Has anyone requested whether or not his name (in all permutations) appears on the index to certificates of foreign birth?
———————
Mrs. Rondeau replies: I remember that Phil at The Right Side of Life (now on hiatus, at least) had put out a formal request to Fukino for any request for release of information on Obama’s part. I don’t believe he ever received a reply. Also, a blood relative of Obama’s who became a plaintiff on one of Orly’s cases requested it and was told it would take a year. I’m not sure what happened then. But a year — that’s preposterous.

GOD BLESS AMERICA

The problem here is that some people imagine that law and order is still operative against this despotic tyrant, who thinks that he is not accountable to anyone, at least for a while.

I agree there is no official declaration by the DoH that the on-line COLB originated at the DoH and for the obvious reasons. The statement Okubo made to Politifact where she essentially retracts her “its a valid COLB” and changes it to “it looks identical to mine” and “I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.” Really. Quite revealing, IMHO.

It would nice for the DoH to either officially declare the veracity or formally deny “verification” so there is an official record of it. The DoH would have saved itself the general public a lot of trouble. Had the DoH been more forthcoming, the vexatious requester bill would have never been introduced.

Also based on information obtained via a DoH UIPA request, there are no records of financial transactions between the DoH and the DNC or Democratic Party of HI and/or their authorized representatives. In short, neither the DNC nor the DPH obtained a certified copy of the COLB from the DoH and they likely relied on the on-line COLB as the basis of their respective Certificate of Nomination. Pelosi and/or her minions have never come within 100 miles of an authentic COLB.

Other than the obvious, the big question is who applied the duct tape? One would think that the DoH has a legal and moral obligation to report the use of a fraudulent document to win election to the most powerful office in the free world.

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaCOLB.htm

Lot’s of information on what the Hawaii Dept. of Health has said about the on-line copy of Obama’s supposed COLB.

With that said, I suspect the DoH will do one of two things:

1) Deny the UIPA request for “verification” based on the “persons with a direct and tangible interest” clause contained in HRS 338-18.
2) Point the requester to the instuctions and form for requesting verification (fee is $10.00 I believe) and then deny the verification based on the above, all while collecting and pocketing the fee.

Regardless of the outcome, the request has merit as it would at least create a record that the DoH has refused to validate veracity of the on-line COLB.

Someone who is not on the DoH vexatious requester list needs to submit the request. Normally I would do it, but I already know the outcome would not be in my favor.