about political rights that are natural rights and natural political rights are inherited from our fathers who are citizens. It just does not get any easier than this. It is just so incredibly obvious. You can forget about the positive law jurisdiction and appeal strictly to the natural law jurisdiction and the inheritance of natural political rights by blood (father) because that is what Article II is telling you. I hope this helps you to understand.
This might also help you to understand why the Courts lack proper jurisdiction to determine this issue because it is already settled by appealing to the natural law jurisdiction which is outside of the jurisdiction of the courts to determine because Article II places the jurisdiction outside of Congress or the Courts. By appealing to the courts in the way you have, you are essentially asking the courts for an advisory opinion on the meaning and interpretation of Article II and the meaning is already clear and defined and not within the power of the courts to determine. This is now a political situation and not appropriate for the courts to get involved in. Hence, all the rulings that we lack standing. The proper use of the courts would be to empower a citizen as a special prosecutor to bring a criminal complaint and arrest warrant and just arrest the President since the FBI and Justice departments and Congress obviously lack the political will to enforce the laws and they have abrogated their responsibility. Then the courts would have proper jurisdiction to act.
As far as the soil read on:
Also, examine their discussion (CRS memo) about the soil jurisdiction and it is easy to see their lack of proper understanding of the role of the soil jurisdiction and they are ignoring blood inheritance. They fail to understand that under the political system of a monarchy, the soil is used to grant privileges doled out by the king. Just because we call the privilege of citizenship granted by the king via his soil, “natural born” does not mean that we are talking about natural inherited political rights because the king is not the source of natural rights. That term “natural born” when derived strictly from soil and English Common Law, is called “natural born” simply because under a king, if you are born on the kings soil, then you are “naturally” subject to the kings authority who automatically creates and demands political allegiance to the king without your consent. We did not free ourselves from the dictatorship of the king in 1776 to create another king over us. The U.S. government is not our king and we are not born with a political allegiance owed, without our consent at birth, due to soil jurisdictions since we won the war of 1776, otherwise we would not be a sovereign people anymore. Remember the Declaration of Independence were it says “deriving their just powers from the CONSENT of the governed”? We just retained the ability to grant privileges, the same as the king used to do, which is a positive law power, and we gave that ability to the government so they could extend privileges via the soil that falls under the jurisdiction of Congress. We retained the nomenclature from the English common law “natural born citizen” which meant a natural born citizen “subject” of the king. When used in this manner, the term “natural born citizen” is just a legal fiction or word art retained from a different political system from history that does not describe a condition of blood inheritance of natural political rights.
Article II is clearly not referring to that nomenclature. If Article II was constructed with the words “natural born citizen” without the capitalization, then it would just mean any statutory definition or created legal fiction of what is called a “natural born citizen” and one could just substitute whatever the current definition is as that term is modified over time by judge’s rulings, or by statutes from Congress. Since the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and is a STATUTORY AUTHORITY and not a STATUTE, it can not be changed buy a judges opinion or by a simple statute from Congress. This is why I have been trying to teach you that in Article II, “natural born” is an adjective phrase meant to convey that we are talking about what is created by natural birth so that it falls entirely under a natural law jurisdiction. The adjective phrase “natural born” is describing a proper noun “Citizen” that means a sovereign male. Put the two together and reference Vattel and it is clear that what is being conveyed is a sovereign male citizen who is created by natural birth which implies the inheritance of natural political rights from a father who is a citizen.
Hi, I believe your getting a little too ‘scientific’ …and yes law may be a science, but the act of dealing in law is not. You need look no further than the Article itself. “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution.” Explain how by ‘at the time of adoption’ a citizen is NBC’s equivalent, when being a ‘citizen’ entailed being in America, on it’s soil. It infers just that. Knowing it’s wording was included to allow those British Nationals, standing on American soil, be made NBC’s, or grandfathered.
There were no American citizens prior to the adoption! A British National, having been in the colonies for 20 years, and whom left and was in ubumga at the time of adoption.. is not a NBC nor even a ‘citizen’….as to be or become a citizen, by it’s wording, meant being present at the time of adoption.
The allegiance comes from the soil as well as the parents. Would the founders have meant that two American citizens, or one, the father as you claim, having moved to Viet Nam, be married to a Vietnamese National and bearing a son.. but never denouncing American citizenship, move back to the US and the son be a Natural Born American citizen? No! It is contrary to the very rational for the NBC quaification!, Would such a child, raised by a foreign parent, in a foreign land surrounded with foreign language and opinions.. have an allegiance to America?? I say No.. and further that.. I’ am a common man, without the knowledge, education nor wisdom of anyone of our founders… let alone their collective. I’m quite sure their wording is precise and concise… and given the fact there were no American citizens before adoption.. scientific deduction demonstrates that the ‘soil’ does in fact matter. Being born of two U.S. military parents in Tokyo… had I have been born outside the enclave, on Japanese soil, I’d be a naturalized citizen. But not a NBC.
Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_nationality_law#Through_birth_abroad_to_two_United_States_citizens
Also, you don’t understand the use of the term “Theory”. A scientific “Theory” IS A FACT.
Ever hear of the “Theory” of gravity or any other such scientific “Theory”. They are facts just like my scientific theory of the true meaning of Article II “natural born Citizen”. This is why you and many others can not comprehend the simple and obvious meaning of Article II. You are lacking in science skills. You falsely believe that a “theory” means supposition and it does not mean supposition in the world of science. Law is a science not supposition.